Updated 12:47 pm.EST, Sun November 22, 2009

Society|Thu, Oct. 11 2007 06:17 PM EDT

Conservatives, Evangelicals Urged to 'Galvanize' Support Around Romney

By Eric Young|Christian Post Reporter

Some 150 top-level conservative Christian leaders are expected to receive in the mail this week a letter urging them to “galvanize support” around presidential hopeful Mitt Romney so former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani “isn’t the unintended beneficiary of our divided support among several candidates.”

  • Republicans Debate
    (Photo: AP Images / Carlos Osorio)
    Republican presidential hopefuls former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney speak to someone in the audience during the final break at the GOP Presidential candidates debate at Ford Community and Performing Arts Center Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2007, in Dearborn, Mich. The debate was sponsored by CNBC/MSNBC and The Wall Street Journal.

Or, “worse yet,” the letter adds, “so we don’t abdicate the presidency (and the future of the Supreme Court) over to Hillary Clinton.”

The letter, which was published by the New York Times on Wednesday, was written by Mark DeMoss, who has served some of the world’s most prominent and effective Christian ministries and enterprises since the founding of faith-based PR firm The DeMoss Group in 1991.

“In about 100 days we will likely have a Republican nominee for president,” DeMoss writes at the beginning of his letter to “Conservative & Evangelical Leaders.”

“While most people think this election cycle started too early, I’m finding that few people realize the primaries are almost upon us – and how compacted the primary calendar is,” he adds.

DeMoss, whose clients include the Rev. Franklin Graham, says he decided over a year ago to help former Massachusetts Gov. Romney after spending months researching his life and his record, and hours with him (and his wife and staff) in his home, his office and on the road.

“I am convinced his values practically mirror my own—values about the sanctity of life, the sacredness of marriage, the importance of the family, character and integrity, free enterprise and smaller government,” he writes.

And although he has not been and will not be paid for his efforts, DeMoss says he has worked harder for Romney’s campaign than during any past election because he believes the next president is “almost certain” to appoint two to four Supreme Court justices.

He also notes that the next president will have to deal with issues including same-sex “marriage” and abortion. “Do we want that person to be Hillary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani or Mitt Romney?” DeMoss asks several times to the letter’s recipients.

Recently, some of the nation's most politically influential conservative Christians, alarmed by the prospect of a Republican presidential nominee who supports abortion rights, said they were considering backing a third-party candidate.

“We’re very, very concerned about the implications of a Hillary Clinton presidency,” said Dr. James Dobson, who attended the meeting of more than 40 Christian conservatives late last month in Salt Lake City.

“[B]ut you know, we have been working … for 35 years, I’ve been trying to defend the unborn child,” Dobson said on Fox’s Hannity & Colmes show Monday. “That’s been my life. That’s been my belief, along with marriage and the family and the other things. I can’t now abandon that because we’ve got two bad choices here.”

Dobson is not yet participating in any planning for a third party, said Gary Schneeberger, a spokesman for Focus on the Family Action, according to The Associated Press. But Dobson has expressed in the past that he wouldn't support Giuliani.

The possibility of a third party candidate is one of the growing concerns DeMoss says he has as the final stretch of the nominating process approaches.

“While I wholeheartedly agree with Dr. James Dobson that not having a pro-life nominee of either major party presents an unacceptable predicament, I would rather work hard to ensure we do nominate a pro-life candidate than to launch an 11th-hour third party campaign,” he writes.

In regards to Romney’s “conversion” on the abortion issue, which some conservatives have doubted the authenticity of, DeMoss defended the former governor, stating that he “always thought the pro-life movement existed for the purpose of influencing hearts and mind on the issue of life, and historically, we have celebrated converts to our side.”

“We embraced Ronald Reagan (who signed a liberal abortion law as governor of California), Norma McCorvey (“Jane Roe”), and others—and I am prepared to accept and embrace Mitt Romney,” DeMoss writes.

