Advanced Search

Schools Pull Children's Book About Same-Sex Penguin Couple

By
Christian Post Reporter
Tue, Feb. 19 2008 02:26 PM ET
[-]Text[+]
E-mail Print RSS More on Topic AddThis Button

A children's book about two male penguins that hatched a chick together was pulled from school library shelves earlier this month in Loudoun County, Va., for its pro-gay message.

The 2005 award-winning book, "And Tango Makes Three," draws on the real-life story of Roy and Silo, two chinstrap penguins at the Central Park Zoo in New York. The book, recommended by Simon & Schuster for children ages 4-8, says the two penguins sleep together and attempt to make a nest like other boy and girl penguin couples. At one point, an observer in the book says that the two "must be in love." Roy and Silo then name their chick "Tango" because it takes two to tango.

An unnamed parent at Loudoun's Sugarland Elementary School objected to the book several months ago and said it promoted a gay agenda, according to officials.

Following the complaint, the school principal and a district review committee comprised of principals, librarians and teachers convened to review the book. The group did not find the book inappropriate. A similar opinion was reached by a second committee that examined the book after the parent appealed the first review.

The final decision came from Superintendent Edgar Hatrick, who overruled them. He removed the 32-page book from the shelves of 16 elementary schools in Loudon County and placed it in the professional collection at each school library. Students can still access the book through the request by a parent or teacher.

According to officials, "Tango" is still in the general collection at one middle school and two high schools in the county, reported The Washington Post.

Wayde Bayard, spokesman for Loudoun County Schools, told Fox 5 News in Washington, D.C., that Hatrick thought the book's content might not be developmentally appropriate for some students.

"It might just explore some mature themes that younger children may not particularly understand," said Bayard.

He said it was "fine" that children were exposed to such themes but advised that a parent, adult, or teacher be with the children as they read the book.

Gay rights advocates have criticized the book's removal as censorship and rejects claims that the book is gay propaganda.

But according to Peter Parnell, co-author of the book, presenting the issue of same-sex couples to children was the aim of the book.

In a past interview with U.S. News, Parnell said he "wanted to write a book that treated the subject of same-sex couples that kids will adore."

"Tango is so cuddly. We're hoping kids will love it and beg their parents to read it again and again, since children are bumping into children from these same-sex families at school and at birthday parties. This [book] makes it comfortable for parents to talk about these families," he said in 2005.

The incident with Loudon County was not the first time the book has been protested by parents. In November 2006, parents of students of an elementary school in Shiloh, Ill., requested that the book be placed in a restricted section of the library and for the school to require students to get parental permission prior to checking the book out. They were turned down by the school superintendent. Other complaints had also surfaced in North Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, Iowa, Wisconsin, Indiana, and Illinois, according to the Boston Globe.

John Stevens, a school board member from Potomac, recently criticized Loudon Schools in his blog for not having policies that allow parents and gay rights activists to appeal Hatrick's decision.

He intends to propose a new set of policies at a committee meeting on March 4.

Although the book strives to highlight a somewhat success story of a non-traditional family, the two penguins at the center of the controversy have already split.

BACK TO TOP Print E-mail More on Topic AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

Most recent comments
SheQuon
  • Sun Mar 09, 2008 7:31 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Okay, that post worked, now I shall try another. I think I was going to respond to your belief that it's okay to tell a child his/her "very nature" is unacceptable. The whole idea stems from the notion that same-sex attraction is a "vice" (like pedophilia, or perhaps kleptomania), and you cannot seem to find an analogy that doesn't involve a victim, so there is no valid analogy to justify maintaining the idea that acting on such attractions would be sinful.

Furthermore, many parents have indeed told their children exactly that, and there are quite a few who wish every day that they could take it back and mend their relationships both with their kids and with God rather than lose both.
SheQuon
  • Sun Mar 09, 2008 7:12 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Actually, it was not conveniently on the last try. The post you read below was actually the third try after I gave up trying to stay on the subject. It happened on other articles too. In fact, this post right here is my third try once again.
Chris333
  • Sun Mar 09, 2008 5:20 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
NoWire,

Your point is? It doesn't change what it was.

