Updated 12:58 pm.EST, Sat November 21, 2009

Society|Thu, Oct. 09 2008 01:32 PM EDT

Major Shift in Faith Voters toward Obama, Survey Finds

By Michelle A. Vu|Christian Post Reporter

Not only is Sen. Barack Obama ahead in general national polls, but a new survey finds that the Democratic presidential candidate has made significant inroads among faith voters.

In comparison to the 2004 Democratic nominee Sen. John Kerry, Obama has made significant gains among monthly worship attenders. Among this group of voters, who attend religious services once or twice a month, 60 percent support Obama in 2008 compared to 49 percent for Kerry in 2004, according to results from the report, “The Faith and American Politics Survey,” sponsored by Faith in Public Life and conducted by Public Religion Research.

Also unlike the 2004 election, more Americans think the Democratic candidate is friendly to religion than the Republican nominee. Forty-nine percent of Americans say Obama is friendly to religion, while 45 percent say the same of McCain.

This is a significant difference given that President Bush in 2004 won more than 60 percent of the religious vote.

The poll also found that 71 percent of Americans say it is important for public officials to be comfortable talking about religious values.

Besides looking at faith voters as a whole, the survey also delved into examining young faith voters, particularly Catholics and evangelicals.

It found that young Catholics (ages 18-34) are more supportive of Obama than older Catholics (ages 35 and older). While older Catholics are split between the candidates (46 percent for McCain and 44 percent for Obama), younger Catholics support Obama by a 15 percentage point margin over McCain (55 percent to 40 percent).

Younger Catholics are also more supportive of abortion, with six-in-ten saying it should be legal in all or most cases, compared to older Catholics, half of whom support legalizing the practice.

However, when it comes to young white evangelicals, this religious segment still remains strongly opposed to abortion rights, with two-thirds saying it should be illegal in all or most cases, and solidly backs McCain (65 percent).

But young white evangelicals are more likely to favor either same-sex "marriage" (24 percent) or civil unions (28 percent) than older evangelicals. Sixty-one percent of evangelicals age 35 and above want no legal recognition of homosexual relationships.

In other words, young white evangelicals are 2.5 times more likely than older evangelicals to say gay couples should be allowed to marry.

Among young white mainline Protestants and Catholics, nearly half (48 percent and 44 percent, respectively) support same-sex “marriage.”

“Younger Americans, including younger Americans of faith, are not the culture war generation,” commented Dr. Robert Jones, president of Public Religion Research and lead analyst of the poll, during the report’s teleconference on Wednesday.

“On issues from gay and lesbian rights to the role of government at home and around the world, young Catholics, mainline protestants and evangelicals are bridging the divides that entrenched their elders and ushering in an era of consensus in which the common good trumps the clash of ideologies.”

In this election year, culture war issues of abortion and same-sex “marriage” have been put on the back burner given the state of the economy and the financial crisis.

According to the survey, 83 percent of Americans say the economy is the most important issue in the 2008 election, followed by energy and gas prices (76 percent) and health care (71 percent).

Economic issues topped the list of most important issues among all religious groups polled. Even white evangelicals did not rank abortion or same-sex “marriage” among their top five most important voting issues.

Survey results are based on telephone interviews with a representative sample of 2,000 American adults and an over sample of 1,250 younger adults (ages 18-34). The poll was conducted under the supervision of Opinion Access Corp from Aug. 28 to Sept. 19, 2008.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
1 | 2
  • Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:33 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Daniel that's hilarious - a poll on the defectiveness of polls.

  • Thu Oct 16, 2008 8:39 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    I'd like to do a poll here. Please thumb up or down if you think polls are stupid and really prove nothing!
    Thumb up for stupid. Thumb down for not stupid.

  • Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:42 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    holito8,

    "This case is not closed."

    It might as well be, she can run, but she can't hide.

    Yet Palin claimed to reporters over the weekend that she had been "cleared of any legal wrongdoing, any hint of unethical activity."

