Updated 03:31 pm.EST, Tue November 24, 2009

Society|Thu, Jan. 08 2009 04:25 PM EST

Bill Introduced to Bar Broadcaster 'Muzzling'

By Eric Young|Christian Post Reporter

Republican lawmakers have introduced a bill in both the House and Senate to prevent the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from reinstating the Fairness Doctrine, a policy abolished more than two decades ago for its alleged threat to public interest and violation of First Amendment rights.

“The time has come to do away with the Fairness Doctrine once and for all,” said Congressman Mike Pence (R-Ind.), who introduced the Broadcaster Freedom Act of 2009 on Wednesday together with Congressman Greg Walden (R-Ore.), chairman of the House Republican Conference; Senator Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), chairman of the Senate Steering Committee; and Senator John Thune (R-S.D.), vice chairman of the Senate Republican Conference.

“It is dangerous to suggest that the government should be in the business of rationing free speech,” he added.

First introduced in the United States in 1949, the Fairness Doctrine required the holders of broadcast licenses to present balanced and fair coverage of controversial subject matter. In 1987, however, the FCC abolished the doctrine, stating that "the intrusion by government into the content of programming occasioned by the enforcement of [the Fairness Doctrine] restricts the journalistic freedom of broadcasters ... [and] actually inhibits the presentation of controversial issues of public importance to the detriment of the public and the degradation of the editorial prerogative of broadcast journalists."

The commission also suggested that, because of the “multiplicity of voices in the marketplace,” the doctrine be deemed unconstitutional.

While some believe the return of the Fairness Doctrine is improbable, if not impossible, the men behind the Broadcaster Freedom Act of 2009 say there was enough movement on Capitol Hill to merit their recent course of action.

“Over the past few months, some of the most powerful Democrats in Congress have made their intentions to restore this Depression-era regulation clear,” announced congressman Pence, whose bill in the House has over 100 cosponsors.

“Democrats want to impose an unfair doctrine that destroys talk radio and silences the voices of millions of Americans who disagree with their vision for America,” added senator DeMint, whose Senate bill, S. 34, has 24 cosponsors.

In his statement, DeMint noted how talk radio has grown rapidly since the repeal of the Fairness Doctrine. Many have credited the rise of right-wing radio to the repeal in 1987.

The introduction of the Broadcast Freedom Act of 2009 has been widely welcomed by conservative groups, including Family Research Council, the American Center for Law and Justice, and the Christian Coalition of America.

“I commend these Congressional leaders for their work to protect the airwaves from government controls,” expressed FRC President Tony Perkins in a statement Wednesday.

"This act will protect broadcasters from those who seek to intimidate and silence any political opposition,” he added. “I wholeheartedly support the Broadcaster Freedom Act and urge Congress to act in support of the First Amendment and a free press."

In a statement of support Thursday from the ACLJ, Jay Sekulow, the group’s chief counsel, noted how the return of the Fairness Doctrine “would be devastating to Christian broadcasters by putting the federal government in charge of telling broadcasters what to air.”

“Such a move would put the federal government in control of dictating the content of what’s aired effectively muzzling Christian broadcasters,” he said. “That’s precisely why the Broadcaster Freedom Act is so important.”

The Christian Coalition of America, meanwhile, accused liberal activists of wanting to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine to “intimidate radio station owners not to carry hours of conservative talk (because they would have to offer hours of liberal talk) – meaning shows like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly would be a thing of the past.”

“They know that conservative talk radio is one of the biggest obstacles standing between them and being able to implement the rest of their radical liberal agenda,” it added.

According to the coalition’s president, Roberta Combs, the group has launched an on-line campaign to ensure that the Fairness Doctrine is not reinstituted by Congress or by the Obama administration.

"Congress should resist the urge to shut down radio talk show hosts around the country which is what the ‘Fairness Doctrine’ would effectively do if brought back,” she stated.

