Updated 11:59 pm.EST, Sun November 22, 2009

Entertainment|Tue, Jan. 15 2008 12:11 PM EST

Vatican Slams Harry Potter as 'Wrong Kind of Hero'

By Katherine T. Phan|Christian Post Reporter

The Vatican offered its latest view on the good vs. evil debate over the immensely popular Harry Potter series in a recent edition of its newspaper, headlining an article by an expert in English literature who calls the teen wizard "the wrong kind of hero."

In the article, "The Double Face of Harry Potter," published by the Vatican's official newspaper L'Osservatore Romano this week, Edoardo Rialti writes about the harmful effects of the "half-truth" messages presented by JK Rowling in the Potter saga.

Rialti’s attack echoes the sentiment of Pope Benedict XVI, then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who voiced fears in 2003 that the "subtle seductions" contained in the Potter series could "corrupt the Christian faith" in impressionable young children.

Young Christian minds will "lose the spirit of discernment between good and evil and that they will not have the necessary strength and knowledge to withstand the temptations to evil," Ratzinger wrote in a March 2003 letter to German Catholic sociologist Gabriele Kuby, author of the book Harry Potter - Good or Evil.

Rialti writes that many have tried to establish a parallel between the "fantasy masterpieces" JR Tolkein's “Lord of the Rings” and CS Lewis “Narnia” books with the Potter series. He argues that other than "superficially apparent common points," there is nothing similar between them.

Harry Potter "transmits a vision of the world and the human being full of deep mistakes and dangerous suggestions, even more seductive since it is mixed with half-truths and compelling story-telling," describes Rialti.

The author recalls Tolkien's essays in which the fantasy writer said "fables can depart from the physical world and the universe created, but not from the moral order." The fables can present "a universe illuminated by a green sun" but should not positively portray "a reality in which the moral and spiritual structure are inverted or confused, a world in which evil is good," wrote Tolkien.

But that is exactly what happens in Harry Potter, Rialti points out.

"Despite several positive values that can be found in the story, at the foundations of this tale is the proposal that of witchcraft as positive, the violent manipulation of things and people thanks to the knowledge of the occult, an advantage of a select few: the ends justify the means because the knowledgeable, the chosen ones, the intellectuals know how to control the dark powers and turn them into good."

"This is a grave and deep lie, because it is the old Gnostic temptation of confusing salvation and truth with a secret knowledge," he adds.

The fables by Tolkien and Lewis, the article continues, describe the "rejection of magic and power" and offer "grave and destructive consequences" for those who are seduced by magic.

In contrast, Rowling's story shows a disregard for the "muggles," the humans in the story who do not possess magic, Rialti observes.

"There is nothing more antithetical to Harry Potter than Tolkien's young Frodo or Lewis' Pevensie siblings."

Tolkien and Lewis portray "the extraordinary discovery of true Christianity, for which the main character of history is not an exceptional human being, like in the ancient paganism or in today's ideologies, but a person who says yes to the initiatives of God's mysteries."

In Rowling's stories "we are told that, at the end, some things are not bad in themselves, if used for a good purpose: violence becomes good, if in the right hands and [used by] the right people, and maybe in the right dose." Continue »

Pages: 12
Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:56 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Pope Benedict does against Rowling’s stories of HP, and Pope John II did support the Rowling.
    I am confused with Roman Catholic Church.

  • Sat Jan 19, 2008 2:42 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    MuggleBorn, yes, there was some agreement between your last paragraph and my post. Did you see the scripture reference I posted in my message below? (It's after the second point.)

    I wish we could edit our posts here; I had meant to add a line saying that, yes, that passage says Solomon was 'old' when he was aiding and abetting his foreign wives' idolatry (and God was *very* angry with him about that - never says he was a 'witch', though) - but I do believe he was even older when he wrote Ecclesiastes. He seems to have written that very close to the end of his life.

  • Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:44 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    maranatha7593,
    Alright, I'm having trouble finding the Solomon reference you provided. Do you have the Chap:Verse? If I don't get it, it's going to bug me all day, like trying to remember the name of that guy, who was in that movie, with that other woman, who dated that musician, that sponsored that event, that that model attended ... with Kevin Bacon.

  • Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:28 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    maranatha7593,
    Did YOU read the last paragraph of my last post? :^) It's like you JUST answered a question I didn't know how to phrase.

    I'm gonna go check out Ecclesiastes right now. Thanks again and God bless :^)

  • Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:27 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Though I am not Catholic, I am glad the Vatican is speaking out about this.

    ITA with these points from the article:

    the "subtle seductions" contained in the Potter series could "corrupt the Christian faith" in impressionable young children.

    Young Christian minds will "lose the spirit of discernment between good and evil and they will not have the necessary strength and knowledge to withstand the temptations to evil."

    It's the children I'm most concerned about. The Bible tells us not to call good evil or evil good. To use evil to fight evil is not possible in the real world and the acceptance of that myth sets children up for confusion.

  • Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:23 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    TUPRBABE, you left out important context in your comments about Solomon (though, to be honest, I can't see what Solomon has to do with HP)

    First of all, Solomon was never a practicing witch.

    Secondly, God was indeed very angry with Solomon's disobedience. (I Kings 11:9-11)

    Thirdly, Solomon did repent in his latter years for his disobedience in his younger years. See Ecclesiastes.

    Lastly, I've never known Solomon to be 'touted as a hero', except in the case where the Lord offered him anything he wanted, and he chose wisdom instead of riches, fame, etc. If Solomon had continued in that state of mind, he would have been a great king indeed.

  • Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:21 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    My faith was not affected by the Harry Potter books. I have to say, the stories were very interesting.

    However, if there is ANYONE whose faith is affected by the Harry Potter (or even the Da Vinci Code or the Golden Compass), I am willing to abstain myself from supporting it.

  • Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:18 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    I was going to sit this one out, but Strudelcookies pretty much summed it up for me. Yeah, HP is not the best role model, but I couldn't help but love the stories. (It's my dirty little secret). I'm completely cognitave of the problems with the series' moral ambiguity and relativism.

    But since the stories will be toted as literary behemoths for probably a long time to come, I just endevour to dig, twist, yank, or force the Christian allegories out of them. Wherever I can't do that, I have explanations ready for what characters could have done differently, or how I would have written them. I would have written the ending of Deathly Hallows much differently to provide Malfoy with repentance and redemption, at least (*cringing* ... don't hit me :^) with Harry, Hermione, and Ron's.

    I'm not planning on giving the books to my own son to read; Piers Anthony and Terry Brooks will be offered, but if he gets them himself, I at least have conversations ready.

    Incidentally, TUPRBABE, I agree with you on most of your points. I'm a little confused about Solomon ... I thought he was just whipped (having all those wives) and put their wishes over God's. And I don't remember ever hearing him being hailed as a hero in Sunday School (CCD for me).

  • Wed Jan 16, 2008 11:53 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Interesting article.

    There are some points I agree with, some not so much. I like Harry Potter...been there, done that, bought the t-shirt. Here's what I agree with:

    --The characters show disregard for the muggles--
    They do. The bad wizards are rotten to them, the good wizards have a patronizing attitude. (Mr. Weasley's "bless them".) Even the good wizards modify (erase) muggles' memories and have no problem with it. There are a lot of parts in the series where the author contradicts herself over the treatments of others. (It's not okay for the pure-bloods to be mean to the muggle-borns, but apparently if you're a muggle-born, being mean to the pure-bloods is a-okay. (Check out Ron's comment in the epilogue...so much for tolerance.)) Bad writing.

    --Harry uses violence for good.--
    This was worded vaguely, but I think what they mean is that Harry uses the "unforgivable" curses (clearly set forth in book 4 that NO good wizard would use) against the bad guys. He uses them like peanuts, too, pops them whenever he feels like it in books 6 and 7. It was contradictory. Where were the editors?

    --Harry is the wrong kind of hero.--
    Yup. No character arc. He's the same whiny, bland kid he was in book one.

    There's a lot of questions over the moral implications of HP; I think it's more a sign of bad, inconsistant writing that could have been fixed by the editor had none of them been afraid to touch her manuscripts after she got rich and famous. That being said, I think for the most part the HP books are funny and enjoyable.