    That's just not true, and Palin knows it.

    She kept repeating her silly contention at campaign stops, instructing one reporter to "read the report, sir."

    And american people should read the report, here is the money quote.

    "Governor Palin knowingly permitted a situation to continue where impermissible pressure was placed on several subordinates in order to advance a personal agenda."

    (actual alaska report here)
    http://download2.legis.state.ak.us/DOWNLOAD.pdf

    http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/images/10/11/response.branchflower.report.pdf

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/11/us/politics/11trooper.html?hp

  • Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:28 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    agent, I don't have my history books nearby, but if I'm not mistaken at that time in our political system whoever got the 2nd highest number of votes in the preseidential election became the VP, so the Republican Party would not have nominated Andrew Johnson.

  • Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:22 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "Well, many people thought that Republican Abraham Lincoln was, but unfortunate after his assasination his Democrat VP overturned almost all of the work that he did for the black community"

    Democratic VP, overturning 'most' (which ones, details?) for the black community? Besides seedy, if a former democrat turned republican was so obviously bad, why did the republican party see fit in nominating him? They are at least partially culpable, just like McCain and his choice of Palin.

    Uhhh, not quite. Hamlin joined over to the Republican party several years prior to be being a VP....darn, those facts again.

    ..."on June 12, 1856 he withdrew from the Democratic Party and joined the newly organized Republican Party, causing a national sensation."

    6 years later he'd be a VP...

    "From the very beginning of his service in Congress he was prominent as an opponent of the extension of slavery;"

    "...although he urged both the Emancipation Proclamation and the arming of African Americans."

    Yup, sure sounds like a guy who would be pro-slavery if I ever heard one.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannibal_Hamlin

  • Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:24 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "is there such a thing as a good president?"

    Well, many people thought that Republican Abraham Lincoln was, but unfortunate after his assasination his Democrat VP overturned almost all of the work that he did for the black community much to the dismay of the Republicans who faught so hard for their freedom and gave up their lives.

  • Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:46 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    True Christians who fast and pray for guidance on a daily basis will not put their trust in any politician.The US has avoided Christian persecution till now. But, the days ahead will TEST the faith of Christians worldwide. It is easier to wear Christianity on your sleeve than in your heart. In the future many of us will undergo the TEST for our FAITH. We, in the WEST have a false sense of security for our Christian faith. GOD BE WITH YOU"LL

  • Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:02 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Lord, I hope Obama doesn't. As I said earlier, if he does it will be like going from the frying pan into the fire.

    As far as Bush is considered, he may have not been the best, but he sure beat the alternative. And is there such a thing as a good president?
    Bush got us involved in a war. People are pissed off about it. Now if he hadn't gotten us involved, we would still be dealing with Saddam, and people would be pissed off. It doesn't matter what you do, people are going to get pissed off.

  • Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:47 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    OK prophet, at least we can agree bush not the best prez we ever had. We will have to see how obama works out should he get elected, which my money says he will be the next prez.

  • Sun Oct 12, 2008 6:10 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    scitsonga,
    You said "feed up, come 1/2009, that evil will be removed after eight disaster filled years........"

    Very true. Only to be replaced by a bigger evil....should Obama win....

  • Sat Oct 11, 2008 11:38 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    feed up, come 1/2009, that evil will be removed after eight disaster filled years........

  • Sat Oct 11, 2008 11:32 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    We need to also pray without ceasing that God will keep evil from the Whitehouse and Congress. Our way of life is at stake!

  • Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:23 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I love it pretty petty palin sure can dish it out, but doesnt take it very well when her character is being questioned. palin is like a lead weight for mccain, I bet he wished he hadn't gambled putting this unqualified bimbo on the ticket. disperate people do disperate things, US doesnt need another 4 years of poor decision making.

  • Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:16 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    yeah right prophet, you got the correct set of beliefs and your goin to spend eternity in paradise while the "incorrect believers" goin to get the eternal torture treatment...........LOL, you make me laugh.

  • Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:13 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    wrhalver, Well I got to tell you, the IEM poll seems to work pretty well. I remember I didnt want to believe it in 2004 when it was predicting bush to win, but win he did. As they stay in investing, "the trend is your friend", as an Obama supporter I like the trend.

  • Sat Oct 11, 2008 6:16 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I recall reading the guy who was fired said it was not because of her former brother-in-law. So its interesting the people who did not like her spanking the republican party leadership, plus people in the opposite party who want a dem elected pres came to this conclusion. Its also interesting that the investigation is supposed to be held by a specific group, which is not the legislature.

  • Sat Oct 11, 2008 5:15 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Daniel,
    That goes along with surveys that state that 80% of Americans believe in God. So what? There's going to be a lot of "believers" in the wrong line on Judgement Day.

  • Sat Oct 11, 2008 4:20 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Just FYI, if enough investigation could be done I think DC would be mostly empty if this is considered abuse of power. I know here is SC we wouldn't have much government left!

  • Sat Oct 11, 2008 4:18 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "an investigation by the Alaska Legislature "

    Are these not the same guys who were lining their pockets with big oil money that stopped flowing with Palin as Governor? Wow...their really credible....

  • Sat Oct 11, 2008 4:16 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    A major survey says that most everyone who believes in heaven thinks they can get in....

    so much for surveys.

  • Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:31 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Alaska Inquiry Concludes Palin Abused Powers

    Sarah Palin abused the powers of her office by pressuring subordinates to try to get her former brother-in-law, a state trooper, fired, an investigation by the Alaska Legislature has concluded.

    http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jOTk11gvqDAgD0cY3i4WjI_2YOxwD93O25DG0

    Dont think sarah goin to be DC in 2009. Back to Alaska to face criminal charges of abuse of powers for starters. Alaskins will deal with her after Nov 4th defeat.

    This case is not closed.

  • Sat Oct 11, 2008 11:04 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    scitsonga

    Thank you for your explanation.

    Here is something that you may want to think about.
    The past elections that are referenced by Rasmussen did not have the unusually higher voter turnout as was experienced during the most recent primaries.

    It is likely that the polling numbers reflected the views of the hard core Party voters. These are the ones that will actually cast a vote. But this vote is based on Party affiliation and not personal preference.

    This is why the polling numbers would match up pretty closely with the actual vote.

    Both Parties have concern that the while the anticipated hard core Party vote seems to make the race appear relatively even, it is the rest of the voters who will make the difference.

    Can they get the same unusually high voter participation in November that they had during the primaries? If so, the polling numbers will not be accurate.

    The current polling numbers are a nice reference, but they have to target the non-hardcore voter who needs to show up at the polls to make the real difference.

    You need to spend lots of money for that kind of tracking. The overall news media is not interested.

  • Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:09 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    seed, I love your posts, they make me laugh, keep up the good work......

  • Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:08 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    good questions wrhalver, I dont have a breakdown on the participants. If one were to research it, Im sure the info. is out there, the link below might address some of your question

    However, IEM predicted a bush win in 2004. Democrats at the time said the polling was biased towards republicans because "republicans are more likely to invest in markets", never mind that IEM predicted clinton in '92 and '96. The link below is an interesting paper talking about the bush lead in Sept 2004.

    http://dir.salon.com/story/tech/feature/2004/09/29/market_kerry_two/

    Here is an abstract for a paper written on the market approach for predicting elections :

    Abstract
    "Prediction markets" are designed specifically to forecast events such as elections. Though election prediction markets have been being conducted for almost twenty years, to date nearly all of the evidence on efficiency compares election eve forecasts with final pre-election polls and actual outcomes. Here, we present evidence that prediction markets outperform polls for longer horizons. We gather national polls for the 1988 through 2004 U.S. Presidential elections and ask whether either the poll or a contemporaneous Iowa Electronic Markets vote-share market prediction is closer to the eventual outcome for the two-major-party vote split. We compare market predictions to 964 polls over the five Presidential elections since 1988. The market is closer to the eventual outcome 74% of the time. Further, the market significantly outperforms the polls in every election when forecasting more than 100 days in advance.
    ------------------------------------------------------

    To address your other question, no I did not pay for the information. I will repost the web site for the IEM, thats where I get my information and some info. from google searches. I am not participating in the IEM.

  • Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:57 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Scit, If this is the best the liberal masses can come up with I think that it reveals just who really is "desperate."

  • Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:43 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    scitsonga
    You have said...
    "Not really, the IEM is real money. Real people placing bets with real money on the outcome of the election."

    Do you have the breakdown of who these real people are?
    If you have paid for this information, please share it.

    Thanks.

  • Sat Oct 11, 2008 12:41 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    FYI

    Alaska Inquiry Concludes Palin Abused Powers

    Sarah Palin abused the powers of her office by pressuring subordinates to try to get her former brother-in-law, a state trooper, fired, an investigation by the Alaska Legislature has concluded.

    http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jOTk11gvqDAgD0cY3i4WjI_2YOxwD93O25DG0

    Dont think sarah goin to be DC in 2009. Back to Alaska to face criminal charges of abuse of powers for starters. Alaskins will deal with her after Nov 4th defeat.

  • Sat Oct 11, 2008 12:32 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Not like this country is in bad enough shape, let's make it worse and vote in Obama.
    A man once told me "The road to hell is paved with Republicans."
    I told him "Well, of course. Democrats need a smooth ride on their way home....."

  • Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:47 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "yeah prophet, "blind leading the blind"....LOL. all the way to Nov 4th win."

    Yeah! Out of the frying pan....into the fire.

  • Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:42 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    no seedling, just enjoying the ride..........

  • Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:36 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Scitsonga, you sitting in as an Evangelical tonight?

  • Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:27 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    yeah prophet, "blind leading the blind"....LOL. all the way to Nov 4th win.

  • Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:22 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    All his supporters....kinda like the blind leading the blind, eh scitsonga?

  • Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:52 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    igh "Your Dollars, your Pesos, Euros, anything you got!"

    Actually thats mccain, the poor lad and his lap dog are really hurting for cash. obama has plenty thanks to his millions of supporters...

  • Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:50 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    halver "Ok, so we have another poll clearly showing the divide between liberal and conservative thinking."

    Not really, the IEM is real money. Real people placing bets with real money on the outcome of the election.

    GOTO web site and see for yourself. http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/

  • Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:46 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    believer, Here is an explanation of the IEM taken from their site:

    2008 U.S. Presidential Election Markets

    The IEM 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Markets are real-money futures markets where contract payoffs will be determined by the popular vote cast in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election. There are currently two markets in this set:

    Pres08_VS -- based on vote shares won by the two major party candidates in the 2008 U.S. Presidential election

    Pres08_WTA -- a winner take all market based on the popular vote plurality winner of the 2008 U.S. Presidential election

    See the market prospectuses for specific details of these markets.

    The markets are open to all traders world-wide. Consult our on-line trader's manual for additional information.

  • Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:42 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Ok, so we have another poll clearly showing the divide between liberal and conservative thinking.

    Now we just need to see how many of these people, who were so willing to answer these phone calls, are still willing to get to the voting booth where it really counts.

  • igh »
    Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:36 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Official slogan of the demon-cratic party:

    Change! We need Change!
    Send us your Change!
    Your Dollars, your Pesos, Euros, anything you got!
    We need Change!

  • Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:07 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Bush was a hands off president as far as the fed government being supportive in social moral issues. At least Bush appointed Conservative Judges for the Courts - only ONE good thing as far being pro active regarding moral social concerns since he was too busy creating the more literal translation of "The End Times" scenerio War with IRAQ etc...instead of rebuilding America inside out! o well, * as I limp to the local soup kitchen jobless thus, not able provide a quality of life for family. PTL anyway!

  • igh »
    Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:44 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    He is a deceiver for sure prophet.

  • Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:44 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Those catholics may be informed, but not sure it's the correct information. Afterall, they have strayed from the truth. So their record isn't all that good in the "correct information" column.

  • Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:43 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    scits, but I haven't got a clue what that data is telling us, please translate thanks, believer

  • igh »
    Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:42 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    ok, who's the wise guy flagging posts?

  • Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:42 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    Obama comes across as being the closest thing to the Antichrist as I've seen so far. But that's just an observation.

  • DRJ »
    Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:14 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    blue1018 wrote this: You see, us informed Catholics know that the time has come to GIVE, to LOVE, and to CHANGE this world. Yes, Obama may support abortion; which is a big issue with voters. But he also is AGAINST bloody war, FOR peace with leaders of all - ALL - people, he is FOR the poor, has WORKED for the poor, and MADE a difference in his community.
    Since you have made a statement representing INFORMED CATHOLICS, I will assume you may have missed a few bits of INFORMATION about Mr. Obama's voting record. You said that it was time to GIVE...Obama has voted 94 times in his brief career in the Senate to RAISE TAXES! You said that it was time to LOVE...Obama has displayed his hatred for human life in two ways: he is extreme in his desire to see babies murdered and he has voted to cut off funding our men and women who are fighting overseas to preserve our freedom! You said it is time to CHANGE this world...for an avowed Catholic you have a severely stunted understanding of the Scriptures! JESUS IS THE CHANGE this world needs!!! You've got your saviors all mixed up. Jesus (not Barack Hussein Obama) is the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world. My counsel is that, in stressful times like these, we all need to fix our eyes on Jesus, the author and finisher of our FAITH. Fixations on political celebrities who make charismatic speeches and offer sweeping promises without the track-record to back them up should be strictly out of bounds for people who are looking to Jesus for their salvation. May God bless those who are seeking Him in the midst of our current national crises!

  • Fri Oct 10, 2008 2:31 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    believer, Nope. I said some, and I would say its not the majority of posters. I respect your posts, we may not agree on many things, but your posts are well thought out. You are very respectful of others, more so than I am sometimes.

    As far as the IEM is concerned, its based on real dollar markets, it is not just an Iowa market. Its sponsored by the University of Iowa. It seems to track very closely with the Rasmussen Market polls (not actual money).

    IEM, http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/

  • Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:36 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    scits, am I one of those posters? But a serious question what in the world does that data say you put up about Iowa?

  • Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:11 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 2

    crc "Obama is clearly not the right choice because of his anti-Christian beliefs."

    Obama is a decent and caring human being, thats a lot more than I say of many of the hate-mongering and lying posters on CP.


    The hypocrites on CP dont seem to have a problem with bush's anti-christian actions during his 8 years of wars and incompetence.

    I'm just glad to be an agnostic.

  • Fri Oct 10, 2008 12:58 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    The poll numbers from the Iowa Electronic Markets are looking very good:

    2008 Presidential Election Vote Share Market.
    Quotes current as of 11:45:03 CST, Friday, October 10, 2008.
    Symbol Bid Ask Last Low High Average
    UDEM08_VS 0.555 0.558 0.558 0.552 0.558 0.555
    UREP08_VS 0.450 0.454 0.450 0.450 0.455 0.454
    -----------------------------------------------

    2008 Presidential Election Winner-Take-All Market.
    Quotes current as of 11:45:03 CST, Friday, October 10, 2008.
    Symbol Bid Ask Last Low High Average
    DEM08_WTA 0.840 0.860 0.840 0.834 0.860 0.853
    REP08_WTA 0.153 0.168 0.162 0.162 0.175 0.166

  • Fri Oct 10, 2008 12:24 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Well if you believe that Obama is the anti-Christ and the anti-Christ is part of God's chosen plan for the end-times, shouldn't you be voting FOR Sen. Obama?

    You really must be joking. This clearly shows a lack of understand or reading the Bible.

    Let me ask you a question. Do you want death and destruction to befall you and your family members?

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Also on CP
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links