In his letter, dated Tuesday, DeMoss also addresses one of the biggest concerns surrounding Romney that has prompted many evangelicals to keep their distance – the presidential hopeful’s Mormon faith.

“Now, I fully recognize some evangelicals take issue with me for supporting a Mormon for the office of president, and I respect their concerns. Indeed, I had to deal with the same concerns in my own heart before offering to help Gov. Romney,” he confesses.

“But I concluded that I am more concerned that a candidate shares my values than he shares my theology.”

DeMoss’s sentiments mirror those of other Christian conservatives including Southern Baptists leaders Dr. Richard Land and Dr. R. Albert Mohler, who have affirmed Mormonism as “false” and “antithetical to historic orthodox Christianity,” but also acknowledged that they are not voting for a “pastor in chief” or a theologian.

“I am wholeheartedly convinced that Mitt Romney can be trusted to uphold the values and principles most important to me as a political conservative and an evangelical Christian,” DeMoss continues, as he nears the end of his five-page letter.

In closing, the self-described Southern Baptist evangelical and political conservative urges the recipients of the letter to pray fervently for the upcoming election, to follow the news and the primary calendar, encourage others to vote, encourage others to support the candidate who best represents their values and not just their theology, and galvanize support around Romney.

“I believe we can make a difference—the difference in this election,” DeMoss states.

According the latest Associated Press-Ipsos poll, white men, conservatives, evangelicals and other pivotal blocs are still divided among the Republican Party's leading contenders for president, leaving the race for the 2008 GOP nomination highly fluid.

The poll showed the contest remains a virtual tie between Giuliani at 27 percent and Fred Thompson, the actor and former senator from Tennessee, at 23 percent. Not far behind are Sen. John McCain of Arizona at 13 percent and Romney at 11 percent. About 18 percent of Republicans, meanwhile, did not back a candidate.

In contrast, New York Sen. Clinton has a clear, across-the-board lead in the Democratic race over Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois by 46 percent to 25 percent, a margin notably wider than the one she has enjoyed for months. Lagging behind was former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina at 9 percent.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Sat Oct 20, 2007 7:15 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Some Facts to Consider when trying to both vote for the most Godly man to promote Christ, and someone who has the traction to beat Hillary. Huckabee may be a Godly man, but he won't beat Hillary or Barack. Romney, Giuliani, Thompson, and McCain are both, not the Godly, principled men to choose from. Nor can they beat Hillary.

    Consider who REALLY leads the polls (the un-censored, un-controllable, and HUGE internet).

    Ron Paul. He tops both Hillary and Barack in many areas to suggest that he have both the platform and the following. What he doesn't have is you, my Christian friend, checking him out first-hand. You're taking your news from the so-called "great American:", Sean Hannity and Fox News.

    Be a Berean my friend. Don't trust anyone's word...not mine, not this websites, not the media's, nor a friends. Do you research on your own. Google Ron Paul. Google 'Ron Paul's statement of faith'. Do the same with the other candidates.

    Find out why Ron get the most contributions from our soldiers...more than ANY OTHER CANDIDATE. Find out why Ron Paul's supporters are so passionate. I know why as I'm one of them. But I wasn't always one. I voted for Bush twice and thought this war was justified. I'm learning not to be a sheeple. Find out for yourself. Google Ron Paul or go to:

    www.RonPaul2008.com
    www.DailyPaul.com
    www.FreeMe.TV
    www.IHateRonPaul.com
    www.TechPresident.com
    http://hitwise.com/political-data-center/

  • Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:43 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Conservative Christian Values Voter:
    Are you looking for the right candidate to support?

    Please consider this essay:
    "Who Was That Masked Man?"
    http://truthrealm.com/?q=node/7

  • Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:20 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    Evangelicals vote pro-life. Evangelicals vote for Ron Paul.

    http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/life-and-liberty/

    Ron Paul revolution

  • Wed Oct 17, 2007 5:54 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I discovered a gospel tract that warns the public about both the Mormon and Jehovah Witness cults and can be downloaded for free on the right hand side panel of this anti-darwinism website and reprinted, front/back.

    http://evolutionfacts.blogspot.com/

  • Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:40 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Quote: “I am convinced his values practically mirror my own—values about the sanctity of life, the sacredness of marriage, the importance of the family, character and integrity, free enterprise and smaller government,” he writes.

