Updated 12:19 pm.EST, Mon November 23, 2009

Society|Wed, Aug. 27 2008 10:00 AM EDT

People of Faith Challenge Democrats

By Eric Gorski|Associated Press Writer

DENVER (AP) — Religious leaders and people of faith who've been invited to the table at this week's Democratic National Convention are not sitting quietly with their hands in their laps.

  • Democratic
    (Photo: AP Images / Bill Ross)
    Maria Peterson listens to speakers at the Faith in Action Interfaith Gathering at the Wells Fargo Theater in the Colorado convention Center in Denver, Sunday Aug. 24, 2008. Religious leaders and people of faith who've been invited to the table at this week's Democratic National Convention are not sitting quietly with their hands in their laps.

The head of a large African-American denomination challenged the party on abortion. An Orthodox Jewish rabbi raised his voice about school choice. A thirty-something evangelical Christian author warned against Democrats who mock believers.

Although well aware that party officials have political reasons for reaching out to them, several faith figures taking part in convention events say they want to go beyond talk about how faith and values inform longstanding Democratic policies. They are also calling for change on core Democratic issues, which could create tension.

"It's important that people of faith are being listened to just like other constituencies, that we're not marginalized," said Alexia Kelley of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, which has pressed the party to support policies aimed at reducing abortion rates. "Just because we're participating in the process and engaging people who may not agree with us doesn't mean we're just a mascot."

Religion has played a visible role at the convention, starting with an interfaith service and continuing Tuesday with the party's first caucus meetings for people of faith.

Beneath "Pro-Family Pro-Obama" placards, a range of faith leaders — and Joshua DuBois, Barack Obama's religious affairs director — framed poverty, climate change, human rights and abortion as not just policy causes but moral ones.

"Let's be honest: Religion has been used and abused by politics," said Jim Wallis, an evangelical and editor of Sojourners magazine. People of faith, he said, "should speak prophetically more than in a partisan way." Wallis is not endorsing a candidate and will also appear on a panel in St. Paul, Minn., next week during the Republican convention.

Wallis said religious voices lobbying Democrats have gotten results, including language in the platform that aspires to reduce poverty rates by half in the next decade. Religious groups also had a hand in crafting platform language that pledges to support women who decide against having abortions; that was possible in part because the platform also strengthened wording supporting "a woman's right to choose a safe and legal abortion."

One tenet of the Obama campaign's religious outreach is connecting to religious communities beyond the usual liberal-leaning constituencies that support Democrats — and that's where some of the challenges have come from.

Donald Miller, a 37-year-old author from Portland, Ore., is little known to most voters but revered among many young evangelicals for his best-selling spiritual memoir "Blue Like Jazz."

Miller was a loyal Republican but said he left the party, in large part, because he thought Republicans pandered to evangelicals on abortion and gay marriage to win votes without accomplishing much.

Democrats are "reaching out to us, and I'm not naive as to why — they want our votes," said Miller, who gave a two-minute prayer to close Monday's convention session. "But they won't get them and keep them unless they continue the momentum of adopting policies that promote the sanctity of life."

Miller cited progress along those lines — including on abortion. His other priorities — poverty, global warming — also reflect a widening evangelical agenda that might benefit Democrats, if not in large numbers in November then in future elections. Miller also said he'd leave the party if some Democrats keep mocking people of faith.

"I'd like to see Obama address that — say that voice is no longer welcome," he said.

Others invited to take part in the convention — including Rabbi Tzvi Hersh Weinreb, executive vice president of the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America — make clear their participation isn't an endorsement.

Even so, it's significant Weinreb was invited to deliver a keynote address at the interfaith service. He sides with Republicans — and apart from most Jewish leaders — in support of government assistance, such as tax credits, for parents who want to put their children in private schools.

Weinreb did not pass up an opportunity to speak at the service "for freedom of choice in education" — and he later credited Democratic officials for putting no restrictions on what speakers could say.

That freedom also was evident when Bishop Charles Blake, head of the 6 million-member Church of God in Christ, spoke of "disregard for the lives of the unborn." Blake, who called himself a pro-life Democrat, challenged Obama to adopt policies to reduce abortions and chided Republicans for not caring about "those who have been born."

"Are we being used?" Weinreb said of faith leaders at the convention. "I certainly didn't feel used. Obviously, politics is politics. I don't want to be naive. I also don't want to be cynical."

Critics of the Democrats are skeptical. Tom Minnery, a senior vice president with the Colorado Springs, Colo.-based conservative Christian group Focus on the Family, said Democratic voting records don't back up the religious rhetoric.

"The party wants the voters," said Minnery, who attended Tuesday's faith caucus. "But not the values."

But Democratic Rep. John Lewis of Georgia, after speaking at a luncheon hosted by the nonpartisan Faith and Politics Institute, insisted that the party's outreach to faith communities is sincere, and that voices will be heard.

"The majority of our party people, they are people of faith," he said. "When we get elected, we don't check our faith at the door. We may not wear it on our sleeve."

Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Mee »
    Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:05 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    We are all sinner, therefore we can not look for a perfect candidate ... we have to vote for the lest of the evils and push them to follow the word of God or let evil run our country. If Jesus was a candidate i would Vote for him. He is not. Do Not stay home go out and vote let them know that we do count ... For mee I'll be voteing for Palin/McCain . May God Bless the USA ....

  • Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:39 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    As most of you know I am by no means an Obama supporter, but today while sitting in the doctors office, I heard several people saying that they never voted Republican before, but this year they will or they won't vote at all because Obama is, and I won't use their term, black. I would hate to look back in history and see that he was not elected because of his skin color as opposed to his stands on important issues.

  • Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:57 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Everyone is so focused on abortion (not to say it isn't an issue), BUT...

    Think: How often did Jesus teach on adultery and the rich oppressing the poor (also see the prophets) as a big deal sin, and how often did he talk about abortion?

    I don't think either party is a lock, but I definitely think we evangelicals have been used by many politicians who profess to "care deeply" about life issues, but never do squat about them. The Republicans controlled the entire federal government for 6 years, ending in 2006, led by Bush (who strongly campaigned as anti-abortion). Ask yourself: "Did they make it a priority?"

    No

  • Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:30 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I am not really happy with either party or the men who wnt to be president. So now I have to consider the planks of the parties. I have foted for mort than 42 years, and this is the most difficult presidential election I have had to deal with.
    I see an older man of 72 on one side, who worries me about his view on his attitude on war, proverty, health care, and the economy. On the other side I see deep concerns about abortion, homosexuality, and they are so inclusive they allow almost anything. But the concern for the poor, veterans, and the war, and many humane agendas.
    I ask is war equal to abortion? Is accepting homosexuality equal to a premptive war? When will those in power see that many Americians are in financial trouble, and call it what it is, a ressesion? As much as I hate abortion, I hate war with a passion! As a 100% disabled veteran that lives on V.A comp I can say the comp pay is way below proverty. There an many many like me who pay everyday for the service we rendered to our country. Which party will be there to help verterans?
    I have not made up my mind yet. McCain has to select a super person as a VP. I would suggest Miss Rice would be a strong reason for me to vote for McCain. Romney would make no choice for me but for the other party. God help us.

  • Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:34 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Talmid asked, "How can people of faith vote for a political party whose platform is for outright perversion, such as abortion and gay marriage to name a few?"

    I can only speak for myself. My faith does not limit itself to abortion and gay marriage. There are other issues such as war, poverty and racism that are vital to my faith that I believe are dealt with better by the Democratic party.

    I also don't believe that a political party or a candidate are the answers to any of these moral questions. The answers to the ills of our society are found in Jesus Christ, represented by His disciples acting with compassion. What we've got now are disciples tryiing to change the world through angry politics rather than the true love of Christ. When that changes, we'll see our society change.

  • Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:25 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    If people are looking for sinless leadership, only Jesus Christ can provide that. In terms of the election, however, it is not what I don't know about Obama and the Democrats that would keep me from voting for them, but what I do know. If they want to make inroads into the evangelical vote, then remove the abortion plank and any support of gay "marriage". Anything else is a non starter.

  • Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:44 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    The choices are: adultery or abortion. Which is worse in your eyes? Which is worse in God's eyes?

    Or you can stay home, write in a vote, or vote libertarian or Green. I think the last four are simply a waste.

  • Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:59 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    With all these "I'm personally opposed, but... " politicians, I wonder how many of them have ever personally supported a pro-life organization? I mean, if you are REALLY personally opposed, why would you not contribute to any of the many pro-life organizations?

  • Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:08 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    The Democrats' way of catering to people of faith is not fooling me. They want the world's ways in the same room with the Cross. Barack Obama has boasted to be a "devout Christian" and be against abortion personally but legislatively speaking he's for it, contradictory and oxymoronic? I'd say!
    How can people of faith vote for a political party whose platform is for outright perversion, such as abortion and gay marriage to name a few? Where does what you believe interact with the way one votes?
    Eph 5:11, "Take no part in the worthless deeds of evil and darkness; instead, rebuke and expose them"

  • Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:28 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    The Democrats can keep their religion; I have Jesus!

  • Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:25 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    thomas jefferson an american president, highly esteemed, also an atheist(see wikipedia)

  • Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:14 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    george bush a born again christian, a man of faith.

  • Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:01 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I agree with song2vs4

    Regarding McCain: Adulterers who marry the woman they commit adultery with, (DUMP their first wife, while she is incapacitated), whose family happened to make their fortune selling booze to children, are not "truth and righteousness" no matter who they choose for VP.

    The entire launch of McCain's career in terms of money and political connections came from this mistress. I cannot endorse that with my vote.

    Obama has his own imperfections (drug mistakes during his youth), but it is McCain that scares me.

  • Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:42 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    If you vote for a candidate that doesn't obey God's Word, you get what you deserve. Christ followers have an obligation to stand up for truth and righteousnes.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Also on CP
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a