Advanced Search

Southern Baptist Head: Christians Should Be Involved in Politics

By
Christian Post Reporter
Wed, Mar. 26 2008 04:44 PM ET
[-]Text[+]
E-mail Print RSS More on Topic AddThis Button

The president of the nation’s largest Protestant denomination dismissed the idea that politics was too “dirty” for Christians and instead urged believers to be involved in the political process.

Dr. Frank Page, president of the 16 million-member Southern Baptist Convention (SBC), discussed politics and American society during an interview with Donald E. Wildmon, the founder and chairman of the American Family Association, in a video made available online Tuesday.

Wildmon recalled growing up being taught that politics was “dirty” and that, as a Christian, he should stay out of it. The prominent pro-family leader then asked Page what he thought about Christian engagement in the political sphere.

“I believe Christians should be involved in the [political] process – not only because of our spiritual obligation but because as active participants in a democracy we are required to be participants,” Page responded without hesitation. “You cannot complain and you cannot whine about things if you’re not part of the process.”

He also recalled how Christians are called to be the “salt and light” in the world, and that through political involvement believers can make an impact on the culture for Christ.

In particular, Page urged Christians to vote this November for the next U.S. president whether their favorite candidate is on the ballot or not.

"Unfortunately, you've got a lot of foggy notions out there that electing the right person is going to change everything," Page observed, according to OneNewsNow, the website of the American Family News Network (AFN). "The reality is we're in a system of checks and balances, and not one person can do everything."

He warned against the thinking of not voting in the presidential election because of problems perceived in the three major presidential contenders.

“There is no perfect candidate; you must vote – and particularly this fall," Page urged. "Whoever the next president is going to be is most likely going to appoint at least two Supreme Court justices."

In addition to politics, Wildmon also asked Page if he felt society has changed the definition of God from the biblical definition that “God is love” (I John 4:8) to “love is God.”

The SBC president agreed with Wildmon that society has increasingly reduced God to an emotion or feeling instead of as a reality – a trend that he called “dangerous” and “inaccurate.”

“[I]t is also an attempt to make everything palatable, everything acceptable,” Page noted, “and just say we got to be loving towards everyone. So I see that as part of an overall strategy that says we can’t be judgmental about anything.”

But the love of God can be compared to the love of a father who, because he loves his child, will discipline the child, Page pointed out.

“God’s love is manifested in many ways,” Page explained. “Our world may define it as they want to define it as tolerance, accept everything, love everybody regardless – and we should love everybody regardless – but it doesn’t mean we can’t say ‘thus saith the Lord,’” he argued.

The SBC president was at the AFA headquarters in Mississippi on March 18 for the interview. Other topics he spoke about were the sanctity of life, traditional marriage, and homeschooling.

BACK TO TOP Print E-mail More on Topic AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

Most recent comments
DHFabian
  • Sat Mar 29, 2008 2:46 pm
  • : 1
  • : 2
  • Flag
I think Christ's teachings are antithetical to US politics and culture. Embracing Christ's teachings, as explained in the Bible, would result in dramatic changes in our country. We would put our strengths and resources into bringing peace instead of fighting our serial wars. We would aid our poor instead of using public dollars to pay off the tax responsibilities of the rich. We would feed the hungry rather than throw surplus food in the trash. And so on. No harm can come from mixing Christ's teachings with politics. The destruction comes when we mix something more like hard-line puritanism, with an excessive dose of arrogance, into our politics.
abhodim
  • Fri Mar 28, 2008 10:17 am
  • : 1
  • : 1
  • Flag
As an American-Christian, I appreciate the idea of the separation of Church and State, but not the revisionist concept that would bar the Church from having any influence. I agree that America should avoid having its variety of Cardinal Richelieu. But such extreme separation is not the original intent of the Founding Fathers. They held for a mutual noninterference. The Church should not build the national infrastructures. The State should not dictate doctrine.
I view this separation of Church and State as two entities that have every right to impact society, the State through its institutions, bureaus, and committees, the Church through its individual members, guided by conscience and faith. Daniel, while he could not do much for the individual souls of Nebuchadnezzar, Belshazzar, and Darius, committed his life to the service of the nation within the parameters of his faith and morals. Jesus, in his trial with Pilate, could assure the governor of the non-political nature of the Gospel and address His divine kingship towards those who place that faith in Him. Paul, under arrest and in the court of governors Felix and Festus, could take up imperial time to explain the faith for which he dedicated his life and risked much.
Christians should be in politics only in the capacity of their "seeking the peace of the city" (Jer. 29:7), in assisting the citizenry in their material wants. Proclaiming Christ crucified has its own forum, and that is wherever the moment is there to preach Gospel in word and action, giving the reason for our faith (1 Pet. 3:15).
wrhalver
  • Fri Mar 28, 2008 4:09 am
  • : 2
  • : 0
  • Flag
Coffee
It sounds like somebody was more interested in political influence.

