Updated 03:46 pm.EST, Mon November 23, 2009

Education|Thu, Jan. 29 2009 09:26 AM EST

Calif. Court: Christian School Can Expel Students Over Lesbian Behavior

By Lawrence Jones|Christian Post Reporter

A California appeals court ruled this week that a private Christian school has the right to expel two students over an alleged lesbian relationship that was in violation of the organization's "Christian Conduct" rule.

In a 3-0 ruling, the Fourth District Court of Appeals upheld California Lutheran High School's right, as a private, religious organization, to use religious criteria in making admission and discipline decisions. 

The school is not a business enterprise, the appeals court ruled on Monday, and therefore not covered in the state's Unruh Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

"The school's religious message is inextricably intertwined with its secular functions," wrote Justice Betty A. Richli in the appeals court opinion. "The whole purpose of sending one's child to a religious school is to ensure that he or she learns even secular subjects within a religious framework."

The appeals court ruling relied on a 1998 California Supreme Court decision that allowed the Boy Scouts to exclude gays and atheists. The Boy Scouts of America, which had faced similar discrimination charges, did not have to comply with the state's anti-discrimination law because it was a social organization, the state High Court had ruled.

The Riverside County-based school had expelled the two girls, then 16, for having a "bond of intimacy" that was "characteristic of a lesbian relationship."

In 2005, a student had reported to a teacher that the girls said they were in love with each other and referred the teacher to the girls' MySpace pages. One girl indicated she was bisexual on her MySpace page, while the other said she was "not sure" of her sexual orientation. The school's pastor said that when he confronted the girls over the suspected lesbian behavior, the girls admitted they had hugged and kissed each other and told other students they were lesbians.

The school's pastor suspended the two girls but the directors of the school later expelled them.

The two students, who were only identified in court documents as Jane Doe and Jane Roe, sued the school for violating state anti-discrimination laws.

Court documents show that the school has a policy of refusing admission to homosexual students and its “Christian Conduct” rule provided that a student could be expelled for engaging in immoral or scandalous conduct, whether on or off campus, including homosexuality.

The girls were expelled for "conducting themselves in a manner consistent with being lesbians," said John McKay, attorney for California Lutheran, according to the Los Angeles Times. He noted that the girls never disclosed their sexual orientation during the litigation.

McKay said the school's mission statement is to educate students based on Christian principles.

The Association for Faith-Based Organizations (AFBO), a coalition of over 830 California Christian schools, had sought to intervene in the case to protect its member schools' First Amendment right to make admissions decisions and disciplinary decisions consistent with their religious beliefs.

Members of AFBO include California private religious schools, such as Biola University, The Master's College, Point Loma Nazarene University, and Simpson University, that have religious admissions criteria substantially similar to Cal Lutheran and require their students to abide by rules prohibiting all forms of extramarital sexual conduct.

Attorneys with Christian Legal Society’s Center for Law & Religious Freedom and the Alliance Defense Fund had filed a motion to intervene on behalf of AFBO. The court denied the request since it decided in favor of the school.

"Christian schools should be able to make admission and discipline decisions consistent with their religious beliefs.  The Court of Appeal’s decision preserves that right for Christian schools in California," said CLS litigation counsel Timothy J. Tracey. 

"The court understood that this right would be violated if Christian schools were subjected to liability under California anti-discrimination laws for expelling students who engage in homosexual conduct."

The Cal Lutheran case is not unique. Four years ago, a 14-year-old girl was expelled from a Ontario Christian school in California because her parents were lesbians. The school's admission policy states that at least one parent cannot engage in immoral practices such as cohabiting or engaging in a homosexual relationship.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
1 | 2
  • Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:32 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    As long it is a private school that does not receive state funding, it is allowed to discriminate. These girls showed bravery.

  • Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:36 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    As one of the christian leaders (came out from the misconcepts of the Sriptures)I even can't agree,although this is a religious school; expel from school isn't the right way.Suprise! this over conservative-uncivil-ideology-ideas still happen in the advance-mature-educated-civilized California(America).

  • Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:59 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Okay, thanks dp, you know how these things appear above the radar for a while and then drop down again.

  • Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:16 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    They never did say what happened to the girl who originally brought all of this to the attention of school officials.

