Updated 12:47 pm.EST, Sun November 22, 2009

Society|Wed, Jul. 18 2007 09:28 AM EDT

Debate Over Gay Reparative Therapy Heats Up

By Lillian Kwon|Christian Post Reporter

"There are many different ... approaches to this issue of bringing your behavior in line with your beliefs or your values, and the research that we have so far find that some of those approaches lead to harm," said Throckmorton. "Other research suggests that there are other approaches that lead to benefit. What we don't have is a good handle on what leads to benefit and what leads to harm."

As psychologists, gay-rights groups and evangelicals continue to argue over the issue in the context of the clinical sciences, Wilkins posed a question to the church.

"Since when did the church of Jesus Christ delegate its responsibility to healing people's hurt to some source outside the church?"

While Wilkins doesn't negate the benefits of counseling or therapy, he pointed to the Church as "God's primary source of healing" the hurt.

"In one sense, it is easier for evangelical Christians to passionately pound the APA right now regarding this possible move (to ban therapy) than it is to recognize and to implement our responsibility as Christians to share the life-changing gospel of Jesus Christ," Wilkins stressed.

"How have we got to the place where we have relegated the issue to the clinical sciences and removed it from one of the primary responsibilities of the Church?"

APA's new policy statement on counseling for homosexuals may be adopted early to mid next year.

Pages: 12
Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Fri Aug 10, 2007 9:21 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    Sadly, people do not always attend of their own free will and many that do are not given information about the track record of the "treatment". Exodus International's oldest and largest ministry "Love in Action", for example, has regularly accepted teenagers sent against their will. Moreover, they have even accepted a client brought to their campus in handcuffs who was administered Prozac without prescription.

  • Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:00 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 5

    Speaking without opinion regarding homosexuality (or the cause of it), I cannot imagine how courts could allow a "ban" on people receiving treatment. These people come to these clinics on their own free will. If a decision is made that this treatment is "unfair" to homosexuals, that just goes to show how radical most of these pro-gay groups have become.

  • Fri Jul 20, 2007 5:25 am Agree: 5   Disagree: 6

    The issue is not one of religious belief. Whether or not homosexuality is a sin is an issue of religious belief. However, these organisations are not simply claiming this. They say that homosexuality is a disorder which requires therapy and resort to pseudo-science and carefully distorted statistics to support their claim. This takes them out of the religious realm and into the field of Health. As such, RT should be held accountable for any dishonest and misleading claims. Moreover, the effectiveness of the "treatment" and any risks involved should be made known to the counselee at the outset.

  • Fri Jul 20, 2007 1:31 am Agree: 4   Disagree: 4

    RT theory says all gays are this way which is clearly not so. Many (most?) have no issues with their father. Among those who do RT theorists cannot say for certain if the "issues" were the cause of the homosexuality or and effect of homosexuality. In other word did dad react badly to a son who was somewhat overtly gender-nonconforming (such as claiming he were a girl). The RT theorists (Nicolosi and NARTH at that forefront) have not provided the scientific basis to prove RT works (following up on patients with questionaires). About the best guess is that about 25% of people seeking RT therapies say they now have a heterosexual outlook. But that's 25% of a highly motivated crowd seeking "change" which may not represent but 5% of all gay men. Likewise there is no information where these people are on the spectrum of sexuality, they could all be bisexuals who just ended up switch hitting. Taken together there is no evidence RT therapies really work nor does RT theory describe most (most all?) gays.

  • Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:00 am Agree: 11   Disagree: 3

    I seriously cannot believe this is being argued. You can't say all reparative therapy as harmful. It's like saying we should not allow Arabs into the country because there are a lot of Arabs who are terrorists. C'mon!! We live in America. The land of freedom. How can you ban a service that has helped (and could help) many people who want to change their lifestyle? Should we ban all drug rehab centers if there are some out there they use extreme measures to cure people of their addictions? I can understand banning the bad ones, but banning them all? Really now? What's happening to our nation?

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links