Updated 04:40 pm.EST, Sat November 21, 2009

Society|Wed, Oct. 22 2008 11:27 AM EDT

Prostitutes May Be Able to Roam Free in San Francisco

By Evelyn Nieves|Associated Press Writer

SAN FRANCISCO, California (AP) - In this live-and-let-live town, where medical marijuana clubs do business next to grocery stores and an annual fair celebrates sadomasochism, prostitutes could soon walk the streets without fear of arrest.

A sex worker who goes by the name of Violet stands at a San Francisco, California, bus stop.

San Francisco would become the first major U.S. city to decriminalize prostitution if voters next month approve Proposition K, a measure that forbids local authorities from investigating, arresting or prosecuting anyone for selling sex.

The ballot question technically would not legalize prostitution, since state law still prohibits it, but the measure would eliminate the power of local law enforcement officials to go after prostitutes.

Proponents say the measure will free up $11 million the police spend each year arresting prostitutes and allow them to form collectives.

"It will allow workers to organize for our rights and for our safety," said Patricia West, 22, who said she has been selling sex for about a year by placing ads on the Internet. She moved to San Francisco in May from Texas to work on Proposition K.

Even in tolerant San Francisco, where the sadomasochism fair draws thousands of tourists and a pornographic video company is housed in a former armory, the measure faces an uphill battle, with much of the political establishment opposing it.

Some form of prostitution is legal in two states. Brothels are allowed in rural counties in Nevada. And Rhode Island permits the sale of sex behind closed doors between consulting adults, but it prohibits street prostitution and brothels.

In 2004, almost two-thirds of voters in nearby Berkeley rejected decriminalization. But proponents of Proposition K say their proposal has a better shot in San Francisco, which they believe is more sexually liberal than the city across the bay.

After all, the world's oldest profession has long been established here. During the Gold Rush, the neighborhood closest to the piers was a seedy pleasure center of sex, gambling and drinking known as the Barbary Coast.

These days, on certain corners, prostitutes sell their bodies day and night, ducking into doorways and alleys when police pass. One recent afternoon in the Mission District, six prostitutes were plying their trade on a single block.

Police made 1,583 prostitution arrests in 2007 and expect to make a similar number this year. But the district attorney's office says most defendants are fined, placed in diversion programs or both. Fewer than 5 percent get prosecuted for solicitation, which is a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail.

Proposition K has been endorsed by the local Democratic Party. But the mayor, the district attorney, the police department and much of the business community oppose the idea. They contend that it would increase street prostitution, allow pimps the run of neighborhoods and hamper the fight against sex trafficking, which would remain illegal because it involves forcing people into the sex trade.

The San Francisco Chronicle editorialized against the measure, saying it could make the city a magnet for prostitution.

If the proposal passes, "we wouldn't be able to investigate prostitution, and it's going to be pretty difficult for us to locate these folks who are victims of trafficking otherwise," said Capt. Al Pardini, head of the police department's vice unit. "It's pretty rare that we get a call that says, 'I'm a victim of human trafficking' or 'I suspect human trafficking in my neighborhood.' " Continue »

Pages: 12
Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Sat Oct 25, 2008 12:54 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    The Trade was evident in the scriptures, so I accept it as part of the human element, though to some it is an ugly situation, mainly due to the STD factor. No one has ever been able to stop it.

  • Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:10 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    It is interesting that while Nevada has for decades had this negative publicity related to prostitution and SF now is getting a lot of negative attention, no one seems to get very excited or worked up over RI legalized prostitution.

  • Thu Oct 23, 2008 1:57 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    The greatest failing of Proposition K as they have described it here is that it seeks to elevate the acceptance of a sinful practice and attitude that was previously only tolerated.

    The solution for these women who sell themselves and the men who indulge in this is not more acceptance and less police victimisation; it is in a widespread change of heart of the city, state and country towards God.

    Proposition K will not heal these men and women, it will not save them from the danger of this career/lifestyle they have to chosen (yes, even though their circumstances are hard, they still chose it); danger from STDs, from the violent and sick personalities they attract, and worst of all, from the spritual scarring that sex outside of its intended purpose creates (Oh Lord, save them!).

