Updated 04:40 pm.EST, Sat November 21, 2009

Society|Fri, Feb. 08 2008 10:13 AM EST

Romney’s Pullout Big Opportunity for Huckabee

By Michelle A. Vu|Christian Post Reporter

WASHINGTON – Mitt Romney’s pullout from the presidential race have many curious if the party’s right wing will coalesce behind Mike Huckabee, who touts himself as the “authentic conservative” in what he calls a now two-man race for the GOP nomination.

  • Huckabee
    (Photo: AP Images / Danny Johnston)
    Republican presidential hopeful former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee greets supporters at his election watch party as his wife Janet looks on in Little Rock, Ark., Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2008.

Nearly immediately after Romney’s withdrawal, Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family released a statement announcing his endorsement, as an individual, of Huckabee.

“I am endorsing Gov. Mike Huckabee for President of the United States today,” the influential, evangelical leader declared Thursday night. “My decision comes in the wake of my statement on Super Tuesday that I could not vote for Sen. John McCain, even if he goes on to win the Republican nomination.”

Dobson had lamented that McCain appeared close to winning the Republican nomination after his big wins in the Super Tuesday contests. He lambasted the Arizona senator for what he deemed as anti-family and anti-conservative stances.

Among the long list of criticisms of McCain by Dobson are his lack of support for a Constitutional amendment to define marriage as one man and one woman; his support for embryonic stem-cell which Dobson likened to murder; and his “legendary temper” and frequent use of “foul and obscene language.”

“I cannot, and will not, vote for Sen. John McCain, as a matter of conscience,” Dobson said after results from Super Tuesday contests showed McCain pulling way ahead of his more conservative Republican opponents.

That left Romney and Huckabee as viable candidates for the support of the pro-family leader. But after Romney’s “suspension” of his campaign Thursday afternoon, Huckabee was the only “remaining candidate” that Dobson said he could vote for.

“Obviously, the governor faces an uphill struggle, given the delegates already committed to Sen. McCain,” Dobson acknowledged. “Nevertheless, I believe he is our best remaining choice for President of the United States.”

This is the first time Dobson – known to be careful and hard-to-get in his endorsement – has publicly supported a candidate this early in the race, during primary season, according to The Associated Press.

But Huckabee, who’s running 533 delegates behind McCain, does not have the luxury to bask in Dobson’s endorsement. On Thursday, the former Arkansas governor immediately appealed to Romney voters for their support.

“As a true authentic, consistent, conservative, I have a vision to bring hope, opportunity and prosperity to all Americans, and I’d like to ask for and welcome the support of those who had previously been committed to Mitt,” Huckabee said in a statement.

“This is a two-man race for the nomination, and I am committed to marching on. I believe in the importance of a strong national defense – which includes winning the war against Islamic extremists and the protection of American sovereignty,” he said.

Meanwhile, McCain is also trying to grab Romney’s conservative voters and invite them to join his base.

On Thursday, just hours after Romney’s announcement, the “maverick” senator sought to allay fears that he was too liberal to be the GOP nominee. McCain pledged to support key conservative agendas and boldly extended his hand of friendship to the nation’s largest gathering of conservative activists, students and policymakers. Continue »

Pages: 12
Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:05 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I agree GreatNW!

    Wake: "Huckabee is the most ethics-challenged candidate. If he stays in the race, Democrats are going to show how easy he has had it up to now."


    You may be right. Unfortunately, the liberal media elite has already had a hay-day with him and there is no-telling what they will do to him then. I think that many of the accusations can be defended, but I think that as the media has ignored his arguments this far that they will continue.

    AR was no. 37 on the list of over all tax burdened states before he was elected.
    Huck took it to number 44.

    It is true that he raised taxes, but it was only after a court ordered mandate.

    He did actually cut taxes 94 times and still ended up with millions of dollars in surplus, when it was in the million dollar bust.

    The fair tax could revolutionize America and bring the economy completely out of its slump. It would be better for businesses and create job growth. It would help families. It would alleviate financial stress and tear down the deficit.

