Updated 12:47 pm.EST, Sun November 22, 2009

Society|Wed, Jan. 07 2009 08:55 AM EST

Mississippi has Highest Teen Birth Rate, CDC Says

By Associated Press Writer|Mike Stobbe

ATLANTA – Mississippi now has the nation's highest teen pregnancy rate, displacing Texas and New Mexico for that lamentable title, according to a new federal report released Wednesday.

Mississippi's rate was more than 60 percent higher than the national average in 2006, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said. The teen pregnancy rate in Texas and New Mexico was more than 50 percent higher.

The three states have large proportions of black and Hispanic teenagers — groups that traditionally have higher birth rates, experts noted.

The lowest teen birth rates continue to be in New England, where three states have teen birth rates at just half the national average.

It's not clear why Mississippi surged into first place. The state's one-year increase of nearly 1,000 teen births could be a statistical blip, said Ron Cossman, a Mississippi State University researcher who focuses on children's health statistics.

More than a year ago, a preliminary report on the 2006 data revealed that the U.S. teen birth rate had risen for the first time in about 15 years. But the new numbers provide the first state-by-state information on the increase.

The new report is based on a review of all the birth certificates in 2006. Significant increases in teen birth rates were noted in 26 states.

"It's pretty much across the board" nationally, said Brady Hamilton, a CDC statistician who worked on the report.

About 435,000 of the nation's 4.3 million births in 2006 were to mothers ages 15 through 19. That was about 21,000 more teen births than in 2005.

Numerically, the largest increases were in the states with the largest populations. California, Texas and Florida together generated almost 30 percent of the nation's extra teen births in 2006.

Some experts have blamed the national increase on increased federal funding for abstinence-only health education that does not teach teens how to use condoms and other contraception. They said that would explain why teen birth rate increases have been detected across much of the country and not just in a few spots.

There is debate about that, however. Some conservative organizations have argued that contraceptive-focused sex education is still common, and that the new teen birth numbers reflect it is failing.

Other factors include the escalating cost of some types of birth control and their unavailability in some communities, said Stephanie Birch, who directs maternal and child health programs for the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services.

Glowing media portrayals of celebrity pregnancies don't help, either, she said. "They make it out to be very glamorous," said Birch, who cited a calculation by Alaska officials that teen pregnancies were up 6 percent in that state in 2006.

In Mississippi, there were about 68 births for every 1,000 women, ages 15 through 19 in 2006. The New Mexico rate was 64 per 1,000; Texas was 63.

The national birth rate for females in that age group was about 42 per 1,000. New Hampshire, with a rate of 19 per 1,000, was the nation's lowest.

A variety of factors influence teen pregnancy rates, including culture, poverty and racial demographics. For those and other reasons, kids in mostly white New England likely would delay child birth, said David Landry, a researcher at the Guttmacher Institute, a New York-based organization which supports abortion rights and gathers research on sexual and reproductive health.

"It's more costly for youth in the Northeast to have a teen birth than for youth in the South, in terms of opportunities they'll miss," he said.

On the Web: www.cdc.gov/nchs

Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:04 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    This is not a debate on slavery. Slavery is not the cause of high teen birth rates.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:09 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    agent wrote: "Yeah, your point? I've never stated the north wasn't even involved in any level of slavery. You're conflating the issue."

    Yee...sorry.

    "The root causes of the Civil War can be broken down into States Rights, Slavery, Political and Economic considerations. Slavery, while listed as a separate cause, had significant influence on the other three. An understanding of the above influences of the time will reveal, however, that slavery should not be considered the sole cause of the Civil War."
    www.civilwar.com

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:29 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    agent, if slavery would have been a profitable endeavor in the North it would have been more prevelant, but because it was not a profitable endeavor they had few slaves.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:22 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Forgivensinner,

    "agent, have you googled north slavery?"

