Updated 04:40 pm.EST, Sat November 21, 2009

Entertainment|Thu, Sep. 18 2008 02:01 PM EDT

'The Shack' Author to Face Fans, Critics via Chat

By Eric Young|Christian Post Reporter

Next month, the author of The Shack will be joining a public online chatroom to discuss his No. 1 New York Times best-selling book, which has received strong praise from some Christian circles and strong criticism from others.

Both fans and critics of William P. Young’s surprise best-seller will get the opportunity to submit questions to the author as part of Abunga.com’s bi-weekly “Authors at Abunga” chat, which connects avid book readers with their favorite authors.

And with all the buzz that has surrounded The Shack since its rise to success, the questions will likely be pouring in ahead of the high-anticipated Oct. 22 chat.

Though Young had not originally intended the novel to be for public consumption, since its debut on the market last year, The Shack has reaped in a surprising amount of success, generating a large amount of buzz – both positive and negative – within Christian circles.

“This book has the potential to do for our generation what John Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress did for his,” stated Eugene Peterson, Professor Emeritus Of Spiritual Theology at Regent College in Vancouver, in a published endorsement for the book. “It’s that good!”

“Everybody that I know has bought at least 10 copies,” Caleb Nowak of Yakima, Wash., told the New York Times earlier this summer. “There’s definitely something about the book that makes people want to share it.”

The Shack tells the fictional redemptive story of Mackenzie Allen Phillips, whose daughter is tragically abducted and murdered during a family vacation.

Four years after the tragedy, Phillips receives a note, supposedly from “God,” inviting him back to the abandoned shack where evidence of his daughter’s murder had been found. When Phillips accepts the offer and returns to the shack, he enters into a kind of spiritual therapy session with “God,” who appears in the form of a jolly African-American woman and calls herself “Papa;” Jesus, who appears as a Jewish workman; and Sarayu, an indeterminately Asian woman who incarnates the Holy Spirit.

“This is a story of one believer’s brokenness and how God reached into that pain and pulled him out and as such is a compelling story of God’s redemption,” explained author and former pastor Wayne Jacobson, who was part of a team that worked with Young on the manuscript for over a year and also is part of Windblown Media, the company formed to print and distribute this book.

“The pain and healing come straight from a life that was broken by guilt and shame at an incredibly deep level,” Jacobson wrote in his personal blog, “and he (Young) compresses into a weekend the lessons that helped him walk out of that pain and find life in Jesus again.”

Young says he had suffered sexual abuse in New Guinea as the child of Canadian missionaries and spent a decade in therapy trying to earn back his wife’s and family’s trust after an extramarital affair 15 years ago.

In 2005, Young started writing what would eventually be The Shack to show how he had healed by forging a new relationship with God.

“It wasn’t an intended thing,” Young said during an interview earlier this year on The Drew Marshall Show. “It wasn’t saying ‘Well, this is the new formula for touching the hearts of the people,’ but people are – they’re just starving for authenticity. They’re just starving for someone to stand up and say, ‘You know what? God loves the worst of us – the losers, the screw ups.”

“I’m an example of what grace looks like,” he added.

According to Jacobson, the reason why The Shack has touched so many people is “because it deals with God in the midst of pain in an honest, straightforward way and because for many this is the first time they have seen the power of theology worked out inside a relationship with God himself.” Continue »

Pages: 12
Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:57 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    lharpell1@cogeco.ca

  • Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:55 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    yes

  • Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:52 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    god dont say to much beer sorry GOD

  • Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:49 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    patrick swayze nids help ok all can me give him help with gog and son in us all

  • Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:42 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    no man or women can get you home but god and son ok you all i live you and all on earth

  • Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:39 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    know you god for rally

  • Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:36 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    yes but know you live life god loves live i im live you are live you are god and im god to i ?

  • Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:31 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    god has know plane you make your own its your path not his

  • Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:25 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    i love god and son if are not with him you are in or out?

  • Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:11 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Hello all. I have read the book, and, I have read The Book. Any time that Jesus Himself told a story, it seems that many religious people would miss the point, particularly those in 'authority.' The point, as I see it, was the basic theological ground of theodicy, that God is good, no matter what happens in our everyday lives. God is good, loves us with an everlasting love, and wants to live with and within us... an indwelling apart from which we cannot attain or maintain righteousness. Sure, theology has been stretched somewhat... but any attempt to describe the Trinity is going to be heretical at some point, as it just cannot be done completely and accurately with human words (Remember, it took the Church over 300 years of meetings and councils to hammer it out in a form that most could agree upon). But back to the point of Young's story... God is good, loves you more than you'll ever know, and has a wonderful plan for your life (even though it does not look like it sometimes), and particularly for the life to come! Enter the rest.

  • Tue Nov 04, 2008 7:04 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I am a man of my God, I love Him with all of my heart and I tell my children about His Love every single day! There is no excuse for those who wish to miss the message in this gift to a dad's children. I am truly grateful for and deeply moved by this piece of literature. Never allow your relationship to devolve to a religion. If this book in any way offends your sense of God's dignified character then perhaps you should spend some more time playing with your children and watch the joy in their eyes at a Father who loves them.

  • Chaz »
    Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:49 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Blacksho89, the HUGE difference is that in the Scriptures the tenor is "God is like owner of a vineyard who..." No problem. Whereas with The Shack the tenor is that out pops the Papa woman with the clear understanding that "Here is your God" I see a WORLD of difference between those two ways of referencing the Holy One.

  • Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:36 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Matt Slick from www.carm.org interviewed Young regarding the Shack on Matt's Faith and Reason Radio show. Matt also wrote a critic of the book...which has some serious problems:
    http://www.carm.org/features/theshack.htm.

    Far too many people just follow what feels good without applying biblical truths to "popular" movements.

  • Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:14 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Part One...
    http://www.haventoday.org/prevbroadcast/1661

  • Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:13 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Here's a link to the Haven Today interview...
    http://www.haventoday.org/prevbroadcast/1662

  • Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:10 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    So, how many of you critics HAVE ACTUALLY LISTENED TO Young talk about the book, the reason he wrote it, his intent at first for it to be for his family only, and the reason he decided to go ahead and SELF publish??? I HAVE! And I'll reiterate what I said before ... I have three options... 1) Take him at his word that he's NOT trying to teach or change theology, 2) Brand him a liar, or 3) Assume that I know his intentions better than he does. And considering what he said to Charles Morris, taking him at his word is the only realistic choice I have.

  • Fri Sep 19, 2008 5:13 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    This is an example of why the Church is at the point it is. People are not willing to hold on to sound doctrine. They want their ears tickled. Read Jude or Timothy or 1 2 3 john. All concerned with correct doctrine.

    CS lewis never called Aslan God. It's always clear it's an allegorical story. The Bible always likens God to things we can understand, never calling Him a woman or the Holy Spirit a woman. This book is saying that's what God is (or at least appearing as).

    You're right, I haven't picked up the book. I bet the apostles avoided the Gnostic heretical writings as well. I try to avoid things with blatant heresy.

    The biggest problem is people who are ignorant of theology say this book is "revolutionizing" the way they perceive God. If that's true, it's tragic. They are worshipping a false God.

  • Fri Sep 19, 2008 10:53 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    I have to say that I am very conservative in my theology, but I really loved the book. I too almost put the book down after one part that particularly challenged my theology, but thankfully I went on to finish the book.

    One thing that bugs me about some of the vitriolic comments from people about this book is that they haven't even read it for themselves. There are some really powerful things in that book that people just completely miss because they're so focused on a few misconstrued paragraphs.

    Look, I don't agree 100% on the portrayal of God in this book, but you know what? I'm not afraid to hear someone else's thoughts on God. It doesn't get in the way of a truly powerful story of God's love and restoration of a broken man. Give it a chance before you rip it.

  • Fri Sep 19, 2008 10:26 am Agree: 6   Disagree: 1

    Even those who like The Shack agree that there are theologically unsound representations in it. So why would anybody justify or support the book? We're talking about the very image of God! Doesn't the Bible say that the mind is a fertile ground for good or evil? And Jesus' parable reps of God all portrayed His righteousness FROM SCRIPTURE. Most people I've heard from and read admit the book's rep is greatly unbiblical.

  • Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:57 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    I gently disagree. The Father is represented in Scripture, in parables, as the owner of a vineyard, as the train of a robe-but we do not actually think of the Father as a real estate baron. I see a definite difference between symbolic, theoretical, figurative representations and a golden calf.
    I understand your discomfort. The representations can NOT be Scripturally justified; I agree. But I no more think of God as a large African American woman than I think of him as-well, any form comprehensible to my mind at all.
    The Shack is NOT scripture. It should not be taken as such. Neither is Narnia. God is not a lion, either. Perhaps Lewis was clever in his portrayal that way, removing the human element so no one would mistake Aslan for an idol.
    If you feel uncomfortable, don't read it. Be careful recommending it to others, lest you inadvertently confuse them. But if you are well grounded, and can tell real from counterfeit, the strong emphasis on relationships is a powerful message.
    From Merriam-Webster: Blasphemy- 1 a: the act of insulting or showing contempt or lack of reverence for God b: the act of claiming the attributes of deity2: irreverence toward something considered sacred or inviolable.
    I did not see contempt or lack of reverence. Apostasy, perhaps; but not blasphemy. I really can't remember profanity, either.
    If it makes you uncomfortable, then I do not tell you to read it.

  • Chaz »
    Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:39 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 3

    My objection has to do with personifying the Trinity. That, to me, is unquestionably unbiblical and sinful every bit as much as a physical golden calf is. Just because the image is suggested to one's imagination is of no less consequence in shaping one's thoughts of God than an image of silver or gold sitting on one's kitchen table and saying, "Behold, your God."

    per·son·i·fy
    2. To represent (an object or abstraction) by a human figure. www.thefreedictionary.com

    I believe that we are never to represent the Father (or the Holy Spirit for that matter) `by a human figure,' and any attempts to do so is serious error. Didn't the apostle Paul speak to this when he wrote "Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles." (Romans 1:22, 23, NIV.)

    Think of it: "exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man." "The Shack," does PRECISELY that. On the potters wheel of his mind the author fashions an image, an image of the Holy One, God the Father-"the blessed and only Ruler, the King of kings and Lord of lords, who alone is immortal and who lives in unapproachable light, whom no-one has seen or can see" (1Tim 6:15,16 NIV). And what does the image look like? It is "made to look like mortal man" --> the "Papa" woman.

    Jesus said: "God is spirit, and his worshippers must worship in spirit and in truth." John 4:24, NIV. NO IMAGES can convey "spirit" and any attempts to create one I think is a subtle form of idolatry and will instigate deception.

    There may be some good insights in the book, but the ends don't justify the means-ever.

  • Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:12 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 2

    The man represents God in a blasphemous way. Why are so many Christians willing to try to explain that away and defend the guy?

  • Thu Sep 18, 2008 6:58 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 2

    I found the emphasis on relationships to be inspiring. That is something that I need more of in my walk, both spiritually and on Earth.
    While I would not recommend this book to a young Christian, for those who are steeped in the Word and can recognize theological errors, it is a fascinating novel, I'd have to say that, for me, the good FAR outweighed the bad.

  • Thu Sep 18, 2008 6:18 pm Agree: 8   Disagree: 2

    Well I took personal affront at his blasphemous image of the Almighty in this book. Then there's the profanity. That use to be one of the reasons I read only Christian fiction, to avoid things like that. To me it's a big intrusion of the story. And it's not"just a story." I'm so tired of hearing that. Has nobody paid attention to the stuff coming out of the mouth of these "God" characters? I was glad I didn't spend any money on it. In fact, I put it down part way through, something I've rarely done with books, and also got it taken out of our church library.

  • Thu Sep 18, 2008 5:37 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 6

    I read The Shack a couple of months ago. I enjoyed the story and I definitely got some good "takeaways" from it. I'm not quite sure where all the "hate" is coming from. I did not consider it to be theological or theologically threatening in the least. Sure. WIlliam Young took considerable PERSONAL liberty with his written portrayal of God and the Trinity, but IT'S ONLY A STORY, people, so get over it! I did happen to listen to William Young's radio interview with Charles Morris of Haven Today. I came away with the conclusion that I had these options: 1) Take him at his word that he's NOT trying to teach or change theology, 2) Brand him a liar, or 3) Assume that I know his intentions better than he does. And considering what he said, taking him at his word is the only true choice.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Listen to Sermons by  
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Gifts
  • Health
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Bethany House Publishers

The second book in the Seasons of Grace series will be available soon. The Missing is filled with mystery and family secrets, love and loss, heartbreak and healing — all wrapped

Featured Advertiser Links