    (I flagged myself)

  • Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:08 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Yawn... I have read all of the Ron Paul scripted talking points before. Must be why Arkansas voted so overwhelming for Huckabee as well as the other southern states. The states that know him the best are voting for him. Of course, Ron Paul does not have a problem with issues such as paroles or having to approve carrying out the death penalty. Primarily because, despite his best efforts, no one has every voted him in to an executive office. Huckabee has 10 years of experience and with a record of 10 years, you will have a long list of people upset with many of your decisions and actions.

    Ron Paul if free from all such worries.

    Huckabee can win in the South and the GOP can not win the White House without carrying the South.

  • Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:56 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 4

    Huckabee is the most ethics-challenged candidate. If he stays in the race, Democrats are going to show how easy he has had it up to now.

    They have been holding their fire, waiting to make the most of an easy kill. This summer when the moment seems just right, they’ll start off with his sellout to the tobacco industry and all of his ethics violations and his misuse of public office for personal greed.

    The “wedding” gift registry he used to shake people down after leaving the governor’s office won’t seem like a big deal at first.

    But Democrats will expand on the picture of greed, bringing up the Jonesboro school shooting and how Huckabee promised survivors no one would profit from it, only to cut a book deal a few days later and reject pleas to share the proceeds in the form of scholarships.

    Use of another Huckabee book will start establishing his dishonesty along with his greed, when Democrats start having fun with what they’ll portray as his pretense that dieting took 110 pounds off him, rather than bariatric surgery or some similar procedure.

    At this point some fringe blog will use public doubt about Huckabee’s character to seek traction for a charge that will attract heavy web site traffic when played correctly: the dog torture incident.

    Everyone knows there is something seriously wrong in a family when a teen old enough to be a Boy Scout counselor tortures or helps torture a dog: It was hung by a wire, stoned and had its throat slit.

    Democrats will say it is especially wrong when the crime is minimized and the father steps between the son and a state police investigation, then fires the guy who would not immediately back off. The guy who says he suffered the injustice loves an audience and liberal mainstream media will be only too happy to provide him one at the perfect time. Juicy!

    Then they will take Huckabee to task for granting convicted criminals 1,033 pardons and commutations of sentence – about twice as many acts of amnesty as his three predecessors in the governors office combined.

    After Huckabee pressured a parole board to release a sex offender early, the rapist went on to murder a mother in Missouri. And people who don’t have a special loyalty to Huckabee are going to be outraged by this as it gets more and more attention.

    He pardoned or commuted the sentences of 669 criminals, including 11 murderers. And this time instead of media playing down the evangelical connection, it is going to be played up.

    The way Democrats will portray it, criminals who said they were saved will have used pastors to get special consideration from Huckabee. And you know they’ll ask if the pastors and Huckabee got anything in return, and they’ll ask in a way that implies corruption. (Remember all the ethics violations and gift demands?)

    Liberal mainstream media may wait for fringe blogs to raise these subjects, but then they’ll report on what the blogs have been saying with glee. It won’t be pretty.

  • Sun Feb 10, 2008 3:48 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Seedplanter - Well said. I saw some of the Ron Paul supporters at our caucus meeting in Washington State yesterday. They were easy to spot in their brown shirts. Definitely the tin foil hat crowd. One of them had snuck in some Ron Paul flyers in the stack of official hand outs. It was a cheap stunt.

  • Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:12 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    Ron Paul can't win the Republican primaries; he could never win the general election. He has more skeletons in his closet than Huckabee. Ron Paul surrounds himself with neo-Nazis which heads up his campaigns. Michael Medved has made the point that Ron Paul was a prominent columnist for a white supremacist publication for years. This not the kind of candidate that America needs or wants. He does have some good ideas, but he is far from perfect, without even considering his electability.

    Huckabee on the other hand is very electable. He is appreciated among conservative Republicans and Democrats, including many black conservatives. Ron Paul would be a wash out among blacks and other ethnicly diverse voters. The federal constitutional amendment to define marriage between man and woman as supported by Huckabee was also supported by Romney (even though Romney was in favor of every single other gay rights issue, including ENDA). I think Huckabee would make a great VP to help balance out the conservative ticket. If it is McCain/Romney, I will be joining thousands of conservatives in looking at an independant ticket.

  • Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:04 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I agree about Ron Paul. His honesty is not limited to politics, he also speaks the truth about theology which hurts him with evangelicals, have you ever read his article about theology: theology not politics? http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul244.html

    Ron Paul is a politician and thus his last sentence in this article is profound. There are politicians in this world and then there is a person who is concerned with something more important: the spiritual direction of the flock. His last sentence says it all ...HE'S TOO HONEST!

  • Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:04 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    P.S. Huckabee did NOT win Louisiana, Ron Paul did. There were many "errors" and "problems" with incorrect counts. Ron Paul was the true winner of Louisiana.

  • Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:02 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    Huckabee is not who people think he is; other than being pro-life and against gay marriage, he is a liberal and has quite a few skeletons in the closet. Don't let yourselves be herded with all the "evangelicals" to support Huckabee.

    http://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-announces-list-washington-s-ten-most-wanted-corrupt-politicians-2007

    Huckabee is #6 on the Judical Watch's Ten Most Corrupt Politicians of 2007.

    The only conservative in this THREE man race for the GOP nomination is Ron Paul. He is a true conservative, Constitutionalist candidate who will eliminate the income tax and replace it with nothing, shrink the government, remove many powers that the federal government has taken upon itself against the Constitution, he supports a right-to-life amendment because he is pro-life. Ron Paul is a true conservative while Huckabee is a big-government, big-spending, big-scandal candidate. Don't fall for the lie.

    Ron Paul 2008

  • Sun Feb 10, 2008 5:58 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Hyperion,

    You are gravely mistaken on a point, you said,

    "how else can we protect ourselves from the powerfully forceful poisons that are islam and other cult class religions? "

    Trust me, we as Christians do not need a theocracy to protect us. God was clear in the OT that He did not want us to appoint kings for ourselves, but that we should be led by Him alone. The early Christians did not need a "theocracy" to protect them from the evils around them. And God certainly does not need our "theocratic" governments to maintain His authority in the world. Think about what you are saying, it is not Christian.

  • Sun Feb 10, 2008 5:11 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    ::begin quote::
    Big deal, kansas is a bible thumper state. no surprise there
    ::end quote::

    Well however you feel about the constituents, what the "big deal" about it is that Huckabee consistently wins the states that help Republican carry the General election. And it is vitally important for the Republican party to select someone who can win the Red states, not the Blue states. Also, Huckabee won Louisiana.

  • Sat Feb 09, 2008 10:59 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    HyperionOverseer "If a Theocracy means the guaranteed immunity from dark influences as a christian nation, then YES i am in favor for it, a nation under the one true Christian God, who made all!"

    Wow, you should find a new screen name, may i suggest: American Taliban. Seriously dude, you are really scary and sick. My guess is you dont have many friends, your are way too scary. You are a perfect example of why we want to keep religion out of government. Religion and Theocracy, its all about control....you would have concentration camps filled-up with people that behaved in ways unacceptable to you. Not too different i suppose from communist re-education camps.

  • Sat Feb 09, 2008 8:35 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    Dr. Dobson, welcome to the party...we've been working hard, so thank you for taking a stand in the culture war. Huckabee can still win in 2008! Let's get to work!

  • Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:19 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    "Huck won Kansas today, and possibly more."

    Big deal, kansas is a bible thumper state. no surprise there

  • Sat Feb 09, 2008 5:50 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    It sounds like some friends are going to get paid....Go Huckabee Go

  • Sat Feb 09, 2008 3:56 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    Huck won Kansas today, and possibly more.

  • Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:50 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

    Did I miss something? I keep hearing about the threat of America becoming a theocracy if Huck is elected. Did Arkansas end up as theocracy after 10 years with Huck in the Governor's mansion?

    Headed to the Washington State caucus today and supporting Huck. Social conservatives need to rally around Huck in order to bring McCain to the bargaining table and have a voice in his administration. Huck's best bet is VP and then he will be in great position to run for Pres. in 4 years. There has probably been no time when the selection of who will be the VP has had greater importance given McCain's age.

