Updated 11:59 pm.EST, Sun November 22, 2009

Society|Thu, Sep. 25 2008 01:39 PM EDT

Evangelical Leader: McCain 'Waffles' on Issues

By Jennifer Riley|Christian Post Reporter

An influential evangelical leader recently expressed his dissatisfaction with Republican presidential nominee John McCain, who he accused of “waffling” on issues.

“I thought John McCain was a principled person,” said Richard Cizik, vice president for governmental affairs of the National Association of Evangelicals, to The Colorado Independent.

“But John McCain has backed off, not just on climate change but on torture and a sensible tax policy – in other words, he’s not the John McCain of 2000 … He seems to be waffling on issues after issue,” charged the chief lobbyist of the nation’s largest evangelical network that represents some 30 million members.

Interestingly, Cizik, who was named this year by Time magazine as one of the world’s 100 most influential people for his climate change work, is a Republican who says he has known McCain for many years.

But the Republican nominee fell from Cizik’s favor when he began succumbing to his party and to the Christian right, said the outspoken evangelical.

“It’s not illogical for someone to conclude that John McCain is going to be more like George Bush than John McCain is going to be John McCain in 2000,” he said.

Cizik, whose comments may anger some people, is no stranger to controversy and tension, even within evangelical circles.

Just last year, he was the target of prominent Christian right leaders such as Dr. James Dobson, Tony Perkins, and Gary Bauer for his very public advocacy for creation care.

The conservative leaders had faulted Cizik for distracting evangelicals from more important issues – abortion, traditional marriage, and abstinence – with his green evangelical campaign. They also charged Cizik for misrepresenting to the public the evangelical view on global warming, which they contend is so diverse that it would be hard to fairly represent.

Using a letter, dozens of Christian right leaders had pressed, unsuccessfully, for the NAE board to fire Cizik for leading the evangelical green movement.

But Cizik is undeterred by the opposition and has continued to speak at churches and Christian colleges about the biblical reasons behind creation care.

Just last week he was in Colorado, home state of Dobson’s Focus on the Family empire, and addressed hundreds of congregants and college students about the need for environmental protection.

While in Colorado, he also had a few words to say about McCain’s vice presidential pick, Sarah Palin.

“It is pretty obvious that the Palin nomination plays to identity politics and cultural war issues,” Cizik said to The Colorado Independent. “Her selection is more than an acknowledgment that evangelicals are an important part of the Republican base, and everyone knows that John McCain is not that exciting to religious conservatives.”

Palin and Cizik hold different views on the global warming issue. Palin does not believe climate change is mainly human-induced, supports oil drilling in Alaska’s National Wildlife Reserve, and wants to de-list polar bears as an endangered species.

“The irony of it is that John McCain can’t speak with an evangelical voice of faith - let’s face it, it’s just not his thing - so I guess the substitute is this other (Palin),” Cizik said. “I guess that’s pretty cynical, but maybe his actions are cynical.”

The sometimes polarizing evangelical leader said he has not yet decided who he will vote for in the November presidential election. Obama, he said, lacks experience, while McCain is too similar to incumbent President Bush.

“It’s a conundrum,” the evangelical leader said of the candidate choices.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Mon Oct 13, 2008 8:23 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Did Obama support the murder of Christians in Kenya? Aparently he raised $1 million dollars to his uncle who did.

  • Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:43 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    ifeelfine says: "You've read the Bible, you know that while Jesus didn't state his political views, clearly He was a socialist."

    If there was ever any doubt in our minds as to your Biblical understanding I think you have made yourself known loud and clear.

    Now I know you are a Marxist. Only a Marxist would even suggest such an absurdity.

  • Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:28 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    very interesting perspective on the financial crisis
    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=NU6fuFrdCJY

  • Tue Sep 30, 2008 3:31 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    but part of the issue IS Obama's socialist/communist/marxist influences. I dont want money to be moved from the rich to the poor without the agreement of both individuals involved - otherwise its robbery. I dont want to vote for someone who would vote against letting babies who survive attempted murder (called abortion) receive medical attention. I dont want to vote for someone who had a terrorist for a fund raiser. I dont want to vote for someone who is either still learning what he believes or simply flip-flops to pander to the voters.

  • Tue Sep 30, 2008 12:57 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Yeah, Christ was attacked(by the Pharisees) for associating with tax collectors, sound familiar? Republican leadership uses mind manipulation by attaching negative stimulus to words like: Marxist, Socialist, Muslim et cetera and then trying to falsely apply them to anyone who disagrees with them. Just stick to the issues instead of labeling and name calling and making people so angry. I'm and Democrat and progressive. I'm not after people's guns and I think much more needs to be done about abortion and I'm only for slightly raising the taxes on the wealthy in order to save the country from disaster. You don't have any idea how much collaberation and corruption there is in business. Money really is the one thing Republican leaders are truly concerned about. It's dirty paper. It can't save one soul.It's nothing to put your trust in.

  • Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:02 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    ifeelfine72,

    Please explain how you came to that conclusion. Because based upon my reading, I disagree. I think Christ was very much into personal responsibility with helping those who needed help. He did not come to change governmnet, but people's hearts. He accepted the government as it was, and said individuals were to go further in love and obedience than required. His analogies showed that He expected people to make good use of what they are given and be holy and to be held accountable for their actions.

  • Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:02 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 4

    wbmoore: You've read the Bible, you know that while Jesus didn't state his political views, clearly He was a socialist.

  • Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:30 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    wbmoore: Even politically, I don't see how you can say that McCain is a better choice than Obama. McCain is for pretty much everything Bush was / is for and we all see how horribly that has turned out. Obama actually got a good education . . . and he didn't use any "connections" to make it happen. Isn't it time again that someone with a lick of intelligence took the office?

  • Sun Sep 28, 2008 8:55 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    If Ron Paul or Mike Huckabee had won, I'd vote for one of them. Give my choices, McCain may not be the best from your perspective, but he is from mine. Obama is a definite no-no.

  • Sun Sep 28, 2008 8:37 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    McCain is not the best. He will use fear tactics in order to get things done, just like Bush has done

  • Sun Sep 28, 2008 7:59 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Personally, I don't remember anyone saying McCain is holy or righteous. I recall people saying that he is the best choice between McCain and Obama.

    As for taking verses out of context, please show me where I have done that. I have said we are to help those who truly need help. I also said those who can work for what they need should do so. These are scriptural (Deuteronomy 24:10-22). We are to treat the poor no differently than we do the rich, but speak up for those who need it (Leviticus 19:15; Psalm 82:3-4; Proverbs 31:8-9). We are not to be lazy, or love pleasure, but work for what we need and save for the future but prepare ourselves for the kingdom of God and be rich towards the Lord, always ready for Christ's return (Genesis 41:35; Proverbs 6:6-11, 10:4-5, 20:13, 21:17, 2 Thessalonians 3:10b; Luke 12:15-40).

    As a matter of fact, I think we should go further ad treat the alien among us as we do the native born (Numbers 15:16).

  • Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:52 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    ifeelfine, it appears that you are satisfied with just feeding a man a fish and feed him for a day as opposed to teaching a man to fish and feeding him for the rest of his life.

  • Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:47 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    ifeelfine, please share how we took that verse out of context. Neither wb or I said we should not help the poor and the Southern Baptist Convention through the local church and other mission agencies is doing just that. But the Bible clearly teaches that as shown in the Book of Ruth and the verse we cited that the poor were expected to do their fair share in providing for themselves and if they weren't then they would have to put up with the consequences.

  • Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:39 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    This article seems wrong.. McCain doesn't waffle on issues, he just straight out lies or ignorantly dismisses everything 'wrong' to him. Now that's solved!

  • Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:08 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    "McCain is not a holy man looking out for everyone"

    David commited adultry and had the husband killed just to name a few. Yet, he was a man "after God's own heart". When push came to shove, David bowed.

    Man looks on the outward appearance but God looks on the heart. I have made my political choices by what I have seen of position of heart. Obama at the debate denied his own voting record available online! He doesn't even take responsibility for how he votes. McCain said how he handled his first marriage is his greatest moral failing.

    Obama is a blame shifter. 'It's Rev. Wrights fault so I will distance myself from him' and the list goes on.

  • Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:08 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    wbmoore & believer: So you'll dismiss more than 1000 verses about how we are to treat the poor for one you've taken out of context? . . . just one more proof that you two are making God in your own image and not vice versa.

  • Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:29 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    People have said a few times to pray and let Jesus tell you who to vote for, yet it seems that many of closed their ears to what he might have to say. McCain is not a holy man looking out for everyone: he ditched his disabled wife for a hot new fox, cannot carry himself in a debate, and cares only for protecting the wealth of his family and close friends. Candidates should not be judged on their stance on abortion or gay marriage, but rather their leadership potential and human character. Obama is a good, thoughtful, brilliant man. McCain knows he's in trouble, you could see his nervous energy like crystal during the debate.

  • Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:21 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    ifeelfine72,

    You haven't read the Bible if you think my political views on what I wrote do not line up with the Bible. God is clear to help those who need it. God is clear we are to take care of family. but God is also clear we must work if we to eat. The corners of the fields were left for people to pick them - that is work needed to be done to get what was left for them. And as believer quoted in 2 Thessalonians 3:10b, "If a man will not work, he shall not eat."

  • Sun Sep 28, 2008 1:07 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "Politics is the last resort of a scoundrel"- Samuel Johnson...18th century. If anyone is seeking a promise/change from any politician, you are about to be disappointed. Your best bet is to pray and ask JESUS for guidance in that voting booth.

  • Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:47 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    ifeelfine, but the Bible does speak to that in 2 Thessalonians 3:10, "If anyone isn't willing to work, he should not eat." (HCSB)

  • Sat Sep 27, 2008 12:44 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    wbmoore: That is your political view (which by the way I kind of agree with) . . . now, how about your theological view? If that is your theological view then you are not reading the Christian Bible the rest of us are.

