Updated 11:59 pm.EST, Sun November 22, 2009

Society|Wed, Dec. 17 2008 12:07 PM EST

Rick Warren Not Satisfied with Making Abortions 'Rare'

By Kenneth Chan|Christian Post Correspondent

Attempting only to make abortions “rare” is not much different than saving some of the Jews during the Holocaust when all could be saved, according to megachurch pastor Rick Warren.

“Of course I want to reduce the number of abortions,” Warren told Beliefnet Editor-in-Chief Steven Waldman when asked if he was going to work with the Obama administration to achieve an abortion reduction agenda or if he thinks that the effort is a charade.

“But to me it is kind of a charade in that people say ‘We believe abortions should be safe and rare,’” he added.

“Don’t tell me it should be rare. That’s like saying on the Holocaust, ‘Well, maybe we could save 20 percent of the Jewish people in Poland and Germany and get them out and we should be satisfied with that,’” Warren said. “I’m not satisfied with that. I want the Holocaust ended.”

During the lengthy interview with Beliefnet, the increasingly influential church leader was asked mostly questions pertaining to grace, faith and Christian theology. Warren shared with Waldman comments such as what questions he would like to ask God, what he felt the worst sin is, and how he pictured Heaven to be.

A little more than half way into the session, Waldman’s questions switched over to those related to social issues, including some on abortion, torture, and marriage.

One question Waldman asked Warren was why he talked to Obama about his abortion position but not President Bush about his position on torture, which Warren said he is “totally against.”

“Never got the chance. I just didn’t,” Warren responded.

“In fact, in the first place, I’m a pastor, and people might misunderstand,” he continued. “I don’t deal with policy issues with Barack Obama or President Clinton or John McCain. I just don’t. That’s not my role. My role is to pastor these guys.”

Furthermore, Warren noted that it was Obama who first brought the issue up during a Democratic Senate Caucus that Warren was invited to speak at.

“Hey Rick, let’s talk about the big elephant in the room,” Warren recalled Obama saying.

“When we Democrats … do stuff for the poor and we do stuff for the sick, we don’t get many letters about it. But when we vote to support abortion we get thousands and tens-of-thousands of letters. What’s the issue here?” Obama had asked, according to Warren.

In response, Warren told Obama and the other Democrats in the room – which included Barbara Boxer, Hillary Clinton, Harry Reid, and Chuck Schumer – that almost everybody has a single issue that they care about.

Turning to Clinton, Warren said the New York senator would likely not vote for someone who she felt was wrong on the civil rights issue, even though she might agree with them on everything else.

“And I went around the room and when I came to Chuck Schumer I said, ‘Chuck, how bad, if you had a candidate and he was right in every single area that you agreed with but he’s a Holocaust denier?’

“‘There’s no way you’re gonna vote for a holocaust denier,’” Warren recalled telling the Jewish American politician. “That’s a single issue issue for you.”

With that said, Warren told the Democrats, “For these people who believe life begins at birth, all right, at conception, it’s an American holocaust. They believe that there’s 40 million people who should be here. And to them that’s an issue.”

During the Beliefnet interview, Warren said he does intend to speak with Obama privately about the issue again as the two are friends. But he doesn’t intend to debate publicly with him on it.

“It’s not something I protest out on the street about. It’s something you deal with individually as rational civil people,” Warren said.

Since the election of Barack Obama, conservative Christians have been increasingly prayerful for – and some more vocally critical of – the Illinois senator, who many believe will be "the most radical pro-abortion president" in U.S. history.

During a gathering for Planned Parenthood, Obama declared that the first thing he would do as president would be to sign the Freedom of Choice Act, which would abolish all restrictions and limitations on women in the United States to have an abortion prior to fetal viability, whether at the state or federal level, or after the point of viability when the life of the mother is endangered.

Obama has also been known for his opposition to the Supreme Court ruling to uphold the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act and his votes against legislative efforts in the Illinois Senate for three consecutive years (2001-2003) to give legal protections to a baby born alive during an attempted abortion procedure.

