Sunday, November 08, 2009 Last Update:11:25 am ET

Education|Tue, Aug. 28 2007 10:32 AM EDT

Valedictorian Sues School Over Jesus Speech

By Jennifer Riley|Christian Post Reporter

A high school valedictorian filed a lawsuit against a Colorado school district Monday over being forced to make a public apology for sharing her Christian faith at her graduation ceremony.

Erica Corder says she was pressured last year by the principal of Lewis-Palmer High School in Monument, Colo., to write an apology to the school community stating that her message, which mentioned Jesus Christ, was her own and not endorsed by the principal of the school.

According to Liberty Counsel, which filed the suit against Lewis Palmer School District Board of Education on Corder’s behalf, then-principal Mark Brewer insisted that Corder include the statement “I realize that, had I asked ahead of time, I would not have been allowed to say what I did.”

Corder was one of 15 valedictorians from the Lewis-Palmer class of 2006. All 15 of the valedictorians were each given a general topic ahead of the gradation ceremony and were allotted 30-seconds to speak. Corder and another student were chosen to give concluding messages.

Although each of the valedictorians orally presented a proposed speech to the principal before graduation, during her 30-second message, Corder steered away from the approved speech to share about her faith in Jesus Christ and encouraged fellow classmates who “don’t already know [Jesus] personally … to find out more about the sacrifice he made for you.”

Following her speech, Corder was taken to the assistant principal, who said she would not receive her diploma because of her speech.

The principal, however, later indicated that Corder could receive her diploma despite her “immature” speech, but only if she wrote an apology to the community. Corder agreed to issue an apology because she wanted to receive her diploma and was afraid the school would put disciplinary notes in her file which could hinder her from becoming a school teacher.

Corder’s message was sent out to the entire high school community via e-mail, after which she has continued to be the subject of criticism of school officials for the past year, according to Liberty Counsel. She received her diploma after writing the apology statement.

Liberty Counsel’s letter on behalf of Corder argues that her First Amendment rights had been violated, and requested that the district apologize for the e-mail that Corder was forced to write and institute written policy to ensure that no future constitutional violations occur.

“Valedictorians have the right to express their religious viewpoints while at the graduation podium,” said Mathew Staver, founder of Liberty Counsel and Dean of the Liberty University School of Law, in a statement.

“School officials have no right to threaten young graduate that their diplomas will be withheld. The school district’s action in forcing Erica Corder to write an e-mail apologizing to the community for exercising her right to free speech is shocking,” Staver said.

So far, the school board has taken no action in response to the letter.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Sun Oct 11, 2009 3:41 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Today is October 10, 2009. Can we read the writing on
    the wall? American took the Bible from the schools,
    Ten Commandments from the court houses, school children
    can't take quote from the Bible......well, see the
    hand of God. While other countries are recovering from
    the 2nd largest economic meltdown since the great
    depression of 1929, but America is breathing so hard to
    get a new life. America has to pay a heavy price for
    her sins and for disregarding God. Now, both the good
    and the bad are caught up in the whirwind of this
    economic chaos. Other nations won't be punished for
    their sins like we deserve for our sins, because we
    have taken away everything Godly from the school and
    public places.

  • Sat Mar 01, 2008 9:52 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I stand by this young girl 100 percent. i am very proud of her for doing what she did and if it were me i would do it again and again and again!!! Shes very brave for doing what she did and she is a great influence for young teens in my age group,And as for " wiccan texan" you are obviously very iggnorant on the christiananity perspective and my advice for you is to repnt and ask God for forgiveness before you burn in hell for eternity with all the other lost souls who persicute christians. God bless.

  • Sat Mar 01, 2008 9:52 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I stand by this young girl 100 percent. i am very proud of her for doing what she did and if it were me i would do it again and again and again!!! Shes very brave for doing what she did and she is a great influence for young teens in my age group,And as for " wiccan texan" you are obviously very iggnorant on the christiananity perspective and my advice for you is to repnt and ask God for forgiveness before you burn in hell for eternity with all the other lost souls who persicute christians. God bless.

  • Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:31 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 2

    Does anyone know how I can contact this girl to offer her words of encouragement? I always appreciate it when young people of this generation stand up for something positive. Thanks.

  • Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:27 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 2

    I am a high school social studies teacher, and I appreciate this girl standing up for something positive. So much of the language that I hear in the school (during class, lunch time, in the auditorium, etc) is very offensive; it is profanity and sexually explicit. People who disagree with the young girl need to recognize that far worst forms of language are used everyday in our school system & no one is making that an issue.

  • Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:42 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Freedom of speech is just that, freedom of speech. The supreme court ruled years ago, that student's do have "Freedom of Speech, just as much as any other person."

  • Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:37 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    C'mon ACLU where were you at on this one?g

  • Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:27 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    I am just tired of hearing where christians are forbidden to even mention the word "Christ" any where! You all have to realize this is a concerted effort by Satan to wipe out the Christian Faith from the world! This young Lady did not lie to the school by saying this in her speech. She could have said anything else and not gotten censored by her school! This is just the exact same thing as people trying to get the Ten Commandments taken out of Public Displays and Nativity Scenes not being allowed to be displayed! People say "Those things offend me" and they get taken down. Freedom of spreech means just that, you are free to speek what you want when you want to! I do not like it when Muslims, Agnostics, Aethiests or anyone else who has a different view then me voices there opinion, but I accept it, because they have theFreedom Of Spech to do so! The only people who use the excuse that you don't have the right to say what you want when you want to, are only anti-Christian individuals who want to silence the voice of Christ! It hasn't worked in the past, it isn't working now, and it won't work in the future! If you don't like what someone has to say, just don't listen to them!

  • artm »
    Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:47 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    The Christian is commanded by God To spread the Gospel message of Salvation by and through jesus Christ, It is not a matter of wreather or not it is appealing to people. To most people it will not be appealing, But that id not what matters here.

    The Child of God wants to share their Salvation with the World because they want everyone to be Saved and go to Heaven.

    And they must share that experience in obedience to God. Because someone is offended by that Message is not what matters, There have been people who were offended by the Gospel message since time began, Nothing new there.

    Jesus offended people where ever He went. But there are people out there who want to take that right and privledge away from the Christian. You can preach alah, you can tell people to convert to islam and the world says amen, Just don't mention Jesus Christ, Thats offensive, And to that I say, Amen. Art.

  • Sat Sep 01, 2007 1:53 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 0

    It is a really sad testament that people can jump over the fence as often as they do. Everyone
    knows that the constitution as past in Congress over 200 years ago affords US ALL equal protection involving the freedom of speech but also of Religion. That is was so important to include it in the Bill of Right as separate articles of only 10. Before this this country even had organized school systems.

    The school system will talk about tolerance and diversity and the belief that all people have a right to thier own opinion and ideas yet the school administrator goes to those students who have demonstrated overtime that they are relatively smart individuals with bright futures ahead of them and yet they still chose to spoon feed a topic to these students - the elite and furthermore threaten them that they will not get there diploma if they step out of line? Were they going to erase 12 years of school? Were they going to end there futures before they begun? WHY? The school system and government wants sheep to do as they are told and to not upset the herd. More and more mediocrity is becoming the mainstay in our schools. There is no true exchange of ideas anymore. If you don't line up with the teacher's ideas then you are bigoted and an idiot.

    Now doesn't that sound like indoctrination to a captive audience?

  • Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:35 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    Also you are right. Free speech does not mean you have the right to say what you want where ever you want. I agree with you. But based on the knowledge I have so far, this was not a private school and was a public setting pretty much and public not meaning just being out doors but open to anyone. Now I am not a lawyer by any means but it would seem that her message would be allowed. If I am wrong then I stand corrected.

  • Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:30 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    I do not mean any malice at all wiccantexan but I will say if I held something so dear in my heart as eternal life and salvation and I did not share it with someone than what does that make me? It would be like watching a man die in front of your eyes in the desert thirsty for water while you stand watching him with two water bottles in your hand ,a beverage hat on your head and a long and I mean really long hose connected to the local city municipal water supply. Sure the public may not and most likey they will not agree but that is the case.

    I also suggest that if you believe in the wiccan religion then go out and tell and preach and stand up for your beliefs. A luke warm christian is as bad as a luke warm wiccan. You can't always sit on the fence be passionate about what you believe. Now I wish you were saved but hey at least be a passionate wiccan.

  • Thu Aug 30, 2007 11:08 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 12

    "If the young lady wished to voice her faith in a public forum which I believe then she did that which her heart led her to do."

    There is a big difference in voicing one's faith where the people around have the option to listen or not. In this case, it was a captive audience and she knew it. They couldn't just walk away easily or tune her out. Quite frankly, from stories I have been told by incoming new pagans, this type of behavior is exactly why they LEFT Christianity. But a lot of Christians won't listen - they still think that this type of disrespectful approach is appealing.

  • Thu Aug 30, 2007 11:04 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    "Wiccan you are assuming that school policy is constitutional to begin with. If the school policy violates her rights to begin with then it is a moot point. "

    OK, show me where it's unconstitutional. "Free speech" does NOT mean that every place, everywhere, you can say whatever you please. There are still social, business and other boundaries in place that must be adhered to, which do not interfere with the First Amendment. It's not a free-for-all.

    "The way the school shut this lady down was poorly executed"

    I do agree with that. She should not have had her diploma held hostage for compliance.

    "But her faith in Christ WAS motivation to get her through school. What is the difference?"

    If you will read an earlier post of mine, if she'd mentioned her faith in this manner, I'd have likely been OK with it. But she took it one step further, using the commencement to prostelytize, which was inappropriate for a secular public ceremony.

  • Thu Aug 30, 2007 9:06 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Wiccan you are assuming that school policy is constitutional to begin with. If the school policy violates her rights to begin with then it is a moot point.

  • Thu Aug 30, 2007 9:05 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Nerohdam, thank you for the affirmation. That question was to gage response, and I'll say for the record that I would not bring forth the Goddess to a captive audience for the same reason I believe this young lady was wrong in her actions. The First Amendment, IMHO, includes a reasonable expectation of not having one's special day infringed upon in the name of free speech, the same one that all the other students (not just her) worked for and earned.

    Wiccan: If the young lady wished to voice her faith in a public forum which I believe then she did that which her heart led her to do. Now if you decide that you would not voice your faith in your goddess then that is your choice. That is your right based upon the first admendment but that choice does not give you the choice to silence that which the valedictorian did. In fact it would probably be something your goddess would encourage you to do if you felt so strongly about your religion. :)

    The way the school shut this lady down was poorly executed Now if she mentioned that her something like her parents provided motivation to help her get through school/life then I would guarentee that none of you on this board would oppose. But her faith in Christ WAS motivation to get her through school. What is the difference? Yeah.....

  • Thu Aug 30, 2007 6:37 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 5

    Just to help clarify... "Persecute: 1. To oppress or harass with ill-treatment, especially because of race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or beliefs. 2. To annoy persistently; bother."
    ________________________

    Thanks, imho. That's exactly what she did to the captive audience.

    Sorry, but this hits a sore point with me. For the record, if a pagan invoke the name of a Goddess in this manner, I'd be just as against it. It was inappropriate, and the school acted appropriately, mostly (I don't agree with the withholding of the diploma; she earned that).

  • Thu Aug 30, 2007 6:33 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 3

    A.S.Mathew, how do you figure she was "unlawfully harassed" when she deceived the school administration and went directly against school policy? Is lying and deception OK as long as it was in the name of Jesus?

