Sunday, November 08, 2009 Last Update:11:25 am ET

Society|Tue, Nov. 13 2007 02:05 PM EST

Huckabee Rakes in Major Christian Endorsements

By Jennifer Riley|Christian Post Reporter

Underdog presidential candidate Mike Huckabee is rising yet again as his campaign receives a huge boost from a line-up of influential Christian conservative leaders.

The former Arkansas governor turned presidential candidate announced Sunday the addition of several new endorsements including those from Stephen Strang, founder of Charisma Magazine; Rick Scarborough, president and founder of Vision America; Janet Folger, president of Faith2Action; Mathew Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel; and Phil Burress, president of Citizens for Community Values, among others.

“To have the support of these leaders of faith means so much to me,” Huckabee said in a statement. “I have the greatest level of respect for each person – and I know they will be vital in helping me spread my conservative message of hope and my vision for a stronger America.”

In recent weeks, Huckabee has made headlines as his campaign continues to see greater enthusiasm for his candidacy and as he continues to rise in national polls.

The Rev. Dr. Donald E. Wildmon, founder and chairman of the American Family Association, and Chuck Norris, the martial arts superstar and conservative columnist, have also given their personal endorsement to the former Southern Baptist preacher.
\
“The reason you are starting to see everyone coalesce around Mike is that he doesn’t just talk about conservative issues, he breathes them and has a passion for them,” said Kelly Shackelford, who serves as chief counsel of Liberty Legal Institute and president of Free Market Foundation. Shackelford also made the decision recently to endorse Huckabee.

“He speaks the truth with an honesty and grace that no other candidate can match in either party,” she said.

Dr. James C. Dobson of Focus of the Family, meanwhile, has made it clear that he is “not on the verge of endorsing anyone,” including Huckabee. Dobson said Monday that he personally knows and likes Huckabee, but denied reports claiming he planned to endorse the Republican presidential contender in the next few days.

“I’m telling you, it’s not true and never has been,” said Dobson on Focus on the Family broadcast on Monday. “I may eventually endorse somebody, but if I do, it won’t be done here on Focus on the Family. It will be done as a private individual and, more than likely, it will be later in the campaign when the situation has clarified itself.”

He further noted that he has never endorsed a candidate in a primary.

“I’m watching these people very carefully. I’m seeing how they hold up in a presidential campaign," he said. "That’s a difficult road out there, and weaknesses begin to fall out, and people say stupid things. They reveal untenable positions, and I’m not going to go put my name on somebody at this stage before I see how they’re going to handle that. So I’m not on the verge of endorsing anyone.”

Yet Dobson clearly stated that one thing is certain: His vote will always be a vote for life.

Huckabee has been praised by Stephen Strang – named by Time magazine as one of the “Top 25 Evangelicals in America” in 2005 – for being a “true conservative.”

“He is a true conservative who holds values common to most Americans. Governor Huckabee is a strong, Bible-believing candidate who articulates our values as well as any politician in my lifetime.”

In October, Huckabee came in second narrowly behind former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney at the Washington Values Voter Summit and had a surprising strong second-place finish in August at the Iowa straw poll.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:55 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I like Mike!

    Mitt Romney debated against Ted Kennedy over which of them was more liberal,
    "I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country. I have since the time my mom took that position when she ran in 1970 as a US senate candidate ...and you will not see me wavering on that"
    Mitt's mom ran as a pro-choice Republican in 1970.

  • Tue Nov 20, 2007 10:26 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    Well, after doing some research on Mike Huckabee... I am not longer a supporter of his... the amount of corruption and greed while he was governor is inexcusable. You can read it here... this is not the first time I have read this about him, just another nail in the coffin.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-goldberg20nov20,0,7086270.column?coll=la-home-commentary

  • Tue Nov 20, 2007 6:18 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    In fairness to Ron Paul, he also recognizes it:

    http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul244.html

  • Tue Nov 20, 2007 6:16 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I don't mind Huckabee, his campaign manager is Catholic as are many top advisers. I think religious conservatives have to stick together. As Catholics we should remember that it was Ronald Reagan who established ties with the Vatican and had an excellent relationship with the Pope.

    As Ronald Reagan's son clearly states: We need a strong western leader:

    http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=17178

  • Tue Nov 20, 2007 3:13 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    HUCKABEE IS THE ONLY PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE FIT FOR AMERICA. We must vote for change or a change. Give a Buck 4 Huck! Why?

