Updated 12:47 pm.EST, Sun November 22, 2009

Education|Thu, Dec. 11 2008 10:19 AM EST

Oxford Junior Dictionary Drops Christian Words

By Elena Garcia|Christian Post Reporter

The latest edition of the Oxford Junior Dictionary has dropped many words associated with Christianity and British history that were found in earlier versions.

Christian-related words like "bishop," "chapel," "disciple," "minister," "sin," and "devil," have been replaced by words like "blog," "biodegradable," "MP3 player," "democratic," and "celebrity," in the 2007 edition of the popular children's dictionary in the United Kingdom.

Although the newest version of the dictionary was released last year, the removal of words went largely unnoticed until Lisa Saunders, a mother of four from Northern Ireland, pointed them out.

She first realized the omission of words during a homework session with her son when couldn't find "moss" and "fern," which were in editions up until 2003, but were not included in the 2007 version, the Daily Telegraph reported.

The discovery prompted Saunders to compare entries from the older editions, dating from 1978, 1995, 2000, 2002, and 2003 with the latest junior dictionary.

"I was completely horrified by the vast number of words which have been removed," she told the Telegraph in London. "We know that language moves on and we can't be fuddy-duddy about it but you don't cull hundreds of important words in order to get in a different set of ICT words."

Vineeta Gupta, the head of children's dictionaries at Oxford University Press, told the Telegraph the changes were made to reflect a "multicultural" society.

"People don't go to Church as often as before. Our understanding of religion is within multiculturalism, which is why some words such as 'Pentecost' or 'Whitsun' would have been in 20 years ago but not now," he said.

"The Christian faith still has a strong following," noted Saunders, according to the Telegraph. "To eradicate so many words associated with the Christianity will have a big effect on the numerous primary schools who use it."

The decision by OUP to discontinue particular words is a form of "verbal engineering," Erin Manning recently wrote on Beliefnet’s conservative Crunchy Con blog.

Manning cited Catholic moral theologian William Smith as saying, "All social engineering is preceded by verbal engineering."

"Deciding to drop a word that has already fallen out of use, become obsolete, from a dictionary is not a political act," said Manning on Monday, "but removing words still in everyday use just because you've decided they ought not be important in the vocabulary of a modern child most decidedly is."

The removal of Christianity from Europe will pose consequences for the European Union, said Manning, citing Italian philosopher Marcello Pera.

"You remove the ability to explain coherently both to your own citizens and to those outside just who you are, what you stand for, and what you believe in," commented Manning.

"Europe didn't spring into being as a post-modern secularist entity in the late twentieth century, after all; without understanding the rich and storied past, we have no context in which to place the present, or to envision a hopeful future."

The dictionary was created for children ages 7 and up and includes around 10,000 entries, words and phrases.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Wed Dec 17, 2008 4:11 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I never could understand why "antiquated" words are eliminated from any dictionary. How can we know the roots of our language? I know that paper is expensive and larger books can be difficult to handle, but as a child we had (and still have) a dictionary that is about 6-7 inches thick which my brother and I used for our homework. There were no junior dictionaries then. I agree that at Oxford Publishing House the respect for the written and spoken word should include religious words which helped to form our democracies. The loss of "moss" and "fern" -- what's that about anyway? Those are all around us!

  • zeno »
    Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:58 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    Daniel

    Your last answer is so full of things that are just way off the mark!

    Between the UK and the US, which country is most religious? (Answer: All polls show the US is by a wide margin.)

    Which has the highest murder rate? (Answer: the US rate is about four times that of the UK)

    Which has the highest execution rate? (Answer: the UK hasn't executed anyone since 1964.)

  • Fri Dec 12, 2008 7:58 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "Eh? What's your evidence for that statement?"

    Ahh, that brings back memories, eh? (My dad is commonwealth).

    The studies in law enforcement say that crime is directly proportional to the lack in respect (usually in the area of the fear of God. They don't believe in eternal consequences so why not do what they want?) The more one knows and fears God the less they are likely to commit a crime. Why? I have a religious explaination but not a psycological one.