  • Thu Aug 30, 2007 5:42 am Agree: 4   Disagree: 0

    If Erica quoted from Plato, she never could have been questioned. Since she mentioned her
    relationship with Jesus, she was unlawfully harassed. God blessed this country so abundantly and a young girl due to her gratitude to her personal friend Jesus, exhalted His
    name, and for that act, she is tormented. God bless you Erica, stand firm in the Lord, God will
    use you in a far greater way in the days to come. I pity the Principal because he has
    more fear of ACLU, which is his God.

  • imho »
    Wed Aug 29, 2007 5:39 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    Just to help clarify... "Persecute: 1. To oppress or harass with ill-treatment, especially because of race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or beliefs. 2. To annoy persistently; bother."

    According to the above definition, one does not have to have a gun to one's head in order to qualify as "persecuted".

    As far as the article goes, I'm really torn. I don't like the way the school has handled it. It seems a rather heavy-handed response. However, I don't think the young lady should have changed her speech at the last minute, either. BUT, if she had been praying, and really felt that was what she needed to do, who am I to judge? Hmm...

    I think we all need to be a little more sensitive to others when giving public talks, but as audiences, we need to be a little more tolerant, too.

    I would put the young lady's actions down to youthful impetuousness driven by her passion for Christ and let it go! (And, yes, I'd say the same for someone speaking of any other belief as well.) As for the school, I don't know what to say. I think their threat to withhold the diploma was a mean tactic designed to scare a career "good girl" into doing what they wanted her to do. Surely they could have asked her to write the e-mail, explaining that it was against school policy to be seen to endorse any form or religion or whatever, and she would have complied? Or did I miss that bit?

  • Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:01 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    shooter38, the standards DO apply to anyone. But no one else has one Deity that has as part of the theology the call to go out and witness. Pagans/Wiccans aren't called to do so, so it wouldn't be a consideration. This goes for other non-Abrahamics as well. So, it's not that the standard is just being applied to Christians. It's just that, by the very nature of your faith, you're the only ones that have situations where it has to be applied.

    "Persecution" is a much-bandied-about term, primarily used here in the U.S. when someone (Christian, pagan, whatever) gets taken to task for being pushy. Tell me, exactly what are you "going through?" besides being asked to not deceive a secular institution and hijack a ceremony that belongs to everyone?

  • Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:58 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I agree that Christians should witness by example, however I don't see why we have to follow a standard that doesn't seem to apply to anyone else. This young lady has the right to confess the name of Jesus just as much as any pagan or wiccan has the right to confess the name of their deity. Some might not call this persecution but if you were the one going through it,it might look a little different. Shooter38

  • Wed Aug 29, 2007 11:42 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    "This is about God's light being shed on the World, and the World hating it."

    No it isn't. It's about you not wanting to share the spotlight, because that makes YOU feel vulnerable and not in control. I've found through my own experiences (including being a born-again Christian myself), that the ones that I respect as Christians are the ones who don't need to entrap others. They simply lead by example.

  • JC »
    Wed Aug 29, 2007 9:53 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    This is not about free speech or the Constitution. This is about God's light being shed on the World, and the World hating it. They hated him, they will hate us too. He is showing his light to the World, but they hate it and reject it, for it uncovers them and exposes them naked and weak. People do not like feeling vulnerable. They like to think they have it all covered and under control. However, control is an illusion. And most of us know this. That's why some choose other "easier" gods to follow, ones that don't expose people as they really are. But good luck with that, as only God's light will expose the real truth. As deep calls out to deep.

  • Wed Aug 29, 2007 9:17 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    theseer01, well-spoken! A commencement ceremony should not be considered a freebie to get a captive audience for any agenda other than education. Also, I agree with your assessment of "persecution." It seems that any time the rights of non-Christians are voiced, it's "persecution" to the forefront.

