I had the privilege of seeing the movie "Expelled: No intelligence" allowed in a pre-screening a few weeks ago and I’m thrilled that I did. It was a funny, thought provoking, dangerous, serious, engaging (and did I mention “funny”?) documentary. I have been a fan of Ben Stein since his “Bueller, Bueller” days, but now he is a rock star to me. He was so tongue-in-cheek that he almost bit it off.
Regardless of where you stand in the Creation vs. Evolution vs. Intelligent Design debate you will find this documentary thought provoking and fun. Mr. Stein interviews experts from both sides of the debate and has a great time doing it.
He is not actually trying to make an argument for Intelligent Design as much as he is that we should be free to have the debate in the public square. "Expelled" clearly shows that once esteemed scientists and/or educators who embrace an I.D. point of view have been marginalized, mocked and often expelled by the tightly wound, gated community of evolutionary elitists who rule the roost of all things smart.
This documentary exposes the hypocrisy of the high brow intellegensia and shows that most are only open to free speech and debate if it happens on their side of “the wall” (a term that is coined to describe the closed thinking of many evolutionists to consider any other origin options than evolution.) "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed" pulls their fancy pants down and spanks em good.
If I were a youth leader I’d take a core of my teenagers to go see it and then I’d make a plan with them to unleash a youth group wide discussion once the DVD came out. The doc, while great, feels like about 15 minutes too long for the average teenager to me. And the last thing I would want to do is have a bunch of teenagers fidgeting in the theater. They could miss out on some great content and that would be bad. This film is too important to miss any segment. I think the DVD, broken up in segments over the course of 4 weeks in the youth group setting, would give the entire youth group a chance to process and talk through the excellent content in this ground breaking documentary.
So grab ten or so of your teens, get some tickets this weekend and let the conversations begin! And, once the DVD comes out, make it a youth group wide, month long discussion. On second thought, open it up to the teen community once the DVD releases and use it as an outreach. If this is not an evangelism opportunity I don’t know what one is. For once a movie that doesn’t make creationist Christians look like back woods dummies who cling on to their guns and their religion in the face of all the evidence.
Where do I stand in the Creation vs. Evolution debate? Suffice it to say that I take Genesis chapter 1 at face value. Call me a brute. Call me a literalist. Call me a Neanderthal (actually dont’ call me that one). But don’t ever accuse me of not taking the Bible seriously. Although I have friends that vigorously debate with me on this, I just can’t get away from how plainly the first chapter of Genesis describes how everything began…and I believe it. Because I’m a scientist? No. I wasn’t even that good at science. I believe it because the Bible says it.
What about all the “evidence” that evolution provides? Check out "Expelled" when it comes out in theatres (Friday, April 18th). You may be surprised at how little compelling evidence Darwinian evolution actually does provide. Lots of smoke, little fire.
__________________________________________________________
Greg Stier is the President and Founder of Dare 2 Share Ministries in Arvada, Colo., where he works with youth leaders and students, equipping them to be effective in sharing the gospel. With experience as a senior teaching pastor and in youth ministry for almost 20 years, Greg has a reputation of knowing and relating to today’s teens. He is widely viewed as an authority and expert teen spirituality. He is known for motivating, mobilizing and equipping teens for positive change. For more information on Dare 2 Share Ministries, and the SURVIVE 07/08 conference tour, please visit www.dare2share.org.
Comments
http://www.reuters.com/article/filmNews/idUSN2320158220080424
“The term Neo-Darwinism was not drummed up by misleading creationists to degrade evolutionists, but by evolutionists themselves.”
Time for me to learn you up young padawan. The tern Neo-Darwinism in regards to Evolutionary biology was adopted b/c 1) The older and wrong ideas of Darwin don’t fully or accurately describe how evolution works from what we know now, IE he missed on some of the details, mostly b/c they were things he genuinely didn’t know of and so it’s hard to blame him directly.
2) The real term in biological circles is ‘the modern (evolutionary) synthesis’, in which new more accurate processes describe some of the details Darwin was ignorant of or got wrong. This is why Neo-Darwinism is aptly named, as at the core his ideas of NS and others are still valid, while smaller ones aren’t and thus to define evolution as Darwinism or even Neo-Darwinism is wrong and misleading b/c it gives the impression that all of his ideas were correct, when they certainly weren’t.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_evolutionary_synthesis
From this view, it’s about as logical and correct as defining all of the knowledge we know regarding evolutionary biology as (neo) Darwinism, as it is to define gravity as Newtonianism. A lot has changed in over 150 years since Origins, and to leave the impression that all of Darwin’s ideas define how evolution is understood today is wrong, thus the term Neo is needed to infer an additional layer of knowledge.
The term Neo-Darwinism was not drummed up by misleading creationists to degrade evolutionists, but by evolutionists themselves. It is a helpful tool to know and identify the common understanding of natural materialistic evolution, including common decent, natural selection and random genetic mutations. Many Christians hold to one or more of these, but not necessarily to the whole. When engaging dialogue, it is important to failiarize oneself with the terminology. Well, there you go.
A. not only is evolution the superior hypothesis to explain the origin of life and species...
B. It is the *only* scientific hypothesis to do so.
now, I'm not sure just what you imply with "your claims of superiority betray you", but I can assure you that ad hominem attacks do not make an argument or even a valid point.
I don't think any of us "follow" Darwin....we just acknowledge that he is the first person to figure out that/how different species evolved to what they are today. If you have a better explanation that includes testable hypothesis, please do share it.
What you are making is a fallacious argument; appeal to authority (informal), as the founding fathers are *not* experts on evolution or any related field. Even Darwin believing in God makes no difference because theology is not Darwin's strength. I doubt any supporters of ID/Creationism can make anything *but* a fallacious argument, since none of them have any proof of anything they claim.
Are you suggesting Darwin was a creationist now? He was religious in his early years, but following the death of his young daughter and following his research his faith was eroded. Keep in mind Darwin wrote On Origins 20 years before he published it and so his religious faith from that time had wavered. Seed, I can’t believe you’re actually considering Darwin’s supposed death bed confession, even creationist sites lik AIG confirm it’s not true.
A. not only is evolution the superior hypothesis to explain the origin of life and species...
B. It is the *only* scientific hypothesis to do so.
now, I'm not sure just what you imply with "your claims of superiority betray you", but I can assure you that ad hominem attacks do not make an argument or even a valid point.