    Sadly, it appears Mr. DeMoss has been duped by the Romney machine.


    Quote: He also notes that the next president will have to deal with issues including same-sex “marriage” and abortion. “Do we want that person to be Hillary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani or Mitt Romney?”

    How about "none of the above"?


    Quote: “While I wholeheartedly agree with Dr. James Dobson that not having a pro-life nominee of either major party presents an unacceptable predicament, I would rather work hard to ensure we do nominate a pro-life candidate than to launch an 11th-hour third party campaign,” he writes.

    Then coalesce around Mike Huckabee, an evangelical CHRISTIAN who shares our vales AND can beat HRC.

  • Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:31 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    CORRECTION to last post: RB & everyone- please read my comments in order. I am posting more than one post in reply here for the first time, and posted them in the wrong order. I have 3 posts, with 6 parts ( 2 parts per post). Comments from anyone is welcomed

  • Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:29 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    RB & everyone- please read my commentrs in order. I am posting more than one post in reply here fore the frst reply, and posted them in the wrong order. I have 3 posts, with 6 parts. Comments from anyone is welcomed.

  • Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:28 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    5) RB/etc- LDS Church adheres "more closely to Early Christian theology"? The LDS Church says it has the *same* as the NT, etc. The previous doctrines and comments are neccessary to prove as stated above. In addition, the NT does not ahve evangelists as the OT Jewish styled patriarchs with the "patriarchal blessings", as the LDS Church does. The NT never calls Peter a prophet, and the heads of the church were apostles, not those in the actual calling of prophets. There were not a separate 3 for a First Presidency and then a Quorum of 12 Apostles, but Peter and the rest were all apostles. The NT tells us about NT prophets in Acts with Agabus, which was a very diffeent kind than LDS prophets. The LDS view is more like a Moses, and he was one of the first in the 'OT'/Jewish Bible. Most in the OT were not even like the LDS styled prophets, or Moses. The LDS Church has borrowed from the OT, not the NT in some areas, and have redefined callings ("offices", as the LDS Church calls them). The NT says "God set some in the church, *first* apostles, secondarily prophets" (1 Cor 12:28). While the apostles had authority, they did not have the degree and full scope that the LDS leaders have.
    6) RB, you border on slander & misrepresentation when you give the comfortably couched slam that the " perhaps the reason evangelical pastors [supposedly] promote this mis-reprresentation [sic] is to protect thier flock (and thier livlihood [sic])." I think the paid General Authorities/GAs of the LDS Church (First Presidency, Apostles, etc) have a good claimed 'living allowances' (allowance, like kids? It is paid ministry). Please research past & present on LDS GA payment & so on for being in their offices. You have pointed fingers, even adding a 'perhaps', but you have misrepresented them about the LDS Church & Jesus, and U have used this last one to plant doubts about their honesty. there are a lot of evangelical pastors, & your assertion is far from adequate. LDS leaders & members have been evasive, dishonest, deceptive, refusing to answer questions, misrepresented evangelical beliefs & practices, and have used liberal buzzwords that are emotionally chanrged ('Mormon bash', for instance). This goes right up to LDS leaders and at least one living LDS apostle, Boyd K. Packer in his speech to new mission presidents, "The Candle of the Lord" (See the viddeo clip on YouTube.com under a search for "Lying for the Lord", and Apostle Packers speech in the official LDS Church mag, Ensign, 1/1983, pp 51-etc, also on official lds.org under Church magazines>"Search Ensign">The Candle of the Lord).

  • Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:26 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    3) RB & rest-U misunderstand evangelical preachers- the LDS Church believes in a version of Jesus, but not the same Jesus as evangelicals, "another Jesus" (2 Cor 11:4), and living LDS prophet, Gordon B. Hinckley twice (LDS Church owned Deseret News, [LDS] Church section, 6/20/1998, p 7, & official LDS mag, Ensign, 5/2002, pp 90-91), and Bernard B Brockbank in official April 1977 LDS General Conference (Ensign, May 1977, pp 26-27) have admitted in a guarded sense that the "traditional Christ" is not the same "Christ" as the LDS Jesus.
    The 'gospel and message of 'salvation' of both are radically different, and the NT condemns false gospels (Gal 1:6-9), and speaks clearly that there is "another Jesus, another spirit, and another gospel), and those who advance them are "false apostles, deceitful workers", but are actually "his {Satan's] ministers" ( 2 Cor 11:14, 15-16). The LDS Chuch published edition of the KJV Bible has in its chapter heading for this chapter, "Satan sends forth false apostles".
    Briefly, that is why evangelicals do not consider the LDS Church a true Christian religion or church. The Bible itself teaches that one cannot have a false Jesus and gospel and be "a Christian religion"/church, and has hard words for those who advocates them.
    The NT Jesus himself warns against false prophets, and also says "those that worship him must worship in spirit and in truth" (John 4:23-24).
    4) RB & others:does the blog you recommend accurately and clearly shows that the early church taught that "the Godhead" of Father, Son & the Holy Ghost/Spirit "are three Gods" (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p 370), that God the Father was once "a finite being", and we can become literal Gods & be "as great as God" (official Melchizedek Priesthood Study Guide 1985, pp 151-153)? Does it teach that "His [Jesus'] Atonement" began in the garden of Gethsemane and finished on the cross, when the NT teaches that the payment for sin ("Atonement" started & finished all on the cross, and not in Gethsemane (or in 'hell' between death & resurrection) (Col. 1, Eph 1, Romans 5, etc)? You refer to the blog and "the deity of Christ", but the LDS Church radically reinterprets it to mean he is one of many Gods (3 in Godhead, & others besides- Joseph Smiths' King Follett Discourse, Abraham 4-5, Doctrine & Covenants 132, & Melchizedek Priesthood Study Guide 1985, pp 151-153). Does the blog clearly and accurately prove these things were inspired first century church doctrine?

  • Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:24 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    1) RB & others:Romney believes in polygamy as a 'righeous principle' today, or he disagrees with his LDS Jesus. LDS scripture, Doctrine & Covenants 132 (which also teaches the LDS doctrine that we can become literal gods & goddesses) states in vs 1 "Verily, thus saith the Lord unto you my servant Joseph, that inasmuch as you have inquired of my hand to know and understand wherein I, the Lord, justified my servants Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, as also Moses, David and Solomon, my servants, as touching the principle and doctrine of their having many wives and concubines". Some of the General Authroities of the LDS Church have married in the temple after last wife died, so they are 'sealed' to 2 wives "for time and all eternity", as well. Not all living LDS are 'celestial monogamists' today.
    2) RB & all: Can we trust Romney when we cannot trust the LDS leaders to be forthright, honest & clear of deception? Living Apostle Packer spoke at a seminar given for new LDS mission presidents on 6/1982. In this sspeech he said if one doesn't have a testimony, to bear it to others anyway, and that will help the LDS in getting a testimony. It was given officially, and it was published in official LDS mag, Ensign (1/83, p 51-etc) It's now on the official LDS Church site, lds.org. It is official promotion of lying to others (saying one believes something when one doesn't), decieving to the others, & emotionally conditioning the self. Millett & Packer.... Remember, Romney is LDS, and has held church positions (I think one was mission president).

  • Sun Oct 14, 2007 11:28 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Ron Paul is the only one I trust to keep his word. Most of the candidates of both 'parties' are CFR, a one world gov. group.

    Ron Paul has a 100% PRO Constitution voting record for the last 20 some years. No other candidate can say that.

    Ron is a Christian. He does not use his faith as a "Vote for me! Jesus is my role model" neon sign.