    Both Guiliani, Romney, Thompson are members of the Mason Cult. Therefore, they support the one world government agenda. The masons and their members are trying to cherry pick the next republican nominee. That's why most people who reach the presidency belong to the masons or one of their off-shoot collegiate mason organizations (skull & bones). It makes you wonder...how long has it been since the American citizens truely had a say in picking an american president without masonic influences. I assure you, it is no accident that just about all our presidents belong to the masons. It didn't matter who we voted for in the last election. Do you know why? Both John Kerry and George Bush are members of the same secret society (skull & bones). Hillary and Obama are both masons as well. Ulimately masonic leaders do not care which party is elected. Just as long as their candidate is mason because they will carry out a masonic agenda. And just what is that agenda? Check out this link below.

    http://evolutionfacts.townhall.com

  • Sun Nov 18, 2007 1:31 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    Yes, Ron Paul is pro-life and has some great ideas to reform government; but everytime I hear him he does not seem to be a strong communicator nor does he demonstrate a great command over the issues.

    http://evolutionfacts.townhall.com

  • Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:07 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Please consider Pro-Life Republican Ron Paul: www.ronpaul2008.com/issues

  • Sat Nov 17, 2007 9:57 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

    I’m sorry I missed this one!

    I have to disagree with zeno and Golden Eagle. This country is temporary, Jesus Christ is forever. If you vote for a candidate that supports abortion, you have bloody hands, just as Pilot did. Your job as Christians is to have a clear conscious toward God and man. That is vote for the candidate we know is right, even if it is for a third party and let Hillary win, knowing that where the darkness abounds the light much more abounds. God does not need us to try and uphold what is less evil. lewr2 is right. Voting for the less evil is like drinking out of one of two cups of sewage water; the one with the less will still get you sick at a minimum and may kill you!

  • Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:19 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    I agree with zeno.We must not let Hillary ruin this great country.We have been put here "for such a time as this".Please do not sit at home while Hillary's liberal supporters run out to vote for her.Please don't!!!!!!!!

  • Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:36 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 3

    lewr2,

    Let me spell it out for you and everyone else. Our country may not ever rebound from having a Marxist as President, ever. Hillary and Obama are both Marxists. If you all do not know what a Marxist is, then I suggest studying up on it and then take a long, hard look at both of them and their history.

    Any, and I repeat, any Republican running for President is beyond a shadow of a doubt, better for this country then these two people on the Democratic ticket. If you value your freedom, and your right to Worship and Preach, lower taxes then you will vote.

  • Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:01 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    Voting the lesser of two evils.... still get you evil! A vote for Guiliani is a wasted vote. Unless of course, you endorse abortion on demand and other issues xains shouldn't be voting for.

  • Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:51 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    If the report by Time is to be believed and Mike is standing beside Ken Copeland in this scandal (with finances)... I think I will have to pass... 'if' it is true...

  • BobC »
    Wed Nov 14, 2007 8:29 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 5

    “He is a true conservative who holds values common to most Americans. Governor Huckabee is a strong, Bible-believing candidate who articulates our values as well as any politician in my lifetime."

    Those values include denying scientific facts that conflict with the Bible, and this is why Huckabee is not qualified to be president. We don't need another anti-science president.

  • BobC »
    Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:19 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 5

    "If Giuliani or hilari are the candidates, I don't consider nessesary to vote. The conservatives wouldn't be represented."

    What's a conservative? Somebody like Barry Goldwater who respected our wall of separation between church and state? Or somebody like the preacher Huckabee who would attack science education every chance he got? Huckabee is one of the 3 know-nothing Republicans who announced to the world they prefer supernatural magic instead of science. Is this kind of person who is going to respect our wall of separation? I doubt it. The last thing this country needs is a preacher man president. This is a country of many religions and many millions of atheists. Having a Christian preacher leading this country is out of the question.

  • Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:11 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    rsolanet,

    If Giuliani is the person selected for the Republican party, I will vote for him, even though it may be in vain. We must choose the lesser of evils if necessary. I for one am all for Thompson or Mike H. to win... they each have their strengths and weaknesses.

    The Republican party has not a chance if Rudy is chosen against Hillary... they are too much alike.

  • Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:59 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

    If Giuliani or hilari are the candidates, I don't consider nessesary to vote. The conservatives wouldn't be represented.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links