Saturday, November 07, 2009 Last Update:07:14 pm ET

Society|Sun, Mar. 08 2009 08:42 AM EDT

Christian Group Readies to Defend National Day of Prayer Against Lawsuit

By Katherine T. Phan|Christian Post Reporter

A Christian legal group, which is defending the National Day of Prayer Task Force against a lawsuit by an atheist group, has launched a campaign to rally support for the annual prayer day.

On the "Save the National Day of Prayer" campaign Web site, the Alliance Defense Fund is urging Americans to do their part in protecting one of nation's longest standing faith traditions.

Last year, the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF), a Wisconsin-based group of atheists and agnostics, filed a lawsuit against President Bush, the governor of Wisconsin and other officials over the federal law designating a National Day of Prayer – an annual event observed on the first Thursday of May, after it was created in 1952 by a joint resolution of the United States Congress, and signed into law by President Harry S. Truman.

The suit alleges that presidential and gubernatorial proclamations of National Day of Prayer is unconstitutional because it violates the Establishment Clause's separation of church and state.

Shirley Dobson, chair of the National Day of Prayer Task Force and wife of Focus on the Family founder James Dobson, is also named as a defendant in the suit.

ADF has agreed to defend the National Day of Prayer Task Force in the case should it ever be accepted by the District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.

A video on ADF's "Save the National Day of Prayer" Web site compares FFRF to ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union), claiming that both have been relentless in their drive to silence public expression of faith. The FFRF is known for its "Imagine No Religion" billboards and for insisting that its anti-religious sign celebrating the "Winter's Solstice" be included in a Christmas display at the Washington State Capitol.

"This lawsuit is just another stark example," states the video.

"What many of these people who ascribe and claim that they are for free speech really want to do is shut off the speech of others. They want to silence the voice of the Christian from the public square," Alan Sears, president and general counsel of ADF, says.

The NDP Task Force, which is privately funded, represents "a Judeo-Christian expression of the national observance, based on our understanding that this country was birthed in prayer and in reverence for the God of the Bible," according to the organization's Web site.

Sears suggested that the atheist group has brought the suit now because they think this is a "vulnerable time" and because they are hoping that the person elected to office, President Barack Obama, be less committed to protecting the nation's prayer and faith traditions than the former president.

ADF is asking Americans to support the National Day of Prayer by sending a note of encouragement of Shirley Dobson and writing a letter urging President Barack Obama to uphold the NDP by issuing a presidential proclamation.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Tue May 05, 2009 8:02 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    I think we as Christians are very aware of the underlying motives behind the political rhetoric misconstruing the intent & purpose of the Establishment Clause and ignoring the content of Constitutional law. It's called 'bending & twisting' to suite personal preference. There are indeed folks who absolutely do not want the Judeo-Christian God in public view...at all. Since the 1960's 'little by little' the laws of the land have systematically covered the truth. Why? Because they want to legally shut the mouths of those who share the Gospel.Simple. Bottom line. And, we know this. Our Scriptures tell us. What to do? Stand fast and do what we are personally called to do.

  • Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:54 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    There is a difference between the public square and the government. Nobody is trying to ban prayer. That's inflammatory, deceitful propaganda from people who are afraid of sharing power in what is supposed to be a democracy. Minorities are protected from mob rule by the same constitution that forbids government involvement with religion. This law was meant to protect Christians as well as atheists. See Rev. Jim's comments below. Upholding the day of prayer is neglecting a system that was intended to prevent this sort of divisiveness.

  • Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:29 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Hey believer,

    I agree with your overall assessment . . . my first post merely mentioned my concerns about the national day of prayer and the next thing I know my post was taken out of context. My last post summarizes my thoughts on this subject.
    Peace

  • Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:28 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I think my friends in Christ we may be talking apples and oranges here as I see a proclamation very different than sponsorship. Governments at all levels make a number of various proclamations setting aside a day, week, or month to honor certain people, groups, or causes. I see this very different than state sponsorship of a cause or event. To be honest I'd prefer no government involvement in the National Day of Prayer in order to keep even the appearance of politics totally out of the equation, but only that they would allow the events to occur and government employees the opportunity to take part in those events. If I'm mistaken in this view of there being a major difference in this matter please feel free to show me what I'm misunderstanding.

  • Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:00 am Agree: 5   Disagree: 0

    Up the thread someone said..
    I think the reason for the uproar is simple, there are people who are trying desperately to make it illegal to pray in public, share the Gospel on the street, etc.
    -------
    This has nothing to do with praying in public. The issue isn't praying in public, it's having the government sponsor prayers.

    I think people who are so ardent about government sponsored prayer have not always thought this through. I know that in Michigan at one point when John Engler, an extreme right wing governor, was elected, there was a significant effort to circumvent the constitution and create a time for prayer at the beginning of school. People said that kids were prevented from praying; actually, kids, staff, everyone was perfectly free to pray, the schools were not free to sponsor prayer time.

    Our local clergy group where I was a pastor then wanted to support this move; I pointed out that if we had government sponsored prayer, it would inevitably mean the government would have to be neutral as to the source of the prayer. So there would be Buddhist prayer, Muslim prayer, Wiccan prayer, etc. No one seemed to have thought of that consequence.

