Sunday, November 08, 2009 Last Update:11:25 am ET

Society|Wed, Sep. 17 2008 12:11 PM EDT

Calif. Utilities Giant Sued for Funding $250K against Gay 'Marriage' Ban

By Lawrence Jones|Christian Post Reporter

The Pacific Justice Institute, which specializes in religious freedom and civil liberties, has filed a complaint against the California gas and electric utility provider PG&E for giving over a quarter of a million dollars toward efforts against the California gay "marriage" ban, Proposition 8.

Brad Dacus, president of the group, has filed an administrative complaint against Pacific Gas and Electric Company with the California Public Utilities Commission. PG&E provides utilities to approximately 15 million Californians.

"It is outrageous that a mammoth utility used my money to undermine the values of families in my community," remarked Dacus, who is based in Sacramento, in a statement Monday.

The complaint contends that the PG&E contribution to "No on Proposition 8 Campaign" is unlawful and should be investigated by the Commission. It also requests that the "Commission take all appropriate actions to remedy this matter, including fines, available under the law."

"Proposition 8 has no relevance to the supply and distribution of energy services to its customers," the complaint states.

"As a corporation which has been given near monopoly status (CA Public Utilities Code section 451, et seq.), its use of money extracted from customers to influence an item appearing on the ballot that does not promote the welfare of customers relative to energy is an abuse of trust."

Proposition 8, known as the "California Marriage Protection Act," would amend the California Constitution to define marriage in the state as only between a man and a woman. If passed, the ballot measure would essentially reverse the May 15 Supreme Court decision that allowed same-sex couples to marry.

Around 1.2 millions voters approved the petition to place the controversial issue before Californians. Prop. 8 will appear on the Nov. 4 ballot.

Traditional marriage supporters are hoping for a similar outcome in 2000 when over 61 percent of Californians passed Proposition 22, which affirmed marriage in the state as only between a man and a woman.

The vice president of PG&E Nancy McFadden, stated that the company was "proud to join No on 8 and Equality California to protect the freedom to marry for all Californians," according to PJI.

Dacus said people like McFadden can write personal checks to the campaign, "but not on my dime."

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Thu Sep 25, 2008 4:07 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    PG&E is a privately owned company. It is a subsidiary of PG&E Corporaion, publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange. It is not spending anyone else's money; it is spending its own money. When you buy groceries, does the money you give Safeway remain your money? No. When you buy gas or electricity, you are buying a commodity. The money then belongs to the company. The $250,000 does not increase the rates you charge; it comes out of shareholder profits. PG&E has every right to chose how to spend its money, and the right to chose to spend its money to protect the constitutional rights of its employees.

  • Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:19 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

    The anti-gay camp are the exact same way...please don't pretend as if its not.

  • Thu Sep 18, 2008 1:31 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    "DP, I think thats very different."

    Go off the grid. It is your choice to be dependent on an electric company or gas company. Also, they are a private organization that is only regulated as to how it does business. It is a violation of their First Amendment rights to tell them they cannot donate to whoever they want.

    I've always noticed the pro-gay camp is all for the First Amendment when it is in their favor. I have always found it ironic that the pro-gay camp calls us Christians hypocrites.

    It's the latest in arguement technique where those who victimize claim to be the victim.

  • Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:00 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    Wbmoore states: "BTW, you might be interested to know one can be a capitalist without being Christian and vice-versa."

    He is right. I'm a Christian and a member of the Illinois Socialist Party.

  • Thu Sep 18, 2008 7:57 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I gotta agree with Mike2685 on this one. private and public companies that do not operate as monopolies of the government have the right to decide where their money goes, just as I have the right to decide to use them or not. Its when we have no ability to choose otherwise that the problem comes in.

  • Thu Sep 18, 2008 7:33 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    DP, I think thats very different. I don't support Exxon/Mobil because they are very anti-gay, but I have a choice in who I give my money to, similar to McDonald's. If my gas and electric company was giving my money to support a cause, any cause, I would be annoyed, because I don't have a say in whether or not I give them my money, or how much of it I have to give.

