Updated 04:40 pm.EST, Sat November 21, 2009

Society|Sat, Mar. 07 2009 08:15 AM EST

Obama to Lift Restrictions on Embryonic Stem Cell Research

By Lawrence Jones|Christian Post Reporter

President Obama is expected to sign an executive order reversing a ban on federal funding of embryonic stem cell research, according to administration officials.

  • Barack Obama
    (Photo: AP Images / Gerald Herbert)
    President Barack Obama delivers remarks to the White House Forum on Health Reform, Thursday, March 5, 2009, in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 5, 2009. Behind him is Travis Ulerick, a firefighter from Dublin, Ind.

The officials said the president will announce the move at a Monday event at the White House, during which he will overturn a 2001 order by President George W. Bush that restricted federal funding of embryonic stem cell research to the existing 60 cell lines, according to reports by The Associated Press and CNN.

Obama's intent to lift restrictions on the controversial type of stem cell research has been known for some time and is even articulated as part of his administration's agenda on The White House's Web site. But the exact date of when the reversal would take place was leaked on Friday.

Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, accused the president of "leaking" the news on Friday so it would receive less attention.

He said the administration used the same tactic to announce the repeal of other pro-life orders, including the Mexico City Policy, which declared that American tax dollars would not fund international organizations involved in performing or promoting abortions abroad, and a Bush administration rule that federally funded health institutions comply with laws protecting the conscience of medical and health practitioners.

Perkins said the order would give a green light to the use of taxpayer funds for experiments that encourage human embryo destruction.

"I believe it is unethical to use human life, even young embryonic life, to advance science," he said in a statement. "While such research is unfortunately legal, taxpayers should not have to foot the bill for experiments that require the destruction of human life."

Embryonic stem cell research has drawn controversy because it necessitates the destruction of the embryo during the process of harvesting the stem cells.

Proponents of embryonic stem cell research point to the cell’s pluripotent ability – or its capacity to become nearly all cell types and tissues in the body – claiming that it holds the cure for debilitating diseases such as Alzheimer, Parkinson’s disease, and diabetes.

But pro-lifers, many of whom believe that life begins at conception, argue that destroying a human embryo is tantamount to killing human life. Many hold the view that embryonic stem cell research is not only unethical but also unsuccessful in producing cures or treatments for debilitating diseases.

Adult stem cell research is much more promising, pro-life advocates say.

"We should be increasing funding for adult stem cell treatments, which have been used to treat patients for over 70 diseases and conditions, and we should fund the historic achievements in reprogramming ordinary skin cells into embryonic-like stem cells without compromising ethics by destroying life," stated Perkins.

Republican Congressman Chris Smith of New Jersey also echoed Perkins' sentiments.

"Why does the president persist in the dehumanizing of nascent human life when better alternatives exist? Human embryo-destroying stem cell research is not only unethical, unworkable and unreliable – it is now, demonstrably unnecessary," said Smith, according to FOXNews.

In anticipation of Obama's decision, the National Institute of Health has started drafting guidelines, that among other ethical demands, are expected to require that the cells being used are derived with proper informed consent from the woman or couple who donated the original embryo, according to AP.

Dr. Arnold Kriegstein, director of the Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research at UC San Francisco, told the San Francisco Chronicle the NIH will probably not be permitted to fund the actual derivation of new embryonic stem cells, under a federal law limiting embryo research called the Dickey-Wicker amendment.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:49 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 2

    I think much of the debate centers around when a clump of cells becomes a "person". Now, I don't have an answer to that question, but I do not believe that it starts at conception. There's no evidence that any type of "immortal soul" appears at conception (or any other time, for that matter), and a 2 month old fetus has less self awareness or sense of pain or misery than a cow led to slaughter. Personally, if science can determine the stage at which an embryo/fetus becomes self-aware and capable of feeling pain, that's when I'd consider it a person. But that certainly doesn't happen at conception. Tricky topic, but this stem cell research will prove vital in the battle against countless diseases.

  • Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:28 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Quick question ~ where are the embryos coming from?

  • Mon Mar 09, 2009 10:50 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Judgement is at the door

  • Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:18 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    I believe this is a GREAT leap foreward for man kind. Otherwise wasted tissues will now serve a purpose. With government money backing this who knows what other leaps medical science will make now. Too long have the religious "cults" held back progress to make the world healthier. Seriously, GOD isnt helping a paralized child to walk, GOD isnt helping the elderly to remember their lives and families, he is taking that away from these poor people.

    A few "Holier than thou" hippocrits will slam and make nasty remarks Obama for this. What are you doing for these afflicted people? Obama is trying to save them, your ranting and raving about how un-christian he is for doing it is condemning them to a life of torment and pain. Thats got to be what Christ wanted from his followers right? The questions is simple:

    Child walking > A smear of tissue in the trash

    How did Ghandi put it, something like "I like your Christ, but your Christians are very Un-Christ like"

  • Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:20 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Embryonic stem cell research should be suppported by the government. There is too much that can be learned that will benefit all of mankind. Besides, the embryos that are used are extras that have been stored for fertility treatment and will eventually be disposed of. There is much that can be learned from adult stem cells, but there are limits to the understanding of cell function, embryotic stem cells are essential to understanding of the fundementals of cell growth and regeneration.

  • artm »
    Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:03 am Agree: 6   Disagree: 5

    Mr Obama is no Christian. His lack of regard for life is proof of that. His determination to support, and make law, the death of the unborn is proof of that.

    Dr Death strikes again. And at the sametime I acknowledge that the Bible tells us to pray for this man, and pray we must, Pray for his Salvation.

    Pray that he doesn't destroy America,

  • Sat Mar 07, 2009 6:14 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 5

    I don't think anyone believes 0 is a Christian. I was ready to consider him the antichrist but realized he's way to bumbling and incompetant to be the antichrist. Besides, the antichrist won't need a teleprompter to give a five minute speech.

  • Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:26 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Well, isn't this just nice...entrenched in an economic recession with no end in sight, we still have federal money to fund "experiments that encourage human embryo destruction" and fund abortion for overseas countries.

    Someone commented;"He (Obama) would also realize it is not necesary to destroy persons to speculate on future cures."

    That is assuming he cares one whit for human life over his #!@&! Political "Agenda" which he's cramming down our throats in a real big hurry and at very high costs.

    This administration is like a death train running at us at break-neck speed...is it too late to have a "tea party" on the RR tracks?

  • Sat Mar 07, 2009 12:24 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 5

    Isn't it amazing that Mr Obama can reverse all the moral safe guards put in place by G. Bush and no one questions his Christianity. What a Godless man! It is obvious he has no fear of the Most High God.

  • Sat Mar 07, 2009 10:21 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    Recently, scientist developed the ability to standardize the process of producing Human Embryos. With this ability to indentify and standardize the process of producing Human Embryos, we can now also use the same starting point to determine when a Human Embryo has human rights under the law of the Constitution of the United States.

    Indeed, is a human any less human becomes they cannot fend or care for themselves? Does a US citizen give up their Constitutional Rights because they are not able to defend themselves?

  • Sat Mar 07, 2009 10:18 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    Clearly MR Obama has no science background, else he would realize embryos are human beings. He would also realize it is not necesary to destroy persons to speculate on future cures.
    Nowadays, you can get cured already of many diseases using adult stem cells. They are much safer also. You can learn more at www.bioethicsforum.info

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Also on CP
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links