Updated 04:40 pm.EST, Sat November 21, 2009

Opinion|Sat, Jun. 20 2009 01:00 PM EDT

Reviving States' Rights

By Ken Connor|Christian Post Guest Columnist

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

-The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America

When Republican governors like Bobby Jindal, Haley Barbour, and Sarah Palin voiced reservations about their states' participation in the federal stimulus package this spring, they were accused of placing political ideology over the best interests of their constituents. A prominent attack ad currently running against Republican gubernatorial candidate Bob McDonnell cites his opposition to stimulus funding for Virginia as evidence of his lack of concern for hardworking families. For many people, the idea that a governor would turn down "free" money from Uncle Sam in order to protect the economic solvency and political independence of their state is completely foreign, if not downright laughable. As the central government continues to grow and amass power, however, perhaps now is the time to begin a thoughtful public discussion about the proper constitutional role of state governments in a federalist system.

It is impossible to watch TV, listen to the radio, or surf the internet these days without being reminded that our nation is experiencing the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. No one is fonder of reminding us of this alarming state of affairs than our President and his supporters in Congress. The rhetoric of crisis makes it easy for politicians to convince the people that bold actions were, and continue to be, necessary in order to salvage our flagging economy. And of course, the only entity capable of taking on the gargantuan responsibility of saving America from the consequences of its own selfishness and greed is the federal government.

In the name of remediating this crisis, the American government has presided over the most drastic expansion of its size and scope of influence in our nation's history. In the name of "recovery and reinvestment," this Administration has catapulted the irresponsible fiscal policies begun under the Bush administration to new levels, spending unimaginable sums of taxpayer money to nationalize or quasi-nationalize vast segments of the American marketplace. There's no telling what segment of our economy will fall next into the crosshairs of Uncle Sam's benevolent bailout apparatus.

How will the federal government fund the bailout mania that appears to have no end in sight? Simple. Bureaucrats will work day and night to find creative ways to extract more and more money from the people. Of course, when there is more money flowing into Uncle Sam's coffers, there is less money circulating in households and in communities. That translates into an ever growing dependence on the federal government for the performance of functions that should rightly rest with individuals and their respective state governments. Indeed, the bloated visage of the federal government has become so fixed in the nation's psyche that effective challenges to its legitimacy seem utterly futile, if not downright impossible. Political constructs like "universal health care," "free education for all" and "a hybrid in every driveway" are now viewed as unassailable moral dictates of the American creed to be mandated, managed, and administered by bureaucratic elites in Washington, D.C. Those who would dispute the legitimacy of this statist dogma are no longer invited to have a seat at the table.

History teaches us, however, that this massive government growth and consolidation of power at the national level cannot continue without detrimental consequences for the American people. Thankfully, some are beginning to reexamine the role that the states should be playing in these issues. A review of the Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution reminds us that the federal government was never intended to have the power it now possesses. The bounds of its authority and its role in America's political system are explicitly enumerated, while the bulk and remainder of governmental authority is allocated to the states. In addition to the system of checks and balances put in place to ensure stability between the three branches of the central government, we have a federal system by which the states are to exercise power and check the abuse of power by the central government. Continue »

Pages: 12
Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:36 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Alockslee: Is is POSSIBLE for you to make a point without calling names?

    Pretty please?

    And the only difference between the Bush stimulus and the Obama one are the names on the signature line. The wealthy investors who benefit are the same.

  • Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:26 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Blacksho89 »Mon Jun 22, 2009 4:33 pmalockslee: Maybe you can explain something to me. When George W Bush and the (D) Congress passed the original stimulus bill, this was an example of "deregulation and complete disregard for the rights of anyone who wasn't of the same religion as those in power." And now that His Lordship Barack H Obama and a (D) Congress have passed a substantially identical stimulus bill, anyone AGAINST it "continue(s) to prevent the changes necessary to fix what was done by the Evil Agent Evangelical Bush and his cronies." So how can performing action A undo the evil done by performing action A? Please understand that I am not defending W, and that I believe him to be as much a conservative or a Christian as a ham sandwich. I am just confused as to how repeating the same actions will get different results this time.
    ---------------------------------------------------------
    In response: First off I don't have enough space to cover everything but I will try to summarize it.
    1. The Bill passed during this Congress is similar but not the same a the King George Bush one;
    2. The allocation of funds are different;
    3. The proof of difference is proved by the Republicans against the Bill in it's current state and how much they are fighting to prevent Obama's plans from coming to fruition.
    We have seen a great deal of NO from the Republicans ( I am a registered Republican BTW) and very little from them except posing in front of mics and cameras to make assertions with nothing to back it up. Need more? Easy show what the Republicans (read fundies in /Congress) have done besides complain, interfere and stall to prevent the changes from happening. Your turn!!
    http://alockslee.blogspot.com/ Fundies fear this Blog!!
    TFR

