Oklahoma Rep. Sally Kern (R-Oklahoma City), who said that the homosexual lifestyle is a bigger threat to American than terrorism, faced off against an openly gay pastor Easter Sunday in a debate on homosexuality that delved into politics and theology.
The debate on KFOR-TV's "Flash Point, which was posted on YouTube, featured Kern, host Kevin Ogle, panelists Burns Hargis and Mike Turpen, and Dr. Scott Jones of Oklahoma City's Cathedral of Hope. Hargis defended Kern's views while Turpen sided with Jones.
During the debate, Kern clarified comments she made at a Republican event in January, saying that she was speaking of the "homosexual agenda" and not people who are gay.
"They are out there putting forth-funding very heavily-homosexual and pro-homosexual candidates to run against, and defeat, conservatives across the nation," she explained.
Just like terrorism "destroys and tears down," continued the Oklahoma legislator, the homosexual agenda "is at the heart of trying to tear down what is the bedrock foundation of our society, which is the family and traditional marriage."
The Oklahoma legislator has received over 7,000 e-mails and voice messages including a few death threats for her comments comparing the gay lifestyle to terrorism. Her comments generated national attention after pro-homosexual group Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund posted the recording on YouTube two weeks ago. The video has been viewed more than 1 million times.
On the Sunday television program, Turpen asked Kern whether she believed Jones was more dangerous than Osama bin Laden.
Now, I was not saying that Scott here is personally as dangerous as Osama bin Laden," Kern responded, "but I was just making a comparison to prove my point."
She also countered that it is actually Christians who have been the target of such speech.
"On many occasions, Christians have been compared to terrorists because of our beliefs in traditional family and sticking to the Bible," said Kern. "There's a website right now called American Taliban, where Christians are identified as worse than terrorists and you dont hear anything being said about that."
Jones said that while he denounces hate speech, he wanted to know whether Kern thought gay people were like cancer and terrorists both something that people want to "kill" or "annihilate."
Kern reiterated once more that she was referring to the homosexual agenda and lifestyle, not the people themselves.
It is "a lifestyle that has deadly consequences for our young people, a lifestyle that will if it becomes mainstream throughout society destroy the Christian religion, she said to Jones.
[Pat] Buchanan said in his book, 'The Death of a Nation,' that for homosexuality to succeed they have to destroy Christianity," Kern added.
"I wasn't saying that you guys were a cancer," she continued. "I was saying that the effect is the very same as a cancer. If God's people do not stand up and proclaim God's Word, which teaches that homosexuality is a sin, and if we try to just ignore it and let it become mainstream and take on the mentality that you folks want that it's a normal lifestyle then that is going to spread through our culture, and we will no longer have the same kind of culture we've had for over 200 years. That's all I meant."
In the discussion, the Kern and Jones also discussed biblical views on homosexuality.
Kern said she believed homosexuality was part of man's sinful nature.
"A person cannot be saved until they realize they're lost," she stated. "We must repent of our sin."
"Homosexuals are trying to say that our sin is not sin because you don't want to repent of sin. And that's what God wants."
Jones said that if someone who was confused about his sexuality approached him for advice, he would tell that person that being gay is not a sin.
Hargis challenged Jones on how he would interpret the numerous verses in the Bible- including Leviticus, Romans, and 1 Timothy that condemn homosexuality.
The Oklahoma City minister downplayed the scripture which referenced homosexuality, countering that Leviticus also contain passages that forbid wearing two cloths woven from two different seeds.
Kern, however, pointed out that there is a difference between moral law, civil law and ceremonial law.
While ceremonial and civil laws were intended for God's chosen people, she explained, "God's moral law applies to everyone."
When asked how she would react if her son was gay, Kern said she would love him.
She also made clear that she doesn't hate Jones, Democrats who further the homosexual agenda or gays, noting that she even once intervened on behalf of the lesbian assistant principal at Northwest Classen when administrators wanted to remove her.
The controversy surrounding Kern's comments have added to ongoing debate within the Christian community over the best approach in ministering to those who identify themselves as gay or lesbian.
Some Christians support Kern for her candid views while others say her comments may impede dialogue between Christians and the gay community.
Peter LaBarbera of the faith-based Americans for Truth About Homosexuality recently defended Kern, saying, Rep. Kern is addressing a grave societal crisis caused by the ongoing, aggressive campaign to market destructive homosexual and gender-confused behavior as normal and good especially to children."
He added that Oklahoma's overwhelming 75.6 percent vote in 2004 to define marriage as between a man and a woman confirmed that Oklahomans are behind Kern.
Kerns comments also come at a time when the majority of today's young generation have a negative perception of Christianity with 91 percent of young non-Christians and 80 percent of young churchgoers say present-day Christianity is "anti-homosexual," according to a Sept. 2007 survey by The Barna Group.
Meanwhile, gay and lesbian lifestyles placed fourth in a survey on the most pressing issues for evangelical Christians today after abortion, personal indebtedness, the content of television and movies and homosexual activists, a more recent Barna survey reported in January.
The Thomas More Law Center of Ann Arbor, Mich., agreed last Wednesday to represent Kern in any legal cases arising from the controversy.
Comments
Never in all my life have I seen such obtuseness combined with such an obstinate refusal to either hear the Word of God, or to keep it. How many Christians here on this board, and other threads I've seen, have rebuked you for your willful, stubborn refusal to hear? You have "itching ears" and you are following a false doctrine that you either heard from someone else, or that you made up yourself. I've never seen anything like it. You have Christian after Christian showing you your error plainly but you refuse to see or to hear.
