Updated 12:58 pm.EST, Sat November 21, 2009

Opinion|Thu, Feb. 19 2009 09:01 AM EST

The Palin Parable - Bristol Says Abstinence 'Not Realistic At All'

By R. Albert Mohler, Jr.|Christian Post Guest Columnist

Bristol Palin, the 18-year-old daughter of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, made headlines last summer when it was revealed that she was about to become an unwed mother. On December 27, she gave birth to a baby boy named Tripp. Now, Bristol Palin is back in the news again - and this time by her own choice. She granted an interview to Fox News Channel's "On the Record."

At the same time the pregnancy was made public last summer, Bristol's mom had just been announced as Sen. John McCain's choice to be his running mate. This put the pregnant teenager into the glare of national publicity. Many were impressed and thankful as Bristol Palin and Levi Johnson, her fiance' and the baby's father, made a commitment not to have an abortion but to welcome the baby. They lived up to that pledge, and baby Tripp seems to be doing quite well.

Bristol's parents also affirmed the sanctity of human life when they made a similar commitment during Gov. Palin's pregnancy with a child with Down syndrome. The vast majority of unborn babies identified as carrying the marker for Down syndrome are now aborted, but the Palins said they never even considered aborting their baby. Little Trig Palin, soon to be a year old, was seen by millions of Americans during the course of the campaign. That one baby became a testimony to the worth of every single human life.

Bristol Palin is back in the headlines, and some Americans may be shocked. Bristol told Fox News that teenagers should not have sex. However, she also said that sexual abstinence for teens is "not realistic at all."

These comments seem contradictory, but the national media immediately leapt upon Bristol's apparent rejection of sexual abstinence as an expectation for teenagers. To her credit, she maintained a clear pro-life perspective, even as she admitted the difficulty of being a teenage mother. But the rejection of sexual abstinence as "not realistic at all" caught many off guard.

As reported in the press, Bristol's statement lacked context. But, many in the media simply reduced the story to her statement about abstinence. Consider this headline from the Associated Press: "Palin's Daughter Says Abstinence 'Not Realistic.'"

Many people who admired the way that the Palin family handled their family crisis last summer will be rightly disappointed with this new word from Bristol. But, leaving Bristol's personal situation aside for now, her comment deserves a closer look.

Is sexual abstinence realistic for teenagers and young adults? Well, abstinence is certainly not realistic when teenagers put themselves - or they are put there by others - into a situation where sexual activity is likely. At some point, sexual abstinence becomes very unrealistic indeed.

The real issue for Christian teenagers and their parents is not to debate whether sexual abstinence before marriage is realistic or not. The larger and more important issue is that sexual abstinence until marriage is the biblical expectation and command. Once this is realized, the responsibility for everyone concerned is to ensure that expectations and structures are in place so that abstinence is realistic.

The debate over whether abstinence is realistic or not misses the more important issue - abstinence must be made realistic.

Parents and teenagers must make certain that adequate protections and expectations are in place so that sexual abstinence is very realistic indeed. Far too many Christian parents allow their teenagers to be part of the "hooking up" scene of teenage culture. In that highly sexualized context, sexual abstinence would appear unrealistic in the extreme.

Premature pair dating and unsupervised liaisons, set within the supercharged culture of teenage sexuality, can put teenagers into very vulnerable situations. Asking whether sexual abstinence in those contexts is realistic can appear almost irrational.

Those who reject the norm of sexual abstinence for teenagers will leap on Bristol Palin's statement as evidence for their cause. But the real issue here is our responsibility to ensure that abstinence is made realistic and stays realistic. Anything short of this is truly "not realistic at all."

Adapted from R. Albert Mohler Jr.'s weblog at www.albertmohler.com.
___________________________________________________

R. Albert Mohler, Jr. is president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky. For more articles and resources by Dr. Mohler, and for information on The Albert Mohler Program, a daily national radio program broadcast on the Salem Radio Network, go to www.albertmohler.com. For information on The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, go to www.sbts.edu. Send feedback to mail@albertmohler.com. Original Source: www.albertmohler.com.
Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:08 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    "Safe fornication" curriculums should not forget to teach the following consequences:

    "Now the works of the flesh are manifest...fornication...[and] they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God" (Galatians 5).

    "Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication...For which things' sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience" (Col. 3).

    "For the wages of sin is death..." (Rom. 6).

  • Sat Feb 21, 2009 4:05 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    feet, when I was in catholic high school seminary in my biology class we came to the chapter on human reproduction and the priest teaching the class said this, well none of you need to worry about this so we'll just go on to the next chapter. Many churches have done the same thing with regards to talking about God's original and only design for sexual intimacy to both youth and singles alike. The only problem now is the pendulum has swung the other way to the point I hear youth and singles asking if we're ever going to stop talking about sex all the time. But there is excellent curriculum out there for churches and parents alike that speak from a very Bible-based foundation on this issue.

