Saturday, November 07, 2009 Last Update:07:14 pm ET

Society|Tue, Sep. 09 2008 12:39 PM EDT

Ministers Urge IRS to Stop Politics in Pulpit Scheme

By Michelle A. Vu|Christian Post Reporter

A group of clergy filed a complaint Monday with the Internal Revenue Service to block a conservative legal group from organizing pastors willing to risk their church’s tax-exempt status to preach about politics.

The group, backed by three former top IRS officials, contends that pastors should respect the 54-year-old rule of law that bans tax-exempt houses of worship from endorsing political candidates. They call on the IRS to examine if organizer Alliance Defense Fund has violated its own tax-exempt status by encouraging pastors to make political endorsements from their pulpit.

"As religious leaders, we have grave concerns about the ethical implications of soliciting and organizing churches to violate core principles of our society," the 55 Christian and Jewish leaders wrote in their claim, according to The Washington Post.

The two Ohio pastors organizing the complaint are from the liberal United Church of Christ. They have called for ministers to oppose the ADF strategy by preaching the value of the separation of church and state on Sept. 21.

"The rightful place of religious leaders and communities of faith in American life is not in electoral politics," said the Rev. Eric Williams, one of the UCC ministers, according to The Associated Press.

Interestingly, the UCC denomination itself was investigated by the IRS last year for allowing Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama speak at its convention in Hartford, Conn.

Williams and his group’s complaint is a counter measure to the Alliance Defense Fund initiative to recruit dozens of pastors across the country to endorse political candidates from their pulpit on Sept. 28.

ADF argues that clergy have a constitutional right under the first amendment to talk about politics in church, which directly challenges IRS rules for non-profit religious organizations.

The legal group expects its “Freedom in the Pulpit Sunday” plan will result in an IRS investigation in which ADF lawyers would then contest in federal court. Ultimately, the legal group hopes to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court and persuade the judges to overturn the ban on political endorsements by tax-exempt organizations.

"For so long, there has been this cloud of intimidation over the church," ADF attorney Erik Stanley said. "It is the job of the pastors of America to debate the proper role of church in society. It's not for the government to mandate the role of church in society."

Stanley says some three dozen church leaders from more than 20 states have signed onto the plan to give a political sermon that includes names of candidates.

"The sermon will be an evaluation of conditions for office in light of scripture and doctrine. They will make a specific recommendation from the pulpit about how the congregation would vote," he said.

"They could oppose a candidate. They could oppose both candidates. They could endorse a candidate. They could focus on a federal, state or local election."

Stanley asserts that his group is not encouraging “any congregation to violate the law,” according to The Washington Post. But rather it is encouraging churches to “exercise their constitutional right in the face of an unconstitutional law.”

ADF was founded in 1994 for socially conservative Christians that include prominent evangelical leaders James C. Dobson of Focus on the Family and William R. Bright, founder of Campus Crusade for Christ.

The legal group is often involved in legal battles concerning religious symbols in public places, expression of faith in public schools, and same-sex “marriage” initiatives, among other religious freedom issues.

A survey released in August showed that most Americans believe churches and houses of worship should keep out of politics – the first time in more than a decade that the majority of Americans have held this view.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:27 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    *** People of faith are voting McCain - Palin ***

    Some facts on Obama's voting and speaking against the teaching of Christ:

    - Obama votes to kill babies born alive. These are people Jesus loves.

    - Obama calls traditional marriage, which Jesus ordained, "divisive".

    - Biden's church has told Biden not to take communion.

    Let's vote for McCain - Palin beacuse they care for all babies and marriage - instead of voting because someone is black or speaks well.

  • Mon Sep 29, 2008 12:39 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "So, has your church spoken out against the war in Iraq?"

    As long as there is sin...there will be war. It is the place of a country to protect it's soverignty. Our soverignty was attacked by people who we found in Iraq, who are in Pakistan and many other parts of the world. As long as we have a country there will be the possiblity of war.

    It is the job of the church to protest sin...not war. It is the job of the church teach what is Godly. Unless you are willing to surrender to a bunch of thugs there will be war.

  • Fri Sep 26, 2008 2:20 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Who are these ministers trying to please? Are they serving the best interest of Christianity or something else? Where do the duties of ministers lie, with the welfare of their congregation or pleasing the IRS?

  • Fri Sep 26, 2008 1:53 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Here you will see more friends like you Catholics. All friends are like you and you can join the Catholic club at __ seekingcatholic.com __

  • Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:13 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    The church has spoken out against immoral behavior committed in war, and has prayed for those who committed them. However, that does not mean the war itself is immoral.

    I do not believe fighting is always the best answer. While war is always ugly, and should be avoided, there are times when it is the right response to existing evil. And once begun, it must be successfully completed. I think the people of Iraq and the people of the USA will be better in the long run because of it.

    Today is Sept 11, the anniversay of the murder of thousands by muslim militants. The best response is prayer for those who do not know Christ to accept Him as their Savior and Lord.

    However, prayer should not obviate the need of the government to protect its people, nor should it release us from the responsibility of helping others.