As for me, I have nothing left to say to you, I'm "shaking the dust off my feet" and "shaking my cloak out" at you, metaphorically speaking, and I'm done. It's wasted effort at this point. Only the grace of God and the power of the Holy Spirit can help you now. Pray for God's guidance, grace and mercy. You seem to be a very, very lost and troubled soul and you need his grace and mercy more than anything.
God did not create another male to be Adam's help-meet, Jesus did not say that "a man shall leave his mother and father and cleave unto his husband" and the church is Christ's bride, complete with all the female connotations that reside therein.
MATTHEW 19:11 GIVES DISPENSATION FOR THOSE WHO WISH TO BOND WITH THE SAME SEX. IT IS A SPIRIT MESSAGE FOR ALL TIME AND IS NOT LIMITED BY LEGALITIES.
OPP. SEX MARRIAGE EMBODIES A SPIRIT RELATIONSHIP THAT MIRRIORS THE RELATIONSHIP OF CHRIST AND THE CHURCH.. EXPLAIN HOW MARITAL SEXUAL RELATIONS OF THEMSELVES MIRRIORS THAT SAME RELATIONSHIP?
A relationship of the type that you are espousing (other than man-woman) seeks to warp the image which God made of Himself and dishonors the groom-bride relationship expressed in Christ being groom to the church. In pursuing such a non-biblical model for human relationships, God's very image is mocked. ...and "it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God."
ANYTHING THAT IS OF THE SAME SPIRIT AS ANOTHER, IN SPIRIT IS EQUAL TO THE OTHER.. THE IMAGE OF GOD IS NOT ABOUT FORM, BUT ABOUT SPIRIT.
I BOTH MARRIAGES BOND IN THE SAME SPIRIT., AND THE SEXUAL INTIMACY IN BOTH IS AN AFFIRMATION AND AN EXPRESSION OF THAT LOVE AND DEVOTION.
You are pushing the faulty argument that as Christians walking in grace we are free to ignore the law and are thus concluding that the liberty derived from grace alone permits absolute license in matters previously mentioned in the law. Holding this view may be comfort for the deceived half-hearted pew-warmer hoping for fire insurance, but not for the truly obedient Christian who "studies to show himself approved"
He would find that Paul writes in Romans 6:1,2,4: "What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid!... even so we also should walk in newness of life."
IF YOU ARE SAYING THAT THE LAW SAYS HOMOSEXUALITY IS A SIN...................... I DISAGREE WITH YOU.
EVERYTHING I HAVE SAID WAS ABOUT THAT AS FOLLOWERS OF CHRIST, WE NOW FULFILL THE LAW, AND NATURALLY IF WE FULFILL IT WE AUTOMATICALLY FOLLOW IT. BUT EVEN THRU FULFILLINGTHE LAW, WE DONT RECEIVE SALVATION.
GRACE IS SOMETHING WE RECEIVE THAT WE DIDNT PAY FOR OR EARN. WHATEVER GRACE, WE RECEIVE, WE RECEIVE THRU THE SPIRIT THAT LIVES IN US.
STUDIES IS WORKS. WE DONT RECEIVE SALVATION THRU WORKS. WORKS CAN BE AN INDICATION OF OUR DEPTH OF FAITH. THROUGHOUT HISTORY MANY PEOPLE STUDIED BUT MANY OF THOSE SAME PEOPLE MARTYRED THE SAINTS
HOW COULD WE POSSIBLY FULFILL THE LAW THRU SINNING?
You're so torqued off about defending your pet sin that you aren't even reading straight! I did not post the comment that you seem to be responding to.
However since you seem to wish to engage in verbal jousting so be it...
You are pushing the faulty argument that as Christians walking in grace we are free to ignore the law and are thus concluding that the liberty derived from grace alone permits absolute license in matters previously mentioned in the law. Holding this view may be comfort for the deceived half-hearted pew-warmer hoping for fire insurance, but not for the truly obedient Christian who "studies to show himself approved"
He would find that Paul writes in Romans 6:1,2,4: "What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid!... even so we also should walk in newness of life."
As believers we know that we are created in His image; "male and female He created them." Also, the God-given covenant of marriage between a man and woman mirrors the relationship between Christ and His church. As the church we are His bride.
God did not create another male to be Adam's help-meet, Jesus did not say that "a man shall leave his mother and father and cleave unto his husband" and the church is Christ's bride, complete with all the female connotations that reside therein.
A relationship of the type that you are espousing (other than man-woman) seeks to warp the image which God made of Himself and dishonors the groom-bride relationship expressed in Christ being groom to the church. In pursuing such a non-biblical model for human relationships, God's very image is mocked. ...and "it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God."
You persist in mental gymnastics and contortions of logic in order to continue pushing a biblical basis for your fantasy that God that somehow blesses your behavior because nowhere in the bible does it say explicitly "Feetxxxl, your behavior is sin".
You do so at your own peril. It would seem that you believe that if you can repeat it often enough, even though no one else will buy into your false doctrine, at least you'll further convince yourself.
You need prayer and you need to pray; pray for a renewed mind, pray for open eyes and pray that by the Holy Spirit's conviction and empowerment that you might repent of your slavery to this sin and walk in newness of life.