Advanced Search

Church High Council: Transgender Minister Can Stay

By
Christian Post Reporter
Wed, Oct. 31 2007 08:03 PM ET
[-]Text[+]
E-mail Print RSS More on Topic AddThis Button

A transgender minister is allowed to remain pastor of a Baltimore congregation, the United Methodist Church's highest council announced Tuesday.

The Judicial Council's ruling affirmed a decision by Baltimore-Washington Bishop John R. Schol last spring who reappointed the Rev. Drew Phoenix to St. John's of Baltimore City after the transgender minister underwent surgery and hormone therapy to become a male. Phoenix was formerly the Rev. Ann Gordon who had led the church for five years.

Phoenix was "happily surprised" upon hearing the decision.

Local clergy in the Baltimore-Washington Conference had appealed Schol's decision to the United Methodist Judicial Council amid opposition. While the United Methodist Church bars self-avowed practicing clergy from ordination and does not support gay unions, according to the denomination's Book of Discipline, it says nothing about transgender clergy.

After considering whether to remove Phoenix from leadership, the Judicial Council decided to allow the transgender minister to stay on the job, referring to a church policy stating that a clergyperson in good standing can't be terminated without administrative or judicial action.

"The adjective placed in front of the noun 'clergyperson' does not matter," the council ruled. "What matters is that clergypersons, once ordained and admitted to membership in full connection, cannot have that standing changed without being accorded fair process."

Phoenix learned of the decision Tuesday morning.

"I am elated that the Judicial Council of The United Methodist Church has affirmed Bishop Schol’s ruling of law – that transgender pastors in good standing shall be appointed to serve in United Methodists churches," said Phoenix in a statement. "I celebrate this historic day in our denomination. The Judicial Council’s decision is a very important first step in opening the doors of our churches to the transgender community."

St. John's congregants who have backed their pastor lauded the decision.

"We at St. John’s UMC have a long history of supporting people through various life transitions," said the congregation, which boasts "inclusion" and "diversity," in a statement. "We love and support our pastor. Rev. Phoenix is an effective, professional pastor who has our deep and abiding respect."

According to the statement, church authorities were informed of Phoenix’s decision to transition but did not seek permission or endorsement of the decision.

Religious groups are struggling with the issue of transgender people as the transgender community begins to rise into the public square.

The Rev. Kevin M. Baker, who had raised questions about Phoenix's name change earlier this year, said more discussion is needed on the issue.

"We need a chance to talk about the implications of it," said Baker, pastor of Oakdale Emory United Methodist Church in Olney, Md., according to The Baltimore Sun.

"This just is, in my opinion, another chink in a long fence of issues that we're not dealing well with in the church," such as pornography and divorce, he added.

The Judicial Council's ruling stopped short of stating whether a change of gender violates the denomination's rules.

Mark Tooley of United Methodist Action, a branch of the conservative Institute on Religion and Democracy, was not surprised but expects the upcoming General Conference in 2008 "to respond with legislation that upholds traditional Christian teachings about the sacredness of the human body."

"Christianity's traditions strongly argue against any affirmation of transsexuality or sex change procedures," he said.

Representatives from the United Methodist Church meet in April for the General Conference, an international legislative session that meets every four years. The General Conference is the top policy-making body of the denomination.

BACK TO TOP Print E-mail More on Topic AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