    I don't agree that reading Harry Potter will make kids want to join the occult, not any more than kids who read "Narnia" will become Anglican or that people who watch "The Golden Compass" will hate Catholics for "indoctrinating" children. (Man, that movie was weird.) For me, it's just too absurd to be taken seriously. Why isn't this article going against really crazy books, like Kai Meyer's "Water Mirror", where the god wants to make a pact with Hell? Or Garth Nix's "Mr. Monday", where the creator the world has "left" the people to fend for themselves?

    For me, I see a lot more trouble with the unexplainably popular "Twilight" series, where the whiny brat main character wants to have sex with a vampire, "Fly on the wall" and other sick teen books that flaunt sex like peanuts than I have with Harry Potter. I think those are far more dangerous reads than reading about zapping things with a wand. Just my take.

  • Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:28 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    * sigh * This is probably going to fall on deaf ears...

    For the LAST TIME, people ... Harry Potter is NOT a Christian allegory, and was NEVER meant to be one. It is a story, PERIOD. Just like Aesop's fables (yet I don't see anyone getting bent out of shape because a scorpion stung a fox in the river - oh, but animals can't talk without MAGIC, so I guess maybe everyone SHOULD denounce Aesop as well).

    Harry Potter isn't here to teach morality. On the contrary, it documents morality as it stands now. If you don't like the current world, DO something about it ... other than sit back and whine incessantly about a fictional children's book. (Funny, I seem to recall something Jesus said about "Going and teaching ...", yet according to the "Church Decline" article, apparently the people making most of the Harry Potter fuss are too concerned with getting their own needs met than following Christ's example or commands.)

    And as for the quote: "In contrast, Rowling's story shows a disregard for the "muggles," the humans in the story who do not possess magic, Rialti observes." The witches and wizards who show disregard or disdain for Muggles are pretty much written as either DETACHED, IGNORANT or INSENSITIVE. On the other hand, those who care deeply about Muggles (i.e., Arthur Weasley) are shown to be KIND, INQUISITIVE and COMPASSIONATE. The fact that this was left out of the article suggests that, perhaps, the article's author has never read the books. I may be wrong about this author, and if so I apologize. I hope that I am wrong, since Proverbs 18:13 says those who speak without reading first are shameful fools.

    Quote: "In Rowling's stories 'we are told that, at the end, some things are not bad in themselves, if used for a good purpose: violence becomes good, if in the right hands and [used by] the right people, and maybe in the right dose.'" Yes, and the LORD commanded the Israelites to destroy every living being in the Promised Land, yet it was also for "a good purpose." Jael stuck a tent peg through Sisera's head while he slept in her tent (Judges 4) and was praised as a hero. Ehud plunged a sword into King Eglon's gut and ran away (Judges 3). There's plenty of "violence for good purpose" in the Bible as well.

    Or are we just going to gloss over all of this, the way many do with Solomon ... who eventually became a practicing WITCH and attempted murderer who never repented (1 Kings 11:4-8, 40), yet who is touted as a 'hero' in Sunday Schools to this day?

  • Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:41 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

    This article should be linked to the other one on the front page at the moment" Why churches are declining in America " it explains it all............

  • Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:40 pm Agree: 8   Disagree: 2

    At the risk of being branded a Christian "nit picker", I have to say that I totally agree that Harry Potter is most definitely the wrong kind of hero for impressionable children [and adults].

    In the bible, when Moses' staff turned into a serpent, and Elijah raised an axe blade from the bottom of the river supernaturally, the supernatural power came from God himself. In the Harry Potter series, the reader is left in no doubt whatsoever that any supernatural power used by any character was from a non-God source. And what source could that be, if not the devil himself, so devilishly concealed in broomsticks and stuff.

    On this particular issue, I prefer to throw in my lot with the "nit pickers"

  • Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:25 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 4

    Hey, Moses turned a staff into a snake. Must be a Hogwarts graduate! ;)

  • Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:51 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 6

    and we still sit and wonder why people view christians as they do. nit pick nit pick is all i can say

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Also on CP
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Gifts
  • Health
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Bethany House Publishers

The second book in the Seasons of Grace series will be available soon. The Missing is filled with mystery and family secrets, love and loss, heartbreak and healing — all wrapped

Featured Advertiser Links