Updated 04:40 pm.EST, Sat November 21, 2009

Society|Sun, Nov. 02 2008 08:20 AM EST

Analysis: Religion Used Divide, Mock in '08

By Eric Gorski|Associated Press Writer

Theological defenses were mounted for Wright and Hagee, but the damage was done.

GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin's faith appeals to social conservatives. Yet it became a distraction when footage emerged showing the Alaska governor invoking God's will to get a pipeline built and a Kenyan pastor praying that Palin be protected from witchcraft.

In an interview with Trinity Broadcasting Network, Palin said "faith — not just my faith — faith and God in general has been mocked through this campaign." She did not give specifics.

Mark Silk, professor of religion in public life at Trinity College in Hartford, Conn., pointed out that none of these problematic characters were media creations. All were welcomed into the candidates' orbits.

"When you have religious figures who want to play in the public square, some are going to say things that are not calm, cool and collected," Silk said. "It ought to be cautionary for politicians."

The thread linking the above stories: videotaped sermons posted online, sometimes by churches trying to reach bigger audiences but increasingly by political activists looking for toxic material.

"This year we invaded churches with cell phones and started putting sermons up on YouTube," said Clyde Wilcox, a Georgetown political science professor. "That's been troubling, because you would like to think a candidate would have a little privacy in church."

David Gushee, a professor of Christian ethics at Mercer University in Georgia, said that more so than in past elections, religion became "a marker of identity" for candidates this year.

"It was disconnected from specific policy views and really had to do with whether this person was acceptable culturally because of their religious associations or identifications," said Gushee, author of "The Future of Faith in American Politics: The Public Witness of the Evangelical Center." "All of this functioned in a pretty destructive and not terribly illuminating way in this campaign."

That was in part because the slate of candidates more resembled America's religious melting pot. For the first time, Gushee pointed out, there was a serious Mormon candidate in Mitt Romney, a serious candidate with roots in Pentecostalism in Palin and a serious candidate from an African-American church that preaches black liberation theology in Obama.

"Every time a candidate comes along who brings a religious background that is unfamiliar, the press and the culture does this digging around and trying it on for size," Gushee said.

Romney, more than any candidate, experienced that.

Some evangelical pastors said voting for Romney amounted to endorsing a cult. GOP rival Mike Huckabee, a populist Baptist, wondered whether Mormons believe Jesus and the devil were brothers. Romney was asked about polygamy and sacred Mormon undergarments.

Eventually, Romney delivered a major speech in which he declared that as president he would "serve no one religion, no one group, no one cause," and said calls for him to explain and justify his religious beliefs go against the wishes of the nation's founders.

"Personal opinion: historians will look back on 2008 with disbelief," Michael Otterson, head of public affairs for the Mormon church, wrote this month on a Newsweek-Washington Post blog. Continue »

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:34 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    "In other words, the loser in this election is religion."

    It has been the loser since the 60s when we removed God from the focus on right and wrong and replaced it with ourselves. Just food for thought...under the way of thinking before the 60s revolution this sort of thing on Wall Street would have build a new prison just to house all of them. We had a concept of right and wrong. Now, everyone does what is right in their own eyes.

  • Mon Nov 03, 2008 10:34 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    The Christian left is dangerous.

    There is no Christian left or right. There is only Christ. He is our example of what we should do. Follow God's word.

  • Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:35 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Gsus, excellent post and unfortunately all too true in many churches today!

  • Mon Nov 03, 2008 7:56 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    In 1961, after John F. Kennedy's Catholic faith proved not to be an insurmountable barrier to the White House, Billy Graham predicted that religion would never again be such a divisive force in elections.

    In other words, the loser in this election is religion.

    Two seperate but statement one true the other a lie.
    Billy Graham confirmed the work. We are seeing the manifestation of God's word. People are no longer valuing what God says instead they are looking inward for their own answers. The Bible said there would be a great falling away. Israel did not fall away all at once but overtime more and more Israelites devalued the word.

    In other words, the loser in this election is religion.

    But God never loses nor does He not reap a harvest. God will reap a harvest from each generation.

