Advanced Search

Southern Baptists Fight Climate Change

By
Rachel Zoll
Associated Press Writer
Mon, Mar. 10 2008 08:44 AM ET
[-]Text[+]
E-mail Print RSS More on Topic AddThis Button

NEW YORK (AP) — In a major shift, a group of Southern Baptist leaders said their denomination has been "too timid" on environmental issues and has a biblical duty to stop global warming.

The declaration, signed by the president of the Southern Baptist Convention among others and released Monday, shows a growing urgency about climate change even within groups that once dismissed claims of an overheating planet as a liberal ruse. The conservative denomination has 16.3 million members and is the largest Protestant group in the U.S.

The signers of "A Southern Baptist Declaration on the Environment and Climate Change" acknowledged that not all Christians accept the science behind global warming. They said they do not expect fellow believers to back any proposed solutions that would violate Scripture, such as advocating population control through abortion.

However, the leaders said that current evidence of global warming is "substantial," and that the threat is too grave to wait for perfect knowledge about whether, or how much, people contribute to the trend.

"We believe our current denominational resolutions and engagement with these issues have often been too timid," according to the statement. "Our cautious response to these issues in the face of mounting evidence may be seen by the world as uncaring, reckless and ill-informed. We can do better."

No one speaks on behalf of all Southern Baptists, who leave decision-making to local churches. Yet, the signatories represent some of the top figures in the convention.

Among them are the denomination's president, the Rev. Frank Page of South Carolina; two former presidents, the Rev. James Merritt of Georgia and the Rev. Jack Graham of Texas; and the Rev. Ronnie Floyd of Arkansas, who helped conservatives solidify control of the denomination in the 1970s and 1980s.

Also backing the effort are presidents of three prominent Baptist-affiliated schools: David Dockery of Union University in Tennessee; Timothy George of Samford University's Beeson Divinity School in Alabama; and Danny Akin of Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary in North Carolina. More than 35 people signed the statement.

Supporters plan to collect more signatures for the declaration through baptistcreationcare.org and encourage congregations to advocate for environmental protection.

Even before Monday's statement, religious activism on climate change had broadened beyond just liberal-leaning churches. The 1993 "Evangelical Declaration on the Care of Creation" became a guiding document for the Evangelical Environmental Network. The Rev. Rich Cizik, Washington director of the National Association of Evangelicals, became a prominent environmental advocate, trying to persuade conservative Christians that global warming is real. Polls of younger evangelicals found they considered environmental protection a priority.

But many of the most conservative Christians, including some Southern Baptist leaders, remained skeptical, and vigorously challenged evangelical environmentalists.

The Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation, backed by James Dobson of Focus on the Family and Charles Colson, founder of Prison Fellowship ministries, among others, said that while conservation is important, some environmental concerns "are without foundation or greatly exaggerated." Last year, Dobson and other Christian conservatives unsuccessfully pressured the National Association of Evangelicals to silence Cizik on the issue.

The last Southern Baptist statement on global warming came at the denomination's 2007 annual meeting, which approved a statement questioning the belief that humans are largely to blame for climate change and warning that increased regulation of greenhouse gases will hurt the poor.

Even so, Jonathan Merritt, a student at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, began rallying denominational leaders to take a different approach. Merritt, 25, son of former convention president James Merritt, said a theology class had inspired him.

His professor had compared destroying God's creation to "tearing a page out of the Bible."

"That struck me. It broke me," the younger Merritt said in an interview, "and that was the impetus that began a life change, a shift of perspective for me."

On the Net: Southern Baptist Environment and Climate Initiative: http://www.baptistcreationcare.org

Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

BACK TO TOP Print E-mail More on Topic AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

