Updated 11:58 pm.EST, Sun November 22, 2009

Entertainment|Mon, Dec. 15 2008 05:42 PM EST

'Shack' Critics Develop Books, DVDs to Counter Publishing Phenomenon

By Eric Young|Christian Post Reporter

Although there are many who wish it weren’t so, there is no question that The Shack is the publishing phenomenon of the year.

Author William Paul Young had not originally intended the novel to be for public consumption, but since its debut on the market last year, The Shack has shot surprisingly to the top of best seller lists and set up camp there, generating large amounts of buzz – both positive and negative – within Christian circles.

Not surprising, however, is the development of up and coming books and materials that hope to counter the bestseller.

“It was the most disturbing book that I had ever read in my life,” writes John Langemann in the yet-to-be-published book Beware the Shack, according to an advanced copy.

"The evil hidden in between the warp and the woof of this amazing tapestry is insidious," adds the author from Cape Town, South Africa, who is pursuing his doctorate in theology. "The writer drops little 'pearls of wisdom' of language, theology, history, philosophy, etc. into his narrative to intimidate the reader into believing, mistakenly, that he has quantitive or qualitative knowledge in any, or all those areas, ‘so he must know what he’s talking about.'"

While many of the arguments presented in the new books are nothing new considering the months of debate The Shack has inspired, they are the latest in efforts by opponents of a book considered to be even more harmful than The Da Vinci Code, which centers on the alleged conspiracy to conceal the offspring of a married Mary and Jesus.

“Indeed, because it is being promoted as Christian fiction, it is much more dangerous than books like The Da Vinci Code, which never claimed to be Christian,” argued ministry leader Tim McGhee of Powell, Tenn., in a review of the book. “The Shack is nothing less than rank heresy disguised as Christian literature.”

According to Eric Barger, who has produced the DVD “The Death of Discernment: How The Shack Became the #1 Bestseller in Christianity," the real problem with The Shack and other books, movies, and television shows like it, is that Christians can fail to use scriptural discernment if they let their emotions rule.

“We can be taken captive by ‘evil imaginations,’” argues Barger, who runs Take a Stand! Ministries.

And it is for reasons such as these that opponents of the bestseller are producing anti-Shack materials.

“As one who wears his emotions on his sleeve and who found himself being swayed by the heartbreaking storyline of The Shack, I must again caution," Barger says. "To allow a gripping story to cloud our ability to detect even the subtle theological errors strewn throughout its pages is exactly what Dr. Michael Youssef meant when he described The Shack as ‘a deep ditch that's covered by beautiful landscape.’”

To date, The Shack has sold more than 4.4 million copies in 24 different countries after being initially spurned by 26 publishers.

It has remained on the New York Times Bestsellers List for Paperback Trade Fiction for 29 weeks and currently retains the No. 1 spot.

The book has been openly criticized by conservative Protestant heavyweights including R. Albert Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Ky.; Chuck Colson, founder of the Prison Fellowship Ministries; Mark Driscoll, pastor of Mars Hill Church in Seattle; and influential blogger Tim Challies, who wrote a downloadable 17-page review/guide on The Shack that compares the novel’s assertions to Scripture.

According to reports, Young is not a member of a church and is somewhat reticent about being labeled a Christian. Despite the book’s success, Young said he isn't contemplating a sequel though The Shack may possibly be turned into a screenplay.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:22 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    I really couldn't care less. My only concern is how it protrays God. Does it portray Him correctly? I'm assuming that most people who read this may not be Christian, and I don't want them to be misled about who He is.
    True, we have the Chronicles of Narnia, and the Lord of the Rings that also mirror Christian values. But they don't come right out and say "This is God. This is how He is. Etc, etc..." I get the feeling that this book "Shack" does.

  • Thu Dec 18, 2008 4:56 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 6

    Hello all. I have read the book, and, I have read The Book. Any time that Jesus Himself told a story, it seems that many religious people would miss the point, particularly those in 'authority.' The point, as I see it, was the basic theological ground of theodicy, that God is good, no matter what happens in our everyday lives. God is good, loves us with an everlasting love, and wants to live with and within us... an indwelling apart from which we cannot attain or maintain righteousness. Sure, theology has been stretched somewhat... but any attempt to describe the Trinity is going to be heretical at some point, as it just cannot be done completely and accurately with human words (Remember, it took the Church over 300 years of meetings and councils to hammer it out in a form that most could agree upon). But back to the point of Young's story... God is good, loves you more than you'll ever know, and has a wonderful plan for your life (even though it does not look like it sometimes), and particularly for the life to come! Enter the rest.

