Many interest groups are stepping up their efforts to bring Americans to the polls by bringing the issue of abortion to the forefront in the presidential election.
On Tuesday, the 35th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, Planned Parenthood announced a campaign that plans to spend $10 million toward an effort to persuade one million people to vote for candidates who support abortion.
Cecile Richards, the organization's president, said the campaign is looking to rally particularly young, unmarried independent and Democratic women, reported the Wall Street Journal.
Chuck Donovan, executive vice president of the pro-life nonprofit Family Research Council (FRC) in Washington, D.C., however, disagreed that young voters would necessarily be the type to vote for pro-abortion candidates.
"There's some data suggesting that young people are actually more open to the life message," he told The Bulletin, noting that younger voters often tend to embrace the social "underdog."
"I think anybody trying to exploit [youthful liberalism] would have to be more careful with that dynamic because I think we have a more pro-life generation coming up," he added.
A study released Wednesday by FRC Action, the legislative arm for FRC, showed that a clear majority of voters would be less likely to support a candidate who proposes a national health care plan that includes universal abortion coverage. A majority of women aged 18-54 (51 percent) are less likely to support such candidates and women aged 55 or older (59 percent) are also less likely to vote for a candidate endorsing it.
Many pro-family and pro-life groups have also in recent weeks been rallying supporters to vote for candidates who support overturning Roe v. Wade. A majority have released voter guides that indicate a candidate's position on abortion and other issues. These groups have also encouraged churches and pastors to preach moral issues like abortion to their congregations.
American Family Association (AFA), a pro-family group with over 3 million supporters, released a voter guide and launched a new website, RepairingtheFoundations.com, to serve as a news resource for Christian leaders who want to address politics within the boundaries of the law.
Abortion could become the next big issue in the 2008 election because the next president is expected to have the opportunity to appoint two Supreme Court justices. Two of the oldest justices on the current Supreme Court are in favor of Roe. When President Bush took office, he appointed two anti-abortion justices to the high court.
However, the fate of Roe v. Wade may lie in the hands of the next president.
"If we get a pro-life Republican in the White House in 2008, the reality is it's very likely that you're going to get one vote and maybe two, given the actuarial tables," said Richard Land, president of the Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, according to the Baptist Press.
If Roe were overturned, Land predicts that when the issue returns to the states, "surely about 40 states will pass significant and restrictive" laws on abortion.
1) Fear of distraction: Pastors sometimes ask, "Won't addressing abortion distract the church from the gospel?" This is a legitimate concern. Our preaching must always direct sinful human beings to the righteousness that God alone provides. The good news is that we can use the topic of abortion to point people to the very gospel they so desperately need. At the same time, we should remember that God's gospel is addressed to particular audience, human beings. But our attempts to communicate that gospel suffer when the very definition of what it means to be human is up for grabs. Indeed, it's hard to preach that man is a sinner, that man needs to repent, and that man can be saved only through Christ when nobody knows what a man is anymore.
2) Fear of driving people away who might otherwise hear the gospel. I dealt with this problem in my previous post on clergy and abortion, suffice to say that well-crafted pro-life talks suggest to unchurched people that the Christian worldview is reasonable to believe. When I gave a pro-life presentation at the University of North Carolina Law School, a young female professor responded (in front of her students): “I did not come to this event with the same pro-life views you hold. In fact, I came here today expecting an emotionally charged religious presentation. Instead, you gave one of the most compelling arguments I have ever heard. Thank you.” True, she didn’t fall on her knees and confess Christ on the spot. But now she’s begun wrestling with Biblical truth. To use a baseball example, you don’t have to hit a home run with every conversation. Sometimes just getting on base is enough. And you’ll certainly do just that whenever you clarify the moral logic of the pro-life view.
3) Fear of offending people with abortion-related content. It’s amazing how people will tolerate a strong pro-life presentation if you make your case graciously and incisively. Kindness goes a long way and often pays off with changed lives. Consider this email from 15 year-old Brittany, received after I spoke to an assembly of 1,000 high school students in Baltimore: (taken from Scott Klusendorf)