    He is great on all the issues. Many hot button issues he would resolve by returning them to the States where they should have been resolved in the first place. He would refer to the Constitution & the Founder's advice as US President.

    I say check out Ron Paul! He is a answer to prayer.Remember. God uses what men think are the weak or foolish to confound the 'wisdom" of the 'wise'.

  • Sat Oct 13, 2007 7:49 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Simple question RB: where does the book of Mormon say Jesus was born?

  • RB »
    Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:33 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    Truth and Justice:

    Did you read http://mormonsarechristian.blogspot.com/ ? The archaeological indications are:

    Baptism by immersion
    Baptism by the father of the family
    A lay ministry
    Belief in the original Greek New Testament texts which do not support a Trinitarian diety, but rather three separate personages: God, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit.

    Furthermore, does your church have a cross (5th Century)? Do you emphasize only faith and not works? The New Testament says both are required to progress in the next life. It is true that only faith is necessary, if you want to exist in the next life as a "ministering angel".

    Is your church headed by 12 Apostles, who claim authority from Jesus Christ?

  • Sat Oct 13, 2007 5:45 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    The fact is that there is no historical or archaeological indication of any kind that the early Church was other than the Catholic Church. When dealing with Mormon missionaries, remember that all the evidence is in favor of the claims of the Catholic Church. If you want to watch their sails go slack quickly, ask the missionaries to produce any historical proof to support their claim that in the early centuries the Church was Mormon. They can't do it because there is no such evidence.

    The Book of Mormon itself suffers the same fate when it comes to its own historical support. In a word, it hasn't got any.

    The Book of Mormon describes a vast pre-Columbian culture that supposedly existed for centuries in North and South America. It goes into amazingly specific detail describing the civilizations erected by the "Nephites" and "Lamanites," who were Jews that fled Palestine in three installments, built massive cities in the New World, farmed the land, produced works of art, and fought large-scale wars which culminated in the utter destruction of the Nephites in A.D. 421. The Latter-Day Saints revere the Book of Mormon as the divinely-inspired record of those people and of Christ's appearance to them shortly after his crucifixion in Jerusalem.

    The awkward part for the Mormon church is the total lack of historical and archaeological evidence to support the Book of Mormon. For example, after the cataclysmic last battle fought between the Nephites and Lamanites, there was no one left to clean up the mess. Hundreds of thousands of men and beasts allegedly perished in that battle, and the ground was strewn with weapons and armor.

    Keep in mind that A.D. 421 is just yesterday in archaeological terms. It should be easy to locate and retrieve copious evidence of such a battle, and there hasn't been enough time for the weapons and armor to turn to dust. The Bible tells of similar battles that have been documented by archaeology, battles which took place long before A.D. 421.

    The embarrassing truth—embarrassing for Mormons, that is—is that no scientist, Mormon or otherwise, has been able to find anything to substantiate that such a great battle took place.

  • RB »
    Sat Oct 13, 2007 5:05 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 2

    Mitt Romney belongs to a First Century Christian Church.

    Mitt Romney's church, the Church of Jesus Christ (LDS) is often misunderstood by Evangelical preachers . . Some accuse the Church of not believing in Christ and, therefore, not being a Christian religion

    http://mormonsarechristian.blogspot.com/ helps to clarify such misconceptions by examining early (First Century) Christianity's theology relating to baptism, the Godhead, the deity of Jesus Christ and His Atonement.

    The Church of Jesus Christ (LDS) adheres to Early Christian theology more closely than other Christian denominations. Perhaps the reason Evangelical preachers promote this mis-representation is to protect their flock (and their livlihood).

  • Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:56 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    IIf DeMoss REALLY did his homework about Mitt Romney, he wouldn't be urging people of faith(?) to support him. I don't support him, and we in Massachusetts had to put up with him for four years, and I even voted for the guy. The fact is, he is an empty suit, and he came into Massachusetts on a "No Taxes" platform, but immediately raised all the FEES in the state, which was basically the same thing. Taxes/Fees...you tell me. Then the homosexual marriage issue...HE DID NOT OPPOSE IT. Mitt Romney doesn't know or believe his basic Civics. He let the SJC create a same sex marriage situation, when the Judiciary does not make the law, it only interprets it. Don't let this guy FOOL anyone. Both he and the Attorney General and the Legislature never opposed the same sex marriage thing, and now he's running around the country saying he supports traditional marriage. BALONEY!!! Tell that to the voters of Massachusetts, and those who signed the historic citizen initiative. When push came to shove, he backed out when the new Governor took office and opposed the initiative banning same sex marriage. Mitt Romney hit the high road and did nothing to STOP Governor Deval Patrick's public campaign. Do you call that loyalty to the believers of traditional marriage in Massachusetts? I could go on, but this Mitt Romney has been a flipper and a flopper and he cannot be trusted. He is an OPPORTUNIST, pure and simple, and my vote will go to Dr. Ron Paul, the only REAL conservative and Constitutionalist, who has never changed his mind about any issue he's supported. But then again, he's always supported the ones we believe in. Believers, beware of Romney. He's an empty suit!!! Vote Ron Paul!!!

  • Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:32 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    www.ronpaul2008.com/issues Read his stance on abortion... Ron Paul is the most pro-life candidate... let's support him!

  • Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:37 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    Whether or not Romney truly has converted from his previously stated record of being pro-abortion and pro-homosexual, I don't know. That being said, I do know where Mike Huckabee stands on these issues, as well as Gulianni for that matter. My vote goes with the individual that has the guts and the integrity to take a stand for Biblical values, NOT for someone who is politically expedient! Let's get behind Mike Huckabee for president!!!

  • Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:26 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Well said, zenodaddy.I'm voting against Hillary and her Marxist ideas!!

  • Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:54 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

    This election is not just about getting another Republican in the White House, it is about keeping the Marxists out of the White House. Is my assumption correct in stating that a lot of us do not know the full weight of this election? This is no longer about keeping the liberals at bay, it is about keeping the Marxists OUT.

    Hitlary wants to make everything Nationalized. She also wants to keep the borders open, turn tail and run from the terrorists and make sure that no one can afford anything because of her tax-hike ideas. Democrats already have a plan underway to increase taxes by 1 TRILLION DOLLARS. This will be killed by the Republicans of course, but if she gets in the White House we can just forget about it.

  • Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:18 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    Romney is like the worst choice ever! He says he's a conservative now, but when he was a governor, he was a liberal. I don't trust him at all. He's just a slimy politician.

    Instead, I'm for Huckabee! He's the only Republican I like this year and the only one I'll vote for. And if he doesn't get the nomination, I doubt I'll cast a vote for Romney, Rudy, or Thompson in the general election even if it is against Hillary. If the Republican party is more concerned with "electability" than it is about standing up for its values, than it doesn't deserve to win anyway.

    Vote for Huckabee!!!!! :)

  • Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:28 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    Mike Huckabee.... Every conservative in this nation needs to start pouring support for Huckabee... he is everything we believe a president to be. His values are aligned with mine as a baptist minister.

  • Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:27 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    Why Romney? I would never vote for a Mormon. It's a sick cult. Why not another candidate? Ron Paul has momentum and is the most pro-life of the candidates... why not Ron Paul? Why not Mike Huckabee? Romney? You got to be kidding me. Romney needs to repent and then maybe I would consider it.

    www.ronpaul2008.com/issues

  • FT »
    Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:25 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    I like Romney's social values. Since he is a believing Mormon, I am sadly forced to question his ability to think critically. I doubt that I could vote for him.

    Giuliani will appoint good Supreme Court justices.

  • Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:14 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    I think Evangelicals should think for themselves rather than blindly following a coallition of famous Christians like Dobson. Lets follow Jesus only! We have a direct line to God and a God given intellect just like these "150 top-level Christian leaders" do!

  • Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:26 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    This is complete hypocrisy! Values over faith?

    That means the 500 year war between Protestants and Catholics should be coming to an end. Christians should be embracing all faiths. No more denominations.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links