Advanced Search

Abortion, Life Camps Step Up Election Efforts

By
Christian Post Reporter
Thu, Jan. 24 2008 01:15 PM ET
[-]Text[+]
E-mail Print RSS More on Topic AddThis Button

Many interest groups are stepping up their efforts to bring Americans to the polls by bringing the issue of abortion to the forefront in the presidential election.

On Tuesday, the 35th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, Planned Parenthood announced a campaign that plans to spend $10 million toward an effort to persuade one million people to vote for candidates who support abortion.

Cecile Richards, the organization's president, said the campaign is looking to rally particularly young, unmarried independent and Democratic women, reported the Wall Street Journal.

Chuck Donovan, executive vice president of the pro-life nonprofit Family Research Council (FRC) in Washington, D.C., however, disagreed that young voters would necessarily be the type to vote for pro-abortion candidates.

"There's some data suggesting that young people are actually more open to the life message," he told The Bulletin, noting that younger voters often tend to embrace the social "underdog."

"I think anybody trying to exploit [youthful liberalism] would have to be more careful with that dynamic because I think we have a more pro-life generation coming up," he added.

A study released Wednesday by FRC Action, the legislative arm for FRC, showed that a clear majority of voters would be less likely to support a candidate who proposes a national health care plan that includes universal abortion coverage. A majority of women aged 18-54 (51 percent) are less likely to support such candidates and women aged 55 or older (59 percent) are also less likely to vote for a candidate endorsing it.

Many pro-family and pro-life groups have also in recent weeks been rallying supporters to vote for candidates who support overturning Roe v. Wade. A majority have released voter guides that indicate a candidate's position on abortion and other issues. These groups have also encouraged churches and pastors to preach moral issues like abortion to their congregations.

American Family Association (AFA), a pro-family group with over 3 million supporters, released a voter guide and launched a new website, RepairingtheFoundations.com, to serve as a news resource for Christian leaders who want to address politics within the boundaries of the law.

Abortion could become the next big issue in the 2008 election because the next president is expected to have the opportunity to appoint two Supreme Court justices. Two of the oldest justices on the current Supreme Court are in favor of Roe. When President Bush took office, he appointed two anti-abortion justices to the high court.

However, the fate of Roe v. Wade may lie in the hands of the next president.

"If we get a pro-life Republican in the White House in 2008, the reality is it's very likely that you're going to get one vote and maybe two, given the actuarial tables," said Richard Land, president of the Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, according to the Baptist Press.

If Roe were overturned, Land predicts that when the issue returns to the states, "surely about 40 states will pass significant and restrictive" laws on abortion.

BACK TO TOP Print E-mail More on Topic AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

