Advanced Search

Michigan Court Rules in Favor of Marriage

By
Christian Post Reporter
Sun, May. 11 2008 05:42 PM ET
[-]Text[+]
E-mail Print RSS More on Topic AddThis Button

The Michigan Supreme Court has ruled against giving domestic partnership benefits for homosexual couples working in state university and government agencies.

In a 5-2 ruling this past week, state Supreme Court justices overruled a decision by a lower appeals court to give same-sex couples health benefits, citing the passage of the state’s 2004 Marriage Protection Amendment as the basis of its decision.

"We conclude that the marriage amendment which states that 'the union of one man and one woman in marriage shall be the only agreement recognized as a marriage or similar union for any purpose,' prohibits public employers from providing health-insurance benefits to their employees' qualified same-sex domestic partners,” the court wrote in its ruling.

In 2004, a majority of voters in Michigan and over a dozen other states were prompted to pass a marriage amendment after the State Supreme Court in Massachusetts ruled in favor of gay “marriage.”

While the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Michigan decried the latest ruling as "flawed and unfortunate," pro-family groups were ecstatic.

“The people of Michigan have constitutionally protected marriage as exclusively the union of one man and one woman, period, and that includes prohibiting the recognition of homosexual relationships as equal or similar to marriage for any purpose, including offering spousal-type benefits to the homosexual partners of government employees,” explained Gary Glenn of the American Family Association of Michigan, according to Catholic News Agency.

Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, said that the ruling in Michigan was a victory for the sanctity of marriage everywhere.

“This ruling not only affirms the lower court ruling, but affirms the institution of marriage. In effect, it strengthens the institution and will preserve it for generations to come,” he told LifeSiteNews.com.

Since 2004, when the Massachusetts State Supreme Court made its ruling to recognize gay “marriage,” 26 states have passed a constitutional ban on the practice, while over a dozen others have passed laws limiting or outlawing it.

BACK TO TOP Print E-mail More on Topic AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

Most recent comments
ifeelfine72
  • Wed May 14, 2008 10:02 pm
  • : 2
  • : 1
  • Flag
Daniel Paul: What are you talking about? Evolution has nothing to do with "disproving accountability to God." That is utterly ridiculous. Evolution is science. Period. Stop making it more than it is.
BmoreTeacher
  • Wed May 14, 2008 1:48 pm
  • : 2
  • : 0
  • Flag
Ok, but that doesn't answer my question about God v. Satan. How could God let Satan overpower something he created in his image and likeness? That part doesn't make sense to me.
Daniel Paul
  • Wed May 14, 2008 9:58 am
  • : 1
  • : 3
  • Flag
Bmore, I know people who believe they are going to make a million bucks with some new business idea. That doesn't make it so. :-) The concept of evolution was to disprove accountability to God by disproving creation. This is admitted by many folks involved and restated at the Darwinian Centenial Convention. It was not set out as science but rather as an attempt to use science to disprove accountability to our Creator. (no creation-no Creator)

"Original sin" exists even though people choose not to believe it. The sinful nature of man exists even though people choose not to believe it. My 4 year old doesn't always believe me that he's doing something wrong but I correct that misperception. God does the same for those who will listen now -or- it will happen when 'we get home'. How do I know this. I know my Father. I have a relationship with Him.

What we believe does not determine truth. God determines truth. We either accept or reject it.
BmoreTeacher
  • Wed May 14, 2008 6:48 am
  • : 1
  • : 1
  • Flag
Here's a question for everyone: If you believe in evolution, which I do, then you don't believe the story of Adam and Eve was real. That being said, what is the belief regarding original sin? Wouldn't that be put into place by God, or is the belief that Satan put sin in the world? Again, if you believe that, wouldn't you also need to believe that Satan is just as powerful, if not moreso, than God in order to mess up what he had created? I'm not trying to be at all inflammatory, just asking quesitons to people who seem to know the Bible inside out and backwards.
msnchris70
  • Tue May 13, 2008 12:35 pm
  • : 0
  • : 1
  • Flag
IN the beginning there was no sickness or sin. Today we have sickness and sin, because of original sin. I just wanted to clarify my point. Sin disfigures a person by the choices they make and in their bodilly condition. It may not be there fault, but with prayer and supplication you will still be able to walk with God.
msnchris70
  • Tue May 13, 2008 12:31 pm
  • : 1
  • : 5
  • Flag
To be Gay is to have a disorder. We all have crosses we have to deal with. Because of original sin, our human nature has a proclivity to sin and sometimes that sin takes various forms like homosexual attraction, being born with Epilepsy, being born with congenital heart failure, etc. The point about the gay disorder is that you must not act on it.

Homosexuals should always be treated with respect and we are called to love one another, but hate the sin. Narrow is the gate that leads to eternal life and what you do in your body effects your soul. The Bible is quite explicit about who will not inherit the Kingdom of God.
Stay chaste and repent!

Also, there ARE NO ERRORS IN THE BIBLE!!! The Bible is inerrant and is the infallible Word of God! Don't sacrilege our Scripture to justify your lifestyle.

Give your heart to Christ and he will repair your soul.
star2
  • Tue May 13, 2008 11:51 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
ifeelfine72

How do you know that you are saved?
ifeelfine72
  • Tue May 13, 2008 7:28 am
  • : 1
  • : 2
  • Flag
CanadianChristian: How about you read what I write before you react to it? I've always maintained that I am against abortion because I don't believe that is part of God's plan for us. And where in the Bible does it say it is to be taken literally? I'll give you a hint, it doesn't because you can't - there are too many factual errors in the Bible to take it literally.
canadianchristian
  • Tue May 13, 2008 6:12 am
  • : 3
  • : 5
  • Flag
feelfine72,

You do not speak for CHRIST, HIS word speaks for HIM. You have a bad case of "itchy ears" I suggest some intense bible study, why do you persist in trying to justify unbiblical things like abortion, homosexuality, etc. I suggest strongly that you really think and pray about what you are believing and saying-because we all know the punishment for leading others astray will be severe, and by the way GOD'S WORD IS TO BE TAKEN LITERALLY- What a terrible thing it will be to fall into the hands of the living GOD!!! IN JESUS NAME
free2b
  • Mon May 12, 2008 8:55 pm
  • : 1
  • : 4
  • Flag
ifeelfine - Fair enough - and consistant with what I meant. The bible is not to be taken literally.
Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging Abusive, Spam, Offensive, Illegal, Racist or Libellous Posts.

Comment on this story

ID Password
Submit Don't have a Christian Post ID?Signing up is easy. Click Here