    Did these families really need to take this into the courts?

    At least the results were right even of the courts had to help.

  • Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:38 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Hey Steve, can't find it on our ABC News site. My guess is it's just there to sell ads.

  • Sat Jan 31, 2009 2:14 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Hi

    I'm picking this story up over here about a girl suspended from school for casting a spell...

    This is from ABC, I wonder if anybody can fill me in as to whether this is is true/serious or a joke etc...

    http://mirror.hb-rights.org/www.abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/studentmagic001028.html

    Thanks

    Steve

  • Fri Jan 30, 2009 3:04 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

    The religious schools have right to say "NO" to anti-religious students that is their ethic and morality code. However, lesbian couples or Gay couples could go to public schools if they do not like religious schools or wish to adhere to their Lesbian or Gay ideals. Why they disturb religon by acting against religous ideals.

    One day they may vive for a Gay School - fair enough.

  • Fri Jan 30, 2009 2:06 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    john, I agree with your premise, but another possibility is that these girls got put out of the public school, my wife taught in a Christian High School in Goldsboro, NC back in the late 70s and several of her students were kids who had about as much of a desire to be in that school as the man in the moon and some had been expelled from public schools and this was one of if not the parents last option.

  • Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:23 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 2

    As a Christian I sure would not want my children attending a school full of atheists and homosexuals. Why does the 'other' side feel the need to try to infiltrate Christian centered places?

  • Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:25 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    mike: I understand "crying wolf" perfectly. The "gay" activists are crying "Discrimination!" when the conduct of the girls was prohibited for all genders and sexual orientations.
    There is no wolf there.

  • Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:22 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    "the only reason this made the national news is because of the lawsuit they and their parents and who knows what homosexual advocacy groups brought against the school. "

    This was on O'Reilly last night. He seemed all geared up to call the school on the carpet until he found out the students admitted to it! If a school has rules and you enroll there you are agreeing to follow those rules. It's part of the anti-social pro-gay attitude that says rules are for other people and we don't have to follow rules even if we agree to them. This is a prime example of the anti-social behavior of the gay community I keep posting about.

    Mike...I'll save you the trouble and give 1 thumbs down when it posts.... :) Ain't it right toasty where you are today? Why it's almost not freezing....

  • Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:49 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    mike22685, the only reason this made the national news is because of the lawsuit they and their parents and who knows what homosexual advocacy groups brought against the school. If they would have accepted the expulsion and moved on, we would not be having this discussion about them.

  • Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:45 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    mike22685, dis you engage in pda while at the school and announce to others you were a homosexual? And were there rules against pda in your school? These girls knew exactly what they were doing and they and their parents knew the rules.

  • Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:09 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    I hate to say it Mike, but you can't be so sure the motives or feelings of the girls or their parents either. It's speculation no matter how we slice it.

  • Fri Jan 30, 2009 7:53 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    suitor,
    If sexual sin is no worse than any other sin, it would not be singled out in 1 Corinthians 6 as the only sin that is "against one's own body". It is dishonoring to the body which God has given you.
    Blessings!

  • Fri Jan 30, 2009 7:27 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Mike, if they did'nt want publicity they would'nt have sued

  • Fri Jan 30, 2009 7:25 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    My hat is off to this court for ruling in favor of this school's rights as a private institution, these girls willingly and blatantly violated the school's rules and obviously seek to profit from it financially.This say's a lot about their motivations- I suspect from our pro-gay supporters on this site that if their was a private homosexual school with similiar rules and 2 heterosexual students came out of the closet and violated the rules they would be expelled also, whether or not they seek to gain from it is another question.You can't have it both way's you know!! PRAISE TO OUR LORD AND MASTER JESUS CHRIST

  • Fri Jan 30, 2009 7:11 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Believer, I went to a Catholic high school and was out there. Never did I come out as a stunt, and I'm sure these girls didn't come out ever thinking they'd be expelled and make national news! This is not a publicity stunt.

    Blackho, apparently you don't understand the concept of crying wolf, for what you said made absolutely no sense. If you want to attack these high school students for their actions, so be it, but I think you are being gossipy.