During Warren’s interview with Beliefnet, the megachurch pastor confessed that he and Obama “totally disagree” with one another on the issue of abortion.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:15 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    pregnacy-just something else no one( boy or girl) wants to take responsibality for.you are responsible for what you do whether its a abortion or a child.a child you raise or now days probably the grand parents will raise.but the grand parents cant suffer the rest of their lives for you because you decided to have an abortion an believe me if you are human you will suffer.abortion is murder and anyone who preformes one should be charged with murder.believe me when you kneel before christ we will answer for what we do. and we WILL kneel before christ.whether you believe it or not

  • Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:35 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Prophet,

    The difference between your scenario and mine is that killing other people's baby would inflict pain on its parents, and all who love that baby; abortion is not about killing other people's baby, it's about your own.

    2nd, the fetus would change the mom's life, FOREVER, not driving after drinking won't!

    Paul,

    I am not arguing that abortion is good. I am arguing that let people decide what they want for their lives, and let them face the natural consequence. Forcefully imposing your religious rights on other people's civil rights would only cause more pain.

    If you read my other posts in this forum. I deem sins to be things that prevent us from having a happy future. Abortion can be considered a sin in such a context. Though I hope that your wife will find peace in her heart.

    After all the hypocrisy that I've lived through, I realize that, instead of telling people how to live life, why not live your own life, physically help those whom you come across, and refrain from imposing righteousness. Is that not what Jesus did?

  • Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:23 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Bryan, just so you know...I've reaped a bit in my day....

    Stand firm and be supportive. The Bible says children are a gift from the Lord. It depends on what she wants if she should keep the baby or give it up for adoption.

    I can tell you that an abortion (before I met her) messed up my first wife. It didn't manifest itself for years but when it did.... You really don't want to go there.

  • Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:19 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "If God doesn't punish us for one repented mistake, why must we punish them."

    There is a difference between punishment and consequences. God may not give us eternal punishment but we still reap what we sow here on earth.

  • Mon Dec 22, 2008 5:02 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Bryan, my bad, I just noticed she was only 16, but no problem since many high schools are very accommodating as well in this area.

  • Mon Dec 22, 2008 5:00 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Bryan, where is the compassion for the child in her womb, plus many colleges are very accommodating in matters like this and her pregnancy should in no way interfere with her pursuit of her education, plus there are many parents out there who would love to adopt this child. And there are Crisis Pregnancy Centers that will assist this young lady and stay with her for a year after she gives birth to this child. So please show me the lack of compassion you refer to in your post?

  • Mon Dec 22, 2008 4:30 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Bryan wrote: "she decided to have sex with this boy that she has always had a crush on."

    Does the boy have any rights to his fetus?

  • Mon Dec 22, 2008 3:52 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Bryan,
    So there's a man that gets drunk, and out of "desparation" to get home decides to drive himself. In the proecess crossed into oncoming traffic, hits a car head on, and kills the 3 month old baby in the back seat. He should be let go. Afterall, it's just a baby. The baby doesn't have any regrets, hasn't actually "lived" life yet. Let's not make people accountable for their choices.
    Just like the girl in your story, it was still a choice. No matter how she felt, or whatever, it was still a bad choice.
    Whether you like it or not, in your scenario, there is only one victim. The baby. The woman is not a victim. God doesn't condemn us for a mistake. But he does expect us to bear the natural consequences of our choices. To slough off our responsibilities is not very Christian. And to kill an innocent person in the process only adds sin upon sin.

  • Mon Dec 22, 2008 2:54 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I suppose this board needs "the other side" of the argument.

    Imagine a 16 year old female, academically and socially successful, who dreams of attending a univerity to become a professor to contribute to society. One night, under a lot of pressure due to her overwhelming studies, she decided to have sex with this boy that she has always had a crush on. YES it is a mistake! But imagine if you were in her stead. Do you know how much change would occur in your life?! How much courage you'd have to muster in order to live a life that awaits her?

    Compassion, my friends. God cares about both the mother and the fetus. But if the mother thinks that she cannot live a life with the fetus present, then so be it. The fetus who had not lived, would have no regrets. The mother on the other hand would have her life scarred.