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:38 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    HyperionOverseer,

    Did I understand you correctly? Are you in favor of an American theocracy?

    Iran is a theocracy. Is that what you want for America?

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:43 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    This is interesting:

    "And we, who chose God and the one He chose to presidency, we will live happily, WITHOUT the fear of tyranny of the other candidates!"

    God chose Huckabee to be president?

    This supports my idea that the USA would be a Christian theocracy if Huckabee was president.

    "FOR A GOD FOUNDED COUNTRY LEAD BY A GOD LEAD MAN"

    That sure sounds like a theocracy to me.

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:05 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    grabbag: "bobx2x2 The post is a half baked allegation."

    Too bad nobody can see the post. Did you delete it?

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:03 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Does huckabee like censorship as much as his supporters?

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:01 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Flagged as inappropriate. Why? I said huckabee wants to make america a theocracy. That's inappropriate? Telling the truth is inappropriate?

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:26 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Dg: “WE NEED TO BE FOCUSING ON A THIRD PARTY, WITH DR. RON PAUL HEADING UP THE CONSTITUTION PARTY, THE ONLY REAL CONSERVATIVE PARTY LEFT IN THIS NATION!!!!”

    Ron will have to battle it out with Keys before he wins that nomination. He’ll have to run on the Libertarian ticket or maybe the Nazi Party.

    Pete: “Al Gore failed…”

    You should have stopped when you were on to something. Al Gore is a loser and a sore loser at that; nevertheless he is a rich sore loser.

    How many times has he traveled around the globe in his fancy jet instigating global warming hysteria?

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:27 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    re: bobcatx2x2 The post is a half baked allegation. The fact is, the only reason the issue of amending the constitution came up at all, and at this point it is more theoretical, was over the issue of protecting traditional marriage. In other words it might take a constitutional amendment to actually make marriage between on man and one woman normative in this country. Some would argue that that is the best way to do so. It is possible, but very difficult to change our constitution. There is nothing illegal per, se about doing so. But the founding fathers designed our constitution in such a way as to avoid frivolous changes. In other words by their design they insured that changing it required a complicated, lengthy public debate before it could be done.

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 7:35 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    No, dg, Dobson hasn't lost his marbles at all! Yes indeede, Huck should keep going, in fact he would be the best candidate the Republicans could offer, from the standpoint of losing the election.

    If he doesn't win the nomination, he should definitely run on a third-party ticket, there is no doubt he would get more votes then poor Ron Paul.

    Al Gore failed to become president only because of the ego of Ralph Nader. Didn't the Republicans learn anything from that? I want a democrat to win this election, in fact I think it would be a major disaster if the Dems fail. So whatever you do, don't get behind McCain, who happens to be the only man you have right now who has a shot at winning.

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 7:12 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 3

    Dr. Dobson, with all due respect, has LOST HIS MARBLES!!!

    HUCKABEE DOESN'T HAVE A CHANCE, AND HE WON'T BE PRESIDENT OF ANYTHING, EXCEPT THE LOCAL KIIWANIS CLUB, unless the McCainiac makes him VP.

    FORGET HUCKABEE...FORGET HUCKABEE...FORGET HUCKABEE....

    WE NEED TO BE FOCUSING ON A THIRD PARTY, WITH DR. RON PAUL HEADING UP THE CONSTITUTION PARTY, THE ONLY REAL CONSERVATIVE PARTY LEFT IN THIS NATION!!!!

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 4:47 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    rocky2,

    I am wondering if you have any substantial sources for your accusations?

    Why did Brownback and other conservatives endorse him?

    Why did he support the Defense of Marriage Act?

    I am not saying that there is absolutely no substance for what your saying, but I just think it is worth making some points. Do you have multiple sources that are irreproachable or are they just fly by night cukes that are making spurious accusations?

    Let me guess, you support Ron Paul whose companions are neo-Nazis.

    Again, I could never have voted for Romney if there was a one man ticket. Any vote against Romney was a positive vote!