  • Wed Dec 17, 2008 3:46 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    ramseyadagency

    Ahem....how many times does Scripture mention the word Father when referring to God?
    Can Father be a feminine term? No.

    Galatians 3:28 is referring to the church and not God.

    Please, for civility sake, tone down the antagonism. It serves no purpose here and makes you seem a little crazy in view of the fact you have no point and you don't know the Bible very well to have posted what you did.

  • Wed Dec 17, 2008 3:12 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 5

    The "orthodox mind" will, as Jesus said, strain a gnat and swallow a camel. These modern day Pharisees miss the huge point that a relationship with Jesus is not about "the checklist" but about honor, Love and authenticity...scary topics for the emotionally stunted. Yet it's funny that these same folks can live with the idea of Jesus being portrayed as a Lion by C.S. Lewis in CHRONICLES OF NARNIA but can't fathom God as a black woman. Hahahaha! Since when did God have a gender?!! Read the Bible you Galatians. Start with Gal. 3:28, "...there is neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus." Love always win the day and, praise God, that's what's happening with THE SHACK. It truly is a God thing. All the resistance to it shows that it's right on track.

  • Wed Dec 17, 2008 2:16 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Entertainment themes as in movies, TV and books are very influential, regardless of a 'fiction' label. While we are entertained, we have a tendency to be swayed emotionally and our faculty of critical thinking is manipulated by our emotions; as in 'suspending disbelief'.

    I haven't read the book but I feel that many who do not know God will come away with a humanistic idea of who God is that may very well fit into their chosen mix of personal theology and never get around to picking up the Bible to discern truth. In a day where truth is mixed with lies and discernment is considered intolerant, we need to be very careful in our choices of entertainment; the spiritual battle is for the mind and the powers are not flesh and blood but of the atmosphere.

    Shooter, if you do decide to read it be sure you ask the Holy Spirit for discernment and, of course, don't pay retail...get it from the library or buy it used...just in case you find it less that glorifying to God, that way you will not have supported the author directly.

  • Tue Dec 16, 2008 7:27 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 5

    The main plot line of the story is focusing on your relationship with Jesus, and how you can't live truly unless you let Jesus live through you. It removes the "checklist" that people think they have to accomplish to be a Christian, the law spoken against in Romans. I don't understand the uproar against the focus of the book? It's not the Bible, its a FICTION book.

  • Tue Dec 16, 2008 6:49 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    But I prefer the description given of Him in Revelations 1. But, a lot of immature Christians would be offended by a Jesus who is actually holy and executes judgement.

    It's really funny. The Old Testament gives prophecies about both His first coming and His second coming. The religious people of His time overlooked the prophecies about His first coming...coming in humbleness and to be killed. They were looking for a Christ who would come in power and judgement to set them free. Though if He had, they'd be in big trouble.
    And now, Christians don't want a Christ who comes in power and judgement. We want a sugar daddy, who will overlook our sin and let us live like the devil himself. Just like the religious people of His time, there are going to be a LOT of suprised people on judgement day, when they thought all along they were going to heaven....and they don't.

  • Tue Dec 16, 2008 6:02 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    jkconner: If this is not a book of doctrine, the author shouldn't have included HIS version of Christian doctrine in the story, and he certainly shouldn't be teaching on it in churches around the nation as if he's suddenly a theologian. He seems reluctant to even call himself a Christian, something I'm very proud of.

  • Tue Dec 16, 2008 5:13 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Prophet: I don't disagree with you at all that the portrayal of Christ as an American is inaccurate, possibly even harmful to our understanding of Him.

  • Tue Dec 16, 2008 1:17 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    I enjoyed reading the book. It's depiction of God's love for us and desire to have a personal relationship with us touched my heart. It is not a book of doctrine. There is only one book for doctrine and that is The Holy Bible.

    It's funny as I read this article and many of the attacking responses I noticed an ad on the right for The Pilgrim's Progress movie. When it comes to doctrine one could equally attack that great work of fiction. But how many Christian's today would say that that book also had a great impact on their faith?

  • Tue Dec 16, 2008 12:32 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    blacksho,
    "God is not a plus-size African American woman (or and human at all!)"

    God did come to this earth as a human though, in Jesus. But how is that different than American's depiction of Jesus: Brown hair and blue eyes and fair skinned?

    Jesus was a jew. Black hair, dark eyes, olive skin.

  • Tue Dec 16, 2008 12:06 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

    "THE SHACK is also thoroughly orthodox."

    No. It's not. And I am telling you that as someone who LIKED the book. The emphasis on relationship, "Papa" being "especially fond" of all of us, and the transformation of tragedy through His love spoke deeply to me.

