Advanced Search

Emerging Pastor to Young Believers: Ask Anything

By
Christian Post Reporter
Mon, Dec. 17 2007 06:33 PM ET
[-]Text[+]
E-mail Print RSS More on Topic AddThis Button

Emerging pastors who cater their ministries to young people and those traditionally not found in the pews have opened the pulpit to questions boggling young believers today.

At Mars Hill Church in Seattle, congregants are itching to address the controversial regulative principle.

"Do you believe that the Scripture not only regulates our theology but also our methodology? In other words, do you believe in the regulative principle? If so, to what degree? If not, why not?"

Mars Hill founding pastor Mark Driscoll opened the "Ask Anything" floor in October, encouraging congregants to submit any questions they wanted addressed in next year as part of a sermon series.

Over 893 questions were asked on the church's website and over 300,000 votes were cast to narrow the list down to the top nine questions. Each member was allowed up to 10 votes per day.

Over 25,000 votes went to the regulative principle, making it the number one question, according to a final tally. The controversial principle is a teaching shared by Calvinists that says whatever is not specifically set out by God in Sripture should not be included in worship services. Proponents of the principle have appealed to it to bar the use of contemporary praise songs in public worship and to eliminate musical intruments.

Praise at Mars Hill is led by an indie rock worship band which projects music from speakers to a crowd of mostly 20-somethings.

The second most popular question asked by Mars Hill attendants was: "What can traditional/established churches learn from 'emerging' churches?"

The megachurch has grown to about 6,000 people on six different campuses, appealing to young people as a technologically savvy and culturally relevant church. But beyond the cultural attraction, many have been drawn by the church's conservative theology.

"We take the Bible as literally true," Driscoll has said to The Associated Press. "If the Bible doesn't forbid something, we believe there's a lot of freedom in cultural issues."

On issues that the Bible does speak against, such as sex before marriage and homosexuality, the church leaves no room for wavering on the biblical stance.

Driscoll's "Ask Anything" sermon series, slated to begin in January 2008, comes after popular emerging church Vintage Faith in Santa Cruz, Calif., concluded its series on questions churchgoers were wrestling with. A church survey found many Vintage Faith attendants were struggling with problematic Bible passages or "ones which seem really crazy reading them," said lead pastor Dan Kimball. The "Hot Theology" sermon series at Vintage Faith wrapped up last month with a long message on hell - what is hell and would a loving God send people to hell?

The preaching to questions posed by young believers comes at a time when Christians are increasingly addressing the failure of churches and seminaries to equip believers with the truth and how they can defend their faith. In a culture where truth is relative, more Americans are abandoning a traditional view of God and the Bible, according to The Barna Group, with only nine percent of the "born again" population holding a biblical worldview.

Focus on the Family launched The Truth Project last year to introduce believers to the Truth claims of Christ and tackle the pervasive problem ill-equipped Christians. Also, more Christian authors and leaders have published books answering some of the most common questions both believers and nonbelievers have about God and Christianity.

Driscoll of Mars Hill Church is slated to release Vintage Jesus: Timeless Answers to Timely Questions in February 2008, taking readers on a theological journey chasing Jesus through Scripture and pop culture. Some questions addressed include "Is Jesus the only God?" and "What will Jesus do upon His return?"

Mars Hill continues to thrive in a region considered the most "unchurched" in the country. Outreach magazine ranked Mars Hill second in its 2007 list of the top 25 multiplying churches in America.

The other top seven questions to be addressed from the Mars Hill pulpit:

No. 3: How does a Christian date righteously; and what are the physical, emotional, and mentally connecting boundaries a Christian must set while developing an intimate relationship prior to marriage?

No. 4: If salvation is by faith alone (Romans 3:28), then why are there so many verses that say or imply the opposite, namely that salvation is by works (James 2:24, Matthew 6:15 & 7:21, Galatians 5:19-21)

No. 5: How should Christian men and women go about breaking free from the bondage of sexual sin?

No. 6: Of all the things you teach, what parts of Christianity do you still wrestle with? What's hardest for you to believe?

No. 7: Why does an all loving, all knowing, and all sovereign God will into creation people He foreknows will suffer eternal condemnation? Why does Romans 9:20 feel like a cop-out answer?

No. 8: Why do you make jokes about mormon missionaries, homosexuals, trenchcoats wearers, single men, vegans, emo kids and then expect these groups to come to know God in the same sermon?

No. 9: There's no doubt the Bible says children are a blessing, but the Bible doesn't seem to address the specific topic of birth control. Is this a black and white topic, or does it fall under liberties?