  • Fri Sep 26, 2008 9:35 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    The word is clear on the issue of the poor: help those who can not help themselves, otherwise, provide means for people to work for what they need. The poor in this country are better off than the middle class of many other countries.

    I came from a poor family. My dad worked three jobs when I was a kid. My dad bought a house. His kids learned the value of hard work and both went to college. My brother worked his way through, while I worked and also had some veteran's benefits that were part of the contract I made when I agreed to help defend my country. My uncle on the other hand never saw a need to get a job, because the government would pay him to have kids and not work (those were his words).

    There are plenty of ways for people to get ahead in this country. I know people who never went to college and started small businesses and are highly successful. I know single parents who went to college and are doing quite well for themselves - without student loans.

    People sometimes need a hand up, but not a hand-out. I do not believe in giving people the easy way out. I think we need to instill self-confidence and self-esteem by providing ways for people to earn their way up - and taxing people to death and removing competition is certainly not the way to do it.

    People do not know the value of a dollar and hard work any more. We need to do what we can to encourage people to grow in these areas, not provide easy ways out of not accepting responsibility for their actions.

  • Fri Sep 26, 2008 8:59 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    wbmoore: What about the poor? Not a single verse in the Bible directly addressing abortion and yet there are more than 1000 verses on how we are to treat the poor. While I believe that abortion is not part of God's plan, there can at least be a debate about it - the book is closed on how we are to treat the least amongst us and the poor.

  • Fri Sep 26, 2008 8:57 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    wbmoore: You don't like progressives? Well, then perhaps you can go back to working for whatever anyone will pay you, back to 80 hr work weeks rather than 40 hr work weeks, let's reintroduce slavery too - that was a "conservative" initiative; certainly not a liberal one. Basically, you thank a progressive for almost all of the comforts we take for granted now a days. So I say, if you're going to be a conservative, really be one.

  • Fri Sep 26, 2008 8:18 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    McCain is too liberal. But he's a better choice than Obama. Too bad Ron Paul or Mike Huckabee didn't win.

  • Fri Sep 26, 2008 8:17 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Put God first. If you don't bring your faith into politics, then its not faith. God should determine your every decision, including whether to vote for someone who would let infants die, once they have survived abortion.

  • Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:33 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    John McCain may not be as strong in his personal Christian faith as George Bush, but he stated emphatically in the Saddleback Forum that he had personally accepted Jesus Christ as Savior. He is against gay marriage and abortion. Senator Barak Hussein Obama claims to be a "Christian" but what does that mean to him. It is well-known in the Muslim religion that men take the name Hussein when they become a Muslim. He has NEVER dropped the name. Also, once a person who was once Muslim becomes a Christian, Jew, Buddhist or any other religion, he is a target for execution. Obama has never been executed or even considered for such by the Muslim world. Therefore, he is still a Muslim. By the way, I am NOT advocated execution for anyone leaving the Muslim religion, just stating the facts as they are. He has no compassion for the poor or the down-trodden as he claims. His own brother lives in an African hut and earns approximately $1 per month. Obama has never sent him any help in any way according to his brother. There is a Christian conservative group that is currently collecting money to be sent to his brother for him to go to school to become a mechanic (which he wants to do) and has already raised over $3,000 for him. Shame on Obama and especially any so-called Christian who would even consider voting for him. Do we forget the scoundrel so-called Christian Baptist president Jimmy Carter. What a farce! By the way, I am a Baptist and wish Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Al Gore and all the other liberal socialist left-wing Democrats who say they are Baptist who stop the farce. They hurt good Christians everywhere.

  • artm »
    Fri Sep 26, 2008 12:52 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Sen Obama doesn't waffle, He's Pro-Abortion to the bone, And he will not waffle on that position.

  • Fri Sep 26, 2008 12:01 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I have felt for some time that the choices we have in this election are #1 a traditional Democrat or #2 a radical left wing socialist. I am not happy with McCain but I will never vote for Obama, the most radically liberal major candidate in American history.

    That is not hyperbole, it is a fact, if you care enough to study the issue. Unfortunately, most do not. Most approach the the future of our country like a season of "American Idol".

  • Fri Sep 26, 2008 12:32 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Put people first. A country is an idea and not a life. God bless anyone who follows the principles of his only Son, no matter where in the world they are.

    Don't bring your politics into your faith. Bring your faith into every aspect of your life.

  • Fri Sep 26, 2008 12:08 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    This Election is crucial and please pray for JESUS to give you good judgement when you enter that voting booth.
    This election will affect you personally like no other election ever has. God Bless America

  • Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:07 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Mr. Cizik appears to be very controversial even with the Evangelical community.

    His focus is on subjects that make the church appear politically influencial while diverting attention from true Christian values.

    The bottom line here is that while Mr. Cizik can be critical of the choices we have in this election season, he offers no alternative from the Evangelical community which he so strongly lobby's for.

    It's time for him to use his influence to unify and not divide an already mixed Christian community.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links