    Yeah, your point? I've never stated the north wasn't even involved in any level of slavery. You're conflating the issue. Rather, my point was, largely slavery was done in the South & when it came time to set lawful action of equal rights under the law as passed by our federal govt. & that the slaves in the south be freed as a result, the southern states decided not to comply and resisted abolitionism actions under the guise of 'states rights'.

    After all, it was earlier stated as an excuse that the higher teen pregnancy rates in the South by an large is linked with the war. It wasn't my non sequitur, I was thinking of attempting to link the overall education level with teen pregnancy rates, but it's I think more complicated.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:52 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    agent, where do you think the underground railroad started? There were abolitionists in the South as well as the North.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:25 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    agent, have you googled north slavery?

    Check out this stie: http://www.slavenorth.com/index.html

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 4:05 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "I said that slavery was not the primary reason why a majority of Southerners were in favor of seceding."

    If not for slavery, then for what? The notion of 'states rights' in this context is in how the South wanted to do their own thing & continue on with slavery regardless of the rest of the Union. So if not for slavery, what else, & how else would 'states rights' be implied in this context?

    "And there view was that each state should decide on slavery."

    Exactly, 'states rights' = we want to uphold slavery.

    "But I hope you don't buy into the lie that a majority in the North were sensitive to the rights of blacks."

    Well, for whatever reason slavery in the North tended to be far less common & the underground rail road and other northern abolitionists made it sure appear like the north was at the very least more favorable than the south.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:53 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    agent, I said that slavery was not the primary reason why a majority of Southerners were in favor of seceding. And there view was that each state should decide on slavery. But for some in the South, slavery was the hot button issue as it was for many in the North. But I hope you don't buy into the lie that a majority in the North were sensitive to the rights of blacks. During the draft riots in the North who did the rioters lynch, any black man they could find.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:22 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    So you're trying to tell me the Civil War had absolutely nothing to do with the differences between northern & southern states in regards to the principle of slavery & if it's objectionable or not?

    If not for their distinct differences of opinion on slavery, for what other reason would southern states appeal to 'state rights' as excuse for continuing use of slavery? 'states rights' is this context is code for 'we
    want to rule them colored folk'. Suddenly the notion of 'equal protection under the law' as per the bill of rights need not apply in the south. Fancy that logic.

    So I take it in your book their rights were infringed & they should have been able to continue with slavery? Is continuing the act of slavery worth leaving the Union? They apparently thought so & so do you.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:53 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Agent: Please read some actual history of the South during the 1800s instead of just puking back what you've learned from revisionist historians.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:01 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    beleiver, I get it that racism/bigotry runs deep outside of the South, that's not quite what I am saying though. It doesn't really matter if only 5% of the folk in the South owned slaves, they as a block of states wanted to defend their so called 'right' to own slaves. they wanted 'states rights' to own slaves, right? And that's what the war was over, the decision to or not to be able to own slaves.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:20 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    fsnl, that is how I read it, too. Southern folk, whether we agree or not, are more pro-life while Northerners are mostly pro-choice.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:15 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Excellent point, forsaltnlight. At least in these Southern states the young people are choosing life over death for their unborn children.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:54 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    agent, from wikipedia, according to the 1860 US census, nearly 4 million slaves were held in a total population of just over 12 million in the 15 states in which slavery was legal. Of all 8,289,782 free persons in the 15 slave states, 393,967 people(4.8%) held slaves, with the average number of slaves held by any single owner being 10. 95% of black people lived in the South, 1/3 of the population.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:44 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    agent, you act as if racial prejudice stops north of the Mason-Dixon line, well having grown up in the city of Rochester, NY, I can tell you that is totally untrue. Racial prejudice is a national problem not just a Southern problem. Most of the leaders in the Southern military, Lee and Jackson for example, were opposed to slavery and as I said a majority of the southerners who fought in the war could have cared less about the slavery issue, it was a matter of states rights, which by the way may have caused them to lose the war. And even in the South today states rights is still a hot issue. And once again only 5-10% of southerners owned slaves.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:36 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "5-10% of southerners had slaves"