BACK TO TOP Print E-mail More on Topic AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

Most recent comments
Chris333
  • Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:39 am
  • : 2
  • : 0
  • Flag
why does asking for dna evidence have to be the most ironic thing said on this post? Only an atheist would even suggest something so stupid. Faith and reality are either the same or different. That goes for atheists too, either their faith in a negative is in accordance with reality or not. It is no more ironic to ask a mormon for dna evidence, than it is someone to ask an atheist for evidence that God does not exist (in fact I would say the later is by far much more ridiculous)
Chris333
  • Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:36 am
  • : 2
  • : 0
  • Flag
Merkin, you said: "You are holding a double standard. You accept the authority of the Bible on faith. There is no evidence that any of the major claims in either Testament are true. Sure you can find some tedious examples of historically accurate details if you look for them, but that hardly redeems the rest of the wildly extravagant stories. Presumably you literally believe the absurd story of Noah's ark to be historically accurate? Sorry, but that is at least as silly as anything in the book of Mormon. "

Merkin, you've got to be joking. Seriously, it is basically a joke to say what you just did. I am not going to speak for the book of Mormon, it has some serious answering to do about a lot of historical inaccuracies, but the Bible is not comparable. The New Testament alone is the most, by far, corroborated peice of historical writing from ancient times. If you deny the NT, you might as well throw out all of history before Christ and after for over 600 years, because nothing comes close to the NT's accuracy and corroborative evidence (check out "Evidence that Demands a Verdict" by Josh McDowell) Then the Old Testament is also extremely historically accurate. Examples are the Hittites, the wall of Jericho, the exactness of the names of kings given at the right time period, and so on. I would hardly call these insignificant or "tedious" examples. As far as the story of the flood, it is historically plausible, if not probable that a flood of epic proportions did occur, it is no coincidence that every major world culture from the Americas to China has an ancient flood story. Anyway, comparing the book of Mormon to the Bible is like comparing apples to tomatoes. They are both red on the outside, and classified as fruits, but the rest is completely different.
jesus4me
  • Tue Jan 01, 2008 11:19 pm
  • : 4
  • : 0
  • Flag
Merkin wrote:

"Presumably you literally believe the absurd story of Noah's ark to be historically accurate? Sorry, but that is at least as silly as anything in the book of Mormon. "

Merkin, yes I believe in the biblical account of Noah, and there's more scientific, historical, and archaelogical proof to prove a Flood in the Book of Genesis, a young earth, and a literal Creation by God, than there is in an evolutionist finding a monkey jaw bone, drawing a picture around it, calling her "Dolly" and charging the federal government millions to show unsubstansiated bluff to our school kids paid for by our hard earned tax payer money, and to top off THE MOST ABSURDLY IRONIC PIECE OF INFORMATION IN THE HISTORY OF THE HUMAN RACE STATING THAT MAN EVOLVED FROM A MONKEY. Evolution at best is a theory; it can't even be backed up by biology. And before you go off and say that true scientists aren't Christians, or can't be Christians, I would like for you to read up on the story of history's most respected scie4ntists - Isaac Newton. So indeed the Scriptures are so wise in pointing out that the fool has said in his heart "there is no God". There you go, the Bible itself says that stheism is foolish.
merkin
  • Mon Dec 31, 2007 8:53 pm
  • : 0
  • : 3
  • Flag
And seriously dude, now you're demanding that the Mormon's beliefs be corroborated with DNA evidence?? That has got to be THE MOST ironic piece of reasoning posted on this site to date.
merkin
  • Mon Dec 31, 2007 8:47 pm
  • : 0
  • : 3
  • Flag
jesus4me,

You are holding a double standard. You accept the authority of the Bible on faith. There is no evidence that any of the major claims in either Testament are true. Sure you can find some tedious examples of historically accurate details if you look for them, but that hardly redeems the rest of the wildly extravagant stories. Presumably you literally believe the absurd story of Noah's ark to be historically accurate? Sorry, but that is at least as silly as anything in the book of Mormon.
jesus4me
  • Mon Dec 31, 2007 6:35 pm
  • : 5
  • : 0
  • Flag
jimb, I never refuted the existence of the Mayan's, or the Aztecs. YOu seem to be reading only what you want to read. I asked you to prove where there is DNA evidence to suggest the popular mormon teaching that the indian people groups in the America's have a link to the 12 tribes of Judah. And, please do not dodge this portion of my question. The Mormons celebrate great battles of people groups never heard of in history. Please name those people groups by name as well as the battles waged. Don't dodge my question. The people groups I am refering to are made up of other people groups; not the Mayans, or Inca's, as the mormo's teach. Also, what do you have to say about the mormon teaching that says that white people are superior to blacks; or that Jesus is Lucifer's brother? Do you want me to bring up proof of these heresy's? If not, please expose them yourself, because they are being taught, and Bringman Young University and other's in the Mormon faith have failed to answer many of these questions adequately. Although, i think you won't be able to expose them without exposing your own beliefs in which you have been drawn into believing that go contrary to the Bible, and Sound Biblical Doctrine.

