Sunday, November 08, 2009 Last Update:11:25 am ET

Church|Wed, Feb. 06 2008 09:32 AM EST

More Evangelicals Value Lent Disciplines

By Audrey Barrick|Christian Post Reporter

As thousands of Catholics line up to receive the sign of the cross in ashes on Wednesday to mark the start of Lent, more Protestants are joining the tradition to observe Easter more meaningfully.

The 40-day season of Lent – a period of fasting and prayer that precedes Easter – is largely observed by Roman Catholics. Although some mainline Protestant denominations, including Anglicans and Episcopalians, continue to devoutly follow the tradition, Lent is not typically observed in evangelical churches.

"Easter is huge in evangelical churches," but they do not observe "Lent as Lent," noted the Rev. Sam Shaw of Hope Church in Tupelo, Mo., according to the Daily Journal.

Still, "Easter must have preparation," Shaw said. And some non-liturgical churches are embracing Lenten disciplines.

"There is a trend ... toward more sacramental forms and it is not surprising to see the recovery of imposition of ashes on Ash Wednesday," said the Rev. Daniel K. Dunlap, vice president of Houston Graduate School of Theology and a liturgy expert, according to the Houston Chronicle.

The Rev. Jeremy Rutledge, pastor of Covenant Baptist Church in Houston, said he will administer ashes at a service Wednesday night, as reported by the local Chronicle.

Most Baptists do not observe Lent. Many of them prepare for Easter by contemplating on the Word rather than through ritual, said the Rev. Kermit McGregor of Calvary Baptist Church in Missouri, as reported by the Daily Journal.

But McGregor, along with many Baptists, finds value in Lenten disciplines such as fasting, which many do to identify with Christ's sacrifice.

Fasting is "a great way to focus and to enter more deeply into prayer," he said.

Mark Batterson, lead pastor of the nondenominational National Community Church in Washington, D.C., started observing Lent a few years ago. This year, he's fasting television for 40 days with his son and is planning to pray and read Scripture daily.

"It (observing Lent) has made Easter so much more meaningful," Batterson wrote on his Web log. "I feel like I'm preparing myself spiritually to re-experience the crucifixion and resurrection."

This year's Lent begins Feb. 6, the earliest since 1913 when Lent started on Feb. 5. Easter falls on March 23.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
1 | 2
  • Thu Apr 10, 2008 5:37 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    Hey Prophet, I always enjoy seeing how Protestants who love the same bible I do, tend to focus the Bible on themselves. You know, like when Jesus spoke to Peter and gave him the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven and promised Peter an infallible guide of the Holy Spirit in Matt 16-19. I think it is actually funny that you think Jesus was speaking to you individually and that you received the Holy Spirit to lead you into all truth, if that was the case then how can so many people be led by the Holy Spirit in the wrong direction? The Holy Spirit is a God of clarity and Truth not of confusion and man-made doctrines.

    You want a bible lesson on why Catholicism is historically and biblically the only Christian Church that Jesus founded and that only the Catholic Church has the gift of infallibility in the office of the Bishop of Rome, then let this former Calvinist/Baptists minister who is now a born again Catholic help you out. I know Scripture and taught Scripture and was a Pastor and now I have found the fullness of Truth in the Catholic Church. While there are a lot of uneducated Catholics coming into Protestant and evangelical churches, there just as many going the opposite way to the Catholic Church. The biggest difference is that it has been recently the best and brightest of the Protestants and Evangelicals who have become Catholic. After searching the truth and what the Church looked like in the first few centuries you will find it was Catholic. You will find it was Catholic in the hiearchy; Bishop, Priest, Deacon. You will find it was Sacramentally Catholic; Eucharist(Communion), forgiveness of sins by a Priest, holy orders, marriage, first communion, Baptism and confirmation. You will find it was Catholic in the way they prayed; for the dead, through the intercession of others, of saints and especially the Virgin Mary. Remember, pray means to ask it doesn't mean to worship.

    Any other question?

    Non-Catholic Christians like Baptists, Calvinists and many others have much of the Truth, but they don't have the fullness. I accept them as sepparated brothers in Christ, but Protestants as a whole hold to man made traditions more than Catholics. Catholic Tradition came from Jesus and the Apostles.

  • Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:40 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    And I still don't get it why Jesus was talking to all of us when He was speaking to John and Mary at the cross, but yet, speaking to Peter only when He told Him he would deny Him three times.

  • Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:16 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    And we non-Catholics have the benefit of the infallible Spirit of God help us, which Jesus said would lead us into all truth. Sorry, I don't base my relationship with God, and His truth, on what a church says. From my experience with many Catholics, the Catholic church is like the blind leading the blind. Many Catholics don't even open their Bibles except when in Mass, if even then. There is one Catholic on here that I've debated over and over. And he's very adamant about his stand, too! He constantly quotes what the "Church" says, but can't even find his Bible to back up his claims.
    I wish more Catholics would actually study the Bible to see if what is being taught actually lines up with the Word of God.

  • Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:44 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Yes. I couldn't agree with you more. You absolutely do have to use common sense! And also we Catholics have the added benefit of having the Church help us which as I said before St. Paul told Timothy was "the pillar and ground of the truth." I still don't get it though why was Jesus talking to all of us when he was talking to Peter and only talking to John when he was on the cross? I'm sorry but it sounds to me like there's a little inconsistency in your interpretations just as you're trying to tell me there is in mine. Sorry I have Bible study tonight and I leave for my trip first thing in the morning so most likely you won't be hearing back from me.

  • Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:00 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    “Then one said unto him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren stand without, desiring to speak with thee. But he answered and said unto him that told him, Who is my mother? and who are my brethren? And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren! For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother” (Mt 12:47-50).

    Jesus is strongly rebuking those who invoke the Mary of Rome as the Holy Mother of God, Mother of our Creator, Mother of divine grace, Mother of good Counsel, and Mother most admirable. May all who are bound in this false doctrine see the biblical truth, and reject this false teaching from papal Rome.

  • Mon Feb 18, 2008 6:15 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    If we were to take that scripture to heart, why doesn't the RCC teach that John is our son?

  • Mon Feb 18, 2008 6:12 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "Why do you take that one that way but not others?"

    Why do you?

    Not everythiing that Jesus said can be directed at us. Such as when He told Peter that before the rooster crowed, Peter would deny Him three times. Or when He was speaking to Peter and then told Satan to get behind Him. Or when He was talking to the Samaritan woman at the well. Or when He was speaking to John and Mary. Discernment and common sense are required.

  • Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:29 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Why wasn't he talking to you when he talked to John on the cross?

  • Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:29 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Why do you take that one that way but not others?

  • Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:29 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I take that scripture the way you told me to. He's speaking to me.

  • Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:27 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    He wasn't JUST talking to Peter and no Catholic who knows their faith would tell you that. Like I said, I believe scripture can be interpreted MANY ways. There are many, many, many layers to scripture and the Catholic Church believes that too. Yes, Jesus will build his Church upon the Rock of Peter and all of his successors. Like I said there is a very specific meaning at the time to the people he is speaking to but it also can be interpreted in others ways too. So you think Jesus was saying "Upon this church I will build my church?" So how do you interpret scripture anyway?

  • Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:54 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    mom,
    You didn't answer my question. You merely circumvented it. You seem quite okay with claiming that the words Jesus said to Mary and John were also meant for us, but you balk at saying that when I ask about Jesus' comment to Peter.
    I have debated some with Catholics, but it's mostly that I study the Word (not just read it) and understand it. But I do know for a fact that Catholics believe that the comment by Jesus directed to Peter about "Upon this rock I will build my kingdom", is directed SOLELY to Peter. Whereas, the protestants believe that Jesus was talking about us, the church. And then you said that EVERYTHING Jesus said is directed at us today. That is a contradiction.
    My question required only a yes or a no. It was not an essay question.

  • Mon Feb 18, 2008 6:52 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Well, it seems I have constantly been answering your questions and you haven't answered mine but I will answer another one. I believe the Bible is not like a History book that you just read and that's it. I believe there are many, many layers to scripture and we could read it a million times and that God can speak to us and show us something new every time. So I believe there are several ways to interpret it. What Jesus meant right at that time to that person, what he meant in the near future and what he meant from that time on until his coming again. Of course you have to take into consideration what the authors intention was when he was writing also. So yes, I do believe Peter is the rock that Jesus will build his Church on. But Jesus is the Rock of our salvation and Jesus is the builder of His Church no mere man. Anyway, it sounds like you are a pro at arguing with Catholics and have all your lines planned out. But now that I answered your question will you answer mine? How do you interpret scripture? Thank you for the prayers I do appreciate it. I hate to fly and need all the prayer I can get!!