    The USA had been attacked by terrorists. Iraq was a sponsor of terrorists, had threatened the USA, and had weapons of mass destruction. Even if no evidence of such was found, the 2nd in command of the Iraqi Air Force (among others) at the time stated the WMD were covertly moved to Syria, another sponsor of terrorism (http://www.nysun.com/foreign/iraqs-wmd-secreted-in-syria-sada-says/26514/ http://www.meforum.org/article/755 http://pierrelegrand.net/2006/09/11/saddam-and-al-qaeda-connections-and-collaboration.htm). Just because we do not like war (and I dont think anyone should prefer war) does not mean it was not the right response to the information available at the time.

  • Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:22 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    wbmoore: So, has your church spoken out against the war in Iraq?

  • Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:01 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    When someone claims murder is wrong but simultaneously claims they have no right to stop others from murdering, that person is either lying, pandering, or is afraid to make decisions that protect the people. This not someone I want to be president.

    If murder is wrong, the church should speak out against murder. The church should speak out against unrepentant murderers. The church should speak out against people who want to be in government and support murderers.

    The same is true for abortion. If one says that life begins at conception and abortion is wrong (because it is murder), yet simultaneously claims to not have the right to make policy stopping people from murdering their children, that person is more concerned with votes than people. That person is unable to make wise decisions for the good of the nation. That person is not someone who should be president.

    The church has the duty to speak out against immoral behavior and people who commit immoral behavior or who silently endorse people who commit immoral behavior - particularly people who would be leaders in the country, since they become role models for the country.

  • Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:50 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Congregations of faith enjoy privileges in regards to tax exemption more than any other group, without having to show they are earning them. As many do good, I can overlook those who are oppressive. IMO any minister who can't get across what their faith says is right or wrong, with out endorse or criticizing candidates or politicians, needs to find another career.

  • Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:30 am Agree: 4   Disagree: 1

    Whether a local church or pastor ought to make political endorsements from the pulpit should be a matter of debate within that local body of believers.

    A 54-year-old law should not prohibit pastors and churches from the freedom of expression for fear of losing their tax-exempt status.

    If local churches decide to promote the Gospel rather than a political candidate, then that's fine.

    However, let's not allow a government law to prohibit the exercise of free expression through prior restraint.

    The debate should occur within each local church. The law should not let congregations "off the hook" by avoiding such vigorous discussion.

    Churches should voluntarily refrain from certain actions if they are unwise, even if the law permits them.

    Churches should not hide under the umbrella of law & claim the privilege of inaction due to the law's external prohibition.

    Just because the law permits an action does not mean that the church needs to act in that fashion.

  • Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:50 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Hey believer. I've been super busy at work. Glad to be back.

    I don't know why such an exemption exists. I'm all for encouraging religion, but not dictating what can be spoken of from the pulpit.

    I know if God ever has me start a church, I'll not get that exemption. I want the ability to speak out against sin and not endorse sin or sinners by silence.

  • Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:25 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Of course pastors should speak their views out, loud and clear. I think the problem lies in the fact that religious organizations have a grandfathered-in tax-exempt status. These tax exemptions should cease.

  • Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:42 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    wb, welcome back and I hear you loud and clear!!

  • Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:19 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I have a question, and its not all THAT rhetorical....

    If a man should come to a dramatic rise in power over a short period of time (perhaps thanks to what appears to be popular support) and begins to convince the governmental officials that a certain group of people were the cause of the nation's problems and that if these people were removed from our society (regardless of the means) and placed into prisons (since they not so obviously are breaking laws).... Should pastors speak up? Should pastors speak out against things like the atrocities that occurred in Germany in the 1930's and 40's? Should pastors speak out against an individual political official who is influencing people and society to go against what God has said and commit atrocious crimes against humanity?

  • Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:40 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I still see "most commented". Odd...

  • Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:23 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    The problem is that sometimes if a pastor talks to morals and values with regards to an upcoming election it can be construed as an endorsement of a particular candidate and a possible violation of IRS standards, but I do agree that the pulpit should be mainly if not totally reserved for the proclamation of the Gospel.
    By the way am I the only one who lost the most commented items under or with the comment box?

  • Tue Sep 09, 2008 2:55 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    MSNChris; I agree. A church should not exist to promote Dems or Repubs. It should exist to promote Christ.

  • Tue Sep 09, 2008 2:54 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Somehow I think that left-leaning pastors have never had a problem legislating from the pulpit. Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Jeremiah Wright, Michael Pfleger.....

  • Tue Sep 09, 2008 2:15 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Believer,

    You know these so called clergy were Left wingers. I do think that no church should specifically and officially endorse a particular candidate. I also have no problem though if a church invites candidates to speak at their churches as long as they invite both to speak.

    I think that our churches should talk about values, which is a Christian thing and not a political thing. The more we preach Biblical moral values, the more people will vote for the most Biblically minded candidates.

    Peace.

    McCain/Palin 2008

  • Tue Sep 09, 2008 2:00 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    I wonder what the results would be if a poll was done on these 55 Christian and Jewish leaders to see if they leaned to the left or to the right when it comes to their political views?

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links