SheQuon,

Looks like it worked! And conveniently on the last time when you had forgotten what you were going to say and not going to bother writing any response, only to tell us that you really did have a response! Glad to see it worked though.
NoWire
  • Sat Mar 08, 2008 2:41 am
  • : 1
  • : 0
  • Flag
Update: As of March 5, the book has been returned to the shelves, and it turns out the "unnamed parent" (Sherrie Sawyer) didn't even have a child in the school where it all started. (She's a TA in the district.) Also, the superintendent was stripped of the authority to unilaterally remove books.
SheQuon
  • Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:28 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
I tried to post another response several times since 3/2, and got an error message every time. Now I've completely forgotten what I was going to say. This will be my last attempt, and if it works at least you'll know I wasn't not posting because I had no reply.
Prophet
  • Sat Mar 01, 2008 11:16 am
  • : 3
  • : 1
  • Flag
shequon,
Legally, there is a difference between stealing and homosexuality. Just as there is a difference between adultery and murder. But before God, they are all still sin. I am not here to make homosexuality a crime. I am here to warn those who involve themselves in that practice that it is a sin that will separate them from God.
I would also agree that much of how a child or young adult acts is because of how the parent raises (or fails to raise) their child. Many parents aren't actively involved in their childrens lives. And because of that, their children will get their views of life and morals elsewhere. And it's usually not the best of places either. And sometimes the parents are involved, but their morals and ethics are so askew that it is passed on to their kids.
But, to reiterate what I said earlier, just because something is not illegal, doesn't mean it's not a sin. What God calls a warning, people without a conscience call judging.
Chris333
  • Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:10 am
  • : 2
  • : 0
  • Flag
Finally you seem to think that we cannot tell a person their "very nature" is unnacceptable. I am sorry but I disagree. If someone is a pedophile by their very nature, then I will have to tell them that they can either never act on their urges, or else change. (Please, for the love of all that is good, do not tell me I am equating pedophilia with homosexuality) However, I think you were a bit tricky in your usage of the term "very nature", this is a very broad term and could be applied to a lot of things, and I do not believe that people must have their lives determined by some unalterable nature. Rather, I believe that we all have a sinful nature and that through the grace of God we can overcome anything and conform ourselves to the image of Christ. Here is the bottom line, if the anti-gay crowd said, "Gays are evil, THEY SHOULD DIE" And they said so in the name of Christ, then I would say they were gravely mistaken. First of all, gays are not evil, what they do is wrong, secondly to say a person should die for such a behavior is against the message of Christ. However if an "anti-gay" person says, "Homosexuality is a sinful behavior, and is against the purpose God has" Then there is nothing wrong with it.
Chris333
  • Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:10 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
SheQuon,

I can't believe, that after all of that explaining, you now made the crazy jump to say I am equating homosexuality with stealing too! I said they are DIFFERENT, the word different means not the same, equating means that you are calling two things the same. For that matter, I did say they were both wrong, but not in the same way. I do not consider a rapist and a thief the same. If this concept makes sense to you, then there should be no problem.

Now, the criminal distinguishment between these concepts means nothing to me. Tomorrow, we could all say that rape is 100% A-OK and I would still say it is wrong.

Also, I did not say that kids could be rotten without their parents help, but now that you mention it sure they can be (though the vast majority of the time it is directly the parents fault).

You said,

"I reject your claim that the anti-gay "Christians" opposition to homosexuality has nothing to do with vicious acts like this. Kids hear and pick up on things quite easily. "

Unfortunately for your argument, I did not say that or even imply it. Sure, maybe if I say, "Homosexuality is bad" some kid will think "Bad equals 'I MUST KILL'" But it would be stupid to say that I am the cause of that. I could say, "Rape is bad" and then some kid might think, "I must kill all rapists!!!!" But what I said did not cause that. Saying something is wrong, does not mean we have to kill people. You might find this surprising, I know, I was taken aback whenever I found out that teenagers weren't killing thieves and drunk people, it is really amazing that they could separate the two, but against all odds they did it. (sorry if the sarcasm was a bit heavy, it just comes out when you have to repeat yourself endlessly)
Prophet
  • Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:43 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
If homosexuals could have their way, they would make it a crime to speak out against homosexuality. Just stating a fact.
SheQuon
  • Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:35 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
"Gay rights activist would make it a crime to say homosexuality is a sin. Quit griping."

Not a crime--just a sin. Unless you want to harass people with speech outside funerals, then yes, your keister should be hauled to the klink..
I wasn't griping, I was stating a fact. (Sorry, I know facts are unpopular here.)
Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging Abusive, Spam, Offensive, Illegal, Racist or Libellous Posts.

Comment on this story

ID Password
Submit Don't have a Christian Post ID?Signing up is easy. Click Here