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 4:34 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    While I do think Huckabee is the better in respect to social issues, McCain does hold an 82.3% American Conservative Union lifetime voting record. I would argue that McCain is more conservative than Romney. Romney was the week link in my opinion. He used smokescreens like the Federal Marriage Amendment to cover up for his loathsome support of the radical homosexual agenda. Mass Resistance has collected enough information about Romney while he was governing Mass that if he were nominated, he would split the Republican Party straight down the middle. I was uphauled at the Christians who endorsed him. I dare say that if it wasn’t for Romney, McCain wouldn’t have generated nearly the amount of support that he did, because he was the default candidate for those who do not trust Romney. Although Huckabee has plenty of experience, there is a knee-jerk reaction on the part of secularists who are afraid that Huckabee is going to turn America into a theocracy. Of course the fact that he wants a constitutional amendment to define marriage and ban abortions adds to their ‘terror’.

    Bottom line, I do have some problems with McCain, but I would rather him be in charge than Romney. I thank God Romney withdrew himself. My hope is that when he made a deal with McCain to give him his votes that it did not include him as McCain’s VP.

    As per Romney’s Health Care plan that he wanted to impose on the rest of the US: http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/02/03/subsidized_care_plans_cost_to_double/

    http://massresistance.org/romney/

    http://massresistance.org/docs/marriage/romney/record/

    http://republicansforfamilyvalues.com/2008/01/02/a-stern-warning-to-the-conservative-elites-about-mitt-romney/

    http://www.familytaxpayers.net/article.asp?articleNumber=1582

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 3:37 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 2

    I have been a Huckabee advocate from the beginning and am thrilled that he will not surrender his conscience. He is staying in the race to speak for those of use who believe in honest, conservative, ethical government. In all my years and I am almost as old as McCain I have voted for anyone but a Republican, but I cannot in a clear conscience voted for the "wolf in sheep's clothing" McVain. He is arrogant, egotistical, uses profane and blasphemy constantly. The only conservative stand he has is that on the war, however, that is for his only financial interest. He sits on the board of several companies with contracts with the military. Cheney had that baggage and so does McLame. Personally, I cannot stand his treatment of his first wife. Even though we Americans are duped with pictures of him in a prison cell in Vietnam, the truth is that he spent his time in a plush hotel in Hanoi aiding and abetting the enemy. They put him in this ficticious cell for picture to send to the U.S. While in "prison" his first wife had a severe auto accident, was thrown out of the front window, and was severely injured. She loved him so much she didn't want any news to reach him about the accident so as not to upset him. When he returned, she had been suffering from depression to the accident and gained weight. What did he do? He divorced her. Soon afterwards, the Republican Eastern Establishment funded a run for him to Congress. The man then married his "barbie doll" wife that he already was having an affair with even before the divorce was settled. Is this the kind of Republican we want? I think not. No wonder he supports gay marriage and has NEVER even spoken against human/animal sexual relations. He has spoken in ONE day, five TIMES and took SIX positions on the same issue. He is so stupid he flip-flopped his "stand" in one of those speeches from the opening until the second to the last paragraph. Would he order nukes to fly and ten minutes later change his mind. He is too erratic, unstable, and frankly not able to be able to be believed. Is there any reason he practically got down on his hands and knees and begged John Kerry to make him his VP. Is this a conservative Republican? No, this is an egomaniac in the lines of Hitler/Mussolini/Toto/Stalin/Castro/BinLaden/Napoleon, etc. At least with Hillary or Obama we know what we are getting and can work around them. With McNutt we don't know what to expect except war, war, war, taxes, taxes, taxes, and illegal immigrants taking away our American jobs. After four years of Hillary or Obama we can elect a true conservative, not a radical socialist liberal Juan!