God does not force anyone to their knees. He just occassionally lets you know why you should be on your kness.
coffee
  • Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:55 pm
  • : 1
  • : 0
  • Flag
Here in Sioux City, IA, a couple of Christians were recently elected to the city council. Promptly one of them tried to pass a law that meetings start with oral prayer by the council members themselves. I personally thought that it was a divisive move, although I agree that we should engage the culture when there are God-given opportunities.
JoshGilman
  • Thu Mar 27, 2008 5:16 pm
  • : 2
  • : 2
  • Flag
While I agree we should be politically active, it can only go so far. You enter dangerous waters when you try to mix beliefs with legislation. America is becoming an anti-Christian nation and what could scare them more than seeing legislation representing Christian beliefs being passed?

Like Jesus said, "My Kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but now My kingdom is not from here." (John 18:36)
www.theotrek.org
  • Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:46 am
  • : 1
  • : 1
  • Flag
Christian involvement in politics is fine until we begin to think that we can legislate the kingdom of God. Jesus did not accept political entanglement. He chose to distance his message of God's reign from any political expression. That is where the Religious Right lost itself. Sure, God has standards for everyone, but he allows people to reject those standards, offering love and forgiveness to all. Government does not well advance the cause of the church, nor should the church be enmeshed in advancing the cause of politics.
JHS
  • Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:01 am
  • : 4
  • : 2
  • Flag
Sure the SBC encourages involvement in politics, as long as it is republican politics, they have been knee deep with this party in supporting the war in Iraq, Bush's economic policies of greed with Jesus thrown in to make them feel better, I would go to an independent baptist church where at least seem to know the difference between liberals and republican greed in the name of Jesus.
gmac0961
  • Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:23 am
  • : 3
  • : 0
  • Flag
I think that a Christian should definitely be educated about issues and candidates, then vote as they feel led by the Spirit.

My only problem with Christians and politics is all too often, people place their loyalty to party and politicians over their principals. Whenever a Christian "leader" (and I place the italics because the leader role is usually unofficial) endorses a candidate or party, they begin overlook failings in their chosen candidate.

Using the example of King David's fall into sin, if that were to happen in today's America, there is no doubt that many pundits and religious leaders would have spoken in his defense because he was "their guy". One man had the guts to stand up and tell David where he was wrong and that is the role our Christian "leaders" too often abandon when they place they get involved in the political process.
wrhalver
  • Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:16 am
  • : 1
  • : 0
  • Flag
I have always believed that Christians should be fully engaged in politics. King David is a great example of a Christian-like individual who was.

King David was also an example of how a humble man can be raised into such a powerful position and then fall to the temtations that go with it.

But when David repented, the Kingdom was restored to him. Christians need to learn how to trust God in these positions of greater responsibility and greater accountability. God sees what is hidden from the public view.
Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging Abusive, Spam, Offensive, Illegal, Racist or Libellous Posts.

Comment on this story

ID Password
Submit Don't have a Christian Post ID?Signing up is easy. Click Here