Updated 12:47 pm.EST, Sun November 22, 2009

Society|Thu, Sep. 04 2008 09:17 AM EDT

Palin Fires Up Conservatives

By Liz Sidoti|Associated Press Writer

Both sides will be counting on their rank and file to turn out voters over the next two months.

In the days since McCain selected Palin, the media spotlight turned on the little-known governor's personal and professional life.

The world heard that her unwed teenage daughter is pregnant and that her husband once belonged to a fringe political group in which some members supported Alaska's secession from the United States.

Voters learned that a private attorney is authorized to spend $95,000 of state money to defend her against accusations of abuse of power and that she sought federal money for special pet projects for her city and state, in conflict with her reformer image.

Some Republicans questioned whether McCain had reviewed her background thoroughly enough. Many Democrats hammered McCain for having the gall to attack Obama on experience when he has chosen a running mate who hasn't been a governor for even two full years.

None of it seemed to matter to rock-solid conservatives.

They rushed to defend her and, in line with the McCain campaign's newfound strategy, attack the "liberal media." It's a surefire way to score points with the right — and talk radio hosts who speak to slews of conservatives.

Leading the charge, former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson called Palin "a courageous, successful reformer who's not afraid to take on the establishment" and said her candidacy "has got the other side and their friends in the media in a state of panic."

Added former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, "I'd like to thank the elite media for doing something that, quite frankly, I wasn't sure could be done, and that's unifying the Republican Party and all of America in support of Senator McCain and Governor Palin."

It's no wonder why the right is embracing her.

Palin is more conservative than McCain on a range of issues.

She favors oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge; he does not. Palin has called for teaching creationism alongside evolution in Alaska's public schools; McCain says he believes in evolution when it comes to the origin of life.

She backs a complete ban on abortion except when a doctor determines that the mother's life is at stake; McCain would also support exceptions in cases of rape or incest. Palin has said she doesn't believe humans have caused global warming; McCain says they have contributed to it.

There's no doubt that those who have "generally been sitting on their hands for the last year and grousing about McCain," are "pumped about her," said Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback. "He may have pulled off the impossible by finding someone who fires up independents and Reagan Democrats while not turning off social conservatives."

Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Pages: 12
Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:50 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Does not Obama claim to be a Christian? So all my "Purpose Driven Life" fans out there let's have a party and vote like crazy because we have Palin says she is a Christian too. Wait does'nt most of America say they are Christians? I think that those who call themselves Christians "God's elect" need to get in the word of God. Christian America vote as God leads you to, not being lead by the media, Rick Warren, even better a person running for office.

  • igh »
    Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:29 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    philo777 said:

    "Clearly, we are all better off, religious and non-religious alike, when religious dogma is kept OUT of government as the founders intended. The election of John McBush and St. Sarah will accomplish none of your goals, and will create even greater resistance to the implementation of your agenda."

    Ok, guess you didn't know that God founded this nation, and he does not want to be kept out of it. If God did not want this nation here, then it would not be here.

    Separation of church and state is simply this: No test to run for office, i.e. have to be baptist, pentecostal, presbyterian etc. Next, no persecution, by those governing, of others who are differing in beliefs as to what they believe. Also i might add no persecution by a church of others beliefs, *Ahem*, you know who you are.

    There are those who hate God that use 'separation of church and state' for evil ends, to keep his Holy Word from making Righteous legislation, Just Verdicts in our Courts, and Executives Wise with good works. You see if men deny God and do not Study his Word and Pray, our Government does wickedness. And this is satan's plan.

    This is spiritual warfare. When Truth wins souls are won to God, When lies win souls are lost.

  • Sun Sep 07, 2008 2:23 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    philo, so am I to take it that your post saying that the Bush Administration had filled all the federal bureaucracies with Liberty and Bob Jones graduates was just a gross overstatement on your part and that you have nothing to substantiate that comment? Plus, are you not making another gross overstatement when you assume that all graduates from Regency Law School are anti- science and have no common sense, or should I say at least those 150 graduates who were appointed to the Bush Admimistration that you can't find the names of except one?

  • Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:00 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Believer, my point had nothing to do with Liberty and Bob Jones, as you well know, it had to do with Bush packing the top level of his administration with right-wing nut religious ideologues. The kind of people who ignore science and common sense in running the everyday business of government, holding up progress and chipping away at the wall of church/state separation.

    The point I was trying to make was that all of us are better off if religious dogma is kept OUT of government. To govern by dogma, which Bush has done, is inherently divisive, as evidenced by this election, which is going to be the nastiest election in modern times.

  • Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:49 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    What the mainstream media continues to cover-up:

    Obama, Ayers, Dohrn and double jeopardy
    http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=74486

  • Sat Sep 06, 2008 9:58 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    philo, yes I read the article and it did say that supposedly 150 people who work in the Bush Administration are Regency Law School graduates and was hoping to get some names to see how a majority of them are Liberty and Bob Jones graduates, but the only person they named is Monica Gooding and she was a Messiah College graduate. So who are all these Liberty and Bob Jones graduates you talked about? Oh by the way the article itself never talked to that issue either.

  • Sat Sep 06, 2008 9:12 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Did you not believe the article? You are starting to prove one of my favorite sayings:

    "You can't reason with the religious. If you could, there wouldn't be any."

    --Gregory House, M.D.

  • Sat Sep 06, 2008 4:17 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    philo, by the way Monica Goodling is a graduate of Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

  • Sat Sep 06, 2008 4:11 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    philo, because I have a problem with people who use hearsay rather than facts in their posts, such as your unproven accusation in regards to Bush appointees, plus could you give us the names of those who graduated from the Regency University Law School who are serving in the Bush Administration?

  • Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:26 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Pat Robertson's law school, Regency, attracts grads from many undergraduate schools, including Liberty and Bob Jones. It would be impossible to trace from whence they cometh to Regency, but approx. 150 grads of Regency are serving (or have served) in the Bush administration.. They include Monica Goodling, who is getting some of the blame for the Justice Dept. scandal.

    http://www.slate.com/id/2163601/

    Interesting that out of my whole post that is what you chose to ask about.

    Why do you think St. Sarah is being shielded from those big old meanies in the press? Sooner or later, she will be called to answer for her lies, and the longer it is postponed, the worse it will be for McCain.

    In 50 years of closely following politics (44 of those years as a staunch Republican) I have NEVER seen a politician being hidden away from the press like Palin. I guess there is really nothing after what she has been coached to say.

    In case you are wondering, I left the "party of small government" when it wasn't any longer, which is about the same time it was taken over by the far right wackos.

    Your party is trying to use fear to continue in power, and I don't think it will work again. It least I have confidence that the voting public will see through the smoke and mirrors this time, and finally realize there is no one behind the curtain.

  • Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:27 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    philo, could you name the Liberty and Bob Jones graduates that were named to posts in the Bush Administration, thanks?

  • Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:05 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    Boy, I am really confused! Eight years ago, committed Christians were instrumental in electing the most blatantly "Christian" President we have ever had, and in spite of all the lip service Bush gave to your causes, and all the federal bureaucracies he filled with Liberty and Bob Jones grads, you still didn't get a single thing you elected him for.

    In fact, what you are saying if you back McCain is that we must throw the Republicans out so that the Republicans can clean up the mess! Does this make any sense at all?

    Clearly, we are all better off, religious and non-religious alike, when religious dogma is kept OUT of government as the founders intended. The election of John McBush and St. Sarah will accomplish none of your goals, and will create even greater resistance to the implementation of your agenda.

    There are few top-level Republicans left to run a new administration, if you throw out all the old ones, so where do you think this "new blood" will come from in a McCain administration? it will come from the other side of the isle, it has to. With the majorities the Dems are going to have in the next congress, the only way McCain could govern at all is from the middle.

    What makes you think a neophyte like Sarah Palin would change anything? They will chew her up & spit her out.

    Replacing old Republicans with "new Republicans" to institute "change" is the very definition of insanity.

  • Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:03 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    McCain may not be able to whip up the crowd, but he can certainly whip up Congress.

    And with the likes of Palin at his side, they have the character that can whip up the crowd and whip up Obama as well.

    Palin is a seasoned, and now she'll gain the experience. Powerful combination for a lady who just might be our first woman President some day.

  • Fri Sep 05, 2008 2:07 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I thought the speech she read from the writers was very good, as well her presentation which just like Obama's cannot be faulted, very witty in places and as with Obama and all other politicians in previous elections she portrayed herself as the outsider bringing change, somebody should have copyrighted that phrase years ago they would have made a fortune. The thing I like about such speeches (including Obama' lot) is the way they use key phrases such that the voters en mass head owards them much as when bread is thrown to the ducks. My problem is I like policy not soundbites.