Most recent comments
SqueakyWheel
  • Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:26 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
D. Task #4: The pro-life pastor confronts his own fears over preaching inconvenient truth. Three examples:
1) Fear of distraction: Pastors sometimes ask, "Won't addressing abortion distract the church from the gospel?" This is a legitimate concern. Our preaching must always direct sinful human beings to the righteousness that God alone provides. The good news is that we can use the topic of abortion to point people to the very gospel they so desperately need. At the same time, we should remember that God's gospel is addressed to particular audience, human beings. But our attempts to communicate that gospel suffer when the very definition of what it means to be human is up for grabs. Indeed, it's hard to preach that man is a sinner, that man needs to repent, and that man can be saved only through Christ when nobody knows what a man is anymore.
2) Fear of driving people away who might otherwise hear the gospel. I dealt with this problem in my previous post on clergy and abortion, suffice to say that well-crafted pro-life talks suggest to unchurched people that the Christian worldview is reasonable to believe. When I gave a pro-life presentation at the University of North Carolina Law School, a young female professor responded (in front of her students): “I did not come to this event with the same pro-life views you hold. In fact, I came here today expecting an emotionally charged religious presentation. Instead, you gave one of the most compelling arguments I have ever heard. Thank you.” True, she didn’t fall on her knees and confess Christ on the spot. But now she’s begun wrestling with Biblical truth. To use a baseball example, you don’t have to hit a home run with every conversation. Sometimes just getting on base is enough. And you’ll certainly do just that whenever you clarify the moral logic of the pro-life view.
3) Fear of offending people with abortion-related content. It’s amazing how people will tolerate a strong pro-life presentation if you make your case graciously and incisively. Kindness goes a long way and often pays off with changed lives. Consider this email from 15 year-old Brittany, received after I spoke to an assembly of 1,000 high school students in Baltimore: (taken from Scott Klusendorf)
SqueakyWheel
  • Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:25 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
. Task #3: The pro-life pastor restores passion for ministry through cross-centered preaching. Millions of Christians have given up on a passionate pursuit of God-glorifying ministry because they feel disqualified by past sexual sins which may include abortion, fornication, pornography, etc. Ignoring these sins does not spare people guilt; it spares them healing. And we wonder why there is little passion for missions, evangelism, pro-life advocacy, and worship in our churches?
John Piper deals with the problem of past sexual sin and how believers can be freed from its clutches, but for now, the starting point for human healing is the gospel of Jesus Christ. That gospel teaches how a holy God designed a good world where the humans He made to worship Him and enjoy communion with Him forever willfully rebeled against their creator. Although these rebel humans deserved God’s almighty wrath, He held back His righteous judgment and sent Jesus to take the punishment they deserved. By God’s design, Jesus—the sinless one—was killed on a cross by the very people he came to save. Yet the story doesn’t end there. Three days later, God affirmed Christ’s sin-bearing sacrifice by raising Him from the dead. As a result of Christ’s sin-bearing work on their behalf, God’s people—all of them unworthy of anything but death if judged by their own merits—are declared justified by God the Father, who then adopts them as His own sons and daughters. Who, then, can bring a charge against God’s elect? Paul’s answer is clear: No one can. For it is God who justifies the ungodly (Romans 4:5; 8:33). It is His gift, completely undeserved, so that no one can boast.
Like all sinners, post-abortion men and women need this gospel. With it, they live each day assured God accepts them on the basis of Christ’s righteousness not their own. They experience unspeakable joy knowing their past, present, and future sins are not counted against them. Instead of ignoring abortion and refusing to show Christians what's truly at stake, pastors should use this difficult topic to reiterate the great truth of the gospel, which alone frees people to pursue passionate ministry for the kingdom.
SqueakyWheel
  • Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:24 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
We need to raise up a new generation of pro-life pastors with courage and conviction! Pray for our pastors!
The pro-life pastor commits himself to four essential tasks. First, he preaches a biblical view of human value and applies that view to abortion, embryonic stem cell research, and cloning. Second, he equips his people to engage the culture with a persuasive defense of the pro-life view. Third, he restores lost passion for ministry with cross-centered preaching. Fourth, he confronts his own fears about preaching inconvenient truth.
A. Task #1: The pro-life pastor preaches a biblical view of human value. We don’t need Scripture to expressly say elective abortion is wrong before we can know that it’s wrong. The Bible affirms that all humans have value because they bear God’s image. (Gen. 1:26, 9:6, Ex. 23:7, Prov. 6:16-17, James 3: 9.) The facts of science make clear that from the earliest stages of development, the unborn are unquestionably human. Hence, Biblical commands against the unjust taking of human life apply to the unborn as they do other human beings. Moreover, if humans have value only because of some acquired property like self-awareness--as critics of the pro-life view assert--it follows that since this acquired property comes in varying degrees, basic human rights come in varying degrees. Theologically, it’s far more reasonable to argue that although humans differ immensely in their respective degrees of development, they are nonetheless equal because they share a common human nature made in the image of God. (For more on these points, go here.)
B. Task #2: The pro-life pastor equips his people to engage the culture with a persuasive defense of the pro-life view. Scientifically, pro-lifers contend that from the earliest stages of development, the unborn are distinct, living, and whole human beings. True, they have yet to grow and mature, but they are whole human beings nonetheless. Leading embryology textbooks affirm this. (See here and here and here.) Philosophically, pro-lifers argue that there is no morally significant difference between the embryo you once were and the adult you are today. Differences of size, level of development, environment, and degree of dependency are not relevant in the way that abortion advocates need them to be. For example, everyone agrees that embryos are small—perhaps smaller than the dot at the end of this sentence. But since when do rights depend on how large we are? Men are generally larger than women, but that hardly means they deserve more rights. Size does not equal value. Pro-lifers don't need Scripture to tell them these things. They are truths even atheists and secular libertarians can, and sometimes do, recognize.
PSmith
  • Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:58 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
"If we get a pro-life Republican in the White House in 2008, the reality is it's very likely that you're going to get one vote and maybe two, given the actuarial tables," said Richard Land

I believe that Mike Huckabee is that Republican!
Check out his stand on this and other issues at
http://www.mikehuckabee.com
Dagny
  • Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:39 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
More Christians need to discover Ron Paul. He is truly a brother, in Christ, and I believe that is why he is being maligned and marginalized. He is a defender of life in both word and action!

Please take a moment to read his Statement of Faith: http://www.covenantnews.com/ronpaul070721.htm

Thank You. God bless you.
pammie
  • Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:35 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
“Does your favorite candidate promote biblical values? Does the candidate endorse scriptural teachings on marriage, prayer, and the VALUE OF LIFE AT CONCEPTION— or deny the validity of the same? What does he or she say about Jesus? If a candidate does not believe JESUS IS THE ONLY WAY TO HEAVEN, he or she simply cannot be a Christian.
A candidate can talk till blue in the face about his or her Christianity, but if that candidate doesn’t believe what the Bible says about our Savior, he or she is in essence an unbeliever. Candidates would be wise to learn about the Savior before claiming to be a member of the Body of Christ. Meanwhile, Christian voters would be wise to make sure they are supporting true believers.” From “Finding Soul Brothers” http://findingsoulbrothers.com
star2
  • Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:35 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Roe v Wade will not be overturned because the Justices are a bunch of cowards. Chief Justice Rehmquest (sp?) said in an interview before he died that some laws they have made in the past were bad. He said it is sometimes best to leave them alone because of the political fallout that would occur should they right their wrong. Even though he is now gone I believe that the conservatives on this present Court has the same mindset.

If this is the case, these Justices are a bunch of cowards. They rather have innocent unborn children have their life take then to take a stand for them and overturn a bad, immoral, ungodly law.

Medical science has already shown that these little ones feel pain when they are being killed by being burned to death, being dismembered, or having the base of their skull punctured and their brains sucked out. All this without anything to kill the pain.

God loves these little ones. He has a place in Heaven for them.

God hears the cries of these little ones. He has and will continue to avenge their death on the child's mother, the child's father, the doctor who performed the abortion, and the nation.
Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging Abusive, Spam, Offensive, Illegal, Racist or Libellous Posts.

Comment on this story

ID Password
Submit Don't have a Christian Post ID?Signing up is easy. Click Here