Advanced Search

Portrait of Christianity in the Next 1,000 Years

By
Christian Post Reporter
Sat, Feb. 09 2008 06:30 AM ET
[-]Text[+]
E-mail Print RSS More on Topic AddThis Button

Correction appended

Enlarge this Image
New Life worship
(Photo: AP Images / Nathan W. Ames, Pool)
Aaron Kruse, a New Life Church member, worships during services Sunday, Feb., 18, 2007, in Colorado Springs, Colo.

What will the Christian church look like in the next 1,000 years?

If a devout Christian from the year 1000 A.D. were to be dropped into a mid-morning service at a 21st century progressive church, the medieval Christian wouuld not recognize the Christian faith, says Kevin Kelly in the latest issue of Willow magazine – a publication of the Willow Creek Association.

So it's "reasonable and responsible to expect tremendous change in the Christian church" in the next millennium, he writes.

Besides the end of the world happening in this lifetime, Kelly offers five other scenarios – or plausible stories – for what the church may look like in the year 3,000 A.D.

And he cautions, "If Christians don’t seize the future, then unbelievers will."

Scenario One

The center of Christianity will continue to shift west. Since the time of Christ, the center of gravity for the global Christian church has steadily moved west from its epicenter in Jerusalem. It has shifted to Armenia, Greece, Rome, then into Europe, and further west into North and South America.

Many reports indicate that the center of Christianity is now in Asia and Africa where the Christian population is booming.

But Kelly says it won't stop there.

"If the move west continues as it has for the last 2,000 years, Christianity’s center of gravity will keep migrating westward beyond East and Central Asia. The new missionaries based in Asia in the coming century will reach out to unbelievers in the birthplace of Christianity."

Eventually, the epicenter of Christianity will circumnavigate the globe and arrive back where it began in Jerusalem.

That means, "unless Christianity in the U.S. becomes less parochial and more global, what happens in North American Christianity in the next 500 years may simply be the side-show," Kelly writes. "The main event will happen elsewhere around the globe."

Scenario Two

The varieties of Christianity, including the number of creeds and denominations, will continue to increase. Christian denominations have increased from 500 in 1800 to 40,000 in 2007, Kelly cites.

And nothing will apparently halt the diversification.

"When you can get 72 varieties of mustard in the supermarket, choice is accepted," he writes. "There is no known counter force visible in our culture which would work against increased varieties in Christian approaches."

Scenario Three

Churches outside mainstream Christianity are growing the fastest. The greatest growth in the future is expected from such marginal church groups as the Mormons and the Amish.

The growth, however, won't go without criticism. These churches will be, and some already are, considered cults or heretics by the orthodox, Kelly points out.

Nevertheless, Kelly says "an entirely safe bet would be that the largest denomination 1,000 years from now is one that does not exist at the moment."

Currently, the largest church in the United States is Lakewood Church, a nondenominational church of now 40,000 weekly attendants, in Houston. It was founded in 1959.

Scenario Four

An overwhelming majority of the challenges – such as abortion, stem cell therapies and pornography – Christianity will be facing in the next millennium will be driven by new technologies. Kelly points out that today's challenges are tame compared to the ones coming.

And as Christians have already been witnessing, the next generations of Christians will speak the Facebook and YouTube language as easily as Americans speak English today.

"The long-term trend is more technology in the Christian culture; what is missing, and what may take several generations to supply, is an understanding of the spiritual meaning of technology," Kelly writes.

Scenario Five

As culture continues to move toward a future of questioning and doubt, Christianity has to "develop a cultural practice of positive questioning, of active holy doubt, and a clear articulation of what is eternal and what is in flux," he notes.

That practice is likely to be constructed not by theologians, Kelly says, but by members of the worldwide church in a distributed social media context. "The wiki-church."

And that includes Muslims.

The Christian community is shrinking in Europe while the Islamic community continues to grow. And while Islam has turned radical and militant in other parts of the world, Kelly points to the millions of non-militant moderate Muslim communities.

"On many social issues moderate Islam and conservative Christianity agree," he contends. "They are both people of the book. They both honor many of the same prophets. They agree on many religious issues like prayer, sexuality, sin, and family.

"It is not impossible to imagine Muslims and Christians becoming allies in the inevitable culture wars of the future. It is no more impossible than imagining Christians and Jews would be allies a thousand years ago."

Kelly predicts 100 years from now, a conservative Christian-Islam alliance might be a serious global political force.

While none of the five scenarios may happen, they are presented in order to gain a firm grasp of the present trends, Kelly says.

"Sometimes it takes an exercise of extrapolating to a thousand years from now to see what is happening tomorrow. Only by extending a trend can we see if it might endure, or survive in the face of other trends, or if it might provoke an awareness of a trend we could not see before."