Most recent comments
pastorbrianc
  • Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:38 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
I started out in the Methodist Church as a pastor. I left when they had a vote on whether to allow gays to be married in the church. The UMC has gotten away from the Bible and have become a church that does not want to offend anyone. They are headed in the wrong directions and have definitely gotten away from the preaching of John Wesley. I talk about the need to return to biblical preaching on my blog at: www.time2changechurches.blogspot.com
Benotleh
  • Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:12 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
This is shameful, if that great man of God, John Wesley, was still alive, he would be outraged that these people even call themselves Methodists, a denomination that was the result of his obediant and faithful laborers for the Lord. This was a man who stressed Holiness and perfect obediance to God and his Word, while these people, who are the heirs of his organization, are rolling around in the filth of the world and indulging every sinful desire and "feeling".
shooter38
  • Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:05 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Perhaps she should have just had her estrogen level checked. I would think an imbalance in hormones might be part of the problem. I have never understood how someone of either gender can say they feel they want to be the other. I'm a woman and have no idea how a man feels about anything. Hasn't that been the problem in marriages since the beginning of time? How can someone supposedly be born again and not care what God has to say about any given issue?
imho
  • Fri Nov 02, 2007 5:17 am
  • : 1
  • : 0
  • Flag
That church council is high, all right.
Harry4Health
  • Thu Nov 01, 2007 8:52 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
WiccanTexan-Trans people should be alloowed to attend church. However, fort hose who beliece the Bible, the issue should be whether or not it is biblical to have a trans person as a minister, should a Christian go through a sex change operation, etc. The Buible does affirm gender & sex roles as by birth. To Bible believers- U should speak truth inmlove/etc., whether U agree with a person's choice, etc. One can disagree, but not hate, or have distain 4 people. far too many liberals & GBLTs don't understand that.
superbob
  • Thu Nov 01, 2007 3:51 pm
  • : 2
  • : 0
  • Flag
lordshepard- if your statement was aimed at me then you just read WAY to much into what i said, and miniuplated my words to mean something else. I said nothing about birthdefects but she was not born into this world with a defect at birth her defect happened in her mind as an adult when she decided she wanted to be changed into a man. get what i mean now
lordshepard
  • Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:11 pm
  • : 2
  • : 2
  • Flag
To say that God never makes mistakes in the birth of a child (male vs female) is not a valid argument. Nor is saying that the Biblical sacredness of the body is an argument against surgical alteration of how one was born. People are born with birth defects all the time. Missing limbs, hair-lips, blind, deaf, even hermaphodite (born with both sex organs). That argument would also say that correcting those with such birth defects is a sin. Use another argument and be more sensitive to those who may be born with serious defects for one reason or another. Someone who has had a birth defect corrected by surgery is not going to hell.
John5796
  • Thu Nov 01, 2007 12:35 pm
  • : 5
  • : 0
  • Flag
Regardless of what they may think they are, this is not a Christian church. To openly disregard scripture is of the devil. Sin is forgivable, if repented. If one thumbs their nose at the bible and refuses to abide by its teachings, then that sinner will spend eternity in hell.
superbob
  • Thu Nov 01, 2007 12:06 pm
  • : 3
  • : 0
  • Flag
So basiclly they are saying that God made a mistake because she was supposed to be a man and we as humans had to fix Gods mistake. What exatly do these people preach. I can see it now a sermon goes - and down throughout history we can see all the things man had to fix for God you know samson he used to be a woman before he was the strongest man in history and if those brilliant doctors hadnt made him into a man we would have heard how sally pushed the pillars down and destroyed the building. THIS IS SICKENING
Joshua Joseph
  • Thu Nov 01, 2007 11:58 am
  • : 5
  • : 0
  • Flag
Yo Wiccan, You only disagree with this because you are not a Christian. But it's part of the teachings of the Christian faith that this is wrong. If this person wants be this way that can do that, but they should not be a Christian minister. I'm not saying the perso should not be welcome in church, but this person should not be leading the congregation and being an example for others when the entire life of this person is based on stuff which is denounced by the Bible. The Christian faith is based on the Bible. You can't just deny the basic doctrines of that book and say that you are a minister. That's insane!!! You can be a Wiccan, I don't care, it's your right, but I wouldn't want a Wiccan being a Christian pastor either. I don't want a person who is actively and openly living in sin to lead a congregation either. You have to believe in the faith and obey it if you are going to lead a congregation. You can't make up your own rules and not believe in the gospel and then be a minister at the same time. It's like a heart surgeon who refuses to perform surgeries. You can't have that job if you don't follow the rules. Get it?
Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging Abusive, Spam, Offensive, Illegal, Racist or Libellous Posts.

Comment on this story

ID Password
Submit Don't have a Christian Post ID?Signing up is easy. Click Here