As the pro-intelligent design documentary “Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed” launches full throttle into over 1,000 theaters this Friday, its producers are no doubt feeling a strong sense of anticipation and anxiety.
The film, which explores the existence of what it claims is an elitist scientific establishment dedicated to Darwinism and the silencing of all its critics, has generated fierce reactions and attacks from the moment of its conception, according to producers.
In a series of incidents last month, producers grappled with what they described as both an intentional bootleg distribution campaign designed to wash away the film’s value, and the “crashing” of a pre-screening by two vocal atheist scientists.
And after the most recent wave of attacks – an accusation of copyright infringement and a series of elaborate attacks on the internet – producers have cried of an intentional campaign to discredit and destroy the film.
Despite the attacks, however, Executive Producer Walt Ruloff said that he would not be deterred by what he described as groups of zealot-like scientists unwilling to allow for civil debates on Darwinism.
“We certainly will not allow a small group of self-appointed gatekeepers to infringe our rights of free speech and our obligation to expose them for what they are - namely, intellectual thugs unwilling to accept any dissent from Darwinian orthodoxy,” he said, according to a statement.
Logan Craft, chairman and executive producer of the film, also gave an upbeat commentary, adding that the production team would not be silenced.
"Opponents of our film are attempting to interfere with its important message,” he said.
“As the movie documents, similar tactics are being used across the country against many of the researchers, scientists, and professors who want to engage in free debate within science but have inadequate resources to challenge the Establishment. However, we do have the platform to confront the 'thought police,' and we will work tirelessly to open the doors of free speech and inquiry," he added.
“Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed,” starring actor and former presidential speech writer Ben Stein, is an in-depth investigation of teachers, professors, and researchers who are mocked and threatened with expulsion by an elitist scientific establishment that punishes the scientific proponents of intelligent design because they reject some of the claims of Darwin’s theory of evolution.
Comments
A. not only is evolution the superior hypothesis to explain the origin of life and species...
B. It is the *only* scientific hypothesis to do so.
now, I'm not sure just what you imply with "your claims of superiority betray you", but I can assure you that ad hominem attacks do not make an argument or even a valid point.
I don't think any of us "follow" Darwin....we just acknowledge that he is the first person to figure out that/how different species evolved to what they are today. If you have a better explanation that includes testable hypothesis, please do share it.
What you are making is a fallacious argument; appeal to authority (informal), as the founding fathers are *not* experts on evolution or any related field. Even Darwin believing in God makes no difference because theology is not Darwin's strength. I doubt any supporters of ID/Creationism can make anything *but* a fallacious argument, since none of them have any proof of anything they claim.
you've got a lot of nerve saying that considering how all my recent posts were flagged. All one need do is reveiw this article and all the times I have been flagged. Everytime I post a reply to a comment it's flagged and you have the audacity to say I am flagging?
You must be a little shallow or not much of a thinker b/c all one need do it refer to the first pages from this and other articles and its readily obvious I and others like Steve20, sctingo and GeorgeX and others are the ones being censored here. And you have the nerve to suggest I am behind censoring peoplp, Ha!
WoW a quote from the 1950's Awesome! surely no knowlede has progresses since then! What a horrid arguement, why don't you bother finding a quote from the 1850's too while you're at it. You obvously think a persons words have more sway than that of facts and evidence and don't comprehend how knowledge progress and changes which makes quoting from the 50's about as illogical as it gets.
Ya right. what nonsesne. Why would I flag all others comments, I like people exposing their rope of ignorance so they can hang themeselves, me censoring them would defeat that and not allow me to rebut them. get a clue. I am the one being censored here, not the other way around. Twit.