WASHINGTON – Two influential and younger leaders of the Christian right on Wednesday rejected the idea that the religious right is dying, and instead argued that it is alive and growing.
Bishop Harry R. Jackson Jr. and Tony Perkins, co-authors of Personal Faith, Public Policy, contend that the Christian right is undergoing a changing phase which includes expanding its public policy agenda, detaching itself from the Republican Party, and adjusting to a new multi-racial image.
“Our movement is not dead,” said Jackson, chairman of the High Impact Leadership Coalition and senior pastor of Hope Christian Church in the Washington, D.C. area. “Our movement is maturing,” he said at an event promoting his new book.
Jackson and co-author Perkins maintain that the Christian right needs to expand its influence to address immigration policy, poverty and social justice, racial reconciliation, and global warming – issues commonly associated with the Christian left – to adapt to the “changing political environment.”
However, they emphasize that the Christian right’s deeply cherished pro-life and pro-family agenda will still be at the heart of the movement.
“There remains a prioritization of those issues and life remains top of the list,” Perkins stated. “Marriage, which we saw was a turning issue in the 2004 election, remains a very important issue.”
But he added, “By no means are Christian voters, evangelicals single issue.”
The Christian right leaders’ call to expand the agenda was readily received by panelists the Rev. Jim Wallis, who represented the Christian left, and the Rev. Samuel Rodriguez, who considers himself an evangelical centrist.
Wallis, president and executive director of Sojourners, spoke about the need for the Christian right to be more vocal and aggressive on tackling poverty. He urged the religious right to see poverty and hunger as a life issue and move beyond the understanding that being pro-life simply means being anti-abortion.
Meanwhile, Rodriguez drew attention to the fast-growing Hispanic evangelical population that refuses to be labeled as either the Christian right or left.
Rodriguez, president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference (NHCLC), pointed out that people would be “hard-pressed” to find a Hispanic evangelical that would identify with the Christian right even though studies have shown that Hispanic evangelicals are more pro-life and pro-family than even white evangelicals.
“We (Hispanic evangelicals) want to be center,” Rodriguez said. “I think the future of American evangelicalism will not be right or left, but will be center. We will reconcile the righteousness platform that Bishop Harry Jackson alluded to previously, with that justice platform.”
The NHCLC president contends that the “browning of the church” will challenge the notion of Christian right and Christian left and will shift American evangelicalism to resist the label of “right or left, red state or blue state, Democrat or Republican.”
In their book, Jackson and Perkins also encourage evangelicals to open themselves up to both political parties and be a so-called political “free agent.” They state in the book that not aligning themselves with a party “could prove to have a much greater impact on actual public policy.”
“As a result of the broadening of the evangelical movement, both political parties will increasingly have to compete for support of evangelicals to succeed,” Jackson and Perkins wrote. “This, we believe, will ultimately result in policies that are more faith-friendly.”
The pretensions of the Christian Right may seem mild, but make no mistake, it is an apostate, spiritually dead church that seeks politcal power and to influence the State to enforce its decrees and to sustain its institutions. Historically, whenever the church has obtained secular power, she has employed it to punish dissent from her doctrines and and enslave the consciences of men. The infliction of civil penalties upon dissenters will inevitably result.
Our Founding Fathers wisely sought to guard against the employment of securlar power on the part of the church with its inevitable result, intolerance and persecution. The Constitution provides that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." The Constitution provides that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," and that "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office of public trust under the United States."
Jesus said, "My kingdom is not of this world." The so-called Christian Right would lead our nation only into national apostasy from its broad foundation of civil and religious liberty.
If we fail to heed these words of James Madison, it will be at our peril: "What influence, in fact, have ecclesiastical establishments had on society? In some instances they have been seen to erect a spiritual tyranny on the ruins of civil authority; in many instances they have been upholding the thrones of political tyranny; in no instance have they been the guardians of the liberties of the people. Rulers who wish to subvert the public liberty may have found an established clergy convenient allies."