    Nerohdam, thank you for the affirmation. That question was to gage response, and I'll say for the record that I would not bring forth the Goddess to a captive audience for the same reason I believe this young lady was wrong in her actions. The First Amendment, IMHO, includes a reasonable expectation of not having one's special day infringed upon in the name of free speech, the same one that all the other students (not just her) worked for and earned.

  • Wed Aug 29, 2007 9:06 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    Corder steered away from the approved speech to share about her faith in Jesus Christ and encouraged fellow classmates who “don’t already know [Jesus] personally … to find out more about the sacrifice he made for you.”
    ________________________

    This is the real issue here. If she'd said something like, "Jesus helped me get where I am today," and left it at that, I could probably live with it. It's a personal comment about an influence in her life. However, that's not what apparently occurred. She used a public forum to prostelytize, taking away the rights of others to attend a religion-free event. The graduation was not about her; it was about every student there. And she took THEIR time, THEIR ceremony, to use as her own personal pulpit. How arrogant, in the name of "free speech."

  • Wed Aug 29, 2007 8:50 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Free speech is aprotected constitutional right and should not be discouraged from a graduation or baccaluarate setting. Students not only have constitutional rights to do so but their grades and achievements have ezarned those rights as well. And yes if people can quote Ghandi, use Hilters name, quote other political and philosophical names then a philosophical teacher like Jesus should be able to be qutoed as well. For someone who claim to be a King is a political reference and if other politicians are qutoed in these graduations exercises then the political reference of Jesus should be permitted as well. Hitler mentioned, Clinton mentioned, Bush mentioned, Ghandi mentioned, all okey - but Jesus "No." Quite contradictory and discriminatory in a domcoratic institution. By the way Jesus is allowed to be quoted in the schools of communist Russia and China.

  • Wed Aug 29, 2007 7:42 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    After thinking about it Citizen for once I agree with you... except the "likely erroneous" comment of course nobody likes their arguements to be taged erroneous ( I digress). The school has the right to regulate student speech. In my opinion it is not only necessary, but it should be written into law. Every issue that does not have to do with education e.g. political or religious ideology needs to be left out. As a parent I do not want my kid exposed (as a captive audience) to someones political, social, or religious worldview. There is no place for dialogue in those situations or true free speech.

    The only problem I have with the story is how the school handled it. Let's see Valedictorian... good bet she did not cause teachers grief in class, makes a 30 sec. speech with a reference to Jesus and the school threatens to withhold her diploma if she doesn't apologize to the community? Apologize for what? What was truly "immature" was the school officals, after she apologized, keeping this going by ridiculing her actions (and this after a year). I wouldn't sue for free speech violation, but for slander. : ) Either way she could have a case, but again I'm no lawyer.

    BTW - Citizen I have been to several graduations in the past five years Jesus was evoked in 3 of them, Gandhi, and Gloria Steinem in the others. All three: Christ, Gandhi, and Steinem had political social religious agendas. Didn't hear anything about it in the news. All five graduations were public high schools that had to use the local church to have their commencements... so my erroneous statement is not that erroneous it just depends on where you are and who's making the rules. (I live in the intolerant South).

    Now to the rest of you. Christians do receive their far share of verbal bias in these United States, but that does not constitute true persecution. And there is nothing subtle about the cultural changes going on in America. How many of you, who protest Christianity's decline in America are activly loving your neighbor, co-worker, family? And I'm not talking about God-speak either, I mean loving them through thick and thin? How many of you are contributing to poverty by engaging in gross materialism? How many eat 20 lbs of food at your local buffet while there are starving people right in your communities? How many are really concerned about Christ's directives to love God and love your neighbors, even the people you disagree with? We are not persecuted here, nobody is forcing anyone to close their churches or making anybody go to church, no one is being tortured in this country. Maybe one day that will be a reality, but today you enjoy freedom of religion. Be Blessed, all of you, but be honest too.