  • Sat Feb 21, 2009 3:26 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    The real issue for Christian teenagers and their parents is not to debate whether sexual abstinence before marriage is realistic or not. The larger and more important issue is that sexual abstinence until marriage is the biblical expectation and command. Once this is realized, the responsibility for everyone concerned is to ensure that expectations and structures are in place so that abstinence is realistic.

    i hate the hypocritical way that believers deal with this issue. all believers are aware of the surveys of newly married believers that show that 95% engaged in intimate relations prior to marriage. i dont know a congregation where 30 or 40 year old or older singles in the process of bonding, prior to marriage, would abstain from intimate relations. yet there is no active addressing of this behavior either in individual churches ,or in the denomination as a whole.

    yet for some reason, believers think it is the christian thing to dump this myth off as an actual belief.

    moses said..."the thing that one believes, that is what he will do."

  • Sat Feb 21, 2009 3:25 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    The real issue for Christian teenagers and their parents is not to debate whether sexual abstinence before marriage is realistic or not. The larger and more important issue is that sexual abstinence until marriage is the biblical expectation and command. Once this is realized, the responsibility for everyone concerned is to ensure that expectations and structures are in place so that abstinence is realistic.

    i hate the hypocritical way that believers deal with this issue. all believers are aware of the surveys of newly married believers that show that 95% engaged in intimate relations prior to marriage. i dont know a congregation where 30 or 40 year old or older singles in the process of bonding, prior to marriage, would abstain from intimate relations. yet there is no active addressing of this behavior either in individual churches ,or in the denomination as a whole.

    yet for some reason, believers think it is the christian thing to dump this myth off as an actual belief.

    moses said..."the thing that one believes, that is what he will do."

  • Sat Feb 21, 2009 3:16 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    I can't speak to secular based abstinence only sex education programs, but those that are Bible-based do far more than just say we should wait to have sex because of unwanted pregnancies or to keep from contracting STDs. They talk to the fact that this is God's design and why it more than just about preventing STDs and unwanted pregnancies. It's about purity and treating yourself and your partner as the special creation of God that one is and the fact that the greatest gift a husband and wife can give each other on the night of their wedding is their virginity both from a physical and spiritual perspective and even if a person loses their virginity prior to their wedding night, it is a sin that can be forgiven and we serve a God of second chances who allows us to start over when we sin. Plus, I think we fail to see that there are other problems caused by not wating till marriage for sexual intimacy, if we've had sex prior to marriage there is a high probability we bring some ideas or excess baggage to our relationship with our spouse and can have a negative impact on our marriage and put expectations on our spouse that is not fair to them or us for that matter. Another issue that's spoken to is the issue of self-respect and letting girls especially to know in many cases it will be up to them to say no and let the guy know if he truly loves her, he'll wait and not buy the line of garbage from him that if she really loves him, she'll do it. And I find in many if not most cases once the guy gets what he wants he drops her like a bad habit. Plus any good abstinence only program will also teach some ways of keeping from putting yourself in situations that may lead to sexual intimacy.

  • Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:57 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    bobtx, the only true "safe sex" is that of sex between one man and one woman who have become one in the sight of God through marriage. No one is opposed to teaching kids the dangers of STDs too inlude the fact there are several, such as genital herpes that condoms are not effective in preventing. When you tell kids that the best option is abstinence, but if you should decide to have sex anyways please follow the following guidelines of "safe-sex" you are inadvertently giving them permission to have sex outside of marriage. As I said earlier we know a large number of kids will experiment with drugs, but when we give them drug education classes we don't teach them how to safely abuse drugs, we teach them the dangers and consequences of abusing drugs and positive alternatives to abusing drugs.

  • Sat Feb 21, 2009 2:50 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    PS: anyone who thinks that kids won't hear or stumble upon "how babies are made" outside of any education we present is deluded. Even outside our sex-saturated media, it will happen. It is silly to say we shouldn't teach our kids about safe sex because then they might have sex - they just might have it in dangerously stupid and preventable ways with horrifying consequences.

  • Sat Feb 21, 2009 2:46 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    If you value human life, abstinence is only part of a larger education that is needed to reduce STD's and unwanted pregnancies (= less abortions as well). Their are reams of data showing that regions that have gone to sex ed that only includes pushes for abstinence have higher rates of STD's, death by STD's, teen pregnancy, and abortion.

    I wish abstinence education was all we needed, but if that is all we allow we are literally sentencing people to die and increasing the number of people weighing whether or not to abort an unwanted pregnancy. This is inescapable fact in the world we live in, and unrealistic ideal-focused conversations are just that: unrealistic, and dangerous.

  • Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:30 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    chi, I don't agree that the meesage of abstinence is not for the unsaved, while in the Air Force as a Substance Abuse Officer I taught a number of prevention classes which included Christians and non-Christians alike and the substance abuse rate was very low which meant both Christians and non-Christians did not abuse substances. Plus, in the paraphrased words of Jaime Escalante, our students will rise to the level of the expectations we set before them.

  • Fri Feb 20, 2009 3:19 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    I think expecting abstinence from non-Christian teens is not realistic, there's not basis for them NOT to have sex. But for Christians it is very realistic. Those who have a moral basis should be expected to uphold purity. And I have to say I agree with believer on the fact of sex-ed. Save it until people are married/engaged. I am afraid that by teaching the youth sex ed (the birth control part) we are telling them we EXPECT them to fail, so it's no surprise they do fail. Abstinence is unrealistic for unsaved, and often unexpected for Christians.

  • Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:10 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    Dr. Mohler pointed out the issue of greatest importance. We can't ask youth to be abstinent, and then allow them to participate in a lifestyle designed to do just the opposite. To ask them to abstain, but not point out the behavior and circumstances which create the opposite effect is frivolity. Youth need to be taught how to avoid the behaviors which lead up to intercourse; you don't play with fire, you don't get burned. As Dr. Mohler said, the lack of instruction and supervision in a sensual culture assures failure with many youth. Youth need to understand that abstinence is not just abstinence from intercourse, but from activities designed by God to culminate in intercourse.

  • Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:32 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Believer: LOL. Yeah, we're good! :)

  • Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:29 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    chicago, so does this mean we're still friends!:)

  • Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:33 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Oh. Okay. I fully agree.
    Whew!

  • Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:17 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    chicago, of course I do but you don't have to teach them how to use clean needles, we only need to teach them the consequences of using dirty needles!

  • Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:13 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Believer: You don't feel that kids should know about the dangers of sharing needles????
    I don't know if you have kids, but I hope you never encounter a teenager with AIDS who got it from sharing a needle who said, "I didn't know you could get it from sharing." Especially if it's one of your own.
    Kids need to know what can harm them!

  • Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:50 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    chicago, you can teach them about STDs without teaching them how to have sex outside of marriage. We teach kids about the dangers of drug abuse without teaching them to use clean needles. The issue once again is not that we don't teach them about birth control and STDs but we do it in a way that does not give them permission to have sex outside of marriage.

  • Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:34 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    "The larger and more important issue is that sexual abstinence until marriage is the biblical expectation and command."

    I did not read any confusion in this article nor did I read that he wrote anything saying that sex outside of marriage is "just a mistake as long as you don't abort." I think the thumbs up you recieved for this comment was for the derogatory judgment you made on the Palin family. Whose life can withstand such media scrutiny?

    "But the real issue here is our responsibility to ensure that abstinence is made realistic and stays realistic. "

    That's quite a tall order when the school system is teaching our children that they are no better than evolved animals. We would expect that since they are mere animals then the sex drive cannot be denied and that is exactly what we are reaping as a society from such a godless teaching.

  • Thu Feb 19, 2009 11:33 am Agree: 7   Disagree: 4

    Thanks "Dr. Al" for continuing the confusion that sex outside of marriage is nothing more than a mistake so long as you don't abort... (I am still looking for that in the bible)

    there are so many things wrong with the Palin family that go against the Lord, one doesn't know where to begin...

    Whatever happened to calling sin a sin?

  • Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:47 am Agree: 6   Disagree: 3

    Believer: As much as you might not like the fact that teenagers are going to have sex, the reality is, is that they are going to do so. By simply not addressing this reality (i.e. giving them permission as you mentioned) isn't going to stop them from doing it. It's not even going to lessen the number of unplanned pregnancies as numerous studies have shown.
    Not knowing the proper way to protect one's self from STDs is SO terribly dangerous.

    While we might not teach them what to do if they drink and drive, we do teach them what to do if they drink and plan on driving -- it's called a designated driver.

  • Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:35 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    chicago, while I personally don't have a problem with teaching about birth control, my problem is the package that teaching comes in. It should be taught as a part of a marriage and family class but not as it is in many sex education classes. It goes something like this, even though we recommend abstinence chances are many of you will do it anyways so in that case you need to use protection. There is where I have the problem because you have just given the students permission to have sex outside of marriage.

  • Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:31 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    chicago, but we don't teach them what to do if they do choose to drink and drive!

  • Thu Feb 19, 2009 9:48 am Agree: 5   Disagree: 3

    If one wants to teach that abstinence is expected, fine. But teenagers should also know very well how to protect themselves from STDs and pregnancy during intercourse. It's a health issue, plain and simple.
    After all, we teach them (hopefully) about the perils of drinking and driving and there's even a law that prohibits anyone under 21 from drinking.
    Sexual contact should be no different.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Gifts
  • Health
  • DVD
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links