    The framers wisely said the Federal government must not sponsor religious activity or favor one religious group over another. I support this in part because as a Christian, I don't want to find public support for non-Christian prayer.

  • Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:54 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    Forsaltnlight & Mathetes,

    There is no doubt that many of our forefathers allowed their relationship with the Lord to control every area of their life and were instrumental in guiding the new government, this has not been my focus; I have expressed my thoughts about a national day prayer and the potential beginning of an unhealthy relationship between the church and the state. I have no problem with believers participating in government and exerting a positive influence over civil authorities in order to advance the cause of religious freedom. On the other hand, religious influence has not always resulted in the betterment of society . . . . Religious persecutions, religious wars, and the numerous examples of social and political suppression perpetrated at the bidding of religious people confirm the potential dangers; when the means of the state are used to advance religious objectives.

  • Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:33 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Online,
    You wrote: "Yes, that is how the first amendment reads; however, it is obvious why the framers of the constitution had this clause added . . . ."

    What clause do you mean? I hope not the "wall of separation" clause, because it's not in the Constitution. That phrase is taken from a letter Jefferson wrote to a pastor, assuring the pastor that government should not control the church. It says nothing about the Christians getting involved in guiding the government. In fact, if my memory serves me well, several pastors signed the Declaration of Independence and others attended the Constitutional Convention.

  • Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:43 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 7

    I think the reason for the uproar is simple, there are people who are trying desperately to make it illegal to pray in public, share the Gospel on the street, etc. If organizers from Christian groups do not step up and do something in the legal realm, it will soon be against the law to even mention the name of Jesus in public. There is a day somewhere in the future where praying in public can land you in jail. Do you read about the persecution in other parts of the world? It's on our doorstep. Wake up people! God haters want us to do nothing and we have done just that for so long we have seen a lot of negative changes in our society. Doing nothing is doing something. It's allowed prayer to be removed from schools, the Ten Commandments to be removed from public areas, it's allowed our history to be rewritten by revisionist liars, it's allowed filth and corruption to run wild in our society, it's given rise to relativism, etc. We should be happy, even excited that a group of Christians would stand up for the rights of other Christians.

  • Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:05 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "I have been, and always will be proud to be be counted with the "fools" in whose company I find myself."

    I'll remember you said that....

  • Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:07 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    forsaltnlight, (It is my understanding and history clearly shows the wall of separation only went one way)

    Yes, that is how the first amendment reads; however, it is obvious why the framers of the constitution had this clause added . . . . It was to prevent this nation from experiencing what their European counterparts had. I agree that government cannot take away our relationship with Jesus and that our forefathers were successful because of their prayers and dependence upon the Lord. Yet, these same forefathers did not allow government or the church to impose itself in matters of religion. Balance is the key.

  • Tue Mar 10, 2009 10:55 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    It would seem for centuries that religious proselytizing has been thrust upon civilization disregarding any tendencies toward respect for anyone's opinion or beliefs that differ from that of the particular advent of what ever religion is being promoted. I, for one. am glad to see that some very courageous and thoughtful people are beginning to stand up against the constant pressuring from various religions touting their policies, promotions, and ideologies. I found all religions to be obnoxiously self centered and self righteous to the point of exasperation. Hurrah for those who will express their views and challenge the dogmas of myths and fabrications.

  • Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:30 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    DelightntheLord,

    Well said. . .

  • Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:03 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 4

    Jehovahnissi » I have been offline for a few days and I see I have missed nothing. You really good and copying and pasting scripture...however a trained ape could do that without knowing what he is doing...just like you. I care less if you hate me or my comments you are calling me a pharisee - man are you an _________ (you fill in blank since if I post what I really want to call you they will just not post it) and typical religious freak. I will not respond anymore to your foolishness

  • Tue Mar 10, 2009 12:33 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    Delight,

    Amen. That surely is the heart of God speaking through you.

  • Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:43 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    Flagged as inappropriate. show Nice of the cowards to delete the truth.... Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:18 am Didn't take the self-appointed martyrs of the ADF very long to avail themselves of the opportunity to beg for money..... hide

  • Mon Mar 09, 2009 9:09 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    I'm not sure what all the fuss is about. What good does a National Day of Prayer do anyone?
    Isn't it a form of godliness without power?


    Is government sponsored prayer really necessary...do we need government to affirm prayer for us??

    The CP just published an article recently which claimed public prayer is not done in the name of Christ but is a watered down version of prayer to the 'unknown god'. Look at the inaugeration and the prayer invoked there...isn't declaring a National Day of Prayer just more of the same? Isn't it just a ritual? Are we sure we want to support this?

    Christians, do you want prayer? Start attending your local prayer groups. Meet with your church before the services begin and pray. Pray in corporate prayer in the church where everyone is praying in Jesus name. Do not depend on the government to grant us a national day of prayer and think all is well, PRAY EVERYDAY!

  • Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:52 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    philo777, just noticed your response and as I told steveh20 I was not in anyway personally calling you a fool, but just yanking some chains as I think this is as foolish a lawsuit as can be found. My apology if my post genuinely offended you.

  • Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:07 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    steveh20, you all need to lighten up the same way those opposing a National Day of Prayer need to. I did not call philo777 a fool but at the same time God's Word does indeed declare that in both the Old and New Testament alike of those who willfully choose to ignore Him and His truths as taught in His Word.

  • Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:28 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    (I can only think of one reason why someone would object to any day being a prayer day and it ain't good.)

    My objection to a (national) day of prayer has nothing to do with siding with an atheist . . . . It stems from my belief in the separation of church and state. Perhaps, the national day of prayer is nothing to worry about but then again it could be a small step toward an unhealthy relationship between the church and the state. Time will tell but we need to remember that true religion is found in the relationship between an individual and God, not between the individual and the state. Yes, we need to continue to proclaim the gospel even in the midst of this culture that we live in but we do not need the state in order to do it.

  • Mon Mar 09, 2009 9:40 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    I'm sorry to see you take that approach believer to philo because at the end of the day any honest debate that an atheist might wish to have here and some do simply comes to calling someone a fool because they disagree with you. Now some might say "I'm just speaking the truth in love etc"..but it leaves a bad taste in ones mouth, personally I aim for something better and higher than that. I'm always mindful that fools some people might be(and I include myself in that sometimes) but that does not mean that they are always wrong....
    S

  • Mon Mar 09, 2009 9:34 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Believer:

    OK, fair enough. I have been, and always will be proud to be be counted with the "fools" in whose company I find myself.

  • Mon Mar 09, 2009 9:05 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    God of the bible...hmmm... Thomas Jefferson and many others DID NOT BELIEVE THAT CHRIST IS GOD, so it couldn't have been reverence for the God of the bible....


    God shares His glory with no one,including a country.

  • Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:10 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    Flagged as inappropriate. show philo777, April 1st, after all God's Word says in Psalm 53:1, "The fool has said in his heart, "There is no God,"..." hide

  • Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:02 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    Maybe the atheists are jealous - they want equal time and would like their own Atheist Day of Prayer, but they don't know who to pray to... -)

  • Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:18 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Flagged as inappropriate. show Didn't take the self-appointed martyrs of the ADF very long to avail themselves of the opportunity to beg for money..... hide

  • Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:06 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    If Christians want to have a day of prayer, I say go for it. But lets leave the government out of it. For those that dont believe, they can simply ignore it. Thats what makes America great- freedom to choose.

  • Sun Mar 08, 2009 6:41 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Hmmm. . . . interesting subject here. I have to agree with davidt on this one . . . . what prevents us from praying now? I do not think we need a national day of prayer in order to pray . . .

  • Sun Mar 08, 2009 6:40 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    We (christians) swill always find a way to have a National Day of Prayer whether we have to advertise on the Net or hold it somewhere else. Wiccans have Halloween which personally i don't see as a holiday, Winter Solstice, and other such beliefs are not being told they can't celebrate it. We have Easter Sunday and maybe we should petition to put National Day of Prayer on the calendar....We should be heard...!

  • Sun Mar 08, 2009 3:19 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    OK, Believer, I'll bite, what day each year is set aside for Atheists?

  • Sun Mar 08, 2009 2:48 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 4

    Flagged as inappropriate. show Are you Christians so weak to worry about some Fools group to make a prayer day illegal? Will it being illegal stop you from praying? Since when is prayer to be so national anyway - as if anyone is actually praying at that time lol. No wonder the world looks at you like fools too. Thank you Jesus I am not a disciple of man but of God. hide

  • Sun Mar 08, 2009 2:29 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    steveh20, needless to say if we lose this case the National Day of Prayer will go on, but in the USA there are numerous proclamations setting aside certain days for certain causes and this one has been in place since 52 and it in no way forces people to take part in the observances and it does not force employers to give a person time-off to be a part of any observance and in most places all of the events are held before and/or after work or during lunch hour. So why are the atheists bringing the suit for other than publicity reasons and in fact I don't see why they are so upset since we observe a day for them here in America every year as well.

  • Sun Mar 08, 2009 10:36 am Agree: 7   Disagree: 1

    As a conservative and religious family man, I still believe that keeping religion and government separate will keep them both from corrupting each other. The dark ages in Europe were marked by theocracies where such corruption kept humanity in the dark for centuries. If our forefathers had wanted religion all over government, they wouldn't have given us a Constitution where God isn't mentioned even once. I am proud to say that in order to keep both from corruption, government and religion should stay separate.

  • Sun Mar 08, 2009 10:19 am Agree: 4   Disagree: 2

    Okay, as a Limey someone will have to explain this one to me. Why do Christians in the states have to bother with something like this being official etc..Why can't Christians just agree that on one particular day they will set aside time for prayer on a particular topic. It seems a really simple idea that only becomes complicated when people try to make it "official". Will God only listen to prayers if that is the case? In fact how about the less official the better? You don't need a law concerning a national day of prayer, just get on and do it.
    BW
    Steve

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Also on CP
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links