    Unless everybody who disagrees with abortion contribute physical and emotional resources for the mother of an unwanted child, please have compassion on these mothers. The best way to stop abortion is to stop having unwanted babies.

    If God doesn't punish us for one repented mistake, why must we punish them.

  • Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:27 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "Isn't that like socialistic, or even nazi-like? "

    Absolutely, it appears prosciences world would be one of control freaks dictating who will live and who will die.

  • Sun Dec 21, 2008 4:50 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Daniel Paul,

    "I take it you are fine with Planned Parenthood helping underage girls get abortions even though they are breaking the law in the process because "it's a private matter". Your position brings oppression to the underage girls and their parents."

    Amen. And it's also satans tool to tear apart the family unit. Take away the parent's rights to know what is going on in their underage childrens lives, and take away their right to decide on medical/medicinal interventions for their children, is to take away their right to be parents, and puts that responsibility on the government. Isn't that like socialistic, or even nazi-like?

  • Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:36 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Just FYI proscience, living here in the south I can state that your arguement was exactly the same one used by those who abused people of color. They felt they had the right to. It was a private matter. They were less than people.

    It was people with the same mindset as Rick that eventually put a stop to that. Congradulations. Your arguement supported racism.

  • Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:33 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Actually, proscience's position is very religious in nature. I believe you will find the concept in the Humanist Manifesto which the court has determined to be a religious document outlining the religion of humanism.

    I thought you were not a religious person. Must be our bad. :)

    I take it you are fine with Planned Parenthood helping underage girls get abortions even though they are breaking the law in the process because "it's a private matter". Your position brings oppression to the underage girls and their parents.

  • Sat Dec 20, 2008 6:02 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I'm glad that God places more value on a human life than proscience does. That's another reason why I'm a Christian. God loves us more than anyone else does.

  • Sat Dec 20, 2008 6:01 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    pro wrote: "If somebody else wants to end the life of her fetus, that may be wrong to you, and may be wrong to me, but it's none of your business, it's not my business, and it's none of the government's business."

    How about when it is your business and it is your fetus also? As a man do you have any rights to your fetus?

  • Sat Dec 20, 2008 4:23 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    pro, so then you'd prefer I just walk by and mind my own business while someone is in the process of murdering you?

  • Sat Dec 20, 2008 4:14 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Daniel Paul, if you don't like abortions, then don't get an abortion. If somebody else wants to end the life of her fetus, that may be wrong to you, and may be wrong to me, but it's none of your business, it's not my business, and it's none of the government's business.

    Like I said earlier, everyone cheers when somebody who can't mind their own business drops dead. That's a death worth celebrating, and the more painful the death, the better.

  • Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:40 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    "your nose into somebody else's private life is the most immoral thing a person could ever do"

    So, you think that what someone does in private is their own business. That means you support child pornography, spouse abuse, drug abuse, rape, incest and even murder as long as it's part of their "private lives".

    The courts have already determined that ones rights to privacy ends when it interfers with the general welfare. In the case of abortion, Christians believe that baby is a creation of human life from conception and that any deliberate act to end that life is murder. Therefore, people like Rick and myself are simply speaking up for those human beings who have not been born yet.

    The most mentally ill arguement I have heard to date is that a baby doesn't have the right to live until it is actually born. This is the arguement for partial birth abortions.

    When my children were born they recognized my voice. When the youngest two were born the nurses were openly amazed that each stopped crying when I called to them from across the room. How could they recognize my voice if they weren't alive in the womb as real live babies with the right to live?

  • Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:02 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    pro, if someone was in the process of killing you would you consider it nosy of me if I intervened in order to save your life, well the same is true with our desire to stop abortions in order to save the lives of unborn babies.

  • Sat Dec 20, 2008 12:19 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    nosy: Given to prying into the affairs of others

    If Rick Warren doesn't like abortions, then he shouldn't get an abortion. I have no problem with people who don't like abortions, I don't much care for the idea myself. But sticking your nose into somebody else's private life is the most immoral thing a person could ever do. Nobody like a nosy person and nobody cares when they drop dead.

