Updated 03:31 pm.EST, Tue November 24, 2009

Society|Wed, Apr. 09 2008 03:29 PM EDT

Petraeus: Iraq Security Better, but Fragile

By Michelle A. Vu|Christian Post Reporter

The top U.S. general in Iraq said Tuesday security in Iraq is “significantly better” since his last appearance before Congress seven months ago, but noted that progress was “fragile” and “reversible.”

Gen. David Petraeus appeared before the U.S. Senate Armed Services and Foreign Relations committees yesterday and recommended that troop withdrawals from Iraq be postponed for 45 days after July when its forces will be reduced to 140,000 or pre-surge levels, according to CNN.

He refused to say if further troop pullout would resume after the pause, but repeated his long-held stance that further withdrawal would be based on conditions on the ground.

"This approach does not allow establishment of a set withdrawal timetable," he said. "However it does provide the flexibility those of us on the ground need to preserve the still-fragile security gains our troopers have fought so far and sacrifice so much to achieve.”

"War is not a linear phenomenon,” Petraeus noted. “It's a calculus, not arithmetic."

But frustrated senators and congressmen alike have challenged the general to explain why U.S. troops should stay in Iraq and continue the unpopular war which recently turned five years old.

"We and the American people must ask: Why should we stay in Iraq in large numbers?" Rep. Ike Skelton, the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, asked Wednesday during day two of the Petraeus and U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Croker testimony on Capitol Hill.

"I hope you can also explain the next strategy," Skelton said. "The counterinsurgency strategy worked tactically, but the surge forces are going home. Political reconciliation hasn't happened, and violence has leveled off and may be creeping back."

Although U.S. officials may debate about levels of troops and military strategies, one issue that is difficult to deny is the increased violence against Iraq’s Christian minority.

Just last week a Syrian Orthodox priest, Father Yusef Adel, was murdered in Baghdad. Adel’s death occurred less than three weeks after Chaldean Catholic Archbishop Faraj Raho – Iraq’s second most senior Catholic cleric – was found dead after being kidnapped for two weeks.

Moreover, violent campaigns against church buildings have increased with an astounding number of 10 Iraqi churches bombed within a span of two weeks earlier this year.

Unyielding assaults against Christians have forced the country’s tiny Christian population to flee their homeland in droves. Christians, although making up only three percent of the population, is said to compose nearly half the refugees fleeing Iraq, according to the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees.

There are now only about 600,000 Iraqi Christians remaining in the country, down from 1.2 million before the war.

Religious freedom and human rights groups have blamed the United States and other countries with troops in Iraq for not doing enough to protect the Christian minority population, which they warn will be extinct if something is not done soon.

But in regards to the general violence in Iraq, Gen. Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker laid blame on Iran, which they accused of fueling ongoing conflict by “funding, training, arming and directing” Shiite Muslim militias in clashes against Iraqi government troops.

Iraq’s ambassador to the United States, Ambassador Samir Sumaidaie, also mentioned the threat of Iran to Iraq on Tuesday while speaking at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
.
"I say to them, yes, I understand your pain, but it is not something you can get out of so easily,” Sumaidaie said about U.S. troop withdrawal. “This is the wrong time unless you want to hand the country on a plate to Iran.”

Sen. John McCain, the top Republican on the Armed Services Committee and the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, supports keeping a high level of U.S. troops in Iraq if necessary. McCain was one of the leading advocates of the troop surge last year which lowered incidents of violence in Iraq.

"Success, the establishment of peaceful, democratic state, the defeat of terrorism – this success is within reach," McCain contends. "Congress must not choose to lose in Iraq. We must choose to succeed."

President Bush plans to address the nation on Thursday, when he is expected to adopt Petraeus’ plan.

The Iraq war has claimed more than 4,000 U.S. lives and cost an estimated $600 billion since 2003.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:27 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    gmac 0961,
    You make some valid points. You are correct in saying that military victory does not mean political victory. The real problem with Iraq is the fact that we don't control the outcome. The outcome is up to the new Iraqi government. This is true, however this would not be an option were Sadaam still in power.

  • Thu Apr 10, 2008 7:30 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Just to be clear, I am a retired vet with a son doing his second tour in the MIddle East. I was against the Iraq invasion from the start because of the very quicksand we now find ourselves mired in. I'm no military genius, but there were many voices, Colin Powell among them, who warned us not to do this and I agreed then and now.

    The real problem with Iraq is the fact that we don't control the outcome. In this article, Rep Skelton touches on the key point. Military success does not equal political success. In war, you normally have an objective that is within your control, such as the conquest of a given territory. This is different. No matter what we do militarily, we cannot control what the Iraqis do with their own government, unless we were to try and establish a puppet regime, which would be the worst disaster.

    This is why I am very aggravated by McCain's calls for "Victory" and "Let them win!". It sounds great from a military standpoint, but this isn't an entirely military situation and doesn't really point the way to our ending our involvement in Iraq.

    Simply put: At this point in time, we don't know what real victory looks like.

  • Thu Apr 10, 2008 6:10 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    iraqman says: Dear America,

    Thank you for the "liberation" & destruction of Iraq. Now please leave.

    If we did this then you would blame Americans for leaving the country un-reconstructed.

  • Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:21 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    The General states that security in Iraq is significantly better. Well, that depends on who you ask. The average Iraqi doesn't feel this so-called better security. America has made many, many enemies in the people of Iraq. Iraqi's blame America for the death & destruction of their country.

  • Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:11 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Dear America,

    Thank you for the "liberation" & destruction of Iraq. Now please leave.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Also on CP
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a