Advanced Search

Creation College Seeks Texas’ Approval to Train Science Teachers

By
Christian Post Reporter
Wed, Dec. 19 2007 07:10 AM ET
[-]Text[+]
E-mail Print RSS More on Topic AddThis Button

A Christian research institute is seeking approval from the state of Texas to train science teachers through its online graduate degree program.

The Institute for Creation Research, which teaches from a literal biblical worldview, in Dallas scored the recommendation of a state advisory committee last Friday. It is now waiting for the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to make a final decision next month on whether to issue a certificate of authority, which would give the institute two years to obtain accreditation.

While the institute’s degree programs in California are recognized by the Transnational Association of Christian Colleges and Schools, state approval would allow the nonprofit to seek accreditation from a regional recognized agency, most likely the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.

Most students who attend enroll in the master’s degree program in science education are teachers or aspiring teachers, according to Patricia Nason, who chairs the science education department.

While most of the institute’s students end up teaching at private Christian schools, Nason shared with the American Statesman, some may choose to teach in public schools – which their degrees would qualify them to do.

However, that possibility has some pro-evolution groups like the California-based National Center for Science Education concerned, especially as the institute’s request comes amid a debate on how evolution should be taught in Texas public schools.

"The danger is the miseducation of Texas students should these teachers end up in public schools," Eugenie Scott, the group’s executive director, told the American Statesman.

He said the institute teaches “distorted science,” reported the Dallas Morning News, and believes any student graduating from the master’s program “would not be competent” to teach in science classes.

The institute’s stated mission is to "research, educate and communicate Truth involving the study and promotion of scientific creationism, Biblical creationism, and related fields."

Despite the name the school carries and the shared views of the faculty, the issue at hand is whether the curriculum meets state standards of science education, according to Nason.

She said that the faculty uses "current literature in the sciences and also in science education," as reported by the American Statesman.

"The bottom line is we're teaching science and we're teaching teachers how to teach science," added Nason.

BACK TO TOP Print E-mail More on Topic AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

Most recent comments
www.theotrek.org
  • Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:35 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Evolution is science, investigating the operation of the material world.
ID is theology, looking for something beyond the material world (beyond the scope of science)
Faith/religion is about what lies beyond the natural/material world.

Once you cross the boundary into looking for supernatural agency, it ceases to be science. That is not to say that one's belief in the supernatural world must be incompatible with science. It means that that portion of investigation is outside the boundaries of scientific inquiry. This is the sphere in which the Catholic Church persecuted Galileo and Copernicus for going against scientific views which had been rolled into theology. It is also where people ignored medical advances based on the "biblical" presumption that illness was a spiritual issue, not physical. On the other end, when science tries to make claims about the supernatural, it is out of bounds.

Let science do its job. Let theology do its job. We get in trouble when we force one or the other beyond its limitations.
ifeelfine72
  • Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:22 pm
  • : 0
  • : 1
  • Flag
Chris333 - You have no clue what science is then if you equate it with faith. That is just the most ignorant statement you can make and it shows you lack even a basic understanding of what science even is.

Evolution is testable, it is repeatable. There is no belief necessary - you look at the evidence and it either supports it or it doesn't.
Chris333
  • Wed Dec 26, 2007 10:00 am
  • : 3
  • : 0
  • Flag
ifeelfine72, EVOLUTION IS A FAITH. =O) there is no way any scientist can prove that life randomly began all by itself. For that matter the idea that the complexity we see in life came about by random mutations is also faith driven, not science driven. You see what atheist scientists do is say, "well we know God doesn't exist, now lets see what other ways we can explain life that will support our views" Evolution is not repeatable, it is not testable in a labratory, people believe in it, because they believe that it fits reality (largely based upon their preconceived notions of what reality is). Nonetheless evolution is a faith system. We can choose to believe in it or disbelieve in it, it is not fact, it is a theory, a theory many would say is largely unsupported (and many others would say is).
maranatha7593
  • Tue Dec 25, 2007 11:20 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
I spent years of my life being indoctrinated in evolutionism. Thankfully, I could see that it didn't make sense, and didn't fall for it.
ifeelfine72
  • Tue Dec 25, 2007 8:22 pm
  • : 0
  • : 1
  • Flag
maranatha - I'm glad there are other options as well. Although in terms of grade school or high school education, I can't think of anything other than parochial schools, public schools, charter schools and home schooling.

As far as indoctrinization, nope nothing of the sort for evolution. It's a science, not a faith. Read about it sometime, you might learn something.
maranatha7593
  • Tue Dec 25, 2007 1:53 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
ifeelfine72, there are other options besides parochial schools and home education, and I am grateful for every option out there which precludes children from being indoctrinated by evolutionists. :-)

Merry CHRISTmas!
ProfessorX
  • Mon Dec 24, 2007 5:00 pm
  • : 1
  • : 0
  • Flag
Why is Darwinism and Atheism Unscientific and Mythical?

http://evolutionfacts.blogspot.com
wbmoore
  • Mon Dec 24, 2007 10:19 am
  • : 1
  • : 1
  • Flag
To teach that evolution is fact is to be intellectually dishonest. Neither evolution nor intelligent design can be scientifically proven. If we're being honest, both are theories which can not be proven. To scientifically prove something is to be able to repeat it. The creation of our planet can never be repeated, thus can not be proven.
ifeelfine72
  • Thu Dec 20, 2007 3:34 pm
  • : 1
  • : 4
  • Flag
Who is giving me a thumb's down for applauding maranatha's home schooled kids? There certainly are some petty Christians on this site.
rubinlueski
  • Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:45 pm
  • : 2
  • : 6
  • Flag
Another reason not to get edjamacated in texass
Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging Abusive, Spam, Offensive, Illegal, Racist or Libellous Posts.

Comment on this story

ID Password
Submit Don't have a Christian Post ID?Signing up is easy. Click Here