    Prophet, I'm sure they were willing to take a risk of it making the local newspaper so that their daughters could stay in a private school of their choice, but to make national news an be a topic of conversation is an invasion of their privacy. These are teenage girls and I'm sure their parents are mortified. Put yourself in their shoes.

  • Fri Jan 30, 2009 2:09 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    mike,

    "Give the families some privacy, I'm sure they're not exactly taking this well. "

    If they wanted privacy it would have served the parents well to not have filed a lawsuit against the school. If they thought that filing a lawsuit like that against a Christian school wouldn't be publicized, they are kidding themselves.

  • Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:43 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    "...and the boy who cried wolf thing isn't working much in your favor."
    Exactly. Two girls whose behavior was against a policy they read and signed suffered the consequences of that behavior. They are crying wolf, and no-one believes them.
    They were expelled for their BEHAVIOR.
    From the article: Court documents show that the school has a policy of refusing admission to homosexual students and its "Christian Conduct" rule provided that a student could be expelled for engaging in immoral or scandalous conduct, whether on or off campus, including homosexuality.
    The girls were suspended for CONDUCT, not a state of being.
    "The school's religious message is inextricably intertwined with its secular functions," wrote Justice Betty A. Richli in the appeals court opinion. "The whole purpose of sending one's child to a religious school is to ensure that he or she learns even secular subjects within a religious framework."

    The purpose of a religious school is to keep your children AWAY from the sinful CONDUCT (there's that word again) that is celebrated by the world.
    The argument could be made that the girls were violating the other student's rights by their conduct.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:15 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    mike22685, this stunt is almost identical to one that was pulled by a student at the University of the Cumberlands in Williamsburg, Kentucky several years ago.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:10 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    If the girls violated school curriculum, that they acknowledged contractually, then a dismissal is appropriate.
    However, the "Church", needs to start the bigotry against homosexuality, and welcome them as sinners, which we all are.
    Sinners. Homosexuality, is among the sins, in a bucket full of sins.
    No better, no worse, than lieing, stealing, or coveting.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:41 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    This is not a publicity stunt at all! This is about parents who wanted their children to be able to go a private school and thought the school's decision is wrong. This has absolutely NOTHING to do with gay rights, but rather a student's right to go to school. You are both trying to make this into a Christian martyr issue, and the boy who cried wolf thing isn't working much in your favor.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:21 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 1

    "who do you think allowed these girls to bring the suit,"

    This is simply another intolerance suit by the militant pro-gay agenda who wants to criminalize being a Christian and holding to Biblical values. It is just another attack by the spirit of anti-Christ.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:28 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    mike22685, who do you think allowed these girls to bring the suit, you really don't think their parents are not a part of the problem. This whole incident reeks of a publicity stunt and the parents are aware of it and may very well be key players in this whole thing.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:16 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    OK, let's all compose ourselves and think as adults for a minute. We are talking about 2 high school girls who were expelled for being lesbians. I am sorry, but I would be furious as the parent of those girls that this nonsense was plastered on a newspaper, especially a CHRISTIAN newspaper. Give the families some privacy, I'm sure they're not exactly taking this well. To start focusing on the actions of 2 high school girls you've never met and speculating this, that, and the other thing is nothing more than petty gossip and it serves no point.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 6:53 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    "the girls admitted they had hugged and kissed each other and told other students they were lesbians."

    They admitted it.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 4:27 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    More businesses should have this right to excercise such discernment on who they cater to.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 4:01 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    You mean let them be adults.

    Cheers

    Steve

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:09 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

    steve0

    As in the case of the prodigal son, a father never loses the love for his children. But sometimes the best thing to do is to allow them to go live out their sin so that they can realize the full effect of their sin. Nothing can be more difficult when this happens, but holding on to your kids too tightly only draws more problems.

    Wish you well.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:02 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Na, don't think so, I've seen weeping pregnant girls and their parents apologizing at the front of church, somewhere along the way, people somehow forget their humanity, I understand only too well.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:52 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    steve0;

    You don't seem to understand the church is family and are there to assist in whatever capacity is necessary. Sometimes the prodigal son thing occurs in a family. Schools are an extension of the church family in most cases. If you have a wayward son, daughter or church member, then Biblical protocol is generally instituted.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:50 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    Phat, you bring up a great point - "no discrimination on my dime". So since my kids are in private Christian school because I feel the government schools discriminate against my beliefs, that I can get my school taxes refunded?