  • Thu Sep 04, 2008 7:01 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    come on guys lets give McCain and Palin the congress they need vote republican ticket it will be worht getting the justices we need on the bench

  • Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:13 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Gooooo Sarah Palin! What a breath of fresh air!

  • Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:55 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I have a very low opinion of Christian Fundamentalists and creationists, but Sarah Palin's speech at the convention was the first political speech I heard in a long time that didn't bore me to death. Palin is very likable. I'm not sure if I would ever vote for her, but I don't think it would bother me very much if she and what's his name won the election.

    Sarah Palin as Governor of Alaska respected the wall of separation between church and state. She didn't try to impose her creationist views into public school science education. She seems to understand that the governments of America are secular governments.

    It would be nice to have a vice-president or president who isn't boring to listen to. I wish Sarah Palin good luck, and I congratulate her for soon becoming a grandmother.

  • Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:39 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 3

    Biblical reason to vote Republican.

    Ecclesiastes 10:2
    2A wise man's heart directs him toward the right, but the foolish (A)man's heart directs him toward the left.

    See, even scripture wants you to vote Republican! :) Enjoy!!

  • Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:14 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    Sarah knocked it out of the PARK!!!!!

    Obama has produced two memoirs and yet ZERO legislation! McCain has sponsored over 600 pieces of legislation.

    Nice try, Community Organizer! But your resume is found wanting! Sarah attacked the facts about OBAMA, compared to her as the Governor and Chief Executive of a multi-billion dollar budget, she has more executive experience than OBAMA.

    Prolife all the way!!!

    Catholics for McCain/Palin 2008!

  • Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:44 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Radias: I though your comment was on target and very insightful, especially, "The republican party trots out the abortion/family values/patriotism routine and we eat it up."

    George Bush was the master of this ploy, using the impending doom of gay marriage in order to get re-elected.

  • Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:05 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    "Her remarks were continually disrespectful, divisive and bordering on childish; hardly the kind of person we need as a vice president...I'm still a Clinton fan all the way. "

    This is a contradictory post. You have denounced the exact description of Hillary, and then embraced her in the same breath.

    As for Republican vs Democrat: we need to be careful about how we describe 'selling your soul'. How many policy changes for the better (espoused by Democrats) would it take to create an equal exchange for the lives of millions of unborn children? No amount of reform in other areas is worth a vote supporting such directly anti-christian views as those put forth under the murderous guise of 'pro-choice'. McCain may not be as anti-abortion as some would like, but he is a far cry from two of the most staunch pro-abortionists ever to grace the political limelight.

  • Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:54 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    Radias, you may not like McCain but you'd rather have a wannabe anti-christ in the oval office?? As I've always said it's always better to vote conservative than liberal. Things may not "change" but at least they can't get worse!!!

  • Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:51 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 3

    As an evangelical christian of 42 years, I have finally seen the light. The only reason the republican party tolerates us is because they can't win elections without us. I think that Sarah Palin is a tremendous woman and worthy of the white house. However, I see her for exactly what she is; a carrot on a stick for the church to once again help the republicans get elected. I am sick and tired of being taken for granted until election time rolls around. The republican party trots out the abortion/family values/patriotism routine and we eat it up. I hate abortion and want a constitutional ban but lets be realistic - even if Mccain is elected president, he'll be up against a democratic majority house and senate and will never get the kind of supreme court judges that we want appointed to the bench. I find it laughable that we could barely stand Mccain but now that he has a "evangelical approved" VP running mate we suddenly think that he's great. Think twice before you sell your soul for politics.

  • Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:20 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    Believer: Of course I will. I could never in good conscience vote for a Republican. (And no, it's not because of the gay thing either. Even if a Republican were a rainbow-waiving, same-sex marriage advocate, he/she wouldn't get my vote).

  • Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:14 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    chicago, but I'll bet you'll vote for him in November!!

  • Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:00 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 6

    It was pretty disgusting to watch so many people cheer Palin on as she spewed forth her misleading representations, blatant lies, and condescending smirks which were the order of the night. Her remarks were continually disrespectful, divisive and bordering on childish; hardly the kind of person we need as a vice president.

    I wanted to take a shower after that.

    I'm no fan of Obama either. I wish he could give a speech without hollering all the time.
    I'm still a Clinton fan all the way.

  • Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:22 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 0

    If anyone saw Sarah's speech last night, you saw that she has the charisma of Obama; she's like Hillary, only geniune; and even at her pay grade, she already knows when life begins.

    Christians, this is the most unabashedly pro-life ticket we have had in a long, long time, praise God.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Also on CP
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links