Thursday, November 05, 2009 Last Update:12:04 am ET

Church|Wed, Jun. 11 2008 08:02 AM EDT

Southern Baptists Reject Sex-Abuse Database

By Eric Gorski|AP Religion Writer

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) - Under pressure to fight child sex abuse, the Southern Baptist Convention's executive committee said Tuesday that the denomination should not create its own database to help churches identity predators or establish an office to field abuse claims.

  • Southern Baptist Convention's
    (Photo: The Christian Post)
    Thousands of Southern Baptists sit down during the 16-million member denomination's annual gathering in Indianapolis on Tuesday, June 10, 2008.

The report decried sexual abuse as reprehensible and a sin. But the Southern Baptist principle of local church autonomy means it's up to individual churches — and not the convention — to screen employees and take action against offenders, the committee said.

Opening its two-day annual meeting, the nation's largest Protestant body also elected a new president, Georgia megachurch pastor Johnny Hunt, a theological conservative. He is of Native American descent, a biographical detail that might help the convention reach out to minorities.

Hunt, 55, prevailed in a crowded field of six — winning 53 percent of the vote on the first ballot — and will seek to reverse troubling trends, including a decline in membership.

The clergy sexual abuse scandal that struck the U.S. Roman Catholic Church starting in 2002 has also touched the Southern Baptist Convention, although to a much lesser degree. The past two years have seen a few high-profile allegations against Baptist clergy, and a key victims' advocate in the Catholic crisis, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, began lobbying the Baptists.

In 2006, an executive committee panel began studying how to address the issue. Then, last year, Oklahoma pastor Wade Burleson proposed that the convention develop a database to track clergy and staff who are "credibly accused of, personally confessed to, or legally been convicted of sexual harassment or abuse." The database would then be available to all churches.

The executive committee report, "Responding to the Evil of Sexual Abuse," urges churches to conduct background checks using a U.S. Department of Justice database of sexual offenders.

But it rejected establishing a new Southern Baptist database, arguing it would be impossible to build a comprehensive list. Referring churches to a more exhaustive federal database is better than a limited "Baptist only" system that predators could slip through, it said.

The database idea also is undermined by the fact that the convention cannot require churches to report instances of sexual abuse to local, state or national conventions, the report said.

Local church autonomy rules out creating a centralized investigative body to determine who has been credibly accused of sexual abuse or anything else, it said, and the convention has no authority to bar known perpetrators from ministry or start an office to field abuse claims.

The report made clear that sexual abuse is a serious threat, and urged local congregations to vigorously check out employees and share information when warranted with other churches.

"One sexual predator in our midst is one too many," said Morris Chapman, president of the SBC executive committee. "Sexual predators must be stopped. They must be on notice that Southern Baptists are not a harvest field for their devious deeds."

The vastly different approaches taken by U.S. Catholic bishops and Baptist leaders illustrates the differences in the two traditions. As a hierarchy, the Catholic church adopted a much more top-down approach, establishing standards for the reporting and handling of sexual abuse claims and holding individual dioceses accountable through audits. Continue >>

Pages: 12
Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:16 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I don't believe what I am reading with this article that the governing body is rejecting a database that protects children! CHILDREN aren't important enough to protect from pedophiles and that doesn't even get to women who have been abused too!

    If the church a person attends can't take the step to protect and have a database to keep the people safe then it isn't about the body of God it is about numbers and MONEY!

    Time to leave this crazy collection and go to a place where you can feel and know that you are safe from whackos and sickos like pedophiles and sexual predators.

    TFR

  • Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:53 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    It's the culture "stupid".

    When we allow the culture to shape us instead of God's Word; when we allow culture to influence us and not allow the Holy Spirit to mold us, we begin to see a church that looks more like a "religious organization" rather than a holy and separated people.

    There used to be a day when the church was more concerned about prayer and crying out to God to move in power and to change our hearts to be more like Christ. In turn God would use us to change the culture around us and see many genuinely saved. Now, however, it seems we're more concerned about seeing who can build the biggest church and how we can use a corrupt culture to "lure" people to our show.

    If God is our sole ambition and pleasing Him, and becoming more like Him, then even if we struggle with old habits, He will still enable us to resist temptation and embrace His power to change.

    But what are churches doing now? They put in security guards, do screenings, background checks, et al.

    What would happen if DL Moody or Charles Spurgeon or John Wesley were to live today? I think they would preach with fire and conviction. Conviction would run off any one even thinking of impropriety in the church. Why? Because conviction is the doing of the Holy Ghost, not man. Holiness weeds out all wickedness keeping the Body clean.

  • Thu Aug 13, 2009 8:56 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    The SBC is very wrong-headed on this one. The Fed database may be bigger and possibly more comprehensive but to not have a database of KNOWN church predators for local bodies to access. To be more worried about some perceived encroachment on the local bodies supposed autonomy than to be offering a service (not requiring it my you) that will be able to make known predators is to be worried about the wrong things.

    Grace and Peace,
    Jim

  • Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:09 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    It is true that child abuse or sexual touching is wrong . I believe we need to look at it and consider all the fact before making a hasty decision which hurts the innocent people .
    There is nothing wrong with a sigle pastor or missionary to go out on a date with a single girl . Some pastor thinks it is wrong so they make a bad decision to discipline based on their emotion at the moment and not on the fact . Pray that this thing will not repeat again .

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Also on CP
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Church
  • Gifts
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links