Advanced Search

Evangelical Writers Challenged to Avoid Alienating the Unchurched

By
Christian Post Reporter
Fri, May. 09 2008 12:04 PM ET
[-]Text[+]
E-mail Print RSS More on Topic AddThis Button

PORTLAND, Ore. – “I have a bone to pick with you,” a Christian writer told a group of fellow evangelical writers Thursday.

Evangelical writers nearly always alienate non-evangelicals in their works, noted long-time Christian writer and editor Tim McLaughlin.

While most writers write to impact non-believers, as well as believers, the phrases they use and how they ignore some faith passages are real obstacles to reaching the unchurched, the Oregon native added.

During a workshop, entitled “How the Non-Evangelical World Views You and What You Can Do About It,” McLaughlin said he refers to a list of common pitfalls of evangelical writers in offending the unchurched when he writes or edits stories.

“I will not make a dent in any unchurched person’s mind unless I attend to this,” McLaughlin said, speaking at the annual convention of the Evangelical Press Association.

Unconscious evangelical “passwords,” such as how many years an evangelical has been married and how many kids that person has, in a biography is nice from an evangelical perspective, but may be irrelevant or a stumbling block to non-evangelicals, he said.

McLaughlin contends that evangelicals include personal information in a biography to establish credibility based on religious standards rather than professional. After careful consideration, he decided to delete the line on family life in a biography and leave just the subject’s professional qualification in his efforts to edit out the “passwords” used in evangelical writing.

The speaker also called into question the campaign for traditional marriage.

Evangelicals have long championed the idea of one man-one woman for life as the biblical standard for marriage, said the evangelical writer. But for non-evangelicals, this may be an unrealistic or inconsistent view because the one-man-one woman for life concept in the Bible is only relevant based on where one looks in the Scripture.

“I think that we are also unrealistic, evangelicals, in how we view let’s say marriage,” McLaughlin said. “I wonder if we are reluctant to see our current ideas of a Christian marriage in the United States as a thing much more dictated by culture than the Bible.

“Adam and Eve had no civil ceremony, Abraham slept with other women including Hagar, Isaac’s wife was selected by his father’s servant and was his cousin, David ‘collected wives like military victories, and his most memorable son came from an affair with a married woman,’ and Prophet Hosea married a whore,” McLaughlin noted, speaking from a non-evangelical point of view.

“So what do we have as a biblical model for marriage?” he asked while chuckling.

“Let’s not call marriage ‘biblical,’ as we like to, but healthy,” posed McLaughlin.

The evangelical writer and editor with more than 20 years of experience called on evangelical writers in the room to be more thoughtful and conscious of what viewpoint they write from.

“I speak through writing,” McLaughlin said, who also edits for a non-Christian publication to be able to see through the eyes of non-believers. “So when I’m writing and editing, I’m not picturing a person who is lost, in all respect, but a person who is finding themselves and being chased by God.”

BACK TO TOP Print E-mail More on Topic AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

Most recent comments
terriergal
  • Thu May 15, 2008 12:43 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Daniel Paul your post there has alienated me.
terriergal
  • Thu May 15, 2008 12:40 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
"Evangelical writers nearly always alienate non-evangelicals in their works, noted long-time Christian writer and editor Tim McLaughlin"

Yeah so did Jesus. Who would want to be like HIM. /sarc
Strudelcookies
  • Tue May 13, 2008 10:14 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
>>“I think that we are also unrealistic, evangelicals, in how we view let’s say marriage,” <<

In other words, she's telling religious people to give up keeping values in their writing to connect with others. That's ridiculous. Ask anyone who works at Pixar, that's not how to connect with others, and that's not how to make a good story. Boo, hiss.
timothybrown01
  • Mon May 12, 2008 1:16 am
  • : 0
  • : 1
  • Flag
It is critical that authors are clear on what they intend to accomplish in their writings. A good writer understands his or her audience and arranges an array of words that holds the audiences attention. Some writing is done to educate, some to entertain and some to inspire. Christian sometimes use words that only have impact on or are understand by other Christians. I would not even try to explain "Grace" to person who has not been saved. Even if there were words to describe the phenomena, there is no possible way of describing the emotional impact. The song, "Amazing Grace", probably describes "Grace" far better than any philosophical dissertation. Those of you who have been saved know what I am talking about, others do not. If I were writing a sermon, I would use the word "Grace" and expect it to be understood. If speaking to a secular audience I would use the word sparingly, because it might not be understood. Rather than being concerned about "Alienating the Unchurched" any good writer should focus on reaching his or her target audience.

Non-believers have difficulty reading the Bible because God talks to men through the Bible via the Holy Spirit. That conversation is to our hearts as well as our heads and the conversation often takes us out of the written word into a personal dialog. Though the writings of men, are not the same as the writings of the Bible, I believe some works are divinely inspired and they would not speak to us the way they do if they were watered down to appeal to non-believers.

I also think it some non-believers are intrigued by Christian words, and eventually figure out there really is something exciting in Christianity they do not understand. Maybe the "Alienation" actually turns people to God and saves souls.
Daniel Paul
  • Sun May 11, 2008 9:42 am
  • : 1
  • : 1
  • Flag
We tend to use the word "Biblcial" quite a bit in our society. Jesus said "do you not know the scripture". The Bible contains examples of what will happen if you don't do things Jesus' way. One of the issues the author is pointing to is the first rule of radio I learned. "Never say what you want to say. Say what you want your audience to hear." Journalists write to convey. It accomplishes nothing if it isn't written in a way they can hear.
star2
  • Sun May 11, 2008 1:58 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Another thing about Jerry2 for all of you who don't know him very well: He changes his name often.
believer
  • Sat May 10, 2008 9:21 pm
  • : 2
  • : 0
  • Flag
The author seems to be saying that if God's people in the Bible either think, say, or act a certain way that becomes a biblical model and therefore since they messed up that gives the rest of us permission to imitate them. But God's spoken word always takes precedence over every thing else. In the case of marriage God's spoken word in both the Old and New Testaments tells us what God's design for marriage is regardless of the example set by some of His people in either the Old or New Testament.
star2
  • Sat May 10, 2008 8:17 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Chris333

Re:So does anybody want to deal with the assertion in this post that there is virtually no biblical model for marriage? Especially not in the Old Testament.


The only ones who don't want to deal with it are the ones who want to justify their sexual immorality.
Chris333
  • Sat May 10, 2008 7:52 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
So does anybody want to deal with the assertion in this post that there is virtually no biblical model for marriage? Especially not in the Old Testament.
DiaryOfCross
  • Sat May 10, 2008 7:09 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Well that answered my question about Jerry ^_^ thanks Star ;D

But I wish he was here to answer, and I guess Don got flagged cause he was portraying Evangelicals like Communists. I really wanted to talk to him about that. D:
Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging Abusive, Spam, Offensive, Illegal, Racist or Libellous Posts.

Comment on this story

ID Password
Submit Don't have a Christian Post ID?Signing up is easy. Click Here