Updated 12:47 pm.EST, Sun November 22, 2009

World|Mon, Oct. 27 2008 09:22 AM EDT

Poll: Most Brits Would Vote Obama

By Jenna Lyle|Christian Post Correspondent

LONDON – Barack Obama would win the U.S. presidential election by a landslide next month if the results were down to British voters.

A poll of more than 1,000 people conducted by ComRes on behalf of faith-based think tank Theos found that 66 percent of people would vote for Democratic candidate Obama, 10 percent for his Republican rival, John McCain, and just 2 percent for independent candidate Ralph Nader.

Though far from the 53-40 percent margin revealed by a Newsweek survey late last week, the results of the British poll threw up some similarities between the attitudes of British and American voters when compared to a poll of Americans conducted by USA Today and Gallup in 2007. Both polls asked respondents whether they would vote for a political leader of a particular race, religion or age.

In Britain, 5 percent of voters would not vote for a black leader on principle, the same as in the United States. Seven percent in the United Kingdom, meanwhile, would not vote for a woman, compared to 11 percent in the States, and 43 percent of Britons would not vote for a leader who was 72-years-old – the age of McCain. In the U.S., 42 percent had said they would not vote for a 72-year-old leader.

There were considerable disparities between British and American voters when it came to the importance attached to some aspects of traditional morality.

In Britain, only 7 percent would not vote for a candidate who was divorced, compared with 30 percent in the United States. Twenty-three percent of British voters, meanwhile, would not vote for a homosexual leader, compared with 43 percent in the U.S., and 20 percent of the British public would not vote for a political leader who did not believe in God, compared with a sizeable 42 percent in the U.S.

Delving deeper than the U.S. poll, Theos asked respondents about their religious considerations. The poll found that 23 percent of Britons would not be willing to vote for a Muslim leader, while just 7 percent said they would not vote for a candidate who was Christian.

When asked if the presidency of George W. Bush, a born again Christian, had impacted their view of Christianity, only 12 per cent said their view of the religion had been damaged as a result of his presidency while 86 percent said that his eight years in office had made no difference to their view.

Paul Woolley, director of Theos, commented on the results, saying the U.K. electorate “is evidently very supportive of Barack Obama, reflecting his high popularity ratings across Europe.

“They see him as a candidate of change,” he said.

"Britons also appear to be open to voting for a more diverse field of candidates than their U.S. counterparts, although the fact that one in five people wouldn't vote for a well-qualified candidate because they were a Muslim or an atheist perhaps reveals a concern about fundamental values,” Woolley added.

"The finding that only 12% of the British public believe that the Bush presidency has damaged their view of Christianity is especially illuminating, given the high profile the president’s faith has had and the controversial nature of his period in office."

For the poll, ComRes interviewed 1,007 British adults by telephone between October 17 and 19, 2008. Data were weighted to be representative demographically of all British adults.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:32 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    who cares... they have no say in our election. this reflects a view of trying to appease the world above American interests.

  • Tue Oct 28, 2008 2:42 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Let's face it, most Brits polled couldn't tell you a thing about Obama's or McCain's views on taxes, education, social security, medicare, energy policy, immigration reform etc., etc. Therefore, their ignorant, uninformed opinion means nothing.

    The Brits have far more important things to worry about in their own culturally dying country than what happens in the U.S.

    But then again, the Europeans have always liked politicians that make flowery speeches. Just ask any German who was alive in 1933 - 1945.

  • Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:01 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    The financial scandal of the week... Obama & illegal foreign campaign contributions.

  • Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:01 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    The financial scandal of the week... Obama & illegal foreign campaign contributions.

  • Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:58 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    The views of British voters in an American election are irrelevant.

    When was the last time that American voters were polled about a British election?

  • Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:43 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    One should then investigate on the present demographics of England and inparticularly "Londonistan", where, the surname "Mohammad" in another 15-20 years will probably be the number one most popular name of newborns in that Country,...where also there are members of their Royal Parliment (I read an article on brusselsjournal.com a year ago) advising "Native born Anglo Brits they would be better off moving to Australia and/or New Zealand to preserve their heritage,...pretty amazing.....

  • Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:43 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    One should then investigate on the present demographics of England and inparticularly "Londonistan", where, the surname "Mohammad" in another 15-20 years will probably be the number one most popular name of newborns in that Country,...where also there are members of their Royal Parliment (I read an article on brusselsjournal.com a year ago) advising "Native born Anglo Brits they would be better off moving to Australia and/or New Zealand to preserve their heritage,...pretty amazing.....

  • Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:43 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    One should then investigate on the present demographics of England and inparticularly "Londonistan", where, the surname "Mohammad" in another 15-20 years will probably be the number one most popular name of newborns in that Country,...where also there are members of their Royal Parliment (I read an article on brusselsjournal.com a year ago) advising "Native born Anglo Brits they would be better off moving to Australia and/or New Zealand to preserve their heritage,...pretty amazing.....

  • Mon Oct 27, 2008 6:59 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Chris

    Should that not read "thank God we, with the help of the French kicked them out"?

    Bring on them fredom fries...

    Steve

  • Mon Oct 27, 2008 2:17 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    McCain != Bush

    Get over the comparison, they are not the same people. I enjoyed it when McCain told Obama, "If you wanted to run against Bush, you should have run four years ago."

    HAHA!!

  • mike »
    Mon Oct 27, 2008 1:04 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    the whole world is sick of bush. his arrogant, hypocritical unilateral foreign policy is totally opposite from his 'christ-like' behavior

  • Mon Oct 27, 2008 12:59 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    While it's true we don't want other countries selecting our leaders, I do think we should not dismiss polls like this out of hand. If we want cooperation from other countries, it's at least worth considering how they view our elected officials. Unfortunately for McCain, I think on the international level, belonging to the same party as Bush is going to make it impossible for people from other countries to separate the two of them. It appears that Obama will have a built in advantage in the effort to win friends and influence people abroad. That has got to be considered as a point in his favor.

  • Mon Oct 27, 2008 12:39 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    European countries are socialist, so of course they would vote for obama. Duh?

  • Mon Oct 27, 2008 12:05 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 0

    Yes, and this is the same Britain who just allowed Human/Animal hybrid research like the Island of Dr. Moreou.

    Thank God we kicked them out! Catholics for McCain/Palin!
    We pray that this Godly ticket will win! Please Lord help us!

  • Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:43 am Agree: 4   Disagree: 0

    Didn't our founding fathers fight the British for how they thought? McCain/Palin it is! :D

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Church
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Baker Publishing Group

This full-text Bible is perfect for children who have outgrown Bible storybooks, but who would struggle to read the small type of most Bibles. The large, easy-to-read 12.5 point ty

Featured Advertiser Links