  • Mon Feb 18, 2008 12:05 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I would like it if you answered my question. Thanks. Enjoy your vacation. I pray God keeps you safe.

  • Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:03 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I would appreciate it if you answered the question. I know my answer to the question but I would like to hear yours. I will be leaving on vacation soon and won't be able to respond for awhile but I would appreciate hearing you answer to the question.

  • Fri Feb 15, 2008 3:08 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    So, herein lies the problem. If you say that we can take everything in the Bible and Jesus is speaking to us personally and collectively as Christians, then that would mean that we are the rock upon which Christ will build His church. Which goes against everything that Catholicism stands for. If you say, No, He was talking to Peter personally, then you have contradicted yourself, and admitting that not everything that is in the Bible or Jesus said is speaking to us personally and collectively as Christians. Understanding that, you realize that the Catholic's view of what Jesus said to Mary and John could be (if not "is") wrong.
    What to do? I can see now why you refuse to answer. But I still think it would be good manners if you answered.

  • Fri Feb 15, 2008 7:20 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Is there only one way to interpret the Bible???? Which one is it litteral or spiritual?

  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:00 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    And one last question,
    Are you the rock upon which He will build His kingdom, and the gates of hell will not prevail against it?

  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:50 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    And you'll be in paradise with Him today?

  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:21 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Yes, Jesus is speaking to me even in those words. When the Isrealites worshiped false gods God compared them to a harlot and said it is like committing adultery. So when we sin it is like we are committing adultery. And I know I sin everyday. Since the bible says " The just man falls seven times a day"

  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:55 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Maybe because either way, something is errant that your not wanting to admit.

  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:54 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    sgmom,
    You haven't answered my questions...

  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 6:43 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Yes, the days are very dark and I am very thankful that I have Our Blessed Mother and many saints up in heaven interceding for me at this time.

  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:54 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Sgmom34 said: Well, she's my mother because Jesus gave her to me on the cross when he gave her to John and said "Woman behold thy son!". Then he said to the disciple "Behold thy mother!" (John 19:26-27)

    It is very important to read the rest of verse 27: “And from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home.” Please notice the phrases “that disciple” and “took her unto his own home.” She was not going to be passed around from disciple to disciple and from home to home.

    May all who have embraced the error of “Holy Mother Mary,” “Virgin most powerful,” and “Queen of Heaven” depart from such error quickly and return to truth. The time is short and the days are dark.

  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:27 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    sgmom,
    You said yourself "We can take everything in the Bible and Jesus is speaking to us personally and collectively as Christians."
    So that means that you've had multiple husbands too.

  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:26 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I will be with Jesus in paradise today?

  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:25 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    So I have had multiple husbands?

  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:12 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    When you read the Bible do you read it as a personal letter to you? Or as some dead letter that was written 2000 years ago? I read it as a personal letter from my God to me but some things we have to look to the Church and see how it was interpreted from the beginning. I know this will start a lot of hateful remarks but 2 Timothy 3:15 says "....the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth." We can see trusting in individuals to interpret scripture has led to a mess. There are well over 30,000 different denominations. That's not so good for something that Jesus prayed would be ONE as he and the Father are one.

  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:08 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I have had a number of husbands?

  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:07 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    So I will be with Jesus in paradise today?

  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 6:33 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Yes, Jesus was talking to me when he said "Get behind me Satan" to Peter and told him he would deny him. He was talking to all Christians because we all try to hinder God's plan in our lives and we all deny Jesus every day in our lives. (In fact, every time we sin we are denying his Lordship over our lives) We can take everything in the Bible and Jesus is speaking to us personally and collectively as Christians. God bless you.

  • Wed Feb 13, 2008 8:52 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    It's strange how a person can take what Jesus said specifically to one person, and proclaim it for everyone. When Jesus said those words, He was talking specifically to John and Mary...no one else.
    I suppose when Jesus said to Peter, "Get thee behind me, Satan." that He was talking to you too. Or when He told Peter that he was going to deny Him.
    But, going back to the statement made to John and Mary. I think He said that to make Mary feel wanted by someone after He had denied her in front of a group of people.

  • Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:10 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Well, she's my mother because Jesus gave her to me on the cross when he gave her to John and said "Woman behold thy son!". Then he said to the disciple "Behold thy mother!" (John 19:26-27) And I am so thankful for that gift everyday. I ask her to pray for me and I know she is. And the Church teaches that she is a human and Jesus is her Lord and Saviour just as much as he is anyone's and she would be the first to admit it. Of course the only way into heaven is through the blood of Jesus. I think ALL Christians know that. God bless you.

  • Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:41 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Sgmom34 said: So God confirmed through Our Blessed Mother miraculously what Our Holy Father declared as dogma 4 years earlier?

    Answer: No, God did not confirm anything through biblical Mary. Actually, according to the written word of God, the apparition lied. You might want to read 2 Corinthians 11:14.

  • Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:31 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    She aint my mother! I would not spit in God's face by saying that. Even Jesus Himself dissed His own mother. She was just a human. She died like the billions before and after her. And, if she didn't accept Jesus as her Savior and Lord, she's in hell. (Blasphemy? Naw, just the truth.) There are no short cuts into heaven. And God is no respecter of person. If that's the case, then I can assume you believe that all Jews are going to heaven just because they are Jewish...God's chosen people. It that's the case, then you have made the cross worthless.

  • Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:16 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    That is awesome! So God confirmed through Our Blessed Mother miraculously what Our Holy Father declared as dogma 4 years earlier? It truly shows the Holy Spirit is guiding the Church. Thank you for that!

  • Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:26 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    This year the beginning of Lent providentially coincides with the 150th anniversary of the apparitions at Lourdes. Four years after the proclamation of the dogma of the Immaculate Conception by Blessed Pius IX, Mary appeared to St. Bernadette Soubirous in the grotto of Massabielle for the first time on Feb. 11, 1858. Other appearances followed, accompanied by extraordinary events, and at the end the Holy Virgin, bidding farewell to the young visionary, told her in the local dialect, "I am the Immaculate Conception." (On Entering Into Lent - Benedict XVI, Vatican City, Feb. 10, 2008, Zenit.org)

    The authority of scripture speaks against this apparition and the falsity of the Immaculate Conception of which it spoke.

    Ro 3:9, 10 What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin; As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:

    Ro 3:23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;

    Gal 3:22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.

  • Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:32 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Jester,
    I hate to interrupt you while you're on a roll, but I'm gonna get going. I worked 14 hours today, and I'm beat.
    TAJ,
    Thanks for sharing what the rosary was about. And please don't take it wrong. I didn't ask about it because I necessarily wanted to be empathic, but more to make sure I wasn't debating in error.

    Goodnight all.

  • Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:24 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    so revelations 12 is about mary's "assumption" to heaven. she was "assumpted" into heaven and crowned before Jesus' birth? and then God took jesus away from here as soon as He was born? and she fled to the wilderness by herself? in heaven? she's in heaven, but satan is still attacking her?
    no wonder people say that anyone who believes in the Bible are fools. when you've got stuff like this being believed that makes not one micron of sense.

  • Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:16 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    and i find this interesting:

    the Assumption of Mary into heaven (Rev. 12), and her Coronation (cf. Rev. 12:1).

    again....no.

    i dont know the meaning behind that vision, but i do know what it is not. it's not mary.

  • Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:58 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    now on to the hail mary...i am a strong believer in using the Word of God in my daily prayer time....correctly. not robotically chanting (like tibetan monks, and satanists do), but using the Word effectively.
    And you said:

    The second part of the Hail Mary is not taken straight from Scripture, but it is entirely biblical in the thoughts it expresses. It reads:

    "Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death. Amen."

    Um...no. The only part of the comment you got right is that it is not taken directly from scripture. But is not even infered ANYWHERE that mary is to pray for us. she's dead. most likely unaware of anything goin on in the physical world. there is only on mediator between God and man...and His name is not Mary. sorry.
    "Mother of God"...why not "Mother of the Holy Spirit" since the Godhead consists of three. But I can't complain, I guess. many catholics get ruffled when i say im a son of God and entitled to all the authority that Jesus had, including (but not limited to) healing the sick, raising the dead, bring sight to the blind, opening the ears of the deaf, casting out demons, etc, etc, etc.

  • Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:47 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    so, lets dissect this then.....

    "...the early centuries of the Church monks would recite the Psalms as part of their rule of life." what happened to LIVING the Word of God? i'm all for memorizing the scripture, mind you. but i have a feeling that these monks (as well as a majority of catholics today) were bound in ritualism and had no idea of the true power of God's word. did they truly understand the Word? or merely speaking by rote? those are two completely different things...

  • Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:43 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    ah, yes, elvis presley. is he a saint now? did all the catholics get together and vote him into sainthood? or should we call him pope elvis the first?
    and,no thanks, i'll pass on the catholic propaganda called "the passion". the book was much better..and true! unlike the movie.

  • Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:33 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Thank you for getting those references to me. It helps me understand a little more about what the rosary is about.

  • Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:16 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    or just watch the movie the Passion of the Christ: all stages of the rosary are put into the movie

  • Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:14 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Perhaps just watch this link from youtube and sung by Elvis Presley:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Xi3i5r9yhE

  • Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:12 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Then come the Sorrowful Mysteries: the Agony in the Garden (Matt. 26:36-46), the Scourging (Matt. 27:26), the Crowning with Thorns (Matt. 27:29), the Carrying of the Cross (John 19:17), and the Crucifixion (Luke 23:33-46).

    The final Mysteries are the Glorious: the Resurrection (Luke 24:1-12), the Ascension (Luke 24:50-51), the Descent of the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:1-4), the Assumption of Mary into heaven (Rev. 12), and her Coronation (cf. Rev. 12:1).

  • Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:11 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    First we must understand that they are meditations. When Catholics recite the twelve prayers that form a decade of the rosary, they meditate on the mystery associated with that decade. If they merely recite the prayers, whether vocally or silently, they're missing the essence of the rosary. It isn't just a recitation of prayers, but a meditation on the grace of God. Critics, not knowing about the meditation part, imagine the rosary must be boring, uselessly repetitious, meaningless, and their criticism carries weight if you reduce the rosary to a formula. Christ forbade meaningless repetition (Matt. 6:7), but the Bible itself prescribes some prayers that involve repetition. Look at Psalms 136, which is a litany (a prayer with a recurring refrain) meant to be sung in the Jewish Temple. In the psalm the refrain is "His mercy endures forever." Sometimes in Psalms 136 the refrain starts before a sentence is finished, meaning it is more repetitious than the rosary, though this prayer was written directly under the inspiration of God.

    It is the meditation on the mysteries that gives the rosary its staying power. The Joyful Mysteries are these: the Annunciation (Luke 1:26-38), the Visitation (Luke 1:40-56), the Nativity (Luke 2:6-20), the Presentation of Jesus in the Temple (Luke 2:21-39), and the Finding of the child Jesus in the Temple (Luke 2:41-51).

  • Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:10 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    The Glory Be

    The fourth prayer found in the rosary is the Glory Be, sometimes called the Gloria or Gloria Patri. The last two names are taken from the opening words of the Latin version of the prayer, which in English reads:

    "Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit. As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end. Amen." The Gloria is a brief hymn of praise in which all Christians can join. It has been used since the fourth century (though its present form is from the seventh) and traditionally has been recited at the end of each Psalm in the Divine Office.

  • Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:08 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    Hail Mary

    The prayer begins, "Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee." This is nothing other than the greeting the angel Gabriel gave Mary in Luke 1:28 (Confraternity Version). The next part reads this way:

    "Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus." This was exactly what Mary's cousin Elizabeth said to her in Luke 1:42. The only thing that has been added to these two verses are the names "Jesus" and "Mary," to make clear who is being referred to. So the first part of the Hail Mary is entirely biblical.

    The second part of the Hail Mary is not taken straight from Scripture, but it is entirely biblical in the thoughts it expresses. It reads:

    "Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death. Amen."

    Let's look at the first words. Some Protestants do object to saying "Holy Mary" because they claim Mary was a sinner like the rest of us. But Mary was a Christian (the first Christian, actually, the first to accept Jesus; cf. Luke 1:45), and the Bible describes Christians in general as holy. In fact, they are called saints, which means "holy ones" (Eph. 1:1, Phil. 1:1, Col. 1:2). Furthermore, as the mother of Jesus Christ, the Incarnate Second Person of the Blessed Trinity, Mary was certainly a very holy woman.

    Some Protestants object to the title "Mother of God," but suffice it to say that the title doesn't mean Mary is older than God; it means the person who was born of her was a divine person, not a human person. (Jesus is one person, the divine, but has two natures, the divine and the human; it is incorrect to say he is a human person.) The denial that Mary had God in her womb is a heresy known as Nestorianism (which claims that Jesus was two persons, one divine and one human), which has been condemned since the early 400s and which the Reformers and Protestant Bible scholars have always rejected.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Church
  • Gifts
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links