  • Wed Sep 17, 2008 11:23 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    "It is outrageous that a mammoth utility used my money to undermine the values of families in my community,"

    OK...so ... what about all the money being given to the pro-gay camp by groups like McDonalds? I didn't hear the same outrage when it was ...pro-gay....

  • Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:04 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    BTW, you might be interested to know one can be a capitalist without being Christian and vice-versa. The two are not related.

  • Wed Sep 17, 2008 7:38 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Everyone knows how I feel about the underlying issue but wbmoore and believer are spot on, on this one. Cheers.

  • Wed Sep 17, 2008 7:13 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    You can be sure that if a utility (which because it is a monopoly allowed by the government, operates as a government entity) attempted to spend money in favor of the legislation, the other side would also sue. Its not appropriate to use this money in favor or against such efforts.

  • Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:26 pm Agree: 8   Disagree: 1

    You can be sure that if PG&E donated to the pro-homophobia side, militant, anti-gay activists would be ecstatic and not filing complaints.

    As a PG&E customer, I am proud that PG&E is doing the right thing and standing up for fairness and equal civil rights for law-abiding, taxpaying, gay Californians.

    This is nothing more than another attempt by radical anti-gay activists to silence any dissent to their efforts to cloak discrimination under the mantle of God.

  • Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:41 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    Most people are in no position to create their own energy. Trust me, I live in Boulder, second only to Berkley in "green" ideas, and the amount of solar or wind generated power is very low. The capital outlay is in the tens of thousands of dollars per home, and an apartment dweller would not be allowed in any case.

  • Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:35 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    mike

    you don't have to buy power from pg&e you can create your own.

  • Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:35 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    Thanks for the clarification, dongard. I submit, however, that a monopoly should be held to a different standard than a competitive company.

  • Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:33 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

    wbmoore

    pge and pg&e are not government monopolies. they are both private corporations. pge is a corporation. pg&e is a regulated private contractor. not my rules but then these are the ones people like you made up. live with it.

  • Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:32 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 5

    Mike:
    1)You have to have power to your home, or it will not get a certificate of occupancy.
    2) PG&E is the only supplier in the area, so you must pay money to PG&E.
    3) PG&E then uses that money to support causes you disagree with.
    That is where the objection is. You do not have to spend money with AIG.
    And speaking the truth about homosexual behavior is not hateful. Allowing someone to go to hell because you did NOT tell them the truth IS hateful.
    And yes, I am a sinner. I was condemned to Hell until a caring man told me that fact, and led me lovingly to Christ Jesus, by whose scourging we are healed.

  • Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:29 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    blacksho89

    check out weber's "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism"

    of course i was talking it up. but seriously, PGE inc is a corporation that just happens to own an electric utility pg&e. most capitalists are perfectly happy with this concept. so then when a corporation, legally a private individual decides on its own what to spend it money on, who is the public to demand otherwise. what christian capitalist could claim that outsiders have right to demand that a corporation support their views unless those views violated a specific law.

  • Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:11 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 2

    Oh, lets use government monopoly money to ban making murder as a crime. Oh, wait, we've already done that with paying Planned Parenthood millions.....

  • Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:05 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    If the company makes a profit they can donate to any cause they like. AIG has been throwing money around New York to all kinds of private causes, so why can't PG&E. After all it is money fighting discrimination and hate which I thought was what real Americans did? Why would anyone but bigots object?

  • Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:34 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    I'm sorry, dongard. I don't quite understand how Christians created PG&E. Could you explain?

  • Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:29 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    ifeelfine, for once something we totally agree on, use the money to provide better services to your customers or if you've got extra money hanging around then cut your rates to your customers.

  • Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:14 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    lets be clear here folks. it is not pg&e the electric utility that made the donation. it is Pge inc. a corporation that just happens to have the utility as one of its divisions. you christian capitalists have created this mess so live with it. don't like it then vote for public utilities like SMUD DWP and the most recent one SFPUC. otherwise go pound sand.

  • Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:53 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I agree. I would be angry if they spent the money to support a same-sex marriage ban as well because they shouldn't be spending our money on those kinds of issues.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links