Since 1987, Congress has twice passed legislation to restore the Fairness Doctrine. Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, however, vetoed the bills.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Tom »
    Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:04 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    The only reason that the dems want the fairness doctrine again (isnt that a oxymoron fairness doctrine) is because in the area of ideas that best suit the country as a whole the dont have good ideas. Thus when they launch there on radio programs or tv shows they fail. Why? So instead of competing they want to shut you down. In the liberals world the ends justifies the means. In other words do what it takes right wrong or otherwise so get'er done then do what ever it takes to remain in power. Hmmmm fairness doctrine? Gods Blessing In Christ Tom

  • Tom »
    Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:58 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    feelfine is at it again he cant argue his point of view because it is way wrong so he attack the character of someone who believe that Biblical concept of creation by claiming that evolution is a fact. Man is that arrogant or not. Gods Blessing In Christ Tom

  • Sat Jan 10, 2009 8:09 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Congratulations to Political Correctness. You have successfully ghetto-ized America into several unitergrated entities that would love to have their ideals marketed by some segment of the media. I enjoy my niche (Christian radio, conservative talk). I am sure there are others who groove to Air America and shock-jock. Yippee! We are happy in our own individual safe zones. Unfortunately, the Fairness Doctrine wishes to violate each others niche in a twisted feel for the acceptance of diversity. Who can follow such subverted logic?
    The PC seed ... you get what you sow. This nation is divided, and forcing political correctness has never been the answer. People of America, do you have the "courage of conviction?" Can you express yourself and also hear the counter opinions of others with tact? If we cannot have a "meeting of minds" where we can civilly share our thoughts and ideas, we have failed as a nation.
    But one important facet of our freedoms is knowing we have people who have like opinions that can support our own, encourage us that we are not alone in our ideas, that there is not one state-sponsored approach to life.
    We are best served if there is a wide field of thought, easily accessed on the radio band, television channel, or newspaper of our choice.

  • Fri Jan 09, 2009 5:18 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    If people want to hear opposing views to Christianity....change the station. Simple.

  • Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:00 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Daniel Paul,

    Those are very good points. Spot on.

    It should also be mentioned the huge financial impact this would have on talk radio programming, as well. Since every second of broadcasting would be subject to scrutiny, the legal red tape that would need to be sorted out to decide what a fair portion of time should be alloted to every opposing viewpoint (oh yeah, there'll be more than one) will take a heavy toll in regular fees. I can only guess at the financial dynamics of it, but I'd image retainers would either be higher, more numerous or both to keep lawyers on staff to sort it out.

    So for every hour Christians spread the good news about how Jesus is Love, we'll have:
    Atheists - "No, he's not", for 1 hour
    Muslims - "No, Mohammed is", for 1 hour
    Scientologists - "No, he's an alien", for 1 hour
    Jehovah's Witness (they will have opposing viewpoints since they're not really Christian)
    The Church of Set - "Satan is love"
    Buddhists, Hindus, Thingamahabahaloos .... etc.

    It's essentially censorship by a "drowning out" of Christian and conservative viewpoint, under the guise of "fairness".

  • Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:07 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    FTK;
    Unfortunately, Progressives understand freedom and liberty all too well and are threatened. Put a muzzle on the Repubs in the House and muzzle talk radio and Christian broadcasting so we get only PC indoctrination from the media.
    I wonder if the Internet will be considered for tax and regulation along with banning homeschooling and parochial schooling (as in Germany to prevent a parallel worldview from competing with the state's worldview)? The hate speech legislation will be forth coming as well, you can count on it, to muzzle Christians from speaking about sinful behaviors.

  • Fri Jan 09, 2009 9:20 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Sad to read, how some individuals do not understand liberty and freedom.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:09 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "DP: It's clear you don't know much about the Fairness Doctrine. I'm not sure I'm a fan of it but at least you can be honest about what it is and isn't. "

    Sorry you feel that way but this is what the broadcasters are saying about it. My guess is they would know since their lawyers are telling them how it will effect their stations.

