Members:Log In Not Registered? Register Now.

Why Turkeys Should Thank Atheists

[-] Text [+]

Given the recent wild popularity of books that have been touting the benefits of atheism, one might wonder if an overpopulation of turkeys is going to be our next environmental crisis.

Say again? What’s the link? According to Gallup surveys, every year one out of every eight Americans either plan a non-traditional Thanksgiving or do not observe the holiday at all. Who are those least likely to head over the river and through the woods to gather for the annual family feast? Atheists. These polls report that people who have no religious preference or who never attend church services are more than twice as likely to skip the traditional thanksgiving observance compared to those with stronger ties to religion and religious communities. Over a century ago, poet and painter Dante Rossetti said “the worst moment in the life of an atheist is when he or she feels thankful and has no one to thank.” On the other hand, gratitude and thanksgiving are concepts that are very much at home in religious discourse.

But is it true that atheists have no one to thank? The rejection of God need not mean the rejection of Thanksgiving, and the attitude upon which it is based, gratitude. Although there may be no atheists in foxholes, surely there can be atheists at the Thanksgiving table. Why can’t they use their annual Thanksgiving dinner as a brief occasion to pause and remember to be thankful for family, friends, and food? They may have to work a little harder at being thankful. Scientists studying the cognitive basis of religious belief and non-belief contend that atheism does not come naturally, but rather flourishes under certain environmental circumstances (urbanization, post-modernism, and technologies that sever the link between moral behavior and material consequences). Conversely, according to this cognitive science perspective, belief comes naturally. We are born to believe. From early in life, the tendency to see the world as purposefully designed and to detect signs of supernatural agency appears to be built into our psychological architecture. It takes extraordinary means (e.g. communist regimes) to strip people of this natural tendency to believe in God.

If these scientists are correct, then, it is easy to understand why people would believe that the good things that they have in life—those blessings that they are grateful for—were intentionally given to them for their benefit. Our mental tools support such an inferential process. It would be far more unnatural to see these blessings as randomly occurring, or attribute them to luck or fate, or solely to human intervention. This being the case, gratitude is a nearly inevitable outcome of how our mind works. When the blessings that we have cannot be attributed to human benevolence, attributions to God’s goodness become all the more likely. Therefore, people are more likely to sense a divine hand in cherished experiences that cannot easily be attributed to human effort—the birth of a child, a miraculous recovery from illness, the restoration of an estranged relationship—for which gratitude to God—and the Thanksgiving celebration are apt responses.

The culture wars between atheists and believers show no signs of cooling off. Atheists are offended when believers give credit to God for good fortune in their lives, erroneously assuming this means they are not giving credit to those who are truly deserving of their thanks. Believers, on the other hand, assume that atheists are miserable and lonely because they have no one to thank. Perhaps each side can pause gratefully on this Thanksgiving to give thanks, each in their own way. Gratitude is one of the building blocks of civil and humane society, and surely civility and humanity are gifts we can give each other this holiday season.
________________________________________________

Robert A. Emmons is Professor of Psychology at the University of California, Davis and author of Thanks! How the New Science of Gratitude Can Make You Happier (2007, Houghton-Mifflin).

Most recent comments
  • Wed Nov 28, 2007 5:18 am : 0 : 0 Flag

    http://evolutionfacts.blogspot.com

  • Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:20 pm : 0 : 0 Flag

    Steveh20,.....Seems everyone with a different experience with "Reality" depending on their personal lives,...because everyone is like a "fingerprint" or "Snow-flake" in the L--ds creation,...while two may seem somewhat alike,......they maybe the furthest different that one could imagine,....And in like,.....somes faith may be a breeze or seem like a breeze and some is just like leading a horse to water,.....I`m no expert on this subject,..I just read alot,.......

  • Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:03 pm : 0 : 0 Flag

    Dear da6383ma, there is an interesting thought in your post that applies to all belief. Do we believe something because it is sometimes hard to (i.e we have to put in effort) or because it is easy, in the Christian context, if it is easy (or easier) then could it always be considered faith, that being hope in things unseen. Regards, Steve

  • Sun Nov 25, 2007 6:18 am : 0 : 0 Flag

    Just like former Atheist Lee Strobel said at the end of his DVD " A Case for Christ" with all the evidence he had accumulated in his extensive study and research and interviewing Apologetics ,..etc.,..etc....He would have to put more effort into his "faith" in Atheisism than just believing in Christ , G-d,....And Intellignt universal design......Pretty good DVD by the way......

  • Sat Nov 24, 2007 11:54 pm : 0 : 0 Flag

    And yet my experience in England (not a communist country) is that my friends who do not believe in God are not forcing a belief upon themslves. Talking to them they have come to their opinoin through observation of the world about themselves, a realistic evaluation of their lives, they fully understand the moral consequences of their actions etc...They fly in the face of this study. How do we explain them. Steve

  • Sat Nov 24, 2007 6:32 pm : 0 : 0 Flag

    That is extremely eye opening!
    "Scientists studying the cognitive basis of religious belief and non-belief contend that atheism does not come naturally, but rather flourishes under certain environmental circumstances (urbanization, post-modernism, and technologies that sever the link between moral behavior and material consequences). Conversely, according to this cognitive science perspective, belief comes naturally. We are born to believe. From early in life, the tendency to see the world as purposefully designed and to detect signs of supernatural agency appears to be built into our psychological architecture. It takes extraordinary means (e.g. communist regimes) to strip people of this natural tendency to believe in God."
    So, believing in God is natural, but not believing takes work.

  • Sat Nov 24, 2007 12:02 pm : 0 : 0 Flag

    One outta Eight Americans you say?!,.....if that ain`t scarier than "Friday the 13th",..and all the sequels I can`t personally imagine (Personal opinion) to think what might be.....

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging abusive, spam, offensive, illegal, racist or libelous posts.

Comment on this story

Submit

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

Submit Related NEWS TIPS & PHOTOS
Most Popular