    Proposition K will not heal the men and women who are compelled to indulge in what the men and women prostitutes offer, it will not protect them from the inherent dangers of using their bodies (and other people's bodies) in ways that are contrary to God's intent for it.

    Proposition K is a smokescreen, designed to lead your souls into deeper, darker, more evil states and further away from God. The city, the state and the country are falling too far already.

    Don't accept this proposition, and strive, through faith in God, and diligently helping these men and women in need to seek God and salvation through Jesus. At least one soul at a time.

  • Thu Oct 23, 2008 1:37 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    The answer to this situation (and to the city, state and the rest of the country) will require God's intervention and the involvement his committed children.

    It is unfortunate that people like PhatDajuan live and are pleased their very corrupt point of view, and I pray that the Holy Spirit will show them the error of their ways, before there is no time left to live.

    In response to Phat's comment, I believe Talmid's response was quite appropriate. I am hoping that Phat would not raise his/her daughter (if there is one already) idealising the sex trade, and encouraging her, or her friends, or nieces, etc. or even daughter's of friends to go out and be a prostitute, if that's what they want to do.

    I hope Phat doesn't encourage his/her son (if there is one at all), children's friends or nephew to look at women and their bodies as item that you can just purchase or rent. I hope instead that Phat realises the evil that influenced their pro-prostitution statements and recant, for his/her own benefit.

    It is a weak and unfortunately corrupt person who would encourage a child (grown or growing) to aspire to this career or lifestyle choice, or to encourage a child that when they grow up that it is something that if they wanted to enjoy that they could go ahead and enjoy.

    Don't encourage anyone, regardless of age or gender to promote prostitution, or anything else that is ungodly. That is our moral duty, and for us Christians, it is requirement of us from God.

    These women need help, they need prayer, they need a kind hand, even though they may bite it. They are all involved in this 'industry' out of necessity, weakness, manipulation or depravity; and they need help out of that, not encouragement to stay in.

    PhatDajuan, and any other supporters for the industry, you are wrong and your contribution to this post is depraved. I pray that you seek help for it and ask God for forgiveness while He is still giving you chances. When you are passed away from this earth, you will have no more.

    I pray God keeps you here long enough for you to choose Him.

  • Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:52 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Surely the simple answer it to change the law to prosecute the people who pay for sex. Without the demand there would be no supply.

  • Wed Oct 22, 2008 9:20 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    God tells sin as sin but the government can say, it is
    fine to do whatever we want to do. The government will
    not pay the price of sin, but the sinners will have to pay with high interest.

  • Wed Oct 22, 2008 6:58 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    Preachers will be their best customers.

  • JC »
    Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:01 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    "Prostitutes May Be Able to Roam Free in San Francisco".

    Until these repent of this behavior, they may be roaming, but they will never be free.

  • Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:14 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    phat, why don't you do some research on what leads a majority of men and women to become prostitutes and then respond to this issue.

  • Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:10 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    argyle86 that made me laugh...

    There's something seriously wrong with that city...

  • Wed Oct 22, 2008 1:43 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    when will it fall into the ocean????

  • Wed Oct 22, 2008 12:18 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    PhatDajuan, you must be from San Francisco! God's original design for sexuality was and is between a man and his wife. He prohibited prostitution in His word: Deu 23:17 "None of the daughters of Israel shall be a cult prostitute, nor shall any of the sons of Israel be a cult prostitute. Most if not all of these women are abused and also carriers of STDs, which their Johns pass on to their spouses and possibly to their children.
    If it's so virtous, how you would like your daughter, sister or any other female member of your family to be engaged in that kind of business?

  • Wed Oct 22, 2008 12:12 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Wow, how San Francisco-like! What I wonder is how they're for one sexual perversion but not for another? There really is no end to their folly.

  • Wed Oct 22, 2008 11:55 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 4

    I've never really understood why people get so bent out of shape about prostitution. After all, why should it be illegal for a woman (or a man for that matter) to charge for her sexual favors, when it is perfectly legal for her to give away those same favors for free? If you have a moral objection to prostitution, don't engage in it. The fact that many people enjoy paying for sex should be of no concern to you.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links