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:40 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    As a parent you must do what you feel right, as for me, blood is thicker than water and my daughter gets my unconditional love , even if I where to disagree with a part of her lifestyle, always keep the lines of communication open. I think of her and me and our relationship not what some school boards would think.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:35 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    steve0

    I figure it's the parents who brought the lawsuit in the first place. Don't know if it's possible for 16 yr olds to bring forth a lawsuit themselves since they are under the parent's care.

    We lack shame anymore. If my daughter brought this kind of embarrassment to our family, do you think I'd care much for what she's thinking? Doubtful. I sure the board would be relieved to know that there is still repentance and shame in a world that is full of themselves.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:28 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    No returns blacky, no returns...LOL

    Believer, think you might very well be on to something.

    Roll, do that, and you should be apologizing to your daughter for the embarrassment you caused her and yourself.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:15 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    Where in the world are the parents in this thing? Obviously, there's a parental issue going on. If my daughter were to "come out of the closet" and is involved in lesbian activity, I'd be going before the board of the school and apologizing and weeping for bringing embarrassment to the school.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:15 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Steve:
    Glass houses, mon ami.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:11 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Has anyone considered that maybe this is the very thing these girls were wanting, they wanted out of the school and wanted to go out in a blaze of glory! Whether or not they are truly homosexual is not relevant, what is relevant is they broke rules and were not willing to stop the behavior which left the school with no choice but to remove the girls from the school.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:09 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Glad to hear you where on a debate team at HS (what ever HS is), shame you where not on a, reading the posts correctly team, then you would not get your knickers in such a twist.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:06 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Steve: They violated the Student Code of Conduct.
    I am not interested in defining lesbian or gay. We could spend days arguing semantics; I don't care and I won't be sucked into that game-and that's what it is. I was on the debate team for a short period in HS, long enough to learn the techniques of distraction. I'm not going down that garden path.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:05 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    I would imagine student body at this school will increase as a result of this publicity. Normal parents are desperate to send thier children to an environment where this type of perversion is not condoned or tolerated.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:02 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    I don't understand the up roar. It is a private school and as such they make up their own rules. Don't follow their rules and out you go. Good for them.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:57 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 5

    What I don't understand is why the parents bother to sue. The parents and girls should be happy that they are out and away from an institution with such hateful policies. Hopefully other parents will realize this and pull their kids of out of this "school" as well.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:56 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Its not my place to disagree with them, if they say they are then its not my place to disagree with them, but my main point is, since when has teenag girls holding hands, cuddling and kissing been consistant with lesbianism, I'm suprised the world has got to the population it has today if that is the case. So roll, do you think all girls who do that are lesbians?

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:48 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Steve0;

    Are you missing out that they are saying that they are lesbian? They never deny it.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:43 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    So are you suggesting that all these girls were doing was experimenting and it's all a innocent thing?

    I can't comment, you obviously can, but not me.

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:41 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Hello B89

    Thank you for taking the trouble to point that out to me in case I had missed it. If you read my original post you will note that I make no comment about why the girls where expelled but simply comment on the line that the girls conducted themselves in a manner consistant with lesbianism, I found this an amusing statement and asked the qustion as to what that behaviour would be as I'm sure not all girls who, hold hands, cuddle, and kiss are lesbians, are you?

    Steve

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:38 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    steve0

    So are you suggesting that all these girls were doing was experimenting and it's all a innocent thing? That they say their lesbians is just joking around? Kind of an expensive game to be playing by taking it to court don't you think?

  • Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:31 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    steve: Did you miss the point that the girls violated the student code of conduct? The violation was in ACTION, not in IDENTITY.
    In other words-if football is against the code of conduct, I could probably wear a jersey; I could call myself a football player, I could put black under my eyes, and be OK. But if I pass the ball to another student in the hall, I'm in violation.
    The post-modern world would like to confuse the ideas of action and identity. Frankly I don't care about "identity", but action is rightly regulated, in God's law and in polite society.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • DVD
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a