  • Mon Jun 22, 2009 4:33 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    alockslee: Maybe you can explain something to me. When George W Bush and the (D) Congress passed the original stimulus bill, this was an example of "deregulation and complete disregard for the rights of anyone who wasn't of the same religion as those in power."

    And now that His Lordship Barack H Obama and a (D) Congress have passed a substantially identical stimulus bill, anyone AGAINST it "continue(s) to prevent the changes necessary to fix what was done by the Evil Agent Evangelical Bush and his cronies."

    So how can performing action A undo the evil done by performing action A?

    Please understand that I am not defending W, and that I believe him to be as much a conservative or a Christian as a ham sandwich. I am just confused as to how repeating the same actions will get different results this time.

  • Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:00 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    nohypocrites »Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:56 pm
    What does this have to do with Christianity? You guys are fully sold out to a political party even over your Faith!
    --------------------------------------------------------------
    In response: Well you almost hit the nail on the head, but it was the political party that sold out to a single religious sect/ When the Republicans became the Republican'ts was the same time of that party's adoption of the fundamentalist agenda.

    Years ago the Republicans were the party that was conservative, cared about environmental issues, worried about over spending on wasteful project, etc., then they all jumped on the bandwagon of the evangelical/fundamentalist and it just lost all credibility and were caught up in the repetitive stupidity of those in that religious belief. They stopped pushing for scientific advances, forgot about the truth and went into babble speak making little to no sense whatsoever.

    It will take a major revision to the party core of riding itself of the religious fanatics once and for all to begin the rebuilding back to a viable party. Until the religious fanatics are kicked to the curb no real changes can happen.

    http://alockslee.blogspot.com/ The Whole Truth

    TFR

  • Sun Jun 21, 2009 11:52 am Agree: 4   Disagree: 1

    Suddenly we have a whole slew of evangelicals becoming Constitutional scholars, unfortunately they don't comprehend nor understand their interpretations and get it wrong.

    The recent movement and call for States rights have folks like Texas Governor calling for treasonous action of Succession and the Civil War was fought and those Successionist States LOST. This is nothing more than another Fundamentalist/Evangelical movement to force religion under the guise of a political stance.

    The reason the US is experiencing the economic collapse is due to the last 8 years under Bush and the fundie controlled Congress. The period saw deregulation and complete disregard for the rights of anyone who wasn't of the same religion as those in power. Now the remaining folks continue to prevent the changes necessary to fix what was done by the Evil Agent Evangelical Bush and his cronies.

    Torturing people didn't get it done, nor will the continuing push for forced conversion by the remaining pulpit puppets in Washington. Those during the Bush era tried to force religion down Americans throats and the American population didn't swallow it, in fact they vomited it back on them and now the religious legislators stand covered in the vile bile they heaped out and now have to wear, exposed for their actions.

    Face it separation of church and state is how this country became great and not by forced compliance with religious hate.

    Read the full story on:
    http://http://alockslee.blogspot.com/

    TFR

  • Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:15 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    There are some wo think that states' rights is a bugaboo that has allowed states to pollute next door to their greener neighbors, continue segregation and Jim Crow, underfund education and social programs and generally, work against the common national good.

    The Constitution didn't provide for a lot of things. a national banking system among them, so let's not quibble about proper roles in a country grown so much smaller with modern transportation and technology. There is a place for a large federal role in areas where individual states might lag behind. Environmental protection, workers' rights, education, fuel economy standards, voting rights, child labor, immigration. The list is endless. Sometimes the states have to get out of the way for the greater good.

  • Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:56 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    What does this have to do with Christianity? You guys are fully sold out to a political party even over your Faith!

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Gifts
  • Health
  • DVD
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links