Advanced Search

Methodists Reject Changes to Gay Stance, Oppose Homophobia

By
Christian Post Reporter
Thu, May. 01 2008 09:45 AM ET
[-]Text[+]
E-mail Print RSS More on Topic AddThis Button

After a lengthy debate, United Methodists voted Wednesday to reject changes to its constitution that would have liberalized the church's stance on homosexuality.

Enlarge this Image
United Methodist
(Photo: UMNS / Paul Jeffrey)
Helen Andrew (left), of Sleepy Hollow, N.Y., and Nancie Hughes, of Berkeley, Calif., stand to protest legislation related to homosexuality during the 2008 United Methodist General Conference in Fort Worth, Texas. The assembly voted April 30 to retain the church's position that the practice of homosexuality is 'incompatible with Christian teaching.'

Delegates to the 2008 General Conference, the denomination's highest governing body, voted against a proposed "majority report" which would have acknowledged that members of the United Methodist Church "deeply disagree with one another" on the issue of homosexuality.

Such an acknowledgment would have been a "mature way forward" and "an honest, yet humble approach to how we are to view one another," said Frederick Brewington, a layman in the New York Annual (regional) Conference, according to the United Methodist News Service.

"We can make the determination to move forward, and stop the hurt," he told delegates during a long and emotional debate, urging change to the church's policy to end more than 35 years of struggle over the issue.

The petition for changes would have also deleted the current statement in UMC's Book of Discipline that describes homosexual practice as "incompatible with Christian teaching" and bans noncelibate gay pastors.

However, the Rev. Eddie Fox argued that any United Methodist statement on human sexuality needs to be "clear, concise and faithful to biblical teaching."

And deleting the incompatibility statement would be confusing, Fox said as he presented a "minority report" that would retain the language.

"I have seen and experienced the pain and the brokenness in parts of our global movement whenever our church has failed to hold fast to this essential teaching of the Holy Scripture," he added.

Delegates voted 501-417 to adopt the minority report which also includes wording that "all persons are individuals of sacred worth, created in the image of God," and that United Methodists are to be "welcoming, forgiving and loving one another, as Christ has loved and accepted us."

They also approved a new resolution opposing homophobia and heterosexism. In a separate resolution, the General Conference asked the United Methodist Board of Church and Society, the church's social advocacy agency, to develop educational resources and materials on the effects of homophobia and heterosexism, the discrimination or prejudice against lesbians or gay men by heterosexual people.

Many shared emotional stories about violence used against homosexual people during a heated debate before the vote.

But in the midst of the painful debate, the Rev. Steve Wende of the Texas Conference cautioned, "If we do this (change language in the Book of Discipline) as a way of making some people happy, it won't make anyone happy."

In other decisions on sexuality issues, delegates voted to maintain the church's policy that prohibits United Methodist ministers from conducting ceremonies that celebrate homosexual unions and rejected language that would include "committed unions" in a section describing the sanctity of the marriage covenant.

The United Methodist General Conference, a 10-day legislative meeting that takes place every four years, concludes May 2.

BACK TO TOP Print E-mail More on Topic AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

Most recent comments
jhallaway
  • Mon May 05, 2008 9:09 pm
  • : 1
  • : 0
  • Flag
As painful as all this is. The Word of God is still the focus and the solution. The Methodists have done well to try and preserve the Word of God in their practices of faith. It is not the rejection of any person, but rather a behavior. ML stated is right by just noting the verses from the Bible. There was a day when morality was taught in every arena in this great land, now it is made sport of by many in high places. To be found in Christ is to forsake all that His Word says is evil. There's another list that ends with disobedient to parents. We are all the same. We must come to Jesus willing to forsake all for the one who did the same for us. God bless you all!
ifeelfine72
  • Sun May 04, 2008 6:38 pm
  • : 0
  • : 3
  • Flag
Rev Bill: It seems pretty funny to me that when some Christians are saying that slavery is a sin and that certain parts of the OT should be ignored, their tunes change pretty quickly when talking about homosexuality. Looks like hypocrisy to me.
ifeelfine72
  • Sun May 04, 2008 6:30 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Crunch: Regarding your chastising of John14_6, have you ever heard of the word irony before? Your response was the textbook definition.
Crunch
  • Sun May 04, 2008 5:03 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
** Okay I just noticed that on the right-hand side of this post area, there are 3 Goggle advertsements for "GAY SINGLE MEN".....what is up with that?!?! Isn't his supposed to be the Christian Post...!
Crunch
  • Sun May 04, 2008 4:57 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
I'm really thankful that the Medthodists are staying with the athourity of God's word. People can and probably will, disagree on this homosexual thing (and others) till the Lord himself comes!

It's good to have opinions on issues, but you always have to go back to God's Word to make sure it lines-up with what He says. The bottom line is, it's not mankinds preference/ opinion that matters, it's God's....He has the final word, and He's stated it. It doesn't make one bit of difference if we don't like it....that's the way it is.

Honestly....I think we've all tried to justify or minimize a sinful behaviour because it's comfortable, it's what our flesh wants. You can probably take any sin and try to justify it.... but that sure doesn't make it ok with God....darn.(smile!)
lewr2
  • Sat May 03, 2008 11:20 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Dongard... I haven't seen the posts, but a post can be deleted depending on what that post says. This is America and also the "Christian" Post and as such, try to adhear to a different code of conduct and verbage. Again... haven't seen it, but they have the right to do as they please.
dongard
  • Sat May 03, 2008 6:48 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
i agree with mugglegorn

unless the post clearly presents a clear and present danger, it should not be flagged. better to let the bigots stand naked. this is democracy folks and it works both ways. a point that is sometimes lost by those that are full of themselves.
feetxxxl
  • Sat May 03, 2008 9:03 am
  • : 2
  • : 1
  • Flag
obviously i have been blacklisted from cp, or i have been blacklisted from discussing my position challenging that homosexuality is a sin on cp
feetxxxl
  • Sat May 03, 2008 8:56 am
  • : 0
  • : 1
  • Flag
Flagged as inappropriate.
feetxxxl
  • Sat May 03, 2008 8:26 am
  • : 0
  • : 1
  • Flag
Flagged as inappropriate.
Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging Abusive, Spam, Offensive, Illegal, Racist or Libellous Posts.

Comment on this story

ID Password
Submit Don't have a Christian Post ID?Signing up is easy. Click Here