Correction:Wednesday, February 13, 2008:

An article on Saturday, February 9, 2008, about what the Christian church may look like in the next 1,000 years incorrectly reported that Willow magazine is a publication of Willow Creek Community Church. The Christian Post confirmed with Paul Braoudakis, executive director of Communications for Willow Creek Association, that the magazine is published by the Association and not the church.

BACK TO TOP Print E-mail More on Topic AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

Most recent comments
Jon Matthew
  • Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:17 am
  • : 1
  • : 2
  • Flag
Christ is not continually put to death, and I want to make something very clear. As Catholics we do not believe that Jesus dies again and again and again in the Eucharistic sacrifice of the altar. We believe, rather, that this is an un-bloody sacrifice. It doesn't mean that he is being killed, only without any bloodshed. It means that he is not being killed at all. It means that Jesus Christ, raised in heaven and glorified, continually presents himself to the Father in a perfect sacrifice, the once for all sacrifice. The sacrifice of the body of Jesus Christ was once for all and he sat down at the right hand. Now when somebody takes that to mean that there is no longer any continuation of his sacrifice, they run into problems because in Revelations 5, verse 6, we see a difficulty. John in his vision of the heavenly throne room is told to look and he will see the Lion of the tribe of Judah who is conquered. He looks expecting to see a royal figure. The lion is a royal figure of the tribe of Judah which is David's tribe, and so he expects to see a king. Instead, it says in Revelations 5, verse 6, "He turned and beheld a lamb, looking as though it had been slain in the center of the throne." Jesus Christ was sacrificed on the Cross, raised from the dead and yet that resurrected body bears the wounds; ascended into heaven and glorified so that those wounds are not removed but glorified; so that when we behold our King in heaven at the right hand of the Father, what does he look like? A lamb, looking as though he had been slain. Why? Because the Passover Feast continues on into eternity. Christ is priest and victim. He is the Passover Lamb. No wonder St. Paul can say in 1st Corinthians 5, verse 7"Christ, our Passover, has been sacrificed for us, therefore, let us keep the feast." What feast? The Eucharistic Banquet, the covenant Passover. But why? Because sacrifices are never complete until the sacrificial victim is consumed! It's the consuming of the victim that really signifies the purpose and goal of the sacrifice, because God ordained and commanded sacrifices in the Old Testament for sin, but not simply to kill animals. What happened to the animals after they were slain? They were eaten because to have that meal, to share communion is the purpose and goal of the sacrifice. It signifies the restoration of family bonds, because who do you eat your meals with? Family members. So the ultimate, final stage of a sacrifice is communion. Back in Egypt, 1400 years before Jesus, if you had sacrificed the Passover lamb and sprinkled his blood on your doorpost to preserve your firstborn son, and then you went to bed and that's all you did, you would wake up in the morning and your firstborn son would be dead, because you had to eat the lamb. You had to commune upon the victim. You had to consume the sacrifice. You had to eat the lamb!!!!!!!
Jon Matthew
  • Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:57 am
  • : 1
  • : 2
  • Flag
Every Jew in the audience thinks of Leviticus. Oh no, you don't eat flesh. If you eat flesh and if you drink blood, you are cut off from your kindred, according to the Old Testament law of Moses. "So the Jews then disputed among themselves saying, 'How can this man give us his flesh to eat?'" So does Jesus say, "Well stop, guys, it's just a teaching device. It was just a little illustration to help get a point across." No, He ups the ante; He intensifies their crisis of faith. So Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His Blood, you have no life in you."
That's the first thing he says. Then he states it a second way: "He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life and I will raise him up at the last day." Then he says it a third way: "For my flesh is food indeed and my blood is drink indeed." And then to top it off, he has to say it a fourth time: "He who eats my flesh," and that word in the Greek means chew, munch down on my flesh, "He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me and I in him." I can almost feel the dizziness of the Jews in the audience, and many of his disciples when they heard it said, "This is a hard saying. Who can listen to it?"
They don't say, "Well, who can understand it?" They don't say, "Who can believe it?" They say, "We can't even stand to listen to it. That's how offensive it is." But Jesus, knowing himself that his disciples murmured at him and at the saying, said to them, what? "Oh guys, come on, come on. Relax. It's just a metaphor, just a symbol, just a sign." He doesn't say that, does he? He says, "Do you take offense at this? Then what if you were to see the Son of Man ascending where he was before? It is the Spirit that gives life, the flesh is of no avail. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life."
What is Jesus meaning? He is saying, "Look, I am not saying here is my arm. Why don't you guys just stand in line and take a bite." Right? Well, what is he saying? He is saying that it's the Spirit that gives life and so my flesh and my blood are not quite ready for the communion meal. When will they be? When the Spirit takes the Passover Lamb in the tomb and revives and resurrects and glorifies and infuses the fullness of the infinite Holy Spirit to that flesh and to that blood, so that Christ's flesh and blood is perfectly united to the eternal spirit of God. At that point, Christ's flesh and blood will not be mere flesh and blood. It's the Spirit that gives life. The flesh alone is of no avail.
"The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life." What does he mean? The words that Christ speaks are what cause his flesh and his blood to be transformed. Those words are spoken over bread and wine and that is what causes the great communion meal to take place.
aritonang
  • Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:03 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Based on what is happening outside US in Asia and Africa Christianity is booming. Currently 1/3 of world population is Christians, 1000 years from now it'll be 50%
Prophet
  • Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:23 pm
  • : 2
  • : 1
  • Flag
I think that the title of this article should read "Portrait of Religion in the Next 1,000 Years". Because true Christianity will not change. It may become a minority behind false teachings and cults, but it will never change.
Online4Him
  • Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:34 pm
  • : 2
  • : 0
  • Flag
God would never command His children to do something He had already forbidden. He also states, “And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission” – Hebrews 9:22. The Mass is a repetitive bloodless sacrifice that is not supported by scripture and again, Christ died ONCE for the sins of the world.