  • Wed Aug 29, 2007 7:42 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    No Wiccan I believe you should be able to express your views as equally as Christians should be able to express their views. That is the beauty of the First Amendment. As it is the beauty of God "allowing" humans to either choose or reject Christ His Son.

  • Wed Aug 29, 2007 7:01 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    If I'd mentioned the Goddess in a validictorian speech, would all of you be supporting my right of religious freedom? Or would you be all over me for "contributing to the immorality of this country" and imposing upon students? Just curious.

  • Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:49 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    This is why Atheists and secular humanist's should not run a government or influence education. The citizens always lose their basic freedoms of speech as they do in communist nations.

  • Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:09 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Brothers and sisters, we live in the end times and Jesus warned us that in this world you will have trouble, but be of good cheer, for I have overcome this world. We should not be surprised at the trouble, persecutions that come our way. Yes, over the past 25 years, many of our troubles are escalating, but that is prophetic and we should be praising our Lord, that in our times, we are watching Biblical prophesy unfold!
    The Lord God is returning and this dead world is passing away, and so we need to be prayerful and sober of the days that we live in.
    Citizen: I pray for you that the Lord God will become very real to you, because even though you do not believe in Jesus, He sure knows you.
    This world is immoral folks, and it is not going to get better, another sign of the times; we are looking forward to the new world and new heavens that our Lord Jesus is bringing!
    HalleluYAH! The KING is on His way! Lift up your hearts and start to see things from a Biblical worldview (and not a worldview) and you will be amazed at what the LORD is saying to the church! Come LORD JESUS come! For HIS glory and In HIS love, Annie

  • Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:44 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

    This is to be expected! JESUS said we would be persucuted, for HIS sake. Rejoice, I say rejoice when this happens. Great will be your reward in heaven!!!

  • Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:37 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    This is just another example of Christians being persecuted for HIS sake. HE warned us about this. We should rejoice, when this happens. Stand strong, andd your reward in heaven will be GREAT! Just stand!!!!

  • Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:50 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Angelus: oh, wait, maybe you didn't. It's hard to tell. Would you mind clarifying?

  • Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:49 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    angelus5370: I think its hilarious that you blame atheists for "immorality in our churches."

  • Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:43 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/hazelwood.html

  • Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:33 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    theseer01: Ask and ye shall receive ;-)

    I'm no attorney, so this should not be construed as legal advice by anyone. That having been said, I doubt her claim will succeed. I think it is likely that the principles of Hazelwood School Dist. v. Kuhlmeier (484 U.S. 260) control. In that case, a high school was sued for censoring two articles about teen pregnancy in the school newspaper. The Supreme Court held that the school had the power to regulate speech when that speech was in a non-public forum (in other words, a forum the public or some segment of it was not given indiscriminate access to use for speech), and might reasonably be attributed to the school itself, and could associate the school with non-neutrality on matters of political controversy.

    In other words, theseer01, your statement that "if someone got up there and shared their beliefs in any other issue whether religious or political, I'm sure there would not be a problem" is likely erroneous.

  • Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:01 am Agree: 4   Disagree: 1

    It's amazing how much Christians are being persecuted, even in the USA! I know it happens alot overseas, but happens here also. Our persecuation started out suttle in the USA, but now is growing.........first it is atheists taking prayer from our schools, crosses from cemetaries, The Ten Comandments out of the judical building.....then escalated into immorality in our churches, same sex marriages, gay clergy, etc. The USA I knew and loved is becoming a trash bin, but we have no one to blame but ourselves. Just when did God, and His Son become the enemy?

  • Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:16 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    What is a "Valedictorian" to start out with, and if all is on the up and up depending on valedictorian,.....Double wow......

  • Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:12 am Agree: 6   Disagree: 0

    Where is the outrage? If someone got up there and shared their beliefs in any other issue whether religious or political I'm sure there would not be a problem. It is only freedom of speech if the liberals provide the guidelines of the speech... typical. Bring it on Citizen I know your lurking in the shadows

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • DVD
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links