At its recent convention in Chicago, the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) honored the National Council of Churches top interfaith official with its Interfaith Unity Award.
Undoubtedly, the award was well deserved! The NCC, like most of the Religious Left, defends or accommodates radical Islam, even as it denounces fundamentalist Christianity and condemns Israel. Despite the Religious Lefts support for liberal social causes like same-sex unions and abortion rights, it prefers the supporters of Islamic Sharia law to Christians or Jews who might sometimes vote Republican.
You are doing the will of God, gushed NCC Associate General Secretary for Interfaith Relations Shanta Premawardhana. You are the ones upholding faith and serving humanity. You are my sisters and brothers. ISNA says over 40,000 of its Islamic supporters attended its annual convention.
The award inscription read: "Islamic Society of North America presents Rev. Dr. Shanta Premawardhana, a fellow activist for peace, justice and reconciliation, a 'Christian believer' as described in Qur'an (3:113) in recognition of his tireless contribution to advancing inter-religious dialogue and partnership, with our prayers for a continued demonstration of energy, understanding and commitment."
Very moving. Of course, the NCC official, after receiving his award, theoretically could have used the occasion to urge the Muslim gathering to join with Christians and Jews in affirming democracy, religious liberty and human rights around the world. As moderate Muslims, perhaps some among ISNA might have actually listened.
Instead, Premawardhana baited the audience by attacking far-right wing Christians who are distressed by political Islam. He attacked the Bush Administration for its ostensible plans to attack Irans nuclear weapons program. And the NCC official defended Irans Islamist theocratic dictatorship, to which he has been a personal envoy, and insisted that Irans clerical tyrants accept Islams supposed prohibition against nuclear weapons.
If ISNA is indeed a moderate Muslim group, wouldnt its supporters have their own concerns about the brutal form of political Islam that Irans theocrats have imposed on their suffering country since 1979? And would not the Sunni dominated ISNA strongly prefer that Shiite Iran NOT have nuclear weapons? At least from the NCC perspective, these concerns are subordinate to the more important cause of stopping the Bush Administration. Predictably, Premawardhana concluded his address to the Muslim group by inviting them to join the NCC umptenth demonstration against the Iraq War in the form of an interfaith fast in October, timed wonderfully to coincide with Ramadan.
ISNA President Ingrid Mattson, in introducing Premawardhana, spoke of the NCC's commitment to stand in partnership and solidarity with the Muslim community through some of the most difficult times of discrimination and prejudice they've faced, particularly since 9/11, according to the NCC news release.
Naturally, Premawardhana did not respond that Muslims in America enjoy far more freedoms than they do in any officially Islamic country, where they are likely to be persecuted, imprisoned or killed if their form of Islam does not conform to the expectations of the state, the mullahs, or local tribal leaders.
Instead, the NCC official preferred to warn the ISNA about the far right wing advocacy organization for which I work, the Institute on Religion and Democracy (IRD), which mailed a book by Efraim Karsh called "Islamic Imperialism" to tens of thousands of churches across America. "Despite it being published by Yale University Press, the book has only a thin veneer of academic scholarship," Premawardhana asserted. "Its purpose is not to educate but to persuade towards a right-wing ideology. Continue »