    As Moses and Joshua said choose whom you will serve the god of money and worldy possessions or the Lord, life and prosperity. Yet you may live a long life, however the end will death and destruction. Or you could live long or short enduring the world for God. You will recieve life and a crown of rightousness from God.

    But each of us must choose what is more important.

  • Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:13 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    Lordshepard , You said: "We have more to fear from the political Christian agenda than we do the gay agenda."

    You know, I never thought about it that way...but you do have a point. Anybody who is a Bible believing fundamentalist, has got to be fed up with pastors, priests, the Episcopalian and Presbyterian churches (not all) preaching a whole other Gospel that totally go against basic morals of Cristianity, for example, Same-sex-marriage and abortion. They want to say,and are saying, it is alright to do!!! WHAT???!!!
    YES THE CURCH COULD BE IN TROUBLE if we're not reading the same bible. The Christian left is dangerous.

  • Sun Nov 02, 2008 7:02 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    My concern is not the message of Christ. The message of Christ will always endure and be heard. I am surprised that Martin Marty did not admit of worse times for religion than these recent months have been. Dr. Marty surely knows well that the world (especially the US) goes off the deep end over religion every 50 to 75 years. From the Great Awakening of 1730 up through dates like 1800, 1857, 1904 and the 1970s, some Americans become convinced that "the time has come." Some good is accomplished during these periods of religious fervor, but by and large these painful episodes cause more harm than good. When they abate, people on both sides of the issues are estranged from family and friends. The good news is that these movements do, indeed, always peter out. (We are seeing the end of one right now.) As far as politics are concerned, it seems to me that the two worst presidents in my lifetime have been Jimmy Carter and George Bush, Jr. I hope I never have to live through another president who claims to be a evangelical Christian. God spare us from that!

  • Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:31 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    My concern is the message of Christ. What has happened in this election has made Christ even more alien and partisan and bigoted in the minds of those who might otherwise be led sometime in the future to His message of peace, love and tolerance for all mankind. Those who would use Christ and the church to argue for or against a candidate have lost this message. They draw a line of ‘us against them’. How many people still believe the lie that the commandment ‘thou shalt not take the Lord’s name in vain’ has something to do with cursing? It means vanity. Thou shalt not use the name of God in vanity. Remember the parable Christ told about the priest and the tax collector who both offered prayers to the Lord. While the priest looked up toward heaven and said, ‘thank you Lord that I am not a sinner like this tax collector’; the tax collector hung his head and said, ‘forgive me Lord for I am a sinner, unworthy of your grace.’ It is the tax collector who prayed correctly according to Christ. Because we are all sinners equally, none better than the other. ‘You will be judged as you have judged others.’
    This article is unfortunately correct in the statement that it is religion that is the loser in this election. Christ’s followers now look petty, divisive, bigoted and willing to do or say anything to further their agenda. We have more to fear from the political Christian agenda than we do the gay agenda. A sad day in heaven, to be sure.

  • Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:25 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    wj, there is a huge difference between a person who wears their "religion" on their sleeve and a person who is living out their spiritual convictions and to use campaigns for election is almost comical since unfortunately candidates on both sides of the aisle will do what they need to in order to draw "reigious" voters to their side. My mom ran for office back in the mid-60s and was already very active in our parish, but her opponent was not, but the summer prior to the election all of a sudden he got religion and became very active in our parish, but after he won the election he went back to being a nominal member at best until he came up for re-election. That is what I call wearing one's religion on their sleeve and of course using a velcro patch to hold it on.

  • Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:39 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    This is an excellent story and exemplifies why I read "Christian Post" even though I do not agree with much of the content. That "Christian Post" would publish this story is all the more important to me because I know that I'm not gonna see this COMPLETE and unedited story anywheres else.
    -
    As for any manner of spirituality, the only modus operandi I've embraced for almost five decades is one that was literally carved in stone over the main entrance to the high school I attended in old East Dallas way back in the early 1960's:
    -
    "Keep thy heart with all diligence for out of it are the issues of life."
    -
    That didn't mean anything to me until maybe age 38 or so when it suddenly made an impression upon me that a proverbial ton of bricks would do. I do not see any reason whatsoever for any personal to wear their religion upon their sleeve; that serves only to antagonize others.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links