    Well by virtue of just the math involved in how the South is in particular largely Black, they would kind of have to have a figure like that, as it couldn't be the other way with some 60% of them owning slaves when some 50% of the population there was black.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:34 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    believer, the South wanting to have it's own states rights dealt strictly with having the freedom to have slaves, right? So it was about slavery, at least in the abstract.
    Oh sure they talked about wanting 'states rights', but that's all just code for 'we hate them colored folk, and we think they is inferior to us whites and we can rule em'.

  • Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:49 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I fear it's pointless to try to educate those who don't care to be educated, believer. Alas, the winners of wars get to write (or rewrite) history, and the North has done a very complete job of re-educating today's youth about the real reasons for the War Between the States (or, as I like to put it, the War of Northern Aggression).

    The first shot fired in the WONA, BTW, was not fired on D.C.

    BTW, I'm a Northerner by birth, but a Southerner by the grace of God.

  • Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:25 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    agent, only 5-10% of southerners had slaves, the primary reason the south left the union was over the issue of states rights and not slavery.

  • Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:41 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 4

    Redneck southern fathers are don't know the meaning of a daughter's honor. They are the worst fathers in America. Any father who lets his daughter get in this condition is a colossal looser.

  • Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:23 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    weekenderman,

    Invaded? Which side attacked DC again? The South. Palease, the Confederates were the ones who chose to leave from the Republic under the conditions that they'd rather keep their slaves then having to change their ways. Ahhhh, what a tragedy, want a violin? They had to give up their slave way agriculture in favor of, ya know, actually using paid labor. What an outrage!

    Besides, 150 years is plenty of time to get over a war and get with the program. Ask the Japs & Germans who we destroyed in WWII & don't use such excuses for their pathetic conditions.

  • Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:55 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    What's happening here? Hard to say, but a quick look at the data indicate that the lowest teen birth rates are overwhelmingly in the most liberal parts of the country.

    If threats of hellfire and damnation don't seem to work, perhaps we should try just a tiny bit of reasonableness.

  • Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:50 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Yes, agentorangex, the South has yet to recover from the North invading their communities 150 years ago and destroying its economy, and then leaving it to suffer.

  • Wed Jan 07, 2009 12:34 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    In the South, what a surprise, couldn't see that one coming. Heck, look at the majority of the states at/neat the top of the list and they too are from the South.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090107/ap_on_he_me/med_teen_births

  • Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:55 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Hmm. The headline says "Teen BIRTH rate", the first line of the article says "Teen PREGNANCY rate." Two different things. I wish the AP would just give me the numbers, and quit interpreting it for me!

  • Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:49 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    The article reads: "Some experts have blamed the national increase on increased federal funding for abstinence-only health education"

    I haven't seen the cirriculum, but I wonder what it may be missing.

    Also, again: ""It's more costly for youth in the Northeast to have a teen birth than for youth in the South, in terms of opportunities they'll miss," he said."

    Perhaps, this is the goal of the program; to show kids exactly the opportunities they will miss out on.

    I try very diligently to impress on my daughter, a first things first mindset. So far so good; she is on a path that is strictly about what she wants to accomplish before she finds love and marriage. Through, much pray and dialogue, I hope she continues in this mindset.

  • Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:36 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    The article reads: "A variety of factors influence teen pregnancy rates, including culture, poverty and racial demographics. For those and other reasons, kids in mostly white New England likely would delay child birth, said David Landry, a researcher at the Guttmacher Institute, a New York-based organization which supports abortion rights and gathers research on sexual and reproductive health.

    "It's more costly for youth in the Northeast to have a teen birth than for youth in the South, in terms of opportunities they'll miss," he said."

    So what is being said here??? Teens in the Northeast are having more abortions over teens in the South??

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links