  • Sat Dec 20, 2008 12:08 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "Rick Warren will never be satisfied with minding his own business. He would rather stick his nose into everyone else's private lives. "

    Oooo...touchy aren't we? When I read through the gospels I see that Jesus stuck His nose into others private lives. Take the woman at the well for example. Christians follow the example of Christ.

    I'm glad you have pointed out that Rick is being Christ-like.

  • Sat Dec 20, 2008 12:08 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    proscience,

    "Rick Warren will never be satisfied with minding his own business. He would rather stick his nose into everyone else's private lives.'

    Sounds like you have the same problem...

  • Sat Dec 20, 2008 10:25 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Rick Warren Not Satisfied with Making Abortions 'Rare'.

    Rick Warren will never be satisfied with minding his own business. He would rather stick his nose into everyone else's private lives.

  • Fri Dec 19, 2008 3:17 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Daniel Paul,
    Praise God. It's awesome when a pastor has to say that. Then you know it's God who did it.

  • mike »
    Fri Dec 19, 2008 1:25 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    You want abortion become rare Mr Warren? Start FAMILY PLANNING.

  • Fri Dec 19, 2008 12:23 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    that's funny Prophet, how 'bout "Planned Murderhood" as a new name...

  • Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:48 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    "Any man who's purpose is to create a megachurch "

    Actually, it came about like our church. We started 15 years ago with 75 people. Today we run about 7000+ in three services. The more we build the more crowded we get! The Pastor has been asked many times what he did to make the church grow so much. His answer..."I dunt know" (he's a southern boy). The staff and many of us lay people have just been hangin' on for the ride!

    Our leadership says it must be God 'cause it ain't them!

  • Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:44 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Abstinence from the PP site:

    http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/birth-control/abstinence-4215.htm

  • Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:31 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Does PP even talk about abstinence in any of its programs? I'm just curious.

  • Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:17 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 2

    Actually, Planned Parenthood would have to live up to it's name. Family planning instead of murder planning.

  • Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:16 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Tallguy,
    Yes, it would truly be a better world. And Planned Parenthood would probably go out of business. LOL.

  • Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:29 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Like you believer, I'm starting to warm up to this Rick Warren too. I pray he'll continue to have courage to stand up to our society...

  • Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:26 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Amen Prophet! Can you imagine a world where abstinence was truly taught and promoted by both the school system and the media? It could be done, and it would be a great service to our society!

  • Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:03 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Bryan,
    Amen. In this day and age, we think that by treating the symptoms we can destroy the cause. It's just not true. Teach and promote abstinence. It is the only 100% guarantee against pregnancy and STD's.

  • Thu Dec 18, 2008 12:48 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    I find it amusing how he thinks that by enacting a few laws and regulations, the problem of abortion would be solved.

    Can we for once try to fix the root problem instead of imposing laws on people by force?

    Teach the people! "Use condoms!" or "don't have sex if you can't bear the responsibilities that come with it!"

  • Thu Dec 18, 2008 3:19 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I agree with believer. I am trying really hard to give Rick Warren the benefit of the doubt. I don't agree with his seeker sensitive approach to church, but I hope he can influence BHO to save babies' lives.

  • Wed Dec 17, 2008 11:28 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    believer,
    Amen.

  • Wed Dec 17, 2008 8:44 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 2

    Why do we care what Rick Warren thinks. Any man who's purpose is to create a megachurch is not advancing the Kingdom of God. He's advancing some other kingdom.

  • Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:42 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    No joke, chicago!

  • Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:18 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Wow. I just heard that Rick Warren will be giving the invocation at Obama's inauguration.
    I'm sure there'll be folks on BOTH sides of the fence banging on their high chairs over this choice!

  • Wed Dec 17, 2008 2:36 pm Agree: 6   Disagree: 2

    I know there are some of you who don't care for Rick Warren and I myself am not comfortable with some things he has said and done, but I have got to say these three most recent articles have been biblically right on target and hopefully he'll continue to more boldly stand behind and for the biblical worldview on issues today.

  • Wed Dec 17, 2008 1:14 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 4

    Kudos to Warren for powerfully articulating logical rationales for the pro-life position.

    Politicians who favor a policy of making abortions
    "rare" are finally "outed" for their inconsistent and heartless charades.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Also on CP
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links