    In fact, in this day in age it has gone down hill. First it was lack of respect for God then it worked it's way down to lack of respect for law enforcement. With many it went down further to lack of respect for people and property in general. People at the end of that road don't respect anything...not even themselves and will do anything they can get a kick out of. When people don't respect an authority higher than themselves they feel they don't have to answer to anyone.

    I've had friends and relatives in law enforcement. It's just the way it is.

  • Fri Dec 12, 2008 7:51 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "The American Webster's says:"

    Webster was a religious dude. Quite a few words whose meanings haven't changed have religious overtones.

    Do you know why Webster wrote the dictionary? His wife kept saying "what exactly do you mean by that!!!"....

  • zeno »
    Fri Dec 12, 2008 6:12 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    artm said: "Lets pray that not one book sells."

    And when it does sell, what reason will you give for god not answering your prayers?

  • zeno »
    Fri Dec 12, 2008 6:07 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Daniel said: "Now I know why you need to have cameras all over the place so the government can keep order in London."

    Eh? What's your evidence for that statement?

  • zeno »
    Fri Dec 12, 2008 6:06 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    Daniel said: "the word pulpit means "a platform raised above the surrounding level to give prominence to the person on it. Synonyms: podium, soapbox, stump"

    So, it's not a 'religion' word. It's a discription of a piece of furnature!!! So much for Oxford being so smart."

    I'm sure you are well aware that the usual usage of 'pulpit' is in relation to churches. The American Webster's says: "an elevated platform or high reading desk used in preaching or conducting a worship service". Sounds like religion to me!

  • Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:42 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    What better words to be replaced by, don't you think?

  • Fri Dec 12, 2008 4:11 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    "boycott the Oxford Junior Dictionary until "moss" and "fern" are returned "

    Being a Master Gardener I would have to strongly agree with you. How will they define how slowly the legal system works without the word 'moss'?

  • Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:53 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Chicago 24,
    This is the second time today you have cracked me up. Thanks I needed that!!

  • Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:08 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    "the changes were made to reflect a "multicultural" society."

    Interesting how removing a set of words makes the dictionary more multicultural. I would have thought you would have needed to add words to be inclusive instead of exclusive. Sounds quite intolerant, very undemocratic and lacking in common sense to me.

  • Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:05 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Just FYI, the word pulpit means "a platform raised above the surrounding level to give prominence to the person on it. Synonyms: podium, soapbox, stump"

    So, it's not a 'religion' word. It's a discription of a piece of furnature!!! So much for Oxford being so smart.

  • Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:02 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    "belief in god is low and waning fast"

    Now I know why you need to have cameras all over the place so the government can keep order in London.

  • zeno »
    Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:58 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 3

    Given that they only have space for so many words, I'm glad to see bishop, disciple, minister, monastery, monk, nun, nunnery, parish, pew, psalm, pulpit, saint, sin and devil replaced by words like tolerant, negotiate, interdependent, citizenship, childhood, common sense, debate and democratic.

  • zeno »
    Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:40 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    The UK is a very different country to the US: belief in god is low and waning fast. In surveys, more than 50% of young people live their lives without god and far less than 10% are church goers. So it's hardly surprising that words that are little used are omitted from what is anyway, a selection of all English words.

  • Thu Dec 11, 2008 6:25 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    This report states that "she first realized the omission of words during a homework session with her son when couldn't find "moss" and "fern," which were in editions up until 2003, but were not included in the 2007 version, the Daily Telegraph reported."

    Such a travesty!
    I think botanists everywhere should boycott the Oxford Junior Dictionary until "moss" and "fern" are returned to their rightful stature in this publication.

  • artm »
    Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:16 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Lets pray that not one book sells. And Glory to the King of Kings, and Lord of Lords.

  • Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:54 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    It's no different than it was in Jesus' day. Our sinful nature doesn't want to admit it is wicked. We want to live our lives without being told we are sinners. The devil has been quite successful dealing with such biblically ignorant masses. If you don't have sin, why would you need a Savior. It's just another example of unbelief.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Also on CP
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • DVD
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links