Merkin, I am a BIble Believing Born again Christian who believes that both the Old Testament and the New Testament Scriptures are the God Inspired Infallible Absolute Truth of God. To add to it or take away from it is heresy. We do not need a companion book to teach us how to live apart from biblical teachings. As for your presumption or subtle accusations about my faith: YOU CANNOT REFUTE THAT All THE PEOPLE GROUPS IN THE OLD AS WELL AS NEW TESTAMENT HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE TRUE AND EXISTING AT ONE TIME OR ANOTHER IN HISTORY. MANY HAVE BEEN FOUND UNDER ARCHAELOGICAL FINDINGS. FURTHERMORE, THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS PROVE THAT THE OLD TESTAMET BOOK OF ISAIAH WAS WRITTEN WHEN IT WAS WRITTEN. So you did nothing to make me feel as if I had no idea of what i was talking about, because I do know what i'm talking about, and can stand on the firm truth of God's Word for my beliefs.
As for Jimb, would you like to expound as well on the extrabiblical teachings of the mormon church as related to the Book of Genesis and Adam, as wel as your beliefs that Jesus Christ was married? Please expound on those heresies and humor me some more with your dodgings of direct questions.

By the way, Happy New Year Everyone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
zenodaddy
  • Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:57 pm
  • : 3
  • : 0
  • Flag
‘The Bible is true, inasmuch as it is translated correctly.’

In that case, what translations do you agree with and is this according to your own personal convictions?

‘The Book of Mormon is also true.’

If the Bible is true, and the Book of Mormon is also true, then what about the Quran? Is that also true?

‘The fullness of the gospel has been restored.’

When was it never complete? Before the Book of Mormon?

‘We seek to make bad men good and good men better.’

You see, this is where Christianity differs from all other religions. We know that no man or woman is ‘good’ apart from Jesus Christ. You state that ya’ll seek to make bad men good and good men better… but I ask you, ‘How is this possible’? How can ya’ll make anyone better at anything?

‘I support other Christians in their pursuit of right, as they try to live their faith.’

I support Christians pursuing The Truth, not their pursuit and possible corruption to obtain that Truth. To be a Christian and then to say that the Book of Mormon is correct is blasphemy. This is not a hard issue to understand.

Are Mormons Christians? The answer is NO. Now lets move on.
jimb
  • Sun Dec 30, 2007 11:36 pm
  • : 0
  • : 2
  • Flag
Another important point which I neglected. I do not seek to tear down another's faith. I seek to build on it. The Bible is true, inasmuch as it is translated correctly. The Book of Mormon is also true. Other churches have many things right, but those things can be built on and error can be dispelled. The fulness of the gospel has been restored. We seek to make bad men good and good men better. I support other Christians in their pusuit of right, as they try to live their faith.
merkin
  • Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:10 pm
  • : 0
  • : 3
  • Flag
jimb writes, "...Archeology is constantly being disproven. It is not a good source for evidence on which to base your faith."

Yes, there is much to be discovered in all this dirt. And the story that's being pieced together will necessarily continue to change. Personally, I don't understand how anybody could be content to say they've got all the answers — and the answers were all written down long ago in a book...that's faith, I know. But if you've already got the answers, why even try to compare notes with the scientists? Intelligent design "theory", for example, looks awfully like a project built on shaken faith. Anyway, my point is that trying to justify your faith with empirical evidence is self-defeating — the whole enterprise of faith requires that there be no evidence, right?
jimb
  • Sun Dec 30, 2007 8:27 pm
  • : 0
  • : 3
  • Flag
Oh, and one other thing. About that Bering Straits theory. The cover story of Newsweek, April 26, 1999, presents a host of findings that dispute that the primary ancestors of the American Indians came by that route, although some may have. Newsweek is not a Mormon magazine. The article, "The First Americans," compiles archeological information that points toward western Asia and/or Europe for sources from where most of the ancient Americans came. Of course, archeology is constantly being disproven. It is not a good source for evidence on which to base your faith.
Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging Abusive, Spam, Offensive, Illegal, Racist or Libellous Posts.

Comment on this story

ID Password
Submit Don't have a Christian Post ID?Signing up is easy. Click Here