He has been called “demonic,” “barbaric,” and has been compared to Nazi doctors. And when you read about his work, it is easy to see why Americans are so outraged. Dr. Norman Spack is a pediatric endocrinologist at Boston Children’s Hospital. Not long ago, he opened a clinic for what he terms “transgendered” children. Incredibly, he is giving kids as young as seven drugs that delay the onset of puberty—the first step in sex-change surgery when they are older.
Spack injects children with hormone-blocking drugs to prevent them from developing secondary sexual characteristics, like breasts or facial hair. The idea is to give them a few more years to make up their minds if they want to be male—or female.
When these kids hit their teen years, they are given the option of taking cross-hormones for a few years—which will allow them to develop the characteristics of the opposite sex. Tragically, the treatment will condemn these teenagers to lifelong infertility.
Spack appears to think that that is a reasonable trade-off for teens who feel they are trapped in the body of the opposite sex: After all, the cross-hormone treatments will make it easier for them to “pass” as the opposite sex. For instance, men will not grow as tall as they normally would, nor will they develop beards or Adam’s apples.
In a fawning article about Spack, the Boston Globe referred to his treatment of gender-confused children as “modern medical care.” Medical care, my eye! This is medical mayhem. It is unconscionable.
Dr. Paul McHugh, a distinguished professor of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University, agrees: He says that treating these children with hormones “does considerable harm, and it compounds their confusion. Trying to delay puberty or change someone’s gender,” he added, “is a rejection of the lawfulness of nature.”
Dr. McHugh knows what he is talking about. He and psychiatrist Jon Myer studied men who received sex-change operations at Johns Hopkins. His conclusion? “That Hopkins was fundamentally cooperating with a mental illness.” Better, McHugh thought, to concentrate on fixing their minds instead of taking the more drastic step of changing their sex.
Thanks to the research of Myer and others, this practice was stopped at Johns Hopkins. And it became possible to begin to make sense of the mental disorders that were driving the request for the surgeries.
So why are doctors like Spack altering young bodies instead of treating confused minds?
The answer is that many doctors have embraced the modern teaching that sexual identity, rather than being biologically determined, is a preference or a choice. According to this, people should be allowed to choose whatever sex they want to be.
But both science and the Bible teach otherwise: God created us male and female in His image. Shots and surgeries and politically correct teachings cannot alter this fundamental truth.
Tragically, some parents are now buying into this false teaching—and allowing their children to undergo destructive treatments.
You and I need to be spreading the word that legitimate treatment is available for people suffering from gender confusion—and it is a treatment that does not sacrifice the well-being of children to the political agendas of adults.
From BreakPoint®, July 8, 2008, Copyright 2008, Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with the permission of Prison Fellowship Ministries. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced or distributed without the express written permission of Prison Fellowship Ministries. “BreakPoint®” and “Prison Fellowship Ministries®” are registered trademarks of Prison Fellowship
RSS
I believe Colson most likely failed to mention it because not everyone who has xxy or xxxy chromosomes end up with gender disorders.
Also, instead of the person deciding as an adult, the physician is deciding that the child has sufficient knowledge of their desired gender at a young age to make such a decision,
We don't even let children decide if they want a tatoo at a young age, let alone their gender.
Obviously, you can tell by my comments that i'm very conservative on this subject. However, even from a liberal perspective, it is morally suspect to let a child decide something as signifigant as their gender, when Children often fail to even think thoroughly enough check both ways before getting a ball that rolled across the street.
An individual who has reached the adult age is the only one who should make a decision like that.
Those may argue.. "but as an adult, it's too late, they are already to heavily slanted towards male (or female)"
Which is only serves to prove the point, it's possible they will align both mentally and physically with their gender.
I am appalled at Colson's ignorance and blatant prejudice regarding gender dysphoria. He failed to acknowledge that this condition has biological aspects to it. For example, the brains of people with this condition are "sexed" as those of the opposite gender. Also, most men with gender dysphoria have XXY or XXXY chromosomes.
These physicians are not just treating kids willy-nilly. These treatments follow extremely thorough phychological diagnoses.
Colson's solution to the problem would probably be just to have the boys sign up for football.