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 2:30 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    ::begin quote::
    Mike Huckabee trying to reach out to Romney supporters and expecting to get thier support after making anti-mormon comments just isn't going to happen.
    ::end quote::

    Seriously? how was it an "anti-mormon" comment? Innappropriate would be a better word, and I could go along with that. But if someone said "Don't Christians believe their Messiah died on a Cross?" I wouldn't claim that as an "anti-Christian" claim, maybe innappropriate, but nevertheless it would be a true statement, so its hard to call it "anti"

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 1:38 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Mike Huckabee trying to reach out to Romney supporters and expecting to get thier support after making anti-mormon comments just isn't going to happen. The only thing that Mike did for the GOP was help get McCain elected president. The only political aspirations he can have now is to continue being McCain's pawn and be his running mate. The only way McCain can win the south is if he has an "ordained" Baptist minister as his running mate. His chances of doing it alone were worse than a Mormon's.

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:40 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    ::begin quote::
    Not all the readers here are as evangelical and shove-it-down-your-throat as Huckabee is, so I'm not convinced I'm taking an unpopular stance.

    What would be "diplomacy" in this case? How could I have said that Huckabee is a right-wing evangelical nut diplomatically? Put it up for a vote?
    ::end quote::

    I understand what you are saying, I don't expect you to put it up for a vote. But if your goal was to convince people towards your cause and away from Huckabee, then your method that you whent for will fail. This is what I meant by your not being diplomatic.

    Your best bet would be to take his RECORD from Arkansas and show why he would dangerous "nut". Like for example did he set up a Church-government? etc.etc.

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:26 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 3

    DannyPoo :

    Not all the readers here are as evangelical and shove-it-down-your-throat as Huckabee is, so I'm not convinced I'm taking an unpopular stance.

    What would be "diplomacy" in this case? How could I have said that Huckabee is a right-wing evangelical nut diplomatically? Put it up for a vote?

    Fact is, he is, and clearly the votes of the American people, as a whole, are clearly demonstrating that even the republicans would rather have someone more liberal in office.

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:00 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    If the only criticism they could come up with about Romney is that he is a Mormon, then maybe we should have given him a more serious look. I was guilty of not doing so, but now that McCain is forging ahead, I may be regretting that. McCain is no Conservative, and his line about being Conservative is falling on deaf ears with me. I am concerned, because Hillary and Obama just aren't options for me.

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:55 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    ::begin quote::
    and the religious right folks who dominate this site...
    ::end quote::

    I'm not really sure what else you would possibly expect from a website called "CHRISTIAN Post" I have been to Atheistic websites and have gotten the same reaction, you can't go to a website that's focus is towards for example "Christians" and not expect some resistance to a counter-message. That's where the "being diplomatic" comes in.

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:19 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Now Huckabee really has a chance! Don't buy the media blackout...they say it's over when Mccain only has half the delegates he needs and the remaining states will favor Huck...Mccain is hated by the majority of voters 66% of people voted against him tuesday and it is now a two man race Huck can force a brokered convention easily and all the anti Mccain voters will get a chance to vote again!

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:00 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    DannyPoo: “Try being diplomatic.”

    Diplomatic? This site isn’t known for being diplomatic, and the religious right folks who dominate this site are especially undiplomatic. One of the first questions they ask anyone here they disagree with is – “Are you even a Christian?”

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:42 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Huckabee officially screwed all conservatives by staying in this race. Your only chance was Mitt. It is Huckabee's fault that we will have another Clinton in the White House. Congratulations.

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:19 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    ::begin quote::
    Huckabee doesn't stand a chance. The american people are not willing to have that much ignorant religion shoved down their throats.
    ::end quote::

    Since at least half of the people who visit this site share the values of that "ignorant" religion that Huckabee holds too. Your not going to gain many converts to your "enlightened" values with the way you approach us. Try being diplomatic .

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:01 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 6

    Huckabee doesn't stand a chance. The american people are not willing to have that much ignorant religion shoved down their throats.

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:48 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 3

    Article mentions concerning Dobson, “Among the long list of criticisms of McCain by Dobson are… his “legendary temper” and frequent use of “foul and obscene language.”

    With Dobson it’s okay to be a war criminal, but it’s not okay to cuss! Well… #@%& it!!! Amen.

  • Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:53 am Agree: 5   Disagree: 1

    I have a new found respect for Mitt and now the little engine that could - Huckabee may just have a chance. Go Huck!!!!

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Also on CP
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links