    BUT: God is not a plus-size African American woman (or and human at all!). That is the idolatry God spoke of when He said "Thou Shalt Make No Graven Images".
    God not being interested in punishing sin. Jesus not caring if we follow Him. Mac having murdered his father and apparently never having confessed it to God. The Holy Spirit again being portrayed as human in violation of the prohibition against graven images.
    I would recommend this book ONLY to mature Christians who are discerning. There are good messages, but the counterfeit is very strong.

  • Tue Dec 16, 2008 11:56 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 3

    I haven't read this book YET but I plan to. I am amazed at how upset everyone seems to be. I understand it's a work of FICTION. If we follow the majority thinking we should remove every star trek book because we haven't learned how to transport anyone yet. I have read many fiction books that have blessed me greatly and enjoyed them. When I want to know how God feels about something I go to his word. Lighten up people!!

  • Tue Dec 16, 2008 11:34 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 3

    Well, such criticism is quite normal from the Pharisees when you pull their chain a bit. Pharisees tend to be emotionally stunted and unable to "feel" in a relationship. It's much more comfortable for them to hide behind their "orthodoxy" and throw stones at books and people who are asking them to open their hearts to Love, honor, respect and authenticity. THE SHACK is also thoroughly orthodox. It just scares the folks the Holy Spirit is drawing into grace, asking them to leave their performance and lawfulness behind. Many Pharisees are doing so, which is why the LORD has blessed the book with such phenomenal sales. Ironic, huh?!! <grin>

  • Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:08 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    This is nothing new. A counterfit of Christianity and everthing that comes with it has been with us since Eve was deceived. There is always a counterfit to Jesus' and what He has tried to do. A counterfit bill is not totally different from the real thing and that's how satan works. It won't be something in your face, just a mudding of the waters. People are ignorant of the truth so they believe a lie. Just as Paul taught, if I or an angel preach any other gospel, let them be acursed. If you don't know real Christianity, you won't know what the counterfit is. This book is just another in the line of "spiritual" instead of doctrinal.

  • kami »
    Tue Dec 16, 2008 6:04 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    Sadly, Biblical discernment comes in short supply these days. But Jesus said it should be expected. Thank goodness there are those who are willing to be used to point point out Theological truth from error.

    It's not putting down anyone to simply compare what God's Word states with what another says to check if they coincide. That's just doing what Christ's asks us to do.

    So many have read and claimed to be touched by the book already. It's sold within Christian bookstores, as well as secular, and sold as a Christian book.

    Why call something Christian when it goes against basic Christian doctrine and teaching in the first place, whether fiction or not?

  • Mon Dec 15, 2008 11:25 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 2

    Since when did God ever put human emotion above His Truth. Talk about putting Christians down...doesn't the "Jesus" character in this book do just that? He's not a Christian, doesn't like Christians and doesn't want to make Christians out of pagans. That doesn't sound like the Jesus I know. It sounds suspiciously like the author, who by the way, isn't even part of a church.

  • Mon Dec 15, 2008 9:24 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I also find it laughable that the critics actual thought that this book was an "amazing tapestry." I thought is was sub-par writing, but I appreciated its perspective on things. The book, as far as I am concerned, is less about dogmatic conformity and more abound responding to the difficulties of life. Too bad none of those reviews even mention that.

  • Mon Dec 15, 2008 9:21 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Ha. I guess there is a demon to be found underneath every rock.

  • Mon Dec 15, 2008 8:28 pm Agree: 8   Disagree: 1

    Another thing...when was the last time the churches that we attend actually reached the numbers that folks like Warren and others have.

    Whenever we have to justify our existence by putting down others, we are not building up one another in the faith. In reality, we're making all Christianity look bad.

  • Mon Dec 15, 2008 8:16 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 2

    Flagged as inappropriate. show I remember one time hearing about that "The Purpose-Driven Life" hack Rick Warren talking about how God had blessed him with the success of his book franchise. I wonder if he thinks that the authors of the Da Vinci Code and The Shack are just as blessed, because both of those books far out-sells the cruddy mass of Christian fiction authors who seem eternally unable to make a dent in secular media. hide

  • Mon Dec 15, 2008 6:50 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 1

    Go guys go! Thank the Lord of heaven--as opposed to the Lord of The Shack--that these leaders are continuing to raise their voices against this heretical piece of work.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Listen to Sermons by  
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Gifts
  • Health
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Bethany House Publishers

The second book in the Seasons of Grace series will be available soon. The Missing is filled with mystery and family secrets, love and loss, heartbreak and healing — all wrapped

Featured Advertiser Links