Most recent comments
wolfmanjack
  • Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:44 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Southern Baptist Convention supports Al Bore's Global Warming propaganda? This makes me extremely angry! I left the independent Baptist churches over their arrogance and legalism, and joined a Southern Baptist church. If they're going to be such morons as to believe in this Global Warming rubbish, guess I will just say to heck with these denominations, and just stay HOME from now on! I will not give ONE RED CENT to any church that falls for the Global Agenda, and uses the PULPIT to promote it! Sheesh!!!
Chip
  • Sat Mar 15, 2008 4:26 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
What about the receding polar ice caps on the planet Mars? Does this give credence to the possibility of solar activity being more responsible for global warming than human activity? Why is China not included in the Kyoto Treaty? Oh I see... they already have a totalitarian state.
JAM4the1Lamb
  • Sat Mar 15, 2008 9:43 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Our first job on this planet was to care for the world we were placed in. We are the planet's caretakers. I would venture that part of this responsibility is to be wise about how we care for the planet and not be given to every whimsical trend that comes along (the earth is cooling! the earth is melting! the earth is going to be pulverized by a giant asteroid tomorrow!). So yes, we ought to be leaders in wise living, but Christianity is not an environmental movement; it's a work to bring people into a relationship with Jesus Christ. How about we resolve to be good stewards of our resources, putting all our thoughts and efforts into helping a lost word and not on dictating the latest trendy western-world green living movement that is impractical for the uninterested others of the world.
TRE
  • Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:40 pm
  • : 1
  • : 0
  • Flag
I believe as Christians, we are to be good stewards - to include nature and natural resources. However, I caution everyone from jumping on the "global warming" boat. Is it only theory - like "evolution" or perhaps the verdict of the validity on "global warming" is still to be decided?On FOXNews.com there is an article today entitled: Weather Channel Founder: Sue Al Gore for Fraud. The article is referring to global warming.
coffee
  • Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:09 am
  • : 0
  • : 1
  • Flag
It would help many of us if those who say we should do more to protect the environment, would tell us exactly which evangelistic efforts we can cut back on, in order to fit this new effort into our schedule. Alas, there never seems to be any such cort of practical advice.
HAWK49
  • Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:41 am
  • : 2
  • : 0
  • Flag
scitsonga;
GMG was making a valid observation. Perhaps this fills in the gaps for the absurdity of getting alarmed at the weather cycles.

"In short, science – especially environmental science – has a demonstrated pattern of announcing strong and emphatic conclusions and then later reversing itself.

Further buoying the current skepticism about man-caused Global Warming is the fact that the scientific clamor about radical climate change has been occurring for almost a century. For example, in the 1920s, the newspapers were filled with scientists warning of a fast approaching Glacial Age; but in the 1930s, scientists reversed themselves and instead predicted serious Global Warming. But by 1972, Time was citing numerous scientific reports warning of imminent “runaway glaciation,” and in 1975, Newsweek reported overwhelming scientific evidence that proved an approaching Ice Age, with scientists warning the government to stockpile food; proposals were even advanced to melt the artic ice cap in an effort to help forestall the oncoming Ice Age. In fact, in 1976, the U. S. Government itself even released a study affirming that “the earth is heading into some sort of mini-ice age.” Now, however, just a few years later, the warning of an imminent Ice Age has been replaced with the warning of an impending Global Warming disaster. In less than a century, environmental science has completely reversed itself on this issue no less than three times."
And now, the satellite data are showing the beginnings of another cooling cycle; right on schedule of the normal oscillations.
GMG
  • Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:26 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
scitonga,

You have a really good idea there, seeing as how they don't seem to recall how to read their own charts. I am referring, of course, to their tendency to yell "Oh no, the sky is falling into the new ICE AGE", and then, "Uh, oh no, what we really meant is , the sky is falling into the new GLOBAL WARMING CATASTROPHE".

So, do you have their address handy? =)
scitsonga
  • Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:44 pm
  • : 0
  • : 2
  • Flag
GMG "If you look at one of those charts of the world's temperatures, you'll see that there was in fact a definitive cooling trend from (I believe) about 1940 through the early l970's. All this means is that there are recorded periods of cooling and periods of heating."

Wow, amazing observation on your part. You should alert the atmospheric and merteorlogic scientist around the world about this important trend that they must have over looked, I'm sure they had no idea...........LOL.
GMG
  • Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:26 pm
  • : 1
  • : 1
  • Flag
alex12

If you look at one of those charts of the world's temperatures, you'll see that there was in fact a definitive cooling trend from (I believe) about 1940 through the early l970's. All this means is that there are recorded periods of cooling and periods of heating. Responsible stewardship, which we are called to, would include being TRUTHFUL in a search for causes that may be linked to human factors that can be dealt with. If we discover (by truthful examination) that this is a warming cycle caused by natural factors, wouldn't you want to know this? Or would you rather be the patsy of those who would like to start a panic in order to line their own pockets.
chk555
  • Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:56 pm
  • : 1
  • : 1
  • Flag
I am very disappointed in my denomination taking this step. These men are looking back form the plow of the great commission. This earth and everything in it destined for the incinerator of God’s wrath. Only two things will survive the Word of God and the Souls of Men. We need to nothing except to know Christ and Him crucified and have nothing to do with lesser things.

When Christ transforms your heart, you naturally become more responsible with everything God gives you including his creation. There can be no reformation (of the earth or anything else) unless hearts and minds are transformed by Jesus Christ.
Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging Abusive, Spam, Offensive, Illegal, Racist or Libellous Posts.

Comment on this story

ID Password
Submit Don't have a Christian Post ID?Signing up is easy. Click Here