THE BIBLICAL PURPOSE

Paul's instructions in 1 Corinthians 11 shed even more light on this matter:

"For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me." 1 Corinthians 11:23-24

When Jesus said, "Take, eat: this is my body," He was not suggesting that they reach out and begin eating His literal body. To even suggest such is ridiculous. He was speaking spiritually about what He was about to accomplish on the cross.

Notice how that verse ends: "...this do in remembrance of me." Observing the Lord's Supper is a remembrance of Christ's work at Calvary, not a reenactment. The same is true of Christ's blood:

"After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me." 1 Corinthians 11:25

Jesus Himself taught the same lesson to his disciples at the Last Supper:

"And he (Jesus) took bread, and gave thanks, and
brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me." Luke 22:19
Online4Him
  • Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:32 pm
  • : 2
  • : 0
  • Flag
The Eucharist:

Though this one verse does appear to teach transubstantiation, if you read the entire passage in context, the meaning becomes clear. Right before making that statement, Jesus said:

"... For the bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven, and giveth life unto the world. Then said they unto him, Lord, evermore give us this bread. And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst." John 6:33-35

This teaching is consistent with the rest of Scripture. Eternal life comes through believing in Jesus Christ, not eating His body. The Lord goes on to further clarify:

"And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life..." John 6:40

Again, Jesus points out that eternal life comes through believing in Him. When the Lord's disciples murmured at His words, Jesus explained:

"It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life." John 6:63

Jesus was talking spiritually, not physically. He was explaining that spiritually, all life comes through faith in Him, not eating His body.

Nowhere else in the Bible does God endorse transubstantiation. In fact, God forbids the practice:

"But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat." Genesis 9:4

"... No soul of you shall eat blood, neither shall any stranger that sojourneth among you eat blood." Leviticus 17:12
wilderness
  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:37 pm
  • : 1
  • : 0
  • Flag
If the Lord tarries:

There will still be those who have not bowed down to Baal. A people strong in faith who know that Jesus is the “only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords” (1 Timothy 6:15).

Unfortunately, there will be those who will continue to serve and bow before false gods, statues, pictures, and even a false goddess known as the “Queen of Heaven.”
Prophet
  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:56 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Quecat,
Don't be afraid of being too bold. The timid will not prevail. And amen to your comment "Who are we who wear the full armor of God and wield the Sword of Spirit, if not warriors? "
That is right on the bulls eye! I wish more Christians would realize that we are warriors in a spiritual battle for our souls.
We are the spiritual warriors of God, on the offensive to tear down the kingdom of darkness. So that the Kingdom of God can be built up in us, and in His children. Praise Him.
Quecat
  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:33 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Thanks for confirming that for me brother.
hehe - I wrote that very thing at first (re: our onslaught), but then backtracked and erased it wondering if it were too bold.
I'm glad to hear that it appears the same to another. Who are we who wear the full armor of God and wield the Sword of Spirit, if not warriors?
Prophet
  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:25 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
I guess that goes right along with my belief that we (Christians) should be an offensive spiritual army that should be going into the very realm of hell to wage war, and the gates will not be able to prevail, or overcome, our onslaught.
Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging Abusive, Spam, Offensive, Illegal, Racist or Libellous Posts.

Comment on this story

ID Password
Submit Don't have a Christian Post ID?Signing up is easy. Click Here