Updated 07:54 am.EST, Mon November 23, 2009

Society|Tue, Nov. 25 2008 01:32 PM EST

Opponents of Stem Cell Research Now Face Tough Battle

By Associated Press Writer|Kevin Freking

WASHINGTON – When the Bush presidency ends, opponents of embryonic stem cell research will face a new political reality that many feel powerless to stop.

President-elect Barack Obama is expected to lift restrictions on federal money for such research. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., also has expressed interest in going ahead with legislation in the first 100 days of the new Congress if it still is necessary to set up a regulatory framework.

"We may lose it, but we're going to continually fight it and offer the ethical alternative," said Rep. Joe Pitts, R-Pa. "I don't know what the votes will be in the new Congress ... but it's very possible we could lose this thing."

Stem cells are the building blocks that turn into different kinds of tissue. Embryonic stem cells,e unlike more mature versions, are blank slates. If scientists could control them, they could direct regenerative therapy, perhaps allowing a diabetic's pancreas to begin produce insulin, for example.

Harvesting stem cells from four- or five-day-old embryos kills the embryo, which outrages opponents of this type of research. But supporters say hundreds of thousands of embryos stored in fertility clinics eventually will be destroyed anyway and that people should be allowed to donate them for research that could help others.

"I believe that it is ethical to use these extra embryos for research that could save lives when they are freely donated for that express purpose," Obama wrote during the campaign in response to 14 questions from scientists, doctors and engineers.

Under President George W. Bush, federal money for research on human embryonic stems cells was limited to those stem cell lines, or families of constantly dividing cells, that were created before Aug. 9, 2001. No federal dollars could be used on research with cell lines from embryos destroyed from that point forward. Federal regulations do not restrict embryonic stem cell research using state or private funds.

John Podesta, head of Obama's transition team, strongly hinted that the president-elect would deal with stem cell research soon after taking office Jan. 20. "As you know, he has said something specific about stem cell research, so I think you can expect that what he said in the campaign will be fulfilled once in office," Podesta said.

Obama made it clear during the campaign he would overturn Bush's directive.

"As president, I will lift the current administration's ban on federal funding of research on embryonic stem cell lines created after August 9, 2001, through executive order, and I will ensure that all research on stem cells is conducted ethically and with rigorous oversight," he said.

Opponents of such research say they will press their case on several fronts.

The main argument is that life begins at conception — that once fertilization occurred in the lab, so did a human being.

Secondly, they will argue that scientists are having success using other methods — adult stem cells that form specific tissues, or reprogramming skin cells to act like stem cells — so money should be directed where the biggest scientific breakthroughs have occurred. For example, this past week, doctors gave a woman a new windpipe with tissue grown from her own stem cells, eliminating the need for anti-rejection drugs.

"We still intend to try and talk about the real facts that it's the adult stem cells providing the actual treatments," said David Prentice, senior fellow at the Family Research Council. Continue »

Pages: 12
Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:48 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Thank God these opponents of stem cell research "feel" powerless. My fear is that they are not powerless.

  • Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:18 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 3

    This is what drives me bonkers about Christians. The embryos are not going to be used either way? So where's the problem with using the stem cells for research? Stem cell research is no less moral than donating organs.

    Lots of sick, deserving people could get the treatment they need from this research, and you're depriving them of life by standing in the way. And don't say there's anything wrong with using medicine in this way, because it's no different than getting a flu shot, taking medication for an illness, or having surgery. In that case, "Let He Who Is Without Sin Cast The First Stone."

    You can delete my comment because you disagree with it, but you can't change the validity of my argument.

  • kami »
    Wed Nov 26, 2008 3:57 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    Despite any ground proponents of embryonic stem cell research have gained those on the side of the sanctity of life should remember protecting life wherever it's threatened or whoever it threatens is our responsibility. Being Pro-Life means standing for its sanctity from human conception to natural death. Stating one aspect of life is less deserving "because the other side has already won" is actually giving in and selling out. God created us all. Human Life is precious because he's the one who said so.

    There's also the matter already children within the womb, regardless the age, are seen as disposable unless "wanted" by the mother and/or the father. (Indecently, it's to the poor and minorities abortion is most strongly catered too. Margret Sager, who founded Planned Parenthood, was a eugenicist after all). Infanticide has been well known to happen when children survive the attempted abortion. There's a push for euthanasia of the elderly and those with fatal illness, suggesting "doctor-assisted suicide" instead of comfort care, and the disabled are already on the list.

    By excluding one group we exclude all.

  • Tue Nov 25, 2008 5:15 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 2

    opponents don't face a tough battle. the battle is over. i believe that live begins at conception - but this 'opponents' need to move on to a battle for poor people who are already born. the opposition to stem cell research is wasting valuable time and energy.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Also on CP
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links