Updated 04:40 pm.EST, Sat November 21, 2009

Church|Wed, Nov. 14 2007 11:47 AM EST

Bitter Church Property Dispute Goes to Trial

By Lillian Kwon|Christian Post Reporter

A trial involving 11 former Episcopal congregations began Tuesday in a bitter battle over tens of millions of dollars of church property. It is reported to be the largest property dispute in the history of The Episcopal Church.

  • EPISCOPALIAN SPLIT
    (Photo: AP Images / Jacquelyn Martin, File)
    John Yates, rector of The Falls Church, front, sits with other church leaders in the church's historic chapel in Falls Church, Va., on Nov. 29, 2006. The Falls Church, one of two of the most prominent Episcopal parishes in Virginia voted overwhelmingly Sunday, Dec. 17, 2006 to leave The Episcopal Church and join fellow Anglican conservatives forming a rival denomination in the United States.

Almost a year after the majority of congregants in 15 Virginia churches voted to leave the U.S.-based church body, the battle over the control of church property has gone to the Fairfax County Circuit Court, where a judge will hear evidence during a two-week trial. Only 11 breakaway congregations are involved in the litigation.

The churches severed ties from The Episcopal Church – the U.S. branch of Anglicanism – citing the denomination's departure from Scripture and Christian orthodoxy. After the split, the Episcopal Diocese of Virginia, and soon thereafter The Episcopal Church, filed suits against the churches and individuals to reclaim the multi-million dollar church properties.

"The Episcopal Church has continually walked away from the scriptural foundation of the Anglican Communion," said Jim Oakes, vice-chairman of the Anglican District of Virginia, an association of Anglican congregations in Virginia and a part of the conservative Convocation of Anglicans in North America (CANA). "When we objected, they chose intimidation through lawsuits as their solution."

Breakaway Anglicans have asked and continue to ask for the withdrawal of the lawsuits, which Oakes has called "unseemly."

"We did not choose this path," Oakes stated. "Even today, our churches remain open to negotiating a reasonable solution with The Episcopal Church and the Diocese. The legal proceedings have been an unfortunate distraction from all the good work our churches are doing to advance the mission of Christ."

Conservative Anglicans in Virginia are joined by traditionalists nationwide who are discontent with the liberal direction of The Episcopal Church. The U.S. Anglican arm widened rifts in 2003 when it consecrated its first openly gay bishop. Breakaway Anglicans only make up a minority in the wider church body, and members of the 15 Virginia congregations that left represent about 7 percent of the Diocese of Virginia, according to The Washington Post.

But the minority is supported by conservatives overseas who dominate in Africa and Asia.

This month's trial is the first of two trials and is meant to determine whether a "division" has occurred in The Episcopal Church. The breakaway congregants had filed court documents after their split citing a Virginia law from the Civil War era that allows congregations that have divided to vote on where they wish to affiliate. They argue that there is a division in the global Anglican Communion.

"The division has led more than half of the provinces of the Anglican Communion to announce a severance of relations with [The Episcopal Church] and has prompted a substantial number of congregations in the United States to disaffiliate from [The Episcopal Church] and their dioceses," the conservative Anglicans say in court filings.

Oakes says they have a strong case "legally and ethically."

Meanwhile, the Virginia diocese is arguing that there was no division. Rather, individuals discontent with the national church chose to leave. Also, the diocese and The Episcopal Church say that the denomination is hierarchical and "division" can only happen if there is a vote of its governing body. With no formal division recognized by the Episcopal hierarchy, Episcopal leaders argue that the state law does not apply in this case.

Conservatives, however, argue that it was the national church that "left" by letting stand the controversial 2003 consecration. The national church "has willfully torn the fabric of the communion at the deepest level," attorney Steffen N. Johnson said Tuesday in his opening argument, according to The Washington Post.

The trial is scheduled for six days and Fairfax Circuit Court Judge Randy I. Bellows has said he will rule on this case next month. A second trial will be held on the lawsuits filed by the diocese and The Episcopal Church. The suits ask the Circuit Court to declare the diocese the rightful owner of all the property.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Lex »
    Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:11 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    It's things like this that make the Church look bad to the rest of the world.

  • Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:43 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

    It doesn't matter which side is right. It shouldn't go to court.

    1 Cor 6:1-7
    1 If any of you has a dispute with another, dare he take it before the ungodly for judgment instead of before the saints? 2 Do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases? 3 Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life! 4 Therefore, if you have disputes about such matters, appoint as judges even men of little account in the church! 5 I say this to shame you. Is it possible that there is nobody among you wise enough to judge a dispute between believers? 6 But instead, one brother goes to law against another—and this in front of unbelievers! 7 The very fact that you have lawsuits among you means you have been completely defeated already. Why not rather be wronged? Why not rather be cheated? 8Instead, you yourselves cheat and do wrong, and you do this to your brothers.

  • Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:30 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 4

    Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven (Lk 6:37-38). Curious BOC560 since you are making such a sweeping an unqualified judgment on my church what your affiliation is? How dare you say they don't represent Jesus.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Church Fundraisers
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Church
  • Gifts
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Bethany House Publishers

It was a balmy California evening. I had gone for a jog before I was to speak at a leadership conference. I still can't recall how I got there, but I found myself sitting on a curb

Featured Advertiser Links