    Here's how it works. Take the Muslims. They have a program on their religion, feel that it is an opposing view to ... say ... Billy Grahams weekly program. Since most preaching is on relevant social issues, the Muslims can claim lack of equal access.

    In the case of music, various songs addressing relevant issues draws the requirements from others for "equal access of their opposing views" on everything from sex to who knows what.

    The fairness doctrine is written to broadly. Today's lawyers would have a field day with it.

    Here's a good article on what the deal is:
    http://www.heritage.org/research/regulation/em368.cfm

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:17 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Prophet,
    I don't understand your statement that it doesn't have anything to do with the Bible directly. It is a position that violates Biblical teaching. It violates many of the commandments and violates a Christian's (and ministry) purpose in life; to glorify God in all we do and enjoy Him forever. How is God glorified if a Christian funded radio station is forced to do anything but to glorify God. This violates Biblical teaching directly, does it not? Are not many commandments violated by this govt intervention?

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:12 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    ifeelfine,
    Which is it? The Bible or Christianity? It has nothing to do with the Bible directly, but everything to do with Christianity. The fairness doctrine would make it a law that Christian talk radio would be required to air opposing view shows on their station. We don't want that. If we want to hear an opposing view, we'll just turn to some liberal run station.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:11 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    iff,
    what is sited summarizes it pretty well as best I understand it. Equal time has to be provided for other worldviews at the stations expense. How do you understand it if this is incorrect?

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:10 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    iff;
    Enlighten me prophet, what does the Bible have to say about the Fairness Doctrine?

    how about:
    Love your God with all your heart, soul, strength and mind - Tough to do if a Christian station is forced to broadcast other than a Christian worldview

    No other God's - impossible if any other worldview is forced by govt mandate to be broadcast

    Don't bow to false idols - every other worldview is guilty of this

    Don't steal - this is what happens when other worldviews force their way without reimbursement onto a Christian based station

    Dont' covet - this is all the Democrats do. This time covet the success of Christian and talk radio and want to force the Progressives PC message at Christian expense.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:08 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Hawk: So in other words, it says nothing about the Fairness Doctrine. Thanks.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:08 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    DP: It's clear you don't know much about the Fairness Doctrine. I'm not sure I'm a fan of it but at least you can be honest about what it is and isn't.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:46 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Enlighten me prophet, what does the Bible have to say about the Fairness Doctrine?

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:28 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "This has nothing to do with Christianity"

    Actually, having been in Christian broadcasting I really don't understand your statement. The "fairness doctrine" would require Christian stations to provide non-christian broadcasts. It would FORCE programming onto stations. Not only that but it would force your average shock-jock station to have a program of people with opposite views. Stations that have 4 hours of shock-jock would have to have 4 hours of preaching or something. It's just not realistic. It's the secualar stations that are going to have the real problems more so then the Christian stations.

    Networks like MTV would have to have hour for hour music from different points of view. For example, the Muslims could demand an hour of muslim prayer (which has music in it). Do you REALLY think MTV is going to want to do this?

    The "Fairness Doctrine" is just like putting all the radio stations in a blender an hitting the button. It's just bad programming.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:08 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    ifeelfine
    Yes it is interesting. I don't argue much about evolution because I'm not scientific minded. I'd rather not make a fool of myself in that area.
    I would encourage you to do the same when it comes to Biblical matters. Don't make a fool of yourself by arguing something you know nothing about.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:01 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    Someone who denies the facts of evolution is calling me ignorant? Interesting.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:54 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 5

    If you had a real life, ifee, you would not be haunting a Christian blog with your blathering nonsense . . .

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:53 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 5

    ifeelfine,
    It has everything to do with Christianity which goes to show how ignorant you are.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:19 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 5

    This has nothing to do with Christianity and just further proves my point that CP is not as interested in Christianity as it is in right wing politics with a fundamentalist Christian bent.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:46 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Hoepefully this will pass . . .

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:41 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Dittos to what DP posted.

  • Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:40 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Hurry up boys...get 'r done.... The 20th is on the way.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a