Updated 04:40 pm.EST, Sat November 21, 2009

Church|Wed, Feb. 27 2008 06:18 PM EST

Mars Hill Pastor Ditches 'Emerging' Label for Jesus

By Lillian Kwon|Christian Post Reporter

Second, house church evangelicals also are doctrinally Christian brothers and sisters, Driscoll said. But they do not support creating large churches and instead form little house churches or churches in other smaller settings such as coffee shops.

The third “lane” Driscoll listed is the emerging reformers, where he and Mars Hill fall under. They believe in all of the evangelical distinctives and embrace reformed theological traditions. They love John Calvin and Martin Luther, the early founders of evangelicals including Billy Graham and Francis Schaffer, and modern day preachers such as John Piper.

Emerging reformers also try to find ways to make the church relevant, accessible and culturally connected; they tend to be charismatic; and many are involved in church planting.

The fourth lane is a group of emergent liberals who Driscoll feels has “totally gotten off the highway and is lost out in the woods.” Although Driscoll was initially connected to this group, which also tries to find innovative ways to do church, he left, citing that they call into question many parts of the Christian doctrine.

Some questions include: “Do you need Jesus to go to heaven?” “Is anybody really going to hell?” “Is sex outside of marriage including homosexuality sinful?”

“On many of these issues, they won’t answer the questions,” Driscoll noted.

Leaders in this lane include Brian McLaren and Rob Bell.

While Driscoll only has minor disagreements with the first three groups, he has concerns over the content of the emergent liberals’ instruction.

Who cares?

But at the end of the day, Driscoll says, “We don’t care,” adding that he only preached on the topic because it was voted on.

“You shouldn’t care because what can happen is you get so concerned it’s so easy for Christians to say ‘What does this Christian say?’ ‘What team am I on?’ ‘What does this blogger say about that blogger?’” Driscoll told Mars Hill attendants.

“I’ll tell you what. Maybe this is what you can learn from the emerging church – what false doctrine is,” the pastor simply stated.

“Who cares what the emerging church is doing,” he stressed. “It’s a junk drawer category for all kinds of different people. It’s highly confusing. I’m not even sure that the description is any more of benefit or use.”

Rather than labeling Mars Hill as an emerging church, he calls it a Christian church and points to only two things he and the church really care about – Jesus and the Bible.

“Here’s what we’re all about – Jesus,” Driscoll highlighted. “The emerging church will come and go. The traditional church will come and go. The church of Jesus Christ will continue.”

So whether it’s utilizing the Internet, putting up giant screens in the church, or holding an 8:30 p.m. service on Sunday to reach the late sleepers, when it comes down to it, Mars Hill works to “make much of Jesus’ name in a place that desperately needs to know how wonderful he is.”

Pages: 12
Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Mon Mar 16, 2009 1:24 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    The end is near! Repent! Jesus will come as a thief in the night.

  • Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:56 am Agree: 13   Disagree: 23

    If it walks like an emergent, talks like an emergent, associates with emergents, promotes emergent, than it IS emergent. Mark Driscoll can use any label he wants, but an emergent by any other name is just as toxic. Mark Driscoll has caused a huge amount of spiritual confusion with his filthy mouth and his refusal to obey Scriptural injunctions regarding his speech and conversation. Anyone whose mouth spews corruption has a heart problem, and Mark, like so many other "relevant" emerging leaders, manifests that exact problem. He does not belong in the office of the holy ministry, period. Until he repents and begins to obey the Word, he is in the same camp with all the rest.

  • Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:22 pm Agree: 10   Disagree: 1

    Quote by 29thCOA:

    "find it quite disturbing myself to see Christians defaulting to labels that have but one purpose.... to defame and to silence by building the case with groups of believers into a modern day version of the label heretic, and then dismissing everything anyone says that they can stick that label on.

    My personal experience has shown me that people who resort to the afrementioned tactics as well as being dismissive while showing no interest or intellectual honesty by actually examining what is being said, tend to have very weak beliefs. They rely on a herd menatality of commonly accepted doctrines, and then surround themselves with people who do nothing but agree with them.

    This so called emergent church is scary to fundamentalists who have forgotten how to think on thier own and to challenge their own faith with God and in Jesus Christ. If a person is solid n their walk and relationship with God, they would follow what the bible says about judging others (labels and groups) and be Berans themselves."

    The church today, COA, is seriously lacking - and that includes the Emergent church. If you judge the emergent church by scripture it comes up woefully short. Here's just one example. Paul said this to the Corinthians :

    For we are unto God a sweet savour of Christ, in them that are saved, and in them that perish:
    To the one we are the savour of death unto death; and to the other the savour of life unto life. And who is sufficient for these things?
    For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.
    2 Corinthians 2:15-17

    What this means is that the church on both an individual and a corporate level is NOT supposed to be appealing to the world. It means that one who is in Christ will not be "attractive" to those who are not. But to those who are truly in Christ (and know the doctrine), they will be attracted and attractive to others in Christ. The emergent church wants the praises of the world by becoming "relevant" to the modern generation. Instead of relying on the old foundational Truth, they think it has to be repackaged. At the least, that is lack of faith and will do nothing for a lost world. At worst, it is love of the world and will continue to infect the church and reinforce the world's belief that the Christian church is no different from the rest of society. The church wants to "attract" the worldand make the gospel "relevant" - thus trying to APPEAL to the world rather than convict it (i.e. be the savor of death unto death that it should be). But then, if it really isn't of Christ, then we shouldn't be surprised to begin with because it will only appeal to its own anyway.

  • Mon Mar 03, 2008 12:05 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 6

    I find it quite disturbing myself to see Christians defaulting to labels that have but one purpose.... to defame and to silence by building the case with groups of believers into a modern day version of the label heretic, and then dismissing everything anyone says that they can stick that label on.

    My personal experience has shown me that people who resort to the afrementioned tactics as well as being dismissive while showing no interest or intellectual honesty by actually examining what is being said, tend to have very weak beliefs. They rely on a herd menatality of commonly accepted doctrines, and then surround themselves with people who do nothing but agree with them.

    This so called emergent church is scary to fundamentalists who have forgotten how to think on thier own and to challenge their own faith with God and in Jesus Christ. If a person is solid n their walk and relationship with God, they would follow what the bible says about judging others (labels and groups) and be Berans themselves.

  • Mon Mar 03, 2008 12:01 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 0

    I'm curious why Joel Osteen wasn't listed in the "emergent liberals" section?

  • Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:47 am Agree: 4   Disagree: 5

    By the Way - Hurrah for Mark Driscoll and the Mars Hill Church

  • Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:42 am Agree: 15   Disagree: 1

    RE: "feel-good message"

    Actually the true gospel is "Good news" but to a sinful man's ears,
    it's more of a "good news-bad news" proposition.

    1.You are sinful and are dead and dying in your sins - bad news
    2. Christ died for you and took your punishment - good news
    3. You must repent of your sins, walk in a new way - bad news (to the old man)
    4. Having done so, you are now a child of God and will not "perish" - good news.

    The problem with the liberal churches nowadays is that they equivocate about the "bad news" portions of the gospel, afraid that they will offend: "everyone is inherently good"," there are many valid ways to get to God","I have to be true to myself and this is the way I am, I feel no need to change"," I don't believe a loving God would send me to hell just because I chose to ignore the gift of salvation the way that the Bible says it's supposed to be"

    It's one thing to take harmless elements from culture in order to form a connection with those that you are evangelizing and cross that cultural boundary - It's an entirely different thing to compromise your values so that the "offense of the cross" is no longer offensive to those you claim to want to reach.

    Paul spoke to the Athenians at Mars Hill by way of referring to the "Unknown God" - not that they might ADD this God to their pantheon, but rather that they would turn from their culture of false gods and embrace the one true God. How culturally relavant is that?

  • Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:36 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 8

    Secondly, and more pressing, what are you talking about? As far as the emerging churches go, I mean? Are they the ones with a "feel-good" message? I have read my bible, and that is why I challenge you on this point. The "feel-good" message is built in the Bible! It says I am going to Heaven, because my penalty was paid. It saysif I have faith, I get to have a real and personal relationship with The Author of all existence! So, please clarify what an "emergent" church is. Homosexuality, by the way, is no greater a sin than lying. One of my favorite passages declares that he who breaks the least of the Law, breaks all of it (paraphrase). We cannot say "we live by grace, not by law" if we don't a) know the Law and b) not do as Christ commands- which includes observing the Law!

    I flagged myself,

  • Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:19 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 4

    Question, as I have a true berean spirirt: Is tailoring services to cultural landscape heresy? Did not paul do as much? I will say that tailoring Scripture to the same is heresy, but when someone will explain to me the heretical and pagan practices the established church has implemented (Easter eggs/ Bunny, Christmas trees, yule logs, gifts for children on december 25th, et al) then perhaps I will be able to subscribe to the theory ereging churches are a last days heresy. If you belive me in error describing the pagan roots of the rituals I've listed, you'd better do your homework.

  • Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:36 pm Agree: 14   Disagree: 2

    would Mr. Mark Driscoll also like to speak a bit on Tony Campolo's views about Centering Prayer and using ancient techniques to draw closer to God? Would he also point out to the readers of this paper that Brian Mclaren one of the founders of the Emergent Church Movement has a very ambiguous view of hell and homosexuality? Why is it that postmodernism has to water down the Scriptures. If people would just read their Bibles, they wouldn't be influenced by a "feel-good" message that appeals only to the flesh, or to the twisting of Scripture. The Emergent Church is a last day heresy, whether this article will address it as such or not. Also, why does not Mr. Driscoll point out the numerous connections between "Emergent Christianity" and Bono from U2,COEXIST, Worldwide ecumenicalism, and Eastern Mystic practices such as contemplative spirituality which is more New Age in nature?

  • Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:15 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    Thank you, thank you. I've been reading different opinions on this and trying to figure out what it all means. You have made it much clearer to me. I was about to throw it all out because I knew some of it sounded wrong. Now, I see it's like everything else. Whatever good is going on, someone will take it to extremes and distort it. I

  • Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:12 pm Agree: 18   Disagree: 0

    I am glad that Mark is casting off what is becoming a stigma. Namely, the terms "Emerging or Emergent." Also while it is not mentioned in this article, the term "Missional," is being hijacked as well by those who will deny the absolute truth of the scripture. Mark describes 4 lanes, but there are countless others in the movement or should I say "conversation," that have denied the exclusive way to Slavation (Jesus), the existence of hell, and even the supreme place of scripture as an authority for living as a Christian. Its one thing to fight those that we know our outside of the the Christian faith, its quite another when the enemy is already in the camp and wearing our uniforms.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Church Fundraisers
Listen to Sermons by  
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Church
  • Gifts
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Bethany House Publishers

It was a balmy California evening. I had gone for a jog before I was to speak at a leadership conference. I still can't recall